Knowing that the Benghazi Consulate murders would again come up i jotted down something i saw on RT Oct 5 at 6:08am EST Australia;

A name tag allegedly on the ground there at the Benghazi Consulate was shown three times (!) by the panning camera, and it clearly said MAIGA YOUSSEFF

BENGHAZI
And had his alleged photo.

This time there were no singe marks at all to obscure the first name, and it was pink in background colour.

I had written of this before at the time a month ago, and the name tag then shown had a singe to the top left of it obscuring the first name, but showing YOUSSEFF clearly, and it was off white in background colour.

At that time the camera panned twice to it, as directly as now, and there was no BENGHAZI written on it, nor had it been singed off at the lower border as it was intact.

Perhaps they mulled over the question i had put, which was; whether name tags in Libya were in English. Perhaps i should have said Roman Alphabet.

So, what was their reasoning path resulting in this needless `correction` to the original plant of the false clue ? That is to say, it would have been better for them not to have compounded their original `Mohammed ATTA` folly by trying to cover their butts when not too exposed.

They said; simple, the name tag of a hypothetical locally hired employee of the US Consulate would need to be in the Roman Alphabet, as would the name tag of any locally hired employee of a non Arabic business or concern in the city.

But, here’s the big big big but; in both instances, now and a month ago, the name tags were generic, that is, the issuing organisation was not named, though the alleged photo of the named individual was there – a generic bearded guy.

No employee of any organisation has a name tag issued without the imprint or logo of that organisation ! Right ?

The difference between the Mohammed ATTA incident of 11yrs ago and now is that it was his passport which had all the particulars of the issuing nation state ! The name tag fiasco, and twice over, is that there is no imprint of the employing organisation on the name tags !

Who has media access to get us all thinking, `A r a b, A r a b, A r a b` ?

As it was the 6am RT news service on Oct 5 EST Australia, it was 4pm NYC time Oct 4. Did anyone else see it ? It is the fact that in trying to respond in the way that they did to my idle query about name tags being in English or Arabic in Libya, that they prompted today in me the question of the logo of the employing organisation not being there twice !

“the Taliban and Al-Qaeda”? Who are those guys?

Basheer