HYPOCRISY, INC–McChrystal calls for ‘serious’ gun control measures

This entry was posted on January 9, 2013, 4:01 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Comments ( 19 )

#1 by Bob on January 9, 2013 - 4:41 pm

The full court press for disarming the American public just upped the pressure with McChrystal’s public statements. Clearlythis guy has been recruited to push for anti-gun provisions. The strategy in play here is clear enough. They are using the mass media in an attempt to separate gun owners from those who do not own weapons. If they can get a majority of people convinced that “guns” are the problem and that gun owners are just a fring minority, they will have set the political stage to proceed with disarming the people.

You will notice that any time someone raises the fact that the second ammendment specifically guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms, the mass media scoffs at this and dismisses it out of hand. If they address the constitutional arguement at all, they simply refer to some alledged vagueness in the text of the ammendment (which may be the clearest and most concise text ever written). The fact that what is being proposed is blatantly illegal and that neigther congress nor the president have the authority ot implement these things is systematically excluded from the conversation.

When Piers Morgan brought on Alex Jones to set him up as a strawman caricature of pro-second ammendment Americans, people should have seen right then that the government is going for broke this time. The PTB have apparently calculated that the time is right to make this move….Perhpas they have been looking at the unrest and resistance to “austerity” in Europe and determined that they don’t want Americans to be armed when they take to the streets by the millions when the government imposes the same kind of austerity here. I don’t believe that it is a coincidence that Obama is putting a rush on ramming through anti-gun legislation BEFORE congress addresses the massive spending cuts that are coming.
#2 by Ares on January 9, 2013 - 5:42 pm

Kissinger was right, military men are morons. Put McChrystal on the traitor list.
#3 by Gary on January 9, 2013 - 7:09 pm

This is all political theater designed to give the impression that the traitors in Washington are not bought and paid for by special interest groups. No one could even venture a guess just how many guns there are in America. There will be a blood bath before one gun is surrendered. I’ll bet every politician in America owns a firearm.
#4 by sea on January 9, 2013 - 8:40 pm

Let them lead by example. Disarm the police first, so that only the police stations, and swat teams have guns, but that they’re never carried on patrols. Then hang all the politicians, generals, and elite scumbags, for treason and mass murder!
#5 by sea on January 9, 2013 - 8:44 pm

‘Syrian Girl’ reveals truth behind Syria crisis

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/01/09/282566/syrian-girl-reveals-all/

The Herzl Conspiracy

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/01/09/282623/the-herzl-conspiracy/
#6 by Steven on January 9, 2013 - 9:55 pm

You americans are at the shouting match stage and I think it is interesting that your Quisling politicians and their associates are speaking out and publicly revealing their treason. For patriotic americans please take note of who these villians are and where to find them after the shooting starts. Incase they survive the fighting it would be a shame if they missed their own neck tie party.
#7 by michael on January 9, 2013 - 11:05 pm

makes sense the leaders are all anti god and hypocrites and also have you seen the illuminati playing cards on gun control to disarm and attack the civilians godbless
#8 by Bob on January 10, 2013 - 12:01 am

“Let them lead by example. Disarm the police first”
I’ve had the same thought. If a citizen has no legitimate need to carry or own fire arm, then why do police say they need these very same weapons? Do we not live in the same country they do? Do we not live in the same cities? Do we not face the same criminals and madmen? The police will admit that they cannot protect you…so if they need these weapons to defend themselves from criminals, then how can any of them say that the citizen does not need them?

Of course none of this is even relevant. We have a right to keep and bear arms which the government is specifically prohibited from infringing upon by the Constitution. There is nothing to “interpret” about the second ammendment. It is written clearlyand concisely. The Constitution does not grant the courts or anyone else the authority to “interpret away” clearly written provisions of the Constitution.

The arguement that “the founders could not have concieved of semi-automatic weapons” is irelevant. If people really believe that the right of the people to keep and bear arms should be infringed upon, then there is only one lawful method for doing so and it is through the constitutional process. If the provisions of the constitution can simply be “interpreted away” when they get in the way of the desires of government, then the constitution ceases to serve its purpose and truly becomes an irelevant piece of paper. All of these politicians (and McChrystal) took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution….This is the real issue that should be front and center, not “gun control”.
#9 by bigcree1Shadowhawk on January 10, 2013 - 2:06 am

Hmm I wonder if McChrystal is Jewish. If so, the second question; Did he take the Kol Nidre? I’d bet fifty on both!
#10 by restinpieces on January 10, 2013 - 3:52 am

The police have no duty to protect you. They cannot be sued for failing to provide protective services.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

Gun control means not wasting bullets.
#11 by daniele on January 10, 2013 - 9:36 am

Folks first I want to explain something about “Assault Weapons/Rifles”, and I hope you will pass this on to others so they can hopefully understand also since the JMSM IS PURPOSELY NOT using the proper term to DEMONIZE what civilians own!

The First “Assault Weapon/Rfile”, The “MP44″ was developed in Germany during WW2, massed produced in 1944, hence MP44 (machine pistol 1944). Hitler personally named it what basically transposes into English as “Assault Weapon/’Rifle”. My German is bad, but it’s written something like “Sturmgewaer”.

An ACTUAL “Assault Weapon/Rifle” is what is used by most military troops now-a-days.

An “Assault Weapon/Rifle”, ie, AR15/M4 or AK47, etc., is “selectable” fire, meaning it can be set to fire “semi automatic”, AND “fully automatic, or a three round burst” (depending on make, model). Now there are a couple other features that help make a rifle an “Assault Rifle”, but that is not relavent for what I am saying.

That being said, a Civilian AR15/M4 Rfile (being demonized now), and even an AK47 IS NOT “selectable” fire, meaning that it can ONLY be fired in semi automatic fashion. Lamens terms, one round fired per each manual trigger pull!

Yes a civilian AR15/M4 can use a 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 100 round magazine, but SO WHAT! The US Constitution’s explicit meaning for an armed population is to prevent government tyranny, and DOES NOT restrict the use/ownership of a firearm to muskets, etc. as some JMSM, etc. claim! If you want to be technical a civilian should be able to legally own a FULLY AUTOMATIC firearm WITHOUT the special permit needed today, but that is not my point now.

I guess what I am trying to tell most of you is that the JMSM is DELIBERATELY lying to ignorant Americans about what an “Assault Weapon/Rifle” is, and the reason why The US Constitution is written as it is!

Some finer points left out, but I hope you all understand what I am trying to say!

Now when someone brings up to you about banning these type of weapons, etc., I suggest you give them this history lesson, and you need not even mention who was really behind it, ie: jews,

The Bolshevik/Communist Revolution in 1917 Russia. The gun ban that immediately insued and the resulting 40 to 70 or more (nobody knows the real number) MILLION people MURDERED as a result of total control by this “Government”!
If you don’t know the relavent facts about this, PLEASE do a little research first so you can at least act like you know what your talking about! I tried this personally last night, and IT WORKED!

If need be then mention the UN-patriot act, The Military Commisions Act, The 2012 NDAA, etc. Again you need not even mention who is really behind these “laws”, and the gun ban push, ie jews!

Remember “K.I.S.S”= Keep it simple stupid! No disrespect.

I know some say that weapons bans ARE NOT the goal here, but better safe than sorry, so I would suggest if you are able, buy a firearm and plenty of ammo while they are still available and affordable! Sales are through the roof, stocks are low, and prices are rising fast!

Keep your head down and your powder dry cause I think we’re in for a real fight soon!

Hope this helps at least one of you out there.

US Army Vet
Marc C. Daniele
#12 by Mr white on January 10, 2013 - 11:38 am

Typical Army officer – just a paid shill for the communist scumbags!

The late great Senator Joseph McCarthy was right.

The US Army was infiltrated by the communists back in 1950s.
#13 by Anthony W. on January 10, 2013 - 3:48 pm

I ran across an interesting video the other day, it’s title The Business of War: SOFEX
SOFEX is where the world’s leading Generals come to buy everything from handguns to laser-guided missile systems. SOFEX stands for Special Operation Forces Exhibition. American Marine Corp General Smedley Butler stated in the 1930′s, after witnessing what took place during World War 1, that ” War is a racket, it always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.”

The SOFEX Conference held in Amman, Jordan is an exhibit of what General Smedley Butler was referring to. General McChrystal states that he doesn’t believe that the weapons used to kill, innocent people a lot of times, in Afghanistan should be on the streets of America. How many innocent Iraqis, Pakistanis, Libyans, Syrians…etc is the U.S. Government responsible for killing? The accumulation is over 2 million innocent lives. The real merchants of death in our world today are corporations such as General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon…etc. In light of this, General McChrystal’s comments on gun violence in America and what firearms Americans should not possess is rather hypocritical to say the least.
Watch the video: The Business of War:SOFEX
#14 by amerikagulag on January 10, 2013 - 3:57 pm

Stalin would be proud.
#15 by Ingrid B on January 11, 2013 - 2:02 am

“would like to respond to Mark Dankof, I think there are more, and more people, starting to see the Big Picture, and it scares them, probably because no-one knows quite what to do. If your leadership is corrupt, or compromised, who do you turn to? then there are those who do not realize, living in blissfull ignorance, and who are in for a shock. America is occupied by aliens, just as surely as Palestine..”
#16 by Ingrid B on January 11, 2013 - 2:19 am

yes, if the ptb in the US have no compuction about killing defenceless civilians in other parts of the world, why would they hesitate in killing defenceless Americans, if it suits their purpose, and I think they have proven, that they care little for the average American/human being..
#17 by michael mazur on January 11, 2013 - 9:20 am

#11, daniele, Juri Lina did a 2hr video titled, In the Shadow of Hermes, in 2011 and at 1:32:32 is the quote, ‘Literaturnaya Rossiya in 1992 published the largest estimate of the total number of victims of the Soviet regime, including those who died of induced starvation and civil war – 147,000,000 ‘.

This would have been from 1918 to 1954, as things started to change after Stalin died the previous year.

So, whenever the Jews wave The Holocaust at us and accuse us of being Deniers, we can invite them to minimise this Democide of the Russian People to a figure they could be comfortable with. Fair ?
#18 by Bill on January 11, 2013 - 3:59 pm

Geneeal Stanley Crystal is a Crypto..
#19 by bigcree1Shadowhawk on January 12, 2013 - 1:44 am

Bill, it figures!!