The Real Iranian Threat


By Dr. Elias Akleh

October 1, 2012

Iran poses a great threat to Zionist terrorist state of Israel. Iran poses even greater threat to the present hegemonic world order controlled by the Western power elite through their financial institutions and the undemocratic United Nation with all its many branches. In the perspective of both Israel and the Western power elite, Iran, as a threat, needs to be weakened and eliminated through regime change, through economic sanctions, through terror attacks, and if need be
through war.

The roots of Iran’s confrontation with the West go back to 1908 when oil was discovered in Iran by Burmah Oil Company, later called Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), and finally became British Petroleum (BP). During WWI the British government bought a controlling share of the company because it needed Iran’s oil for its Royal Navy.

When the Persians expressed their dissatisfaction with their meager share of 16% of the net profits a British caused coup in 1925 got rid of Shah Mozzafar al-Din and installed Reza Pahlavi in his place. Pahlavi served the British until WWII during which he became friendlier with Germany after it invaded USSR in 1941. The British and the Red Army, then, invaded Iran, got rid of Pahlavi and installed his 22 years old son Mohammad in his place. American forces also entered Iran and operated the southern part of the Trans-Iranian Railway that transported oil. After the war the allied forces withdrew from Iran but AIOC kept its monopoly over the oil
fields.

Iranians kept asking for a fair share of their oil industry, but the AIOC refused to re-negotiate and rejected all proposed compromise. In 1951 the pro-Western Iranian Prime Minister Ali Razmara was assassinated and replaced by Mohammad Mosaddegh. The Parliament created the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) and the oil fields were nationalized.

The United Kingdom was furious and raised an anti-nationalization case at the International Court of Justice at The Hague. After losing their case British Prime Minister Winston Churchill resorted to the US for help, but president, then, Harry Truman was very busy with his war in Korea. However, in 1953, Dwight Eisenhower became the president and authorized Operation Ajax, a joined British MI6 and American CIA coup led by Kermit Roosevelt, which overthrew the democratically elected government of Mosaddegh and transformed the government into an oppressive constitutional monarchy led by Mohammad Pahlavi until 1979. As a result of the coup AIOC returned to Iran but accompanied with five other American oil companies including Royal Dutch Shell with their own shares of Iran’s oil monopoly.

In January 1978 the Iranian Islamic Revolution ignited causing the Shah to leave the country in January 1979, and an Islamic Republic with Ayatollah Khomeini as supreme leader was established. On 4th of November 1979 a group of Iranian students seized the American embassy in Tehran taking 52 American hostages accused of being CIA operatives plotting to overthrow the revolutionary government as was done to Mosaddegh’s government in 1953. President Carter’s military and diplomatic rescue attempts failed and the hostages were not freed until January 1981 according to the Algiers Accords.

Encouraged by the CIA and financed by Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, CIA man Saddam Hussein, then President of Iraq, engaged Iran into what is known as the Eight Years War 1980 – 1988. The aim was to engage both countries into a war of attrition that weakens both countries and brings huge profits to the Western military complex. To lengthen the war and to increase the casualties and the devastation both Israel and the US provided intelligence information to both parties and sold them weapons including chemical weapons, sold by Donald Rumsfeld to Saddam Hussein, that resulted in, among many, the massacre of Halabja. The war finally ended in August 1988 according to UN Resolution 598 without any territorial gain by either party.

The CIA had also failed to topple Ahmadinejad’s administration during the 2009 Iranian election through the use of social media; internet, twitter and facebook, to push people into the streets demonstrating against the election.

Iran had become a real thorny bone in the throat of Zionist controlled American administrations when the Iranian government financed and armed Lebanese Hezbollah, whose armed struggle forced Israeli occupation forces to withdraw from Lebanon in 2000, and also inflicted heavy casualties on the Israeli tanks during Israel’s aggression against Lebanon in 2006.

Iran had to be dealt with. Iran became the target of huge media propaganda attempting to demonize its leadership especially Ahmadinejad, who was accused of anti-Semitism, holocaust denying, and threatening to wipe Israel off the map. Iran also was accused of developing nuclear weapons without any real evidence and even with continuous sudden and stringent IAEA inspections. Economic sanctions and oil embargo were imposed on Iran. Penalty and punishment was imposed on countries who would buy Iranian oil, although lax exemptions were later granted to virtually all countries due to failure of the embargo and to the rise of oil prices. Iranian nuclear scientists were assassinated by Mossad/CIA backed assassins. American-backed terrorist Mujahadeen-e-Khalq (MKO) conducted terrorist attacks against government buildings and against ethnic civilian minorities to incite ethnic conflict. American administration has just removed the MKO from its terrorist list. Cyber war had been waged against Iranian nuclear facilities, and nuclear equipment sold to Iran by German Seimens company contained explosives aimed at sabotaging Iranian nuclear facilities.

In violation of international laws Israel continues to threaten to attack Iran and bomb its nuclear facilities. Israel is the only country possessing nuclear weapons in the Middle East as revealed by their own nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu. There are indisputable evidence that Israel had stolen weapons-grade uranium for its nuclear weapons program from American Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation in Apollo, Pennsylvania in 1950s and 1960s. Israel did not just build nuclear weapons but is also proliferating nuclear weapons as evidence show that Israeli Shimon Peres, now Israel president, was trying to sell three sizes of nuclear bombs to apartheid South Africa’s defense minister PW Botha in 1975. This was also documented by the book “The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Alliance with Apartheid South Africa” by Sasha Polakow- Suransky. God knows who else had bought nuclear weapons from Israel. Israel did not sign, and refuse to sign the NPT.

Not mentioning its many wars of aggression against Palestine and its neighboring Arab countries, its violation of international and humanitarian laws and daily terror attacks against Palestinian civilians, its assassinations of officials and terror attacks all over the globe, its illegal bombardments of Iraq and Syria, its illegal piracy against freedom flotillas in international seas, and its international laws violating threats to devastate Lebanon and to nuke Iran, Israel is accusing Iran of being threat to the region and to the world, although Iran have not committed or threatened to commit any war of aggression against any other country during the last 200 years.

One can easily discern who is the war mongering threat to world peace when comparing Iranian Ahmadinejad’s speech to the UN with Israeli Netanyahu’s pathetic “this is a bomb, this is a fuse” speech. When Ahmadinejad addresses heads of states with logic and respect, Netanyahu insults their intelligence by his condescending demeanor as if talking to third grade students. When Ahmadinejad talks peace, Netanyahu talks war. When Ahmadinejad talks global interests, Netanyahu talks Israeli only interests. When Ahmadinejad talks harmonious religious utopia, Netanyahu talks racist religious elitism. When Ahmadinejad talks global consciousness, Netanyahu talks egocentric Judaic consciousness. When Ahmadinejad talks global holocausts, Netanyahu talks Jewish only holocaust. When Ahmadinejad addresses the concerns of all nations, Netanyahu addresses only Israeli concerns and talks us vs others. When Ahmadinejad speaks of citizenship of the whole world, Netanyahu speaks Jewish only state. When Ahmadinejad calls for return to monotheism and cites Jewish, Christian, and Moslem prophets and messengers such as Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Mohammad, Netanyahu cites his racist god and Jewish only prophets; Isaiah, Amos and Jeremiah. Netanyahu accuses Iranian leaders of waiting for a medieval holy man to appear after a devastating holy war to spread radical Islam, yet he forgets that Zionist Israeli Jews are waiting for a Messiah, a cosmic terrorist, who would wage a holy war to purge the promised land from all non-Jewish heathens; Christians as well as Moslems, and build a temple, from which to rule the whole world.

Iran poses a great threat to the present Western hegemonic world order because its leader is pointing to the utter failure of the present world order in maintaining peace and prosperity and is calling for a new joint global management of the world with fundamental changes and structural reforms to the UN and to the Security Council based on real democracy and equal rights to all member nations by eliminating the veto power of few countries, who dominate and manipulate global politics, economy and culture to attain their racist ambitions. Iran is calling for an end to expansionist capitalism, to the elimination of all nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, and to a return to monotheism to eliminate sectarian wars. Iran is also calling for reforming the current unjust and unfair economic structures and setting up a new international economic order based on human and moral values and obligation to allow potential talents of all nations to flourish. Ahmadinejad called for the elimination of present centers of power that seek supremacy based on domination and conquering of others through wars.

What makes Iran more dangerous is not the fact that it possesses advanced long range weapons that could destroy American military bases in the Arabian Gulf States and all the foreign naval armadas crowding the Persian Gulf and could also reach and devastate the state of Israel, but the fact that Iran will be heading the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) for the next three years. NAM consists of 120 member countries from across the globe making two thirds of world countries and 60% of world population and represents the biggest single voting bloc in the 193- member General Assembly at the UN. NAM countries support Iran’s call for the new joint global management, assert Iran’s right to pursue peaceful nuclear technology, oppose war against Iran and deplore Israeli continuous threat to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iran has become a major global player that could not be isolated nor ignored on the global theater.

Of course the present pro-Zionist Western hegemonic world order will not sit idle and will muster every way to ruin Iran. Western military has been very busy devising military actions against Iran and studying their costs and effects. “Weighing Benefits and Costs of Military Action Against Iran” is an analytical report by the Iran Project and authored by 32 respected national security experts such as former security advisers Zbigniew Brzezinski and Brent Scowcroft, and military generals such as Anthony Zinni. The report indicates that military action against Iran would be very costly to the US. “Given Iran’s large size and population, and the strength of Iranian nationalism, we estimate that the occupation of Iran would require a commitment of resources and personnel greater than what the US has expended over the past 10 years in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined” the report stated. Despite this analysis the US and Israel continue to conduct war games in the Persian Gulf testing the feasibility of each new war scenario drawn by American military.

The big question that poses itself is whether Iran would become the nucleus of a global spring that would create a real democratic new world order, or would it be the target of a comprehensive Middle Eastern war, possibly nuclear, whose devastating effects would hit all
countries without exception.

  1. #1 by Steve Wiseman on October 2, 2012 - 4:50 pm

    Excellent summary,however, you could have mentioned the PNAC report and Sbigniew Brzezinski’s books in which be outlined the American foreign policy in Eurasia for the last twenty years starting with the destruction and control of Yugoslavia up to the soon to be destruction and control of Iran,the jewel in the plan. ….And as we all know, when the USA wants a war, they always get it….which, of course, is too bad for the soon to be tens of millions of injured, enslaved, and murdered Iranians.

  2. #2 by Kalki on October 2, 2012 - 5:08 pm

    Insane, psychotic she-devil Hillary laughing about attacking Iran. Do all of them have syphilis?
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=799_1348921063

  3. #3 by SHAFAR NULLIFIDIAN on October 2, 2012 - 6:11 pm

    The cogency of this piece is is like a fresh breeze clearing the air of the overwhelming brain cell killing miasma that has to overwhelmed this nation. This nation is muscle bound cretin disposed to carryout the evil design of Zionism, the evil of which exceeds the cumulative evil of Mao’s Communism, Stalinist Communism, Hitler’s Nazism,Pol Pot Cambodian carnage, Idi Amin’s Uganda, and Ceausescu’s Romania

  4. #4 by Ronald L. Waldron on October 2, 2012 - 7:40 pm

    Complete Dysfunction of federal agencies comes from the top down. Home Land Security with the top leaders all being duel citizens with Israel, all decisions coming from AIPAC, MOSSAD, and the illegal state of ISRAEL. Until the American people insist on leadership being American with American interest the priority, until the Zionist organized crime syndicate is put out of business in WASHINGTON, D.C. America will continue on a downward slide. It certainly would help if the religious right recognizes that Christians do not live in the OLD testament, That only the NEW testament applies to US and our government. Zionism is not biblical, and is the Anti-Christ We need to be more concerned about the Anti-Christ group, rather then all the false flags of anti-Semitism.

    We made an appeal to the listeners to contact President Obama and let him know that we the people are aware of an impending false flag attack by Israel on an American interest somewhere. Below is the message I left on the White House website–

    President Obama, A sizable number of us Americans understand the pressure you are under from Israel to attack Iran. We also know that your military and intelligence advisors are telling you this would be disastrous to our nation. We also know that if Israel does not get her way she will more than likely try another false flag attempt on an American interest somewhere, no different than what took place with Israel’s attack on the USS LIBERTY in 1967. The American people are with you and do not want another war for Israel’s benefit. Stay firm and resolute in the face of the demands they are making on you.

    PRESIDENT OBAMA, WE STAND WITH YOU.

    According to 16 US intelligence agencies and IAEA inspectors, Iran has no nukes, but Israel does. Iran has signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and Israel (with nuclear weapons) refuses to sign and refuses to allow AEIA inspectors into their nuclear facility.

    This begs the question, why is it Iran–and not Israel–that is being subjected to strangling sanctions? Iran has never threatened Israel, America, or any of its neighbors, whereas Israel is threatening to bomb Iran every day and has a long history of attacking and invading many Arab countries. Israel is now making life a hell on earth for Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem as I write this. Where is the outrage, threats of sanctions and the calls for Israel to adhere to the rules of civilized nations?

    Thankfully, this time president Obama stood his ground and showed this arrogant and ungrateful guest some back bone. Netanyahoo (by all appearances) left America empty-handed . He did however succeeded, as Dr. Hassan El-Najjar, the editor of Aljazeerah.info put it, “Netanyahu succeeded to put the illegal Jewish settlements and the theft of Palestinian lands on the back burner.”

  5. #5 by Adalberto Erazo Jr. on October 3, 2012 - 12:05 am

    A very interesting article but if we wish to understand the origins of Operation Ajax and the imposed tyranny of the puppet Shah from 1953-1979,we need to go back to 1951 Pakistan in which the Americans were behind the assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan who was then Prime Minister at that time.The assassination of Pakistan’s first Prime minister was organized out of the US embassies in Afghanistan and Pakistan. No surprise there as US embassies(along with UK and IsraHelli) have always been sources of danger for any sovereign country around the world. The Americans wanted Pakistan to use her influence on Iran to force the transfer of the oil fields to the US and Liaquat like any good neighbor refused.

    The Americans threatened that they would not help Pakistan on the Kashmir issue and Liaquat replied back that Pakistan got half of Kashmir without American help and that they could get the other half of Kashmir on their own. Liaquat told the Americans to vacate Pakistani air bases and get out. This was a bombshell in Washington and that is when they decided to assassinate Pakistan’s first Prime minister. The cartridges found near Liaquat’s body were American made, especially for use by high ranking American officers. Fact of the matter is Pakistan has been used and abused by the United States and was never treated like an ally from the beginning ever since the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries. Think of the overthrow of Mossaddegh as Operation Ajax part 2.

    The link that I am posting below shows the cable from the American Embassy in New Delhi discussing the details of Liaquat’s assassination in 1951. A very interesting read to add to the discussion.
    http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/pakistan/liaquat30oct1951.htm

    The Pakistani Army needs to get it’s act together and stop sending their officers to western countries for training to places like the Military Academy at Sandhurst. Stop sending your men to countries who don’t respect you. The Pakistanis should instead send their men to China, Russia, or even better yet, to Iran, so their military men can get training and who belong to countries who are part of the axis of resistance. Pakistan and Iran are joined at the hip and it’s time that the Pakistani Military took the initiative to start establishing contacts with the Iranian military and form an alliance.

  6. #6 by Mustafa Shaban on October 3, 2012 - 5:00 am

    Good article!

    @Adalberto: Excellent analysis! I totally agree about ur theory on the assasination of Liaqat Ali Khan. Also Pakistan needs to get out of Amercian influence. This is very important.

    The military and ISI isnt American puppet but they also couldnt get Pakistan out of American influence but I know they will and succed taking Pakistan out of American influence soon and out of the hands of curropt politcians.

    I also hope that Imran Khan will get elected and change Pakistan!

  7. #7 by restinpieces on October 3, 2012 - 5:48 am

    The only democracy in the middle east?

    Another example of Jew democracy

    More examples of Jewish democracy.

    http://www.btselem.org/video/201200725_soldier_headbuts_boy

    Even more examples of Jewish democracy.
    http://www.btselem.org/video

    By doing nothing you acquiesce to these Jew atrocities!

  8. #8 by 01abaddon on October 3, 2012 - 11:31 am

    One of the finest summations on Iran and a Zionist led west I have ever read.

    To me though, there is a bigger picture, a picture that is much more than Iran, yesterday it was Vietnam, today Iran, tomorrow who?

    THE REAL GOALS OF THE POWERS THAT BE.

    Like all villainous groups, they all have a front of legitimacy to cover their real behind the scenes agenda.

    We have seen the financial global monster created by a few criminally ingenious banking families, who have engineered a monetary system by which you cannot buy or sell, unless you have ‘their’ permission to do so. This controlling force is a world wi
    de currency of paper monies that ‘they’ control and print, so that from a roll of toilet paper to a nuclear reactor you cannot purchase anything without dependency upon ‘their’ currency. They have made themselves look indispensable to our being able to live without them. That is the key to understanding ‘their’ real goals, and that is, controlling and having a firm grip on all that we are, and all that we own. There is hardly an individual, or family, and certainly not a nation that is not dependant upon these financial institutions. From individuals, to communities, to nations, to a world, it was inevitable that they would attain such power, for money is the financial reactor that puts the lights on all around the world. Just as they have intruded big time in all our lives by having ‘their’ fingers in all our financial transactions, so they have done the same with a world.

    For who controls and owns the oil, the food, the medicines, the media, the politicians, and virtually all the worlds major assets that make it work? They make claims of being essential to the functioning of this world, and they are, and they try to give the appearance of benevolence, as they are behind many charitable organisations, organisations that would not be necessarry if it were not for ‘their’ greed.

    Being the financial controlling factor behind the global ruling powers, they appoint and depose rulers at will, as they pursue their global agenda. And what is that agenda, TO RULE OR RUIN.

    How can we conclude that?…. Look at what they are doing, not what they say.

    What conclusion does any concerned discerning individual come to who looks around this world and sees what is happening on a global scale to the planet itself. Tell me what sea. never mind rivers, that is not polluted big time, and becoming even more polluted? We now have the ability to do serious damage on a global scale as is evidenced by Fukushima, the Gulf oil spill, the tens of thousands of oil rigs that leave serious pollution wherever they are. The widespread use of insecticides, herbicides, pesticides and an array of chemicals that makes one wonder how we are still here.

    Then there is air pollution that is a concern to many peoples, radiation levels in the air are going up everywhere, and that is now worldwide. Over six hundred lethal nuclear reactors pumping out radioactive waste every day, one of which could wipe out all mankind. The daily sparaying of the sky’s with a cocktail of chemicals under the guise of warding off ‘global warming’ but which is causing huge problems for peoples health, and which eventually settles on the land polluting it further. Apart from the general pollution that we all make through living in this man made created pollutant system, and this is only a small part of what is polluting our world, add on all else and it is a disturbing picture for those who are genuinely concerned for the future.

    Financial greed has given those money monsters ‘their’ power, add to that ‘their’ mangement of that power, and we see their greed dominates and it has led to ‘their’ consistency of corruption, for ‘their’ mangement of the world has shown they are even more avaricious in ‘their’ blind pursuit of more wealth and power at the expense of a planet.

    So they have shown they are incapable of ruling, but very good at ruining.

    Even ‘their’ moral crusades of ‘freedom and democracy’ and lets not forget ‘humanitarianism’ have created a divided, hostile, war-plagued world of woe. They have created global organisations for ‘peace,’ like the UN and NATO. They cannot even keep the peace between people’s of their own kind as the moral decline of families, and society reach rock bottom. They have destroyed the very foundation of any society and its morality, by destroying the family unit. ‘Their’ anything goes policy has proven to be a recipe for global meltdown. ‘Their’ military machine is the greatest proof of all, and of ‘their’ failure to rule. For it is the biggest business on the planet, arms sales are at the top of most nations agendas, demonstrating how unstable the world is, if we cannot get on with our neighbours, then how will we deal with a world full of them, with all their differences of race, language, culture and religion?

    We can’t, a world so divided is proof of that.

    Summing up the ‘Powers That Be’ we must conclude that they cannot rule, so ruin is the inevitable conclusion, and all the evidence shows that ruination is forging ahead at an alarming pace, for the financial world is collapsing, the industrial world is dying, leaving its polluting footprint for all to see, and the military, armed with weapons of mass destruction, can destroy the world many times over and in so many diffent ways, and that is looking ever more probable, in an ever increasing unstable violent world. This is a global cancer, incurable, and spreading like a forest fire, even the Powers That Be can now see that, as they make preparations with huge underground bunkers to try and survive ‘their’ incompetence of rule and the motivation of greed that empowered them.

    What can we do? Put our head between our legs and kiss our butt goodbye.

  9. #9 by Steve Wiseman on October 3, 2012 - 12:17 pm

    Wow…..the world is so different than we have been told…..Where did you learn all this?

    Steve

  10. #10 by Vickie Jacobs on October 3, 2012 - 2:19 pm

    Great article..information is so important. Great group of people who stay so knowledable.

  11. #11 by Ingrid B on October 3, 2012 - 6:09 pm

    headline on Press TV: “75 million Iranians ready for defence”, and there`s the difference, whilst every Iranian is willing to lay down their lives for their country, the parasitic “chosen” will be cowering in bunkers. Americans will be left to fend for themselves, since the ptb in the US don`t give a monkeys, as long as the taxes are paid..

  12. #12 by Ingrid B on October 3, 2012 - 6:23 pm

    @ restinpieces, one day, maybe soon, everyone will be equal, and the Palestinians too, will be armed..

  13. #13 by Pip Power on October 7, 2012 - 7:35 pm

    Khomeini was an agent for the West

    Khomeini’s Background & His British Father

    With all bets off, the Iranian reformers have now struck at the heart of the revolution and are insisting on an inquiry into the disappearance of Imam (Ayatollah) Musa Sadr, some 25-years ago, during a visit to Libya. The Iranian-born leader of the Lebanese Shia, Imam Musa Sadr, was revered and respected above all others in the Shia world. He refused to accept Khomeini as an Ayatollah. With the influence Imam Musa Sadr enjoyed, he became an insurmountable obstacle to Khomeini’s political plans, and of those who supported the overthrow of the Shah and needed a despot like Khomeini to be their cat’s paw.

    Imam (Ayatollah) Musa Sadr’s mysterious disappearance in Libya – his body was never found- opened the way for Khomeini to invade Iran, which accurately describes the action of a foreigner like Khomeini taking over a country in which he (Khomeini) was neither born nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally.

    While one devout Iranian in California speaks of Khomeini reverently as a great man, similar to Hitler, other less friendly Persians liken him to an invader like Genghis Khan the Mongol scourge.

    The cornerstone and founder of the Islamic Revolution of Iran was Ayatollah Khomeini and the structure which he put in place. However, there is compelling evidence that Khomeini was never an Iranian in the first place and had no right to impose his policies on the Iranian people. Nor was his elevation to the title of ayatollah anything more than a political, face-saving expediency to prevent his being hanged for treason in 1964. Considerable effort was made in 1979 to eradicate evidence of any record of either Khomeini’s non-Iranian origins and the source of his use of the title of Ayatollah.

    One of the first actions which Khomeini took, within hours of his return to Iran after the Shah left, was to execute two prominent men who were living proof of his origin and also of his false Ayatollah status. One of these was Gen. Hassan Pakravan, Head of SAVAK, the Imperial Iranian national intelligence and security organization.

    Furthermore he immediately tried to assassinate the highly-respected Ayatollah Shariatmadari, who, with Ayatollah Golpayegani, had in 1964 granted Khomeini the false title. They had agreed to allow Khomeini, then literally awaiting death on charges of treason, to be called an Ayatollah to save his life: it was forbidden to execute an Ayatollah. This took place in 1964 at the urging of the British Ambassador to Iran and Gen. Pakravan, when a face-saving legal reason had to be found not to hang Khomeini for treason. It is known that Pakravan had fought hard to avoid Khomeinis execution at that time.

    Later, when the 1979 assassination attempt failed against Shariatmadari, Shariatmadari, far higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini, was placed, incommunicado and under house arrest, without the right to preach or receive visitors other than a handful of close relatives, whose anti-Khomeini statements could be easily impugned as biased.

    Few contest that Khomeini’s mother was a Kashmiri Indian, but even fewer Iranians or otherwise know his fathers origins or his real name. The late Iranian Senator Moussavi, who represented Khuzestan Province in Southern Iran, at the time of the monarchy, knew Khomeini’s father and his four sons well, looked after their needs, used his influence to obtain their Iranian identity cards with fictitious dates and places of birth to avoid military service. Sen. Moussavi died for this help, on Khomeini’s personal orders, immediately on Khomaini return from France after the 1979 coup.

    SAVAK chief Gen. Pakravan, the man who saved Khomeini’s life in 1964, was taken that same night onto the roof of his house and shot to death for having compiled a complete background file on Khomeini. The SAVAK background file still exists, as a senior SAVAK official, who defected and joined SAVAMA (the clerics equivalent of the SAVAK) took possession of it. This same man was reportedly head of SAVAMA in the US for quite some time, and sources indicate that he has kept the file for a rainy day.

    Why did Khomeini return to Iran with such a bloodthirsty mind set? It seems clear that it was to exact the revenge which he said he would have. Prior to his return to Iran in 1979, Khomeini openly stated that he would kill as many Iranians. He considered everyone in Iran guilty in advance as there were hairs on the head of his son, killed in a car accident, but in his mind killed by Iranian authorities.

    Unable to provide an acceptable paternal background for Khomeini, a story was concocted to link his paternal heritage to that of his Kashmiri Indian mother and introduced an Indian-born father (also from Kashmir) but of Iranian heritage. In fact, no such person existed. But someone with similar and misleading characteristics certainly did, which could lend credence to this fiction of an Indian father.

    Khomeini’s real father, William Richard Williamson, was born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage. This detail is based on first-hand evidence from a former Iranian employee of the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (later known as British Petroleum- BP), who worked with and met the key players of this saga. This fact was supported by the lack of a denial in 1979 by Col. Archie Chisholm, a BP political officer and former editor at The Financial Times, when interviewed on the subject at his home in County Cork, Ireland, by a British newspaper.

    The then-78-year old Chisholm stated: I knew Haji [as Williamson was later known] well; he worked for me. He certainly went native but whether he is Khomeini’s father I could not say. Would not an outright, ridiculing denial have been the natural response, were there no truth to the British paternity? From someone who knew Haji [and thus the truth] well?

    Chisholm obviously wished to avoid a statement leading to political controversy or possible personal retribution in the very year Khomeini took over in Iran. Nor as a former, experienced political officer himself would he be willing to drag Britain into the new Middle East conflict. But neither was he prepared to provide an outright lie instead of his no comment.

    How it all happened:

    A stocky, handsome, dark-haired Bristol boy, Richard Williamson ran away to sea at the age of 13 as a cabin boy, on a ship bound for Australia. However, he jumped ship before he got there. Little is known about him until he showed up, at the age of 20, in Aden at the Southern end of the Arabian Peninsula in South Yemen, where he joined the local police force.

    His good looks soon had Sultan Fazl bin-Ali, ruler of Lahej, persuading him to quit the police force to live with him. Richard later left him for another Sheikh, Yousef Ibrahim, a relative of the Al- Sabah family, which rules Kuwait today.

    A few points should be remembered about the Persian Gulf and Arabian Peninsula area at that time. Regional countries like Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia and so forth did not exist as sovereign entities and were artificially created about 70 years ago by the British and French governments when they partitioned the area. Iran, or Persia as it was called, was soon to be controlled by Russian Cossacks in the North and the British Army in the South, although technically it remained an independent monarchy under the largely absentee Qajar dynasty.

    British military presence in Iran was under Lt.-Col. Sykes (later Sir Percy Sykes), based in Shiraz, but politically controlled by Sir Arnold Wilson in Khorramshahr (then called Mohammareh) with assistance from E. Elkington in Masjid-Suleiman and Dr. Young, based in Ahwaz. All three were cities in Khuzestan Province, which was later represented by Senator Moussavi. Col. T.E. Lawrence, who gained fame as Lawrence of Arabia, operated out of Basra in Mesopotamia (Iraq) and Khorramshahr during this same period.

    Oilfields, far beyond the technological capability of the Arab tribes (or Persia) to develop or appreciate as a valuable commodity, were being discovered and exploited by the British, including via the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, formed to siphon off oil from Khuzestan Province in Southern Iran.

    Kuwait, on the other side of the Persian Gulf was still not a country at the time. As the major player in the Middle East oil industry, Britain had to exert influence and control through its political and oil personnel. Haji Abdullah Williamson became one of these in 1924 when he joined British Petroleum as political officer. He retired under that same name in 1937, at the age of 65. Earlier, in what is now Kuwait, Richard Williamson had very quickly converted to Islam and adopted the first name of Abdullah. Family names were still unusual and son of the son of or son of a type of worker or craftsman was still commonly used to identify people. For 14 years he had lived among the Bedouin tribes on the Arabian Peninsula and in 1895 and 1898 he went on pilgrimages to Mecca, took on the rightful title of Haji and took on his first benefactors name of Fazl, adding Zobeiri to it as a distinguisher. Thus, William Richard Williamson became known as Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri.

    During his service with British Petroleum in the Persian Gulf, Haji Abdullah took his vacations in Indian Kashmir, to rest from the relentless Gulf heat and in this timeframe married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women each under Muslim marriage rituals. He had 13 children of whom seven were boys and the rest girls with most of the children dying in early childhood. His repeated Kashmir excursions and Indian wives and use of the name Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri probably give rise to the Kashmir Indian father misconception.

    With dark-haired Haji Abdullah a fanatically devout Muslim, a characteristic he imposed on his children, this fervent religious attitude and Arab nomenclature would not normally be an expected combination for a foreigner, especially an Englishman. He insisted his four surviving sons attend religious school in Najaf (in Iraq) under the tutelage of Ayatollahs Yazdi (meaning of the city of Yazd) and Shirazi (of the city of Shiraz). Two of them, Hindizadeh (meaning Indian born) and Passandideh (meaning pleasing or approved) studied well and eventually became ayatollahs in their own right.

    The third boy, a troublesome young man, failed to make his mark in Najaf and went to the Iranian holy city of Qom, where he studied under Ayatollah Boroujerdi. When family names became a requirement by law under His Majesty Reza Shah, the young man chose the city of his residence, Khomein, as the designator and took on the name Khomeini (meaning: “from Khomein city”).

    The fourth son hated theology and went across the Persian Gulf to Kuwait and opened up two gas (petrol) stations using the paternal family name of Haji Ali Williamson, though it is unclear if he ever performed the Haj pilgrimage. This in itself links Khomeini through that brother with Haji Williamson. Why, otherwise, would Rouhallah Khomeinis undisputed brother use the Williamson family name? The patriarch of this brood, Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri (aka Haji Abdullah Williamson in BP), was thrown out of Iran by Reza Shah along with three other British political officers for anti-Iranian activity and joined his son in Kuwait. Here he took on the duties of Oil Distribution for the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.

    With his longstanding contacts in the Arab world and his Muslim religion, he forced a 50/50 agreement between US oil interests in Kuwait and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company as well as in 1932 pursuing the exclusive exploration rights for British Petroleum in Abu Dhabi.

    His lack of a formal education forced British Petroleum to send out Archie H. T. Chisholm (see above), a senior executive, to conclude the Abu Dhabi contract and together with Haji Abdullah’s political influence they overcame competition from Major Frank Holmes, Sheikh Hussein and Mohammad Yateen to successfully land the exclusive contract. Chisholm, as he said, got to know Khomeini’s father well. Back in Iran again in 1960, Khomeini saw an opportunity to exact revenge for his father having been thrown out of Iran and to impose his Islamic fundamentalist philosophy onto an Iran struggling with budget problems, caused mostly by its oil being in the control of foreign oil companies, which decided not Iran how much oil the country was allowed to produce and at what price it had to be sold.

    With his own and his family’s theological background, Khomeni began to foment an anti-monarchy revolt through the mosques, which by 1964 resulted in imposition of martial law and finally with his arrest and his being sentenced to death by hanging. And consequently he was given the life-saving Ayatollah title which he had not earned.

    After formally being exiled to Turkey, Khomeini ended up in Iraq where he wrote some philosophical and social behavior dissertations which were so bizarre by religious standards that, where possible, the tracts were bought up and destroyed by the Iranian Government when he took over in 1979. The most damning were in Arabic language versions and then later, cleaner versions appeared as edited translations in Farsi.

    Some linguists, who studied his public speeches in 1979 and 1980, concluded his Farsi vocabulary to be less than 200 words, so not only did he not have Persian blood, he did not even speak the language. With the number of Iranians who have died because of him and his successors over the past 25 years going into the hundreds of thousands, if not well over a million if the death toll from the eight-year Iran-Iraq war is included, this Anglo-Indian may have had no love or compassion for Iranians either.

    In the Iran Air aircraft flying Khomeini back from France to Tehran in early 1979, with cameras rolling, a journalist asked: What do you feel about returning to Iran? He replied: Nothing! The question was repeated, and again he replied: Nothing!

    Summary of Khomeini’s Background

    1. In 1964 Ayatollah Shariatmadari and Ayatollah Golpayegani gave Khomeini the title of Ayatollah. Reportedly, they had done this to save Khomeini’s life, as Khomeini was facing a charge of treason against the Shah. And reportedly it was the UK ambassador who had urged that Khomeini be saved.

    2. Shariatmadari was higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini. In 1979, after Khomeini took over Iran, he placed Shariatmadari under house arrest.

    3. Reportedly, Khomeini was not Iranian. He “was neither born (in Iran) nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally.” Khomeini’s mother was a Kashmiri Indian. Reportedly, a story was invented that Khomeini had a Kashmiri Indian father with Iranian origins. The Iranian Senator Moussavi knew Khomeini’s real father. Reportedly Khomeini had Moussavi killed.

    4. Reportedly, Khomeini’s real father, was William Richard Williamson, born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage. A witness to this was a former Iranian employee of the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (later BP), who knew the Khomeini family. In 1979, when Col. Archie Chisholm, a BP political officer and former editor at The Financial Times, was asked about this, he neither confirmed nor denied the story.

    William Richard Williamson’s biography was written in the early 1950s, by Stanton Hope, a British Journalist and writer who had met Williamson in his home near Basra in the late 1940s. The book title is: Arabian Adventurer: the Story of Haji Williamson

    5. Reportedly, Richard Williamson, at the age of 20, was working in South Yemen in the local police force.

    “His good looks soon had Sultan Fazl bin-Ali, ruler of Lahej, persuading him to quit the police force to live with him. Richard later left him for another Sheikh, Yousef Ibrahim, a relative of the Al- Sabah family, which rules Kuwait today.”

    6. In Iran at this time, the British were exploiting the oilfields. Williamson, now a Muslim, joined British Petroleum as political officer. He called himself Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri.

    7. Williamson took holidays in Kashmir and married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women. His sons attended religious schools. Reportedly, one son went to the Iranian holy city of Qom and took the name Khomeini.

    8. In the early 1960s, Khomeini began to plot against the Shah. In 1964 Khomeini was sentenced to death. By becoming an Ayatollah, his life was saved.

    9. Reportedly, in 1979, Khomeini was flown from France to Iran, with the help of the British Intelligence Service, MI6. He took over Iran.

    In 1979, Imam (Ayatollah) Mussa Sadr disappeared during a visit to Libya. Imam Mussa Sadr was the Iranian-born leader of the Lebanese Shia and he “was revered and respected above all others in the Shia world.”

    Why was the Shah of Iran toppled by the CIA and MI6?

    The mainstream media would like us to believe that the Shah was overthrown by People Power and that the CIA and MI6 were taken by surprise. However, there is evidence that the CIA and MI6 toppled the Shah because he had become too much of a nationalist, like Egypt’s President Jamal Abdul-Naser, and was not following instructions on oil or even opium.

    The CIA did not want left-wing democrats taking over from the Shah as they might not be easy to control. So, reportedly, the CIA allowed the Ayatollahs to take over.

    Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom, the Ayatollah Khomeini received a “monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British.”

    On 19 January 1980, the International Herald Tribune reported that the Shah had said, two years before he was overthrown, that he had heard from two different sources connected with oil companies that the regime in Iran would change.

    ‘We believe that there was a plan to ensure less oil was offered to the world markets in order to bring down the price (of oil). One country was to be chosen for the sacrifice… It seems that the country chosen to drop its oil production was mine’ said the Shah.

    According to the Guardian: “Shah- Oil Companies Helped to Oust Him”

    The Shah’s nationalist policies were making him more popular in Iran and making his country more independent and more powerful. This worried the CIA and MI6.

    1. The Shah bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown’s own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers. Over one and a half million people became land owners, thus ending the old feudal system.

    2. The Shah allowed women the right to vote. He brought an end to the wearing of the veil.

    3. He developed plans for a $90 billion nuclear power program.

    4. The Shah signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.

    5. He began to close down the opium industry. This had been created during the days of British influence.

    Former intelligence officer, Dr John Coleman, considers opium to be of prime importance in the toppling of the Shah (Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 – 6). Dr Coleman is sometimes described as being a conspiracy theorist.

    Coleman believes that the U.S. government toppled the Shah of Iran. He writes:

    Why was the Shah deposed…?

    In a word, because of DRUGS. The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British. At the time that the Shah took over in Iran, there were already one million opium/heroin addicts.

    This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the “special relationship” between the two countries.

    When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Teheran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued…

    After 1984, Khomeini’s liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics.

    Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity…

    The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance… and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany and some were even flown directly from the United States with re-fuelling stops at the Azores.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,325 other followers

%d bloggers like this: