ed note–again, the Jewish theatrics are wearing thin.
LEST WE FORGET, Israel’s religious leaders have made it clear TIME AND AGAIN that the way to fight a war means fighting it the Jewish way. Rabbi Manis Friedman wrote in defense of Cast LEad the following–
“The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children and cattle’, adding ’I don’t believe in Western morality…Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention.”
So Jenkins assertion is 1000% correct. The Jewish way of fighting a war–AS EVIDENCED NOT ONLY BY EVENTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST BUT AS WELL WHEN LOOKING AT THE BOMBINGS OF DRESDEN, HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI– is one of total disproportionality.
But we can’t have discussions like this taking place, now can we? After all, for Jewish interests to remain in power they must keep the rest of the world confused and unable to focus on the heart of the problem, which is, as Gilad Atzmon has accurately said many times–Jewish thinking, Jewish Identity.
By Gilad Atzmon
Peter Jenkins, Britain’s former representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency, has told the Warwick University Debating Union that a “just war” is not a Jewish notion.
Jenkins was obviously telling the truth but the Zionist Jewish Chronicle is not happy.
The retired Foreign Office diplomat, speaking in a debate on nuclear proliferation in Iran, said: “Israelis don’t practice an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth; they practice 10 eyes for an eye and 10 teeth for a tooth.” He added that “the idea that a just war requires the use of force to be proportionate seems to be a Christian notion and not a Jewish notion”.
The Jewish Chronicle reported this week that the remark prompted the opposing speaker, the Zionist Federation’s Jonathan Sacerdoti, to shout “shame”.
Mr Sacerdoti spoke to the audience in his self-proclaimed capacity as “a son of a Holocaust survivor”. He said: “I suggest that the speech that we heard first, laced with its subtle attempts at anti-Semitism masked behind polite diplomatic chatter, is exactly the problem in this debate … this is not a Jewish issue, this is not an Israel issue, this is a worldwide issue.”
I actually agree with Mr Sacerdoti: Zionist madness is the biggest threat to world peace. It is not just a Jewish issue, it is not an Israel issue, it is a worldwide issue. It is a universal concern.
…it is our intellectual duty to call a spade a spade and to criticize Jewish politics and Jewish culture for what they are. If Jews insist on operating politically, they must accept that their politics and practice will be subjected to scrutiny and criticism.
Yet, I am slightly perplexed. Why is telling the truth about Jewish culture anti-Semitic? Is not the Old Testament far more violent than any Quentin Tarantino film? That is not to mention the fact that the Jewish state has also managed to buy itself quite a reputation for unrestrained violence.
Mr Sacerdoti added: “It is incredible to think that a man, unashamed to express such a view in public, once had such a senior position on behalf of the UK.”
I would argue that it is our intellectual duty to call a spade a spade and to criticize Jewish politics and Jewish culture for what they are. If Jews insist on operating politically, they must accept that their politics and practice will be subjected to scrutiny and criticism.
Mr Sacerdoti is obviously a hasbara (Israeli propaganda) spin master. He mentions that “this particular view, that Jews do not adhere to the concept of “just war”, implies that Jews are by nature bloodthirsty and unjust. I believe any such generalization about the nature of Jews is racist.”
But there is a slight problem here. Mr Jenkins didn’t speak about Jews, the people, the ethnicity or the race. He was clearly referring to “Israel”, i.e. the Jewish state and to Jewish culture.
The Community Security Trust, another Zionist militia operating in our midst, moved to condemn Mr Jenkins’s remarks. “It is disgusting that students should be exposed to such divisive rubbish. Peter Jenkins appears to be as ignorant of the history of Christian war-making as he is of Jewish values.”
It would be helpful if the Community Security Trust’s spokesman is kind enough to offer some information that could present the nakba (ethnic cleansing and forced dispossession of Palestinians in 1948), the Sabra and Shatila massacre and Operation Cast Lead in the context of a “just war”. It would be helpful also if the Community Security Trust’s rabbis can enlighten us as to how Biblical Samson’s genocidal action fits into the notion of a “just war”.
The truth must be said. Mr Jenkins told the truth and actually used moderate and measured language. I wish the BBC and the Guardian newspaper were as courageous as Mr Jenkins.
I also do no think Zionist organizations should be left to moderate the critical discourse about the Jewish state and Jewish culture.
Watch the debate and witness the revolting Zionist spin and the the relentless Zionist push for World War III.
#1 by amerikagulag on November 2, 2012 - 4:18 pm
I guess we can safely say these people are enemies of humanity. And their ‘holy books’ should be burned. They are a disease on the planet.
#2 by sea on November 2, 2012 - 6:20 pm
‘*Kill everything but the parasites!’ ~ wally walnut
#3 by Stanley Spitzer on November 2, 2012 - 6:54 pm
TRUTH is Kryptonite to the hypocritical Jew scum. The nations of the world should unite to isolate and destroy the terrorist, Jewish-Supremacist, racist state of Israel before they destroy the world.
Weed out the Israeli agents embedded in all western governments. Burn them at the stake.
#4 by SEARCHLIGHT on November 2, 2012 - 8:17 pm
HOW CAN ANY BODY EVER BELIVE THAT ANY NEWS OUTLET, WETHER IF BE PRINTED OF VIA AIR WAVE, AND OWNED BY THE PSYCHOTIC JEWS WOULD EVER TELL THE TRUTH WHEN IT COMES TO THESE CRIMINALS, AFTER ALL THE MOST POWERFUL WEAPON EVER USED AGAINST HUMANITY HAS BEEN ALL THE PROPAGANDA THAT THE MEDIA CAN PUCK OUT EVERY DAY. THE WORLD WOULD BE MORE AT PEACE IF ALL MEDIA OWNED BY ZIONIST JEWS WERE TO BE TAKEN OUT AS, A WIPE OUT, CLEAN OUT CONFISCATED , WITH THE INTERNET NO HUMAN ON PLANET EARTH WOULD EVER HAVE THE NEED FOR A MORON PSYCHO, TO BE COMMITING CRIMES OF DECEPTION ANY MORE. THAT IS WHY MEDIA IS THE WEAPON OF CHOISE THAT THE ZIONIST JEWS WILL ALWAYS, TAKE CONTROL OF BEFORE THEY EVEN BEGIN PLACING THEIR ZOMBI GOVERNMENTS TO STRIP OF ALL FREEDOMS AND STEAL CLEAN WHATEVER WEALTH ANY NON JEWISH INDIVIDUAL HAPEN TO HAVE. AT LEAST IN THE INTERNET THE EXCHANGE OF INDIVIDUAL VIEWS CAN BE DEVATED, BUT WHEN YOU HAVE TRAITORS LIKE RUSH LIMBOUGH,GLENN BECK, HANNETY, AND ALL THE REST OF THE TRAITORS THAT FLORISH AS THEY BETRAY THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS, WITH NO OPEN OPINION ON ANY SUBJECT BEFORE THEY CUT YOU OFF OR WON’T EVEN GIVE YOU THE TIME TO EXPRESS YOUR COMPLETE TOUGHTS. 15 HOURS DAILY OF PROPAGANDAINCLUDING REPEATS OVER THE WEEK END, CAN EASYLY INDOCTRINATE THE MASS OF HUMANITY, IN A VERY SHORT TIME UNLESS GOD PROTECTS THEIR MINDS. BUT WE ALL CAN SEE THAT A ZIONIST LIKE RUSH LIMBOUGH CAN MENTALY CONTROL MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF THE VOTING BLOCK, CAN EASYLY DESTROY ANY CANDIDATE, THAT HAS ITS PRIORITYS BASED ON FAITH OF JESUS CHRIST,FAMILY AND COUNTRY. AND THAT IS NOT EVEN MENTIONING THE COUNTERBALANCE OF THE SAME ZIONIST PHILOSOPHY COMMING FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM, CAN SEND THE MOST OPEN MINDED INTELECTUAL IDIOT INTO THE FUNNY FARM, MAKEING HIM/HER SO CONFUSED THAT HE DOES NOT EVEN KNOW WHO TO VOTE FOR AT ANY GIVEN ELECTION, AND WITH AS MANY PEOPLE THAT JUST VOTES FOR VOTING WITH OUT DOING ANY RESEARCH WHATSOEVER ON THE BASIC ROOTS OF THAT CANDIDATES PRINCIPLES, PROVES INDOCTRINATION MEDIA IS MORE DEATHLY THAN ANY NUCLEAR WEAPON.
#5 by Tanimu Mohammed on November 2, 2012 - 9:44 pm
Its time to fight back. if they are allowed to get away with this kind of BS, time will come when no one will be able to say anything
#6 by rehmat1 on November 3, 2012 - 12:26 am
Sam Westrop and the Bloodthirsty Jews
Rehmat’s World
#7 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on November 3, 2012 - 2:08 am
Islam has always had the concept or doctrine of a JUST WAR! This is spelt out clearly in the Holy Texts.
#8 by SHAFAR on November 3, 2012 - 4:41 am
There is no evil act of inhumanity of which a Zionist is not capable or willing to engage. There are very few of which a Jew being Jewish has not engaged. Accordingly, should any non Jew speak disparagingly about any kind of evil acts of inhumanity whatsoever, some Jew thinking Jewishly, having engaged in that evil or anticipating in engaging in that evil at the first opportunity is going to play the anti-Semitic card.
#9 by Blake on November 3, 2012 - 9:32 am
As always the fake Hebrews play that worn out whine. The truth is anti semitic. Clearly
#10 by Michael philip peter mcculloch on November 3, 2012 - 12:55 pm
shalom godbless MR JENKINS(bless his soul) should be heard and people of the like who want peace and justice in the world godwilling israel learnd to atone for transgressions wickedness and all usury(especially the year of jubilees) as it is written what god adores many blessings in jesus christ godbless shalom michael
#11 by Stanley Spitzer on November 3, 2012 - 2:23 pm
How can the masses be so stupid as to what the problem is? Are they THAT brainwashed by the Jewish Media? This day in age, there’s no excuse for being dumb, except for being DUMB!
The people who embrace their ignorance in this time of need and don’t wanna know, are guilty of treason too. They should be forced to know, so they can help with the solution to supremacist Jewry. Once people become aware, we can elect MG as President and Dankoff as VP. Azaziah can be Secretary of Defense. Max French can be Attorney General.
You can imagine the rest of the scenario.
#12 by Ingrid B on November 3, 2012 - 3:58 pm
Just recieved an e-mail from Scottish PSC.. It`s as I feared.. First Minister Salmond, met recently with the rabid pro Zionist UK “Prime” minister, Cameron, deals were made, agreements signed, and now the two-faced Salmond, has done a U-turn.. Scotland, Bonnie Scotland, is going to the dogs.. Here is the gist:
Despite the difficulties with public opinion, Israel’s honorary consul to Scotland, Stanley Lovatt, said the two had a “very convivial meeting”.
Not far from this conviviality, students were acting very much in line with general public opinion in Scotland and around the world, and certainly in the spirit of Alex Salmond’s repeatedly stated opposition to Israeli crimes and human rights violations.
Speaking in Glasgow on BBC’s Question Time on March 25th 2010 Scotland’s First Minister came close to using the language of boycott and sanctions against the apartheid state when he called for a review of the UK’s trading relationships with Israel. This followed the use of forged British passports by an Israeli death squad in the assassination of a Palestinian resistance leader in a Dubai hotel room. Salmond told the audience, “You can’t have normal relationships if you believe another country has been involved in what Israel has been involved in”.
Foreign Secretary David Miliband had announced the previous week that a Mossad agent was to be expelled from the UK over the Israeli intelligence agency’s “intolerable” misuse of British passports in the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai in January. Salmond insisted the response “should be more than expelling a diplomat”, which he derided as a “diplomatic dance”, and added, “This has implications for example in trading relationships”.
This principled position seems about to ditched on the heels of the SNP government’s abandonment of opposition to NATO membership last week.
Israeli Ambassador Taub seems to think so. He told the Jewish Chronicle “We also explored the possibility of co-operation between Israel and Scotland, particularly in the fields of business, technology, health and renewable energy.”
This is a significant U-turn, given Alex Salmond’s condemnation of Israel over the years. In 2002 he attacked Foreign Secretary Jack Straw for exporting display units for F-16 fighters “used in attacks on Palestinians in the illegally occupied territories”. Two years later he called Tony Blair “George Bush’s toady” for backing a policy switch on “illegal” Israeli settlements, and condemned “massacres in Gaza”, using the appropriate terminology, during an Israeli invasion that year.
Mr Salmond has strongly attacked UK “inaction on Palestine”, declaring himself “appalled by the British approach that runs contrary to our Scottish view of the world”.
In making such attacks, Salmond has enjoyed SNP and wider public support. One SNP MEP Alyn Smith noted Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Avigdor Lieberman’s lack of “any regard for human rights”, and called on the EU “to bring the Israeli government to account” using “economic weapons”.
There seems to be more than a general declaration involved. STV report that “A follow-up meeting has been arranged between the Israeli embassy and enterprise minister Fergus Ewing.”
Many who were angry at the NATO decision will have to swallow another bitter pill; Alex Salmond’s about-turn from talk of trade sanctions against a criminal regime to an instruction to his Minister to grow the trade links he denounced a few years ago. From opposition to ISraeli crimes, the Scottish Government will now work to expand the economic base of the ethnic cleansing regime throttling the life out of the Palestinian people. When goverments support the crime, people have to take direct action to support the victims.
Israel has not become less criminal; Alex Salmond is taking the same path trodden by the Tony Blair he publicly despised and once tried to impeach.
“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
SalmondSalmondBlairBlair
See also: Scottish Government helped Israeli company deal with boycott “threatening future of Eden Springs UK”
Nb. This betrayal of Scottish priciples, saddens, and angers me..
#13 by Benavram on November 5, 2012 - 6:45 pm
The intemperate, violently spiteful, and logically/linguistically invalid use of the term “The Jews” is both immoral and counter-productive. It does not advance the essential, the morally justifiable, and the historically accurate analysis/critique of Zionism’s criminal policies and practices since 1948. The term “The Jews” is a reiification. Linguists and logicians describe reiification as the illogical attempt to assign and attribute human characteristics to any conglomerate abstract or readily identifiable group. ( Example: “Hitler’s Nazi armies swept through Eastern Europe, terrorizing and killing everyone who stood in their way” ) In other words, attributing – with broad generalizations -specific behaviors in specific surroundings to an entire entity ( “Hitler’s Nazi armies” ) composed of millions of individuals is both inaccurate and dishonest. Thus, the use of the term “The Jews” is a major distraction from honest reporting on the horrific daily violations of Palestinian human rights. There are no “The Jews”. Like the Gentile population, the world’s Jewish population is comprised of millions of individuals – each with a moral endowment and behavioral history known only to G_d. Every person on Earth – Jew and Gentile – deserves to be respected and protected. Every honest person on Earth knows the history of Zion’s grotesque crimes against the Palestinian people.There is no shortage of Jewish authors – within and outside of Israel – who are appalled by the Israeli government’s criminal abuse of defenseless Palestinian civilians. The sooner all critic’s of Zion’s policies and practices distance themselves from the loathsome, twisted mind-set of Zionist fanatics, the greater the capacity for dispassionate analysis and honest reporting on the greater tragedy yet to unfold in historic Palestine. Love and pray for the person next to you – Jew or Gentile.
#14 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on November 6, 2012 - 12:41 pm
#13 by Benavram on November 5, 2012 – 6:45 pm
The intemperate, violently spiteful, and logically/linguistically invalid use of the term “The Jews” is both immoral and counter-productive.
We are not interested in ALL THE OTHER JEWS, but only in only in THE JEWS, those fanatical, Satanist, racist, ethnic cleansing, perverted, bloodthirsty, lying, deceitful, thieving, fascist and warmongering bastards, who are destroying our civilisations, our homes, families, nations, cultures, morals, polluting our habitat, and degenerating our human, animal and plant species!
Is this use of the term logically/linguistically valid? And, they call themselves THE JEWS, don’t they?
BAFS
#15 by Benavram on November 6, 2012 - 6:16 pm
No. We do not call the collective nation “THE JEWS”. In self-reference, Jewish people most commonly use terms or phrases such as, The Jewish people, the Israelite nation, Zion, the nation Israel, or Jewish citizens. The reason is simple: the “THE JEWS” is a term that has been used for 2000 years by individuals and group publications to defame or stereotype ALL individuals who derive their identity from a Jewish heritage. Such defamations and stereotypes ignore the facts of the Jewish tradition of free-thinking and expression. This tradition empowers individual Jewish citizens to voice their unwelcome ( in Zionist circles ) opinions that Israel repeatedly has violated international law, civilized norms, and common decency in its’ daily interactions with Palestinians. Zionist overlords and their fanatical West Bank “settlers” hold the entire Arab world in contempt. It is these Jewish exteremists who, on a daily basis, harm defenseless Palestinian civilians, whom they ethnically-cleansed without compensation from their own lands and homes – while simultaneously extorting exorbitant, uncounted billions of dollars from Germany and Switzerland as “compensation” for poorly-documented “losses” in the Nazi era. They do not speak for those of who revere that aspect of the Jewish heritage which upholds justice and compassion for all human beings. On The Day of The Final Judgement, no person should envy any apologist for Israel and its’ crimes.
#16 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on November 7, 2012 - 7:24 pm
#15 by Benavram on November 6, 2012 – 6:16 pm
No. We do not call the collective nation “THE JEWS”.
Love, who are the “We”? How many are you the “We” out there? Where do the “We” live? Do the “We” have a country of their own? I do not have one of my own! Muslims don’t have any country of their own; they are all occupied and constantly being bullied by Jewish and Western Supremacists, and their people butchered at will.
The term “Jew” is quite a modern term and it is not a “race” as it is so often claimed. A Jew is all embers of a certain faith, called Abrahamic, although it is Moses (whether he existed or not is another matter) to who is attributed the first five books of the “Old TestamenT”.
“THE JEWS” is a term that has been used for 2000 years by individuals and group publications to defame or stereotype ALL individuals who derive their identity from a Jewish heritage.”
You should read the Holy Qur’aan and see for yourself IF this term is used to defame or stereotype all the Children of Israel!
Regards
Basheer
#17 by truthis123 on November 8, 2012 - 2:18 am
Brasheer, I think what Benavram is saying is: Zionism is not Judaism. Historic Judaism is based on the Scriptures, which Jewish and Christian believers accept as the works of men inspired by G_d. In contrast, Talmudism – the 65 volume interpretation and commentary developed by inspired rabbis during the past 600 hundred years – is the man-made blueprint for Jewish living. Many of us who grew-up studying the Talmud, instead of the Bible, have come to the belated recognition that the insularity and ethnocentric intensity of Talmudism creates severe limitations in the normal human capacity for relating to pain and suffering outside of the self-selected group, adhering to its’ decision to keep all unlike themselves at a distance. Talmudism – not Judaism – is the springboard for the suffering of the Palestinian people. This is what happens when humans confuse their opinions and interpretations with the inspired words of the living G_d.
–note from me, MG–DEAR GOD, HOW MANY FREAKING TIMES DO WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS RIDICULOUS SONG AND DANCE??????????
‘Good’ Judaism vs ‘Bad’ Zionism=the Mob Vs the Mafia.
The ‘good’ Bible vs the ‘evil’ Talmud–2 sides of the same coin.
Let us look at JUST A FEW ‘inspired words’ of the ‘living G-d’ as our deluded follower of Judaism characterizes it, and see whether these ‘inspired words’ of the ‘living G-d’ are indeed the ‘springboard for the suffering of the Palestinian people’.
REMEMBER NOW, THESE ARE BUT A FEW ‘INSPIRED WORDS FROM THE LIVING G-D’ AS THEY HAVE EXISTED NOW IN THE BIBLE FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS–
“When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…”
‘When the Lord your God brings you into the land he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, he will give you a land with large, flourishing cities you did not build, houses filled with all kinds of good things you did not provide, wells you did not dig, and vineyards and olive groves you did not plant…
‘And Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them without the camp.
And Moses was furious with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle.
And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD…
Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
And the booty, being the rest of the prey which the men of war had caught, was six hundred thousand and seventy thousand and five thousand sheep,
And threescore and twelve thousand beeves,
And threescore and one thousand asses,
And thirty and two thousand persons in all, of women that had not known man by lying with him.’
“Foreigners shall build up thy walls, and their kings shall minister unto thee:
Therefore thy gates shall be open continually; they shall not be shut day nor night; that men may bring unto thee the wealth of the Gentiles, and that their kings may be brought to you.
For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted, and You shall eat the riches of the Gentiles”
Yeah, tell us all again about the difference between ‘good’ Judaism and ‘evil’ Talmudism.
#18 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on November 8, 2012 - 5:37 am
–note from me, MG–DEAR GOD, HOW MANY FREAKING TIMES DO WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS RIDICULOUS SONG AND DANCE??????????
Thanks, Mark. Unfortunately we have to repeat this over and over again because the young Jewish generation is very ill informed.
#17 by truthis123 on November 8, 2012 – 2:18 am
“Basheer, I think what Benavram is saying is…”
Please, Mr JEW, when you address me, do not hide behind a pseudonym! You are Jewish (Only Jews write G-d!) and your people including the fake Jews (the Khazars) rule over us and steal everything from us, so why do you have to hide?
During my whole lifetime I have never met a people more abominable than the Judaists and the Talmudists!
Basheer
#19 by Les on November 10, 2012 - 12:58 pm
The holocaust is the number one propaganda weapon of the zionist state of israel. If you can destroy the image of a false genocide of jews then anything else they say will be suspect. Watch the documentary LAST DAYS OF THE BIG LIE at http://www.holocaustdenier.com to see how holocaust survivors lie through their teeth and are aided and abetted by zionist film maker Steven Spielberg.