Open Letter to Rep. Peter King Concerning His Anti-Islamic Bigotry


 

 

Mr. King, I recently heard that you are calling for a congressional investigation into the Islamic threat to these united States. While I agree Islamic fundamentalism is a tangible threat to the American people, I would like to issue a challenge to you and your colleagues: please call for a congressional investigation in Israel’s premeditated attack upon the USS LIBERTY on June 8, 1967. The Israeli “Defense” Forces murdered 34 American servicemen, and President Johnson, Admiral McCain, and Admiral Kidd ordered a cover-up! This betrayal of our servicemen was done so Jewish donors to the Democrat Party would support Johnson in his 1968 Presidential bid (of course later he chose not to run again)!!! The attack upon the USS LIBERTY resulted in the greatest loss of Navy life since the sinking of the USS INDIANAPOLIS during WW2; the crew of the USS LIBERTY is the most decorated Navy crew in American history; and it’s the ONLY peace time attack upon a United States Navy vessel that DIDN’T result in a full congressional investigation.

Maybe you think the fallen of the USS LIBERTY are not worthy of justice or even relevant in your re-election, since the surviving LIBERTY men don’t have the kind of money your Jewish friends do.

However, maybe you could call for an investigation into the Mossad’s civilian spy-network of Sayanim operating inside these united States of America. For example, one of your peers-Jane Harmon- was caught by the FBI assisting the Israeli government illegally. How about calling for an investigation into the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee(AIPAC), and finding out why donations to Israel are tax-deductible. Why do we give 3 billion dollars annually to a bunch of Zionist thugs like Benjamin Netanyahu? Why not investigate how the State of Israel and her American Neo-Con horde (Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Scooter Libby, and Paul Wolfowitz among others) got us into Iraq to “secure the realm for Israel.” Also why not investigate Israel’s stock pile of illicit nuclear warheads at Dimona, which have destabilized the Middle East? Why not investigate Israel’s penetration of the U.S. State and Justice Departments and our intelligence services? How about Israel’s role in handing classified national security documents to the former Soviet Union and currently to China. How do you think China developed their new stealth bomber, Mr. King.

Most importantly, how about calling for an investigation into the Talmud, which is a diabolical, religious text. Esteemed Rabbis of the Talmud like Simon Ben Yohai and Maimonides considered the murder of a gentile a Mitzvah!!! This type of anti-goyishe mentality led to the murder of 19 innocent humanitarians aboard the Freedom Flotilla. A survivor of the USS LIBERTY HOLOCAUST-Joe Meadors- was aboard the Freedom Flotilla when Israelis illegally boarded the ship in INTERNATIONAL WATERS. I understand the Jews own you, the U.S.A. and the world, but they had NO JURISDICTION, Mr. King! And the Israelis found NO WEAPONS! If 19 Jews had been murdered in the same manner, you and the rest of the U.S. Congress would order Old Glory lowered to half staff, and the building of another “Holocaust Memorial” re-education camp as part Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Of course, the building of another holocaust amusement park would receive unanimous support from “fiscal Hawks” like Michel Bachman, Jim DeMint, and Eric Cantor. And your “friends” on the other side would surely support this effort to “stomp out anti-Semitism.”

I would ask you to investigate the validity of “anti-Semitic” canards such as “dual-loyalty,” but I’m educated enough to know that Jews don’t suffer from “dual-loyalty.” They are wholly loyal to Israel!!!

Investigate the Tribe and Islam sir if you really want to preserve these united States from terrorism.

P.S. your new gun-law proposal is un-American as well as un-Constitutional. In case you have NEVER read the U.S. Constitution, Article 1 Sec. 8 gives the US Congress(that means you!) NO POWER to regulate firearms. Furthermore the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights specifically protects the peoples of the several States from federal firearm laws and disarmament. All firearm regulation must come from the States. The commerce clause ISN’T a justification for violating the “right to keep and bear arms.” You tyrants in the US Congress and Senate have NO MORE POWER to regulate firearms than you do to regulate a stick of bubble gum! Additionally, who the hell do you think you are to make federal employees a special and privileged class? Are you going to have your goon squad- the Federal Bureau of Investigations- enforce this despotism? You better remember who you represent!

Battle lines are being drawn Mr. King.

 

J Nesse

  1. #1 by E Lucidi on January 27, 2011 - 3:17 am

    A powerful presentation

  2. #2 by abinashi on January 27, 2011 - 3:25 am

    Excellent!

    The Jews have usurped our nation. You are quite right, Battle lines are being drawn!
    In the Soviet Union, which was created by Jews, anti-semitism was an executable offence, and Jews decided who was anti-semetic as they controlled the secret police and propaganda. They managed to murder 66 million Christians there. I think there ready to do the dame here. They have already started in Europe and Canada where it is a prison offence to doubt the Jewish history of World War II.
    Yes, the battle has been engaged!

  3. #3 by B.Benhamid on January 27, 2011 - 3:40 am

    I am wondering if maggots have a conscience? But lets hope that this letter will haunt him for the rest of his life and hopefully, follow him all the way into his grave.

  4. #4 by The Avatar on January 27, 2011 - 4:00 am

    why a letter?
    send him a check that overshadows the one in his pocket
    Saudis stop gambling in Monaco and do something for once in your lives since finding oil, getting off the camels and jumping on the chevys
    have dignity

  5. #5 by Concrete man on January 27, 2011 - 7:52 am

    Bravo to Nesse!

  6. #6 by Doug on January 27, 2011 - 7:57 am

    Peter King wouldn’t have a pot to piss in or and window to throw it out of, if he didn’t kiss jew ass, just like the rest of them. I like your letter, it really moved me but, this guy isn’t playing with a full deck. He is a loser in a high position of power. Exaxtly what they want…and need. He’s in to deep the do the right thing…just like most of them.

  7. #7 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 27, 2011 - 11:08 am

    “While I agree Islamic fundamentalism is a tangible threat to the American people,…” J Nesse

    THIS ONE IS A COLOSSAL LIE!

    BAFS

  8. #8 by Andy on January 27, 2011 - 8:56 pm

    What is “Islamic fundamentalism” but a return to the fundamentals, or core beliefs, of Islam?

    The core beliefs of Islam are, as I understand them to be, are demonstrably compatible with American values, and not threatening to followers of other faiths.

    I find such compatibility to be true of Gospel-based Christianity (which values are essentially those of Islam), but much less so of “Old Testament” values.

    If the petitioner had written “Islamic radicalism”, I would have less disagreement.

    Even so, I believe a “third party” is largely responsible for the reprehensible behavior (“terrorism”) labeled as “Islamic” by politicians and the media.

    Andy

    –note from me, MG–once in a while you come across a comment that makes you go “WOW” for its brilliance and this is one of them. Thank you Andy.

  9. #9 by jeremy neese on January 28, 2011 - 5:44 am

    Dear Andy and B.A. , I consider “radical Islam” to be the MeK and Hezbollah variants, which is a synthesis of Islam and socialism. Generally “radical Islam” surfaces as quasi-national, secularist movements in Shia territories. I consider Sunni Wahbism “fundamentalist Islam.” Wahbism is an international movement which seeks to re-create the past glories of the Caliphs. Remember the Chechnyans and Albanians threw out the Wahbists from their nations because they were too “fundamentalist.” Saddam Hussein was exterminating Wahhists, too (not colluding with them as Bush misled this nation to believe). Make of those facts what you will, but please don’t act as though I don’t understand the intricacies of Islam and the complexities of Near East cultures. And for the record, please contact Mr. King and relay your concerns to him; I’m sure you’ll do a better job than me, boys.

  10. #10 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 28, 2011 - 10:32 am

    Andy says:
    January 27, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    “What is “Islamic fundamentalism” but a return to the fundamentals, or core beliefs, of Islam?

    If the petitioner had written “Islamic radicalism”, I would have less disagreement. ”

    Mass murderer John Major, British Prime Minister who was at the head of the European Union that saw the Ethnic Cleansing and mass rape of Muslims (and others) in the Balkans officially exhorted the British people to “GO BACK TO BASICS” in order to save them from GOD knows what!

    BASICS, fundamentals, roots,… are one and the same when we speak of a return to the original values of both Islam and Christianity.

    MUSLIMS are not guilty for the destruction of Christian values, but Christian apostates (Atheists, Socialists, Communists, Marxists, Humanists, Zionists…) are responsible for the destruction of not only Islamic but also of Christian values.

    While it is better for Humankind to go back to its original Christian (of Christ and not of Paul who abolished the Law which Jesus came to fulfill and not abolish!) and Islamic roots, we cannot unfortunately say the same for Jewish roots where genocide, human sacrifice, stealing of other people’s lands, incest, adultery, prostitution, lies, deceit, slavery and racism were quite the way of life of those “Old Testament” Jews who did not follow the original Torah which was lost in time or corrupted beyond recognition!

    DO NOT CHRISTIANS SEE THAT MUHAMMAD SPEAKS OF JESUS CHRIST MORE THAN 500% THAN OF HIMSELF AND IN DEFENCE OF HIM IN THE HOLY ISLAMIC SCRIPTURES!

    DO NOT CHRISTIANS REALISE THAT MUHAMMAD DEDICATED A WHOLE CHAPTER OF THE ISLAMIC HOLY SCRIPTURES TO MARY AND PLACED HER ABOVE ALL THE WOMEN OF CREATION?

    DO NOT CHRISTIANS REALISE THAT MUHAMMAD SAID NAZAREANS (CHRISTIANS) WERE THE CLOSEST TO MUSLIMS?

    IF BOTH CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS SUBMIT TO GOD, ARE THEY NOT BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF THE FAITH?

    Claiming that “those Moozelims or Mozlems” are devils who worship Satan which they call “ALAH” as Pr Texe Marrs and millions other Christians claim and preach non stop from their church pulpits, does not help!

    “Islamic radicalism” is another weapon of mass deception in the Crusade against Islam and Muslims. No Muslim is called a “radical” except those who are defending their lands, lives, property, religion and honour against the mass murderers of the West, Russia, China, India and Apartheid Israel, and those who want to freely practice their religion as they have done for more than 1400 years!

    Basheer

  11. #11 by David Rosser Owen on January 28, 2011 - 8:19 pm

    BAFS is right, and especially as he depicts what Islam and Muslims believe about Jesus Christ. Muslims, when they speak of him, almost invariably refer to him as “Sayyiduna ‘Isa al Masih ‘alayhi-s salam” (Our Lord Jesus Christ peace be upon him).

    The origin of the term “fundamentalist” as applied to Islam/Muslims was as a journalistic shorthand to illustrate the type of mullah personified by Ayatollah Khalkhali at the site of the disastrous rescue mission in March (?) 1980 to free the American Embassy hostages in Iran.

    It was meant to conjure up images of the “preacher man” from Hollywood westerns clad all in black with a dour humourless face and a grim theology, supposedly as an anachronistic result of the 1920s Presbyterian pamphlet series “The Fundamentals of Religion” (anachronistic as most of the Hollywood Westerns take place in the 50 year period between 1840 and 1910).

    It was evocative and worked at the time; but it has since lost any real meaning. It is still used in the West to mean a type of Muslim extremist; but BAFS is correct – being a fundamentalist is what any Muslim is, as the “fundamentals of religion” as they apply to Islam are simply stated as the “five pillars of Islam” (two testimonies of belief; prayer; Ramadan; zakah or ‘purification due'; hajj) and the five pillars of faith (belief in the Unity of God; all His prophets; all His books; power to do good or ill is by His permission; belief in the Day of Judgment). So, even if he may not be a particularly “good” Muslim, any Muslim is – at least by aspiration – a fundamentalist.

    Jeremy Neese wrote “I consider Sunni Wahbism “fundamentalist Islam.” Wahbism is an international movement which seeks to re-create the past glories of the Caliphs. Remember the Chechnyans and Albanians threw out the Wahbists from their nations because they were too “fundamentalist.” Saddam Hussein was exterminating Wahhists, too (not colluding with them as Bush misled this nation to believe).”

    In the sense of the “preacher man”, or Ayatollah Khakhali look-alike (above), Mr Neese is partly correct that the Wahhabis would fit into that “fundamentalism”. However, the Wahhabis are by no means Sunnis.

    The Ottoman religious authorities closely examined them and their ideology and determined it to be a ‘dangerous heresy’ (zandaqah) – its origins are obscure in that it is unclear where Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab al-Tamimi got his ideas from (or who fed them to him), but its development and growth owe nearly everything to the British.

    It was initially the Factor of the Honourable East India Company’s Bombay Presidency in Kuwait who spotted Tamimi when he fled there in disgrace, and he duly reported his ‘find’ to the Intelligence Department of the Maritime Service of the HEIC ( the “Bombay Marine”) which passed it on to London where the HEIC Main Board sat and was by then (the latter half of the 18th Century) dominated by a very influential clique of bankers among the directors.

    The potential for this ideology to spread dissension among the Muslims was assessed and Tamimi duly sponsored. It has no intentions of recreating the past glories of the Caliphs, and the spurious use of the term “Salafi” to refer to them is in an attempt to disguise who and what is being talked about – analogous to their (equally spurious) claim that they follow the Hanbali School of Sunni Jurisprudence.

    The Wahhabis are being fought in Chechenia, Daghestan, Bosnia, Albania, and Kosovo because these Muslims are overwhelmingly Sufis and mainly of the Naqshbandi Order (the same one that is making Islam a grassroots phenomenon in present-day Turkey).

    Mr Neese is right in stating that Saddam Hussein was exterminating Wahhabis, because SH correctly identified them as working against the ideologies of both the Ba’th Party and Sunni Islam in Iraq and for the influence of the West. By the time of the April Glaspie mission in Baghdad, SH had lost his liking for the Americans and was trying to go his own way (it may have been the shabby way the USA treated its erstwhile loyal stooge Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi that opened his eyes).

  12. #12 by Doug on January 28, 2011 - 8:36 pm

    D. Costa,

    Stop all aid to Israel.
    No more wars for Israel.
    Bring all troops home.
    Deport all dual citizens.
    Fire all Jewish terrorists from the US government, military and political office.

    But that would only make America the strongest, greatest, light to the world in the history of mankind, again. We can’t have that, now can we?
    No, Mr. Obama has his marching orders, as he presented to us in his State Of The Union Speech, the other night. We gotta go green…Gangrene.
    Stop trying to make sense here D. Costa, you are confusing me. :)

  13. #13 by Doug on January 28, 2011 - 8:41 pm

    Oh, and by the way, did you see Wolf Blitzkrieg’s exspression, when Rand Paul told him of our plans? Ole Wolf looked as if his ass just blew an O-Ring! It was a Kodak moment.

  14. #14 by Avenzoar on January 30, 2011 - 7:25 pm

    “David Rosser Owen on January 28, 2011 at 8:19 pm said: … about Jesus Christ. Muslims, when they speak of him, almost invariably refer to him as “Sayyiduna ‘Isa al Masih ‘alayhi-s salam” (Our Lord Jesus Christ peace be upon him).”

    David, the Arabic word ‘Sayyiduna’ means ‘Master’ (or the ‘Illustrious Teacher’ of the Sacred), and the word ‘Lord’ is alien to Muslim thinking and usage, even among some deviant sects that associate themselves with Islam. Some mystic Sufi and Masonic groups may secretly use it among themselves to convey the parallels between Muhammad and ‘Isa (Jesus), peace be upon them, such as some infiltrators in the Whirling Dervishes of Turkey.

    Jeremy Neese’s use of “I consider Sunni Wahbism “fundamentalist Islam”” is a political terminology which many in the West have to use unfortunately to convey message to general public without spending too much time in explaning its scope and definition. Wahabism had been labeled widely to Muslims in many areas of the world where these Muslims don’t even know what it is. I assume that it is a code word for arousing worst kind of fears in the mind of non-Muslims about any Muslim population interested in managing the welfare of their community without external interference in their religious matters. Fundamentalism is a concern only when it refers to Muslims, while at the same time it is considered a sacred duty when other religious groups apply it to the point where secularist among those people whole heartedly promote it to exert power over Muslims without feeling any hypocrisy or shame.

    No, Wahabism did not aspire to restoring Khilafah (Caliphate), otherwise we would have seen Caliphate established in Arabia in 1926, the home of the original Caliphate (began 632 CE). Instead, Arabia’s name was changed for the first time in its entire history (including ancient times before Abrahm, pbuh) to Saudi Arabia in 1932. This happened in spite of two gatherings of Muslim leaders (from India, Arab and North African countries and included some Western converts to Islam) at the invitation of King Abdul Aziz ibn Al-Saud between 1926 and 1931. Saddam’s opposition to one or more Muslim groups had to do with keeping social order and his absolute control over Iraq and its riches. One would not be wrong to say that he knew that Iraq was set up for destruction, particularly in the immediate aftermath of 1991 destruction and the slaughter by western allied forces. This is no surprise to Muslims who have read about Prophet Muhammad’s several Prophesies on Iraq in Sahih collections, with one indicating that Iraq will be destroyed and then re-constituted from Syria.

  15. #15 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 31, 2011 - 12:14 pm

    DAMN IT, J NESSE!

    Is Islamic fundamentalism a tangible threat to the American people or not?

    If you maintain it was not a mistake from your part (or a deliberate lie), then I maintain it is a COLOSSAL LIE!

    Please, do not distract us (me) with other issues and slogans!

    Before you made such a statement you should have known what is meant by “ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM” and HOW it was a THREAT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, or even WHY!

    J Nesse, you are wrong. Accept it and then let us get on with our work. I did not even have time to read the remaining of your article which might even be very good!

    Since its birth (the creation of Humans), ISLAM has always been a threat not TO PEOPLE, but only to LYING people, MURDEROUS people, IDOLATROUS people, FORNICATING and ADULTEROUS people, THIEVING people, PARENT DISHONOURING people, COVETING people, unless this was what you really meant by “THE AMERICAN PEOPLE”!

    In ISLAM, there is no islamic fundamentalism, terrorism, fascism, radicalism, reformism, protestantism, liberalism, socialism, marxism, communism, racism, nazism, bolshevism, supremacism, humanism, wahhabism, salafism, democratism, secularism, modernism, or any other such isms!

    BAFS

  16. #16 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 31, 2011 - 12:30 pm

    J NESSE :
    “… please call for a congressional investigation in Israel’s premeditated attack upon the USS LIBERTY on June 8, 1967. The Israeli “Defense” Forces murdered 34 American servicemen, and President Johnson, Admiral McCain, and Admiral Kidd ordered a cover-up! This betrayal of our servicemen was done so Jewish donors to the Democrat Party would support Johnson in his 1968 Presidential bid (of course later he chose not to run again)!!!”

    NOW, we are talking!

    Yet, the word TREASON is the legal term regarding this “cover-up”.

    My argument is that BOTH THE US AND THE APARTHEID ENTITY KNOWN AS ISRAEL PLANNED THE ATTACK, AND I CAN PROVE IT!

    THEN, what is the use of any “congressional investigation” when we know what the outcome will be when we have a Jewish bought and paid for CONGRESS?

    What did the “investigation” of the JFK murder or 9/11 explosions achieve? Do you see a difference between the US Congress and the Soviet Presidium?

    BAFS

  17. #17 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 13, 2011 - 10:10 am

    B.A.Frémaux-Soormally says:
    January 31, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    “DAMN IT, J NESSE!

    Is Islamic fundamentalism a tangible threat to the American people or not?”

    I AM STILL WAITING FOR AN ANSWER AND THE RELEVANT EVIDENCE!

    BAFS

  18. #18 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 13, 2011 - 10:18 am

    Avenzoar says:
    January 30, 2011 at 7:25 pm

    “No, Wahabism did not aspire to restoring Khilafah (Caliphate)…”

    As usual, your observations are accurate and very relevant. THANKS.

    Any Muslim who dares even dream of the Khilaafah is labelled an EXTREMIST TERRORIST FUNDAMENTALIST ISLAMIST RADICAL!

    YET, without the Islamic Khilaafah, there is no freedom for Islam and Muslims to exist anywhere in the world. All Muslim freedom we see today is made up of systematic compromises made with SATAN! And, the result is catastrophic: daily bombing of Muslim populations, countries, plunder of their resources, and total enslavement!

    BAFS

  1. Tweets that mention Open Letter to Rep. Peter King Concerning His Anti-Islamic Bigotry « The Ugly Truth -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,614 other followers

%d bloggers like this: