TUT Broadcast Jan 15, 2012
Thank you for helping us keep the lights on
Archived Radio Programs
My Articles
Mark Dankof’s America–Broadcast Archives
On The Warning Track Broadcast
Snippets and Snappits
Keith Johnson-Revolt of the Plebs Broadcast
The Real Face of Judaism and Zionism
Israhell on Earth
the 5 dancing Israelis on 911
JEWISH FAMILY VALUES
Mask of Zion Report Archives
Judeo-Christianity
Mocking Jesus on Israeli TV
Jewish Ritual Infant Genital mutilation
Sammi Ibrahem Broadcast Archives
Max French’s The Victory Hour Archives
God’s Chosen People
Examples of Jewish Hate Speech
911 Facts Unknown to Most People
Press TV/Russia Today Interviews
The Naked Facts Blogspot
#1 by aj on January 16, 2013 - 12:30 am
Fine presentation, Mark! While I’m sure the official Sandy Hook story is fraudulent, I concur that it’s a very dangerous tarbaby with no potential positives for us. Many thanks as always for the stellar work!
#2 by persnipoles on January 16, 2013 - 1:52 am
Nice speech.
#3 by goodoo on January 16, 2013 - 2:03 am
Dr. Fetzer didn’t make it. Anyone with influence is a target to be duped, or worse.
“The outrageous, downright crazy claims made about Sandy honk” ~ handerson pooper
“These are the people who should not have guns, or a platform to speak.” ~ guest (jordan)
-NY bans magazines with 8+ rounds. Sorry folks, gotta re-load in between mass-murders.
-Full background checks, so don’t tell the doc that government genocide makes you depressed.
-Assault weapons ban, they don’t call her bambi for nuthin’.
Did you know that the Simon Weaselthal center (not Elie Weasel) crowned Carlos Latuff as an honorary top-ten anti-scamite?
http://latuffcartoons.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/charge-a-moderna-caravela-de-eikebatista-e-sergiocabralrj-aldeiamaracana/
Remember this, of all the things I have said — There are no swear words, only swear meanings.
So should I pronounce or spell Jeww in a different language, or incorrectly, is that now verboten?
Will they use a machine to detect whether I dislike parasites, before convicting me for thought crimes?
People have been conditioned into being psychotic, materialistic bullies, and whining cry-babies, sometimes all of the above. Picking on retards sucks ass, but who gave them nuclear weapons??!
Logical thinking comes from the mind and heart being true to our good spirit. Else we are nothing more than self-serving animals, who are out-classed by bonobos; all friends with benefits.
Anyone for some bbq bushbaby kebabs?
#4 by goodoo on January 16, 2013 - 2:37 am
Wel-Mart conspires to enslave 100,000 US veterans, force them to collect food stamps, and render their unemployment benefits into chump-change that barely affords a maccabburger at the front, once they quit, and are replaced by another 100,000 vets.
ca.news.yahoo.com/wal-mart-pledges-hire-more-100-000-veterans-183850105.html
#5 by Bob on January 16, 2013 - 4:00 am
I’ve been out of town the past few days, and forgive me if Mark covered this in todays broadcast (which I haven’t had a chance to listen to yet), but I heard about this on the radio on the drive home and just had to make sure that everyone heard about it.
The mother of Noah Pozner, one of the victims at Sandy Hook was on MSNBC and stated that a fund in her son’s name was collecting money to PLANT TREES IN ISRAEL! I’m not joking. Here is a link to an article about how 3000 TREES ARE BEING PLANTED IN ISRAEL TO MEMORIALIZE THE SANDY HOOK VICTIMS.
These people must have some kind of compelling need to turn everything into a zionist propaganda. I don’t know how many of the victims were Jewish (apparently at least one) and it doesn’t really matter. If someone wanted to create a memorial to these victims, the appropriate place to do so is in SANDY HOOK, or at least in Conn., not in a foreign country on the other side of the world. This is just sickening…..But that’s not the worst of it.
Ed Schultz (the host and a real POS) had this woman on to exploit her son’s death to advocate for much stricter gun control and greater intrusion into the lives of Americans. Schultz is such a zionist shill that in response to one of his fellow Air America hosts (Mike Malloy) comments condemning the Israeli government for their persecution of Palestinians, stood up on the stage and attacked him, and when Malloy asked Schultz how he could defend these Israeli crimes Schutz responded that he was “not going to throw the Jewish people under the bus”! It wasn’t long after that performance that he suddenly came out of nowhere to get his own prime time show in MSNBC.
#6 by Steven on January 16, 2013 - 4:08 am
Mark let’s say absolute proof was compiled and presented concerning who did all the terrorist attacks, assasinations and all the rest of the conspiracies. It has never had, does not have and will never have credibility with most of the public, the governments and even the perps themselves.
Respect for truth and justice is not in them. You might as well present evidence and speak truth to a block of granite. A tiny minority might give a damn but they don’t count because the majority and the perps will under all circumstances call that minority kooks and conspiracy theorists. Truth has no credibility with the bulk of modern society . Mark what ever you and others have tried to do was not flushed down the toilet recently. It was flushed down the toilet thousands of years ago and the stopper in the toilet tank is still up and the water is running and the tank isn’t filling.
As for the term “conspiracy theory”, it is my opinion that the term ought to be outlawed and its use punished, Fine them or flog em. I for one am fed up with being called a conspiracy theorist every time I talk about stuff in the news that just doesn’t match the official story. It is like the public can’t tolerate any one that is smarter than being brain dead.
Now do I believe that Sandy hook was a black op? Absolutely! There is too much BS when it comes to the story. Too much secrecy when it comes to the 2 guys that were apprehended.
Too much of an incentive to have another massacre or terrorist event to justify gun control and other legislation. It is possible we may never learn the truth about Sandy Hook except that the official story like all official stories is a lie and the legislation that provokes a civil war will be real.
The only way truth , good government and freedom is ever going to make a come back is through the crucible of war and the destruction of the evil doers, their allies and those who love to believe the official fairy tales. When they are all good and dead, in prison or terrorized into believing the truth then what ever is left of man kind has a chance and then may be. It is a hell of a way of resolving things but may be that is what it takes to clear the air and get rid of the problem.
Don’t worry about the war. The evil doers and the powers that be will start it. It is only important that good people if any finish it and build a civilization that works.
#7 by Blake on January 16, 2013 - 4:45 am
Man who helped Sandy Hook kids is harassed by conspiracy theorists
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/gene-rosen-sandy-hook-conspiracy-155033813.html
Been reading the comments on yahoo and boy are the sheeple buying what they are spoon fed
#8 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 16, 2013 - 6:45 am
#4 by Alex from NY on January 16, 2013 – 2:10 am
“This stuff that you do (MARK GLENN) allows’ them to demonize the Palestinians as if they’re HATE-MONGERS (like you), please stop it with this illogical anti-semitic PROPAGANDA.”
I wish Mark Glenn would not waste his precious time responding to you.
BAFS
#9 by goodoo on January 16, 2013 - 8:27 am
More Jewash.. didn’t know rabbits could paint!
ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/good-news/young-brothers-stand-bullied-sisters-down-syndrome-173020116.html
r-word.org
Soon they’ll tell us that all the letters in the alphabet represent God’s error, and are thus terrorist insults, because Orwell says, speak only when spoken to! Remember that one ladies?
Retard means LATE, not MUTANT. They’ll just say something else. Is my face insulting now? =(
The real problem is the parents, and society that teaches children to fear and hate, rather than love; a society that would rather punish, avenge and steal, and throw away freedom’s key, rather than understand. Oh no! the T-word! TRUTH.
#10 by Ingrid B on January 16, 2013 - 11:11 am
this is the way I remember it, without re-hashing the programme.. Mr. Tellawi started off by saying he had been trying to get hold of Mr. Fetzer, without success. Mr. Fetzer then rang in, and put forward his theories, which may, or may not have been true.. I neither believed, nor disbelieved what the guy was saying, and I honestly can`t remember whether, or not, he claimed that Mossad was responsible for Sandy Hook. I don`t know what happened on that day, because I wasn`t there, and I leave it to other people to suggest theories, or state facts.. all I heard was someone, who called in, on his own dime, being spoken to, in a rude manner.. If that makes me guilty of “destroying ten years of work, of sabotaging the truth movement” I can only apologise.. one more thing MG, the decent thing to do, would have been to accuse the guy face to face, rather than behind his back, to have given him the chance to explain his theories, uninterupted, then we could have made up our own minds as to the authenticity of what he was saying..
#11 by Richard Wilcox on January 16, 2013 - 12:28 pm
James Tracy seems to be a very intelligent observer, who analyzes the empirical data.
Sandy Hook is an obvious false flag psy op. I have noticed that Mark dismisses these latest shootings as being psy ops but Mark you still think Izrayhell did the Fukushiima disater? You need to stick to scientific details and forget about the elaborate theories for a while my friend. Love you bro’.
#12 by Bob on January 16, 2013 - 1:17 pm
This is for our dear friend Alex above:
Alex, let’s for a moment consider your point, that by calling out zionist and oganized Jewry for what they do, that we are in fact providing them ammo to use against us. I would be curious just how you propose that gentiles should resist the activities of organized Jewry? If speaking openly and loudly about how organized Jewry (admittedly this does not include all Jews, but it does include all jewish organizations that I am aware of) is counter-productive, then what would be a more productive way to refer to this power that confronts us? Should we refer to them by some euphamysm? That clearly would not remove the attacks of “anti-semitism” by orgnanized Jewry. Should we refer to them as Quakers? Perhaps we should only refer to them using some vague undescript term like “the wealthy” or “the bankers” or some other such name?
Look, I don’t have any animous towards anyone because of their race, creed, color, sex, ethnicity or anything else, but you cannot effectively oppose an enemy so well organized as is world Jewry without being specific about who and what it is that you are opposing and why. I’m sure you are well aware of this and if you were not just another Hasbara shill you would not just be crying “anti-Semitism” you would have actually offered what you felt to be a more effective alternative. Is there some other reason why you did not?
We know that calling organized Jewry out in the open is something they themselves fear and consider dangerous for them because of the way they react whenever any public figure even vaguely alludes to the Jewish nature of TPTB. Look at what happened to Rick Sanchez….his career was utterly destroyed. He didn’t even challenge Jewish power, he just merely alluded to the fact that most of the people who run the networks are Jewish…and that Jews in the US are not some downtrodden minority. Both are obvious facts to anyone who has looked at these issues and neither statement should be controversial at all. If the Jews running CNN had not been afraid of having the fact that the networks are in fact run largely by Jews, why then did they make such an example out of Sanchez? Why do they expend so much effort in disguising jewish power?
No, one of the greatest threats to organized Jewry is that the common people will realize what is going on and revolt. I will be the first to say that we do not need to fabricate anything in order to make our case against organized Jewry. The truth is shocking enough. All we need is for a critical mass of Americans to learn the truth about Jewish power and what it has done, and continues to do, to the rest of us.
#13 by Tony on January 16, 2013 - 2:36 pm
This whole Sandy Hook conspiracy stuff reminds me of 911 “truthers” that think there were NO planes that hit the twin towers. Kinda see a pattern here.
#14 by Roman on January 16, 2013 - 4:20 pm
With Sandy Hook there are only two things we as a truth movement need to focus on, 1. Making people aware that there are inconsistencies with the official story, essentially keeping the “question authority” sentiment alive, and 2. to neutralize Jewry from using the event to push forward their de-weaponization of gentiles and using a tragedy like this to reaffirm the holocaust myth and the continuation of the demonization of the Third Reich. 3. to expose the Jewish stranglehold on the psychology and pharmaceutical industries. I’ll go as far as to say that blaming the Jewish controlled culture is also counter-productive when they have such dominance of the Media and that culture is such an abstract and open to interpretation concept that putting the blame solely on it can easily get us de-railed and ridiculed just like when we mention Manchurian Candidate type theories. The bottom line is we have to keep their Jewish narratives out of the dialogue. That’s it, its that easy, end of discussion. We can save talk about Libor and MK-Ultra for a later time.
#15 by woodchuck111 on January 16, 2013 - 5:01 pm
This is getting ridiculous. It can’t be explained by moral degeneracy and/or kids playing violent video games or on drugs and it’s obvious that the “official” story is BS.. For a balanced view, google “Carolyn Yeager Sandy Hook” to find her Part 1 and Part 2 podcasts on this subject. All you really need is to listen to Part 2.
#16 by dennis on January 16, 2013 - 5:45 pm
Mark.Did Dr. Fetzer say that Sandy Hook was a Mossad operation? Did he also claim that there were no dead bodies?
ed note–the following paragraphs are lifted from the article “Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op” co-authored by both Dr. Fetzer and Dennis Cimino
“My [Dennis Cimino's] thoughts on this whole thing go in this direction: given all of the ‘fakery’ and ‘faked dead identities’ of the 9/11 fiasco, one thing comes to mind about the teachers telling the children being led out of the school: “Cover your eyes and close them” or something to that effect. Granted, you would not want children to see that kind of death, but had that been the case, it would have been possible to cover some of the more ‘messy’ victims up so that the exiting children didn’t have to see them as they walked out of the school.
Furthermore, a staged shooting event would even to a child seem ‘nonsensical’ and ‘surreal’ say if any of the so-called ‘dead’ just happened to be breathing or moving still, as it is fully possible that IF this was staged, they didn’t just use crash test dummies for corpses.so there is some doubt in my mind about the veracity of the ‘deceased’ children and the teachers. We know many dead from 9/11 never existed…were created by the government to get people to feel so sorry for them.
This thing possibly was either one of these two possibilities: (i) fully staged and faked, based on the press conference and the ‘read the card’ and the smirking [grieving father's] face in that video; or (ii) was done by the moss*d with EFF BEE EYE help and the State Police helping, because the handling of the weapon in the trunk of the car is totally COUNTER to what any REAL law enforcement people would have done with that weapon.
Per the comments, you don’t wipe down or manhandle a murder weapon under any circumstances, and if you must pick it up you do so in a fashion that ensures that minimal interference with fingerprints will occur when you do lift it up. using wire or other means to bring it out of the trunk would be the preferred method, certainly with latex gloves on so as to not impart the officer’s prints at the very least.”
#17 by Duma on January 16, 2013 - 7:53 pm
I agree SH was most likely a Psy-op but I agree with MG’s general position. ATM there is no actual evidence in favour of it so it just sound retarded to push it. Sure, if you’re awake to the Matrix, it make sense but people need perspective. My only advice to MG is to not fully commit to anything 100%. This is what they love because once someone has their sacred cow, they fight to death for it.
#18 by Michael Mann on January 16, 2013 - 8:22 pm
Mr. Glenn, you attack the visitors of your site who believe there is a government-involved conspiracy at Sandy Hook as kooks, when many of them clearly explained that some of the “facts” given to them by officials, together with inconsistent accounts of the event in the media, led them to believe that the official story cannot possibly be true. You consign this group of people to those who wish only to have their “ears tickled” without addressing the issues, like those brought up in Brother Nathanael’s short video (provided by one of your readers).
Not everyone believes that the children at SH were not killed, or that the Mossad is responsible for their deaths. Those who don’t buy into the latest “lone gunman” story are probably well aware that our government hires mercenaries all the time and carries out black operations throughout the world to further the objectives of their Jew masters. So is it so difficult to imagine that our government may have been involved at SH to serve the agenda of the same people, especially when among the first of those calling for more gun-control legislation after the event – Feinstein, Blumenthal, Bloomberg, Boxer, Schumer, and Liebermann – are all part of that same tribe?
There are glaring inconsistencies in the coverage of the Sandy Hook event, and when you add to them the questions that arise when listening to the interviews of medical examiner Wayne Carver and Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance, you can’t help but be suspicious of the official account of this latest “lone gunman” story.
I’m sure there are others like you and I who have problems with some of the things Gordon Duff has written, but does that justify completely dismissing all the claims and questions he and James Fetzer bring up about SH? Instead of just writing off the concerns brought up by these and others like them
(http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/12/24/the-sandy-hook-massacre-unanswered-questions-and-missing-information/, for instance) maybe we should take a closer look at these discrepancies that make the official story so suspicious. And if we can’t refute the claims of these alleged “conspiracy theorists” I think you’ll agree that we shouldn’t resort to attacking their characters in an effort to take away all of their credibility.
#19 by Digger on January 16, 2013 - 8:50 pm
Very understandable you may feel despondent (at times), this is perfectly normal. Especially in this dark game, with stacks of misinformation/disinformation agents and plain ol repeaters.
However, please do not feel we are starting off again from scratch. We are much more hardened these days. We’re toned, experienced boxers now – these days we can take the knocks and fight back. Maybe a bruise here n there, but with of arnica balm we soon recover.
You just wait sir, in a no time at all, we will be pounding away ….if not already.
Please understand THEY CANNOT HOLD UP AGAINST THE FORCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS. It’s that simple. And they know this.
The undercurrent of the Truth tsunami is building exponentially EVERY SINGLE DAY
#20 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 16, 2013 - 10:12 pm
If the US had a Program since September 1961 for “GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT” I do not see why anybody should be worried about what is said or not about the “Sandy Hook Affair”!
“Holy BAFS speaketh”
#21 by Michael Mann on January 16, 2013 - 11:33 pm
Earlier today I attempted to post most of what appears below and was not successful. The comment may be flying around in cyberspace and may never land in your comment section, so here’s my second attempt:
Mr. Glenn, I have been visiting your site for only about a month and have found your articles and broadcasts, for the most part, to be right in line with and complementary to other sources that I have come to know and trust. I couldn’t help but notice that recently you have devoted at least three broadcasts and a number of articles on trying to distance yourself from those who have a conspiratorial view of the cause of events in the Sandy Hook murders.
Mr. Glenn, I wonder why you are at such odds with visitors of your site who believe there is a government-involved conspiracy at Sandy Hook and refer to them as kooks, when many of them clearly explained that some of the “facts” given to them by officials, together with inconsistent accounts of the event in the media, led them to believe that the official story cannot possibly be true. You consign this group of people to those who wish only to have their “ears tickled” without addressing the issues, like those brought up in Brother Nathanael’s short video (provided by one of your readers).
Unlike what you seem to indicate in your most recent broadcast, not everyone who does not accept the official view believes that the children at SH were not killed, or that the Mossad is responsible for their deaths. There are many other possible sources other besides the alleged “lone gunman.” Those who don’t buy into the latest lone gunman story are probably well aware that our government hires mercenaries all the time and carries out black operations throughout the world to further the objectives of their Jew masters. So is it so difficult to imagine that our government may have been involved at SH to serve the agenda of the same people, especially when among the first of those calling for more gun-control legislation after the event – Feinstein, Blumenthal, Bloomberg, Boxer, Schumer, and Liebermann – are all part of that same tribe?
There are glaring inconsistencies in the coverage of the Sandy Hook event, and when you add to them the questions that arise when listening to the interviews of medical examiner Wayne Carver and Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance, you can’t help but be suspicious of the official account of this latest “lone gunman” story.
I’m sure there are others like you and I who have problems with some of the things Gordon Duff has written, but does that justify completely dismissing all the claims and questions he and James Fetzer bring up about SH? Instead of just writing off the concerns brought up by these and others like them
(http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/12/24/the-sandy-hook-massacre-unanswered-questions-and-missing-information/, for instance) maybe we should take a closer look at these discrepancies that make the official story so suspicious. And if we can’t refute the claims of these alleged “conspiracy theorists,” I think you’ll agree that we at least shouldn’t resort to attacking their characters in an effort to make it look like they are enemies of the truth movement.
#22 by Bob on January 17, 2013 - 3:59 am
Mark, in this episode you mentioned that you don’t really get into the monetary issue much and see Jewish control of the mass media as the key to their power. You also lament the damage you believe has been done to our cause by all of the speculation around the Sandy Hook shootings.
I would suggest to you that while Jewish control of the mass media does indeed provide them their most powerful tool for controlling public opinion (and masking their crimes), it is in fact their control of this monetary system based upon usury and “fractional reserve banking” (which used to be known as fraud) which is actually the source of their power. But let’s set aside any argument about which of these two key areas is more important and turn to the issue of making our case to the people.
I believe you were spot on when you mentioned that all we really need to do is to get people’s attention to focus on the existence of Jewish power and that it will naturally follow that once aware of this power people will begin to recognize its pervasive nature (I know I’m extrapolating a bit from what you actually said, but I believe this is what you meant). I completely agree with this line of thinking. Once we can provide people with a credible, easily understood and impeccably documented case which exposes both the existence of Jewish power and some aspect of its criminal activities, we will have reached a turning point and things will snowball from there. Once you have a critical mass of the general public aware of this Jewish power they will begin looking around and will readily recognize this power at work in so many ways.
This brings me to my point, I believe that it is the monetary issue which provides the best, most thoroughly documented, irrefutable and easiest to convey example of Jewish power and its criminality. We don’t need to rely upon “theories”, conjecture or anything other than cold hard well documented facts….facts which are not in dispute by anyone, even the MSM.
Americans are a funny people in a lot of ways, but they have certain hot buttons that when pressed will invariably provoke a response. Abortion, gun rights, nationalism, etc. are all examples of this. But one of these hot buttons which we seldom look at is that Americans believe in fair play and the only thing they hate worse than a thief is someone who steals from them by cheating.
If we were find away to present to the American public an educational program which provided a solid introduction to what debt based money is, how fractional reserve banking works, how the international banking cartel controls these debt based currencies and exactly what effect this has on us all, I believe we would see a far greater reaction from the public than anything else we could imagine. I know that when I first learned about these things, my first reaction was disbelief, but the facts are easily verifiable. After doing a little research it became obvious that what I had learned about these issues was in fact true….this brought on my second reaction, I was outraged! I had been cheated virtually all my life by this power! This of course leads to the other relevant questions, how did this happen and who is behind it. Both are actually not difficult to discover once someone knows to look.
I realize that what I am suggesting involves more work than simply putting forth evidence of various conspiracies and will not fit easily on a billboard or a 12 second sound byte, but that is okay. It just may be that we are attempting to use the wrong tools in this struggle. The internet is a great tool, but probably not the best tool for this particular phase of the struggle. I’m not suggesting we abandon internet efforts, far from it. What I am suggesting is that recruiting well spoken people among those which are already aware to begin looking for opportunities to present this information to church groups, rotary clubs (I know one would probably be thrown out for giving such a talk there) or any other venue where responsible people gather together.
It is not necessary to put on a 3 hour lecture, perhaps just a 20 minute discussion with appropriate props and visual aids would be sufficient. All you really need to do is provide people with enough information to pique their interest and a sizeable percentage of the people in these kinds of audiences will be compelled to seek out further information, if only to discredit your points….but once they look, what they will find is only things that will back up your points (assuming that you stick to the core monetary/usury/fractional reserve facts and avoid going off into “the Jews are behind it all”. All of the who’s and hows will be readily discovered by anyone who does even the most rudimentary research on their own. These people will in turn be so shocked and outraged that they will begin spreading the word to their friends, family, co-workers, etc.
This is how you can defeat the MSM. We will never do so from an internet site. People will be convinced by people they know, trust and respect. All that is required is to get a certain number of people interested enough to actually do a little research of their own and then the message will spread like an unstoppable wild fire. Even the power of the MSM will be unable to stop it.
All of the major problems we face today are all deeply interconnected and these interconnections all come back to this monetary system. It was this system that provided the funds organized Jewry has used to buy up all of the mass media, the seats on the stock exchange, and to take over the political system. It is this system that is at the root of the so called “financial crisis” which is being used to implement an “austerity” program which is designed to impoverish the people and transfer wealth that is rightfully theirs to these banksters and hustlers. It is this system which is responsible for globalization and the de-industrialization of America; it is this system which is responsible for the inflation that sees the US dollar today having lost more than 97% of the purchasing power that it had when this banking cartel gained control of our currency in 1913. It is this Jewish controlled mass media which has been used to displace our culture and replace it with vulgarity It is this system which has been undercutting US wages and jobs by encouraging massive flows of non-European illegal immigration into the country…in effect balkanizing the USA. Transforming what had been a unified nation into a fractious collection of various ethnic groups, some of whom are not assimilating at all, and setting the stage for a complete disintegration of the country.
These connections cannot but spring forth in front of anyone who becomes aware of the nature of debt based money, fractional reserve banking, and the fact that this banking cartel controls and benefits from both. These are not theories which can be refuted. The nature of WHO lays behind this power becomes glaringly obvious once someone discovers the truth about the monetary system. Of course the MSM will continue a steady barrage of propaganda to convince people that these “facts” are just silly conspiracy theories, but these facts happen to be easily verifiable by your average person.
A lot of good work has already been done. There are a few feature length videos online which do a great job of explaining these things, the history behind it and who is responsible. “The money masters” is one. “Money as debt” is another. A third excellent program for those wishing to learn about what the global economy is and how it works can be found by seeking out Dramon Vrabel’s excellent lecture series on the topic. A lot of work has gone into convincing people that banking and monetary issues are “far too complicated” for the average person to understand, this is nonsense. It is actually not that complicated at all. In fact, it is shocking just how simple it is. This is one of the reasons why the first reaction of most people is disbelief. It is the ultimate “big lie”….and once you get people to look at it, it completely collapses.
This monetary power is the source of their wealth and power…and it is also the key to bringing them down… IMO.
#23 by daniele on January 17, 2013 - 4:02 am
Mark,
Basically all I want to say about this is that from my personal experiences with the “government’ or “establishment”, if you will, as a veteran, I have learned not to believe ANYTHING I am told by them! I think you can understand this, or at least hope you can.
I guess to put it in lamen’s terms, I question everything they tell me now!
US Army Vet
Marc C. Daniele
Also Mark when you have time please call me.
#24 by Ingrid B on January 17, 2013 - 5:13 am
Been giving this some thought, and would just like to say, with regard to Mr. Duff, it is my belief that he, and his website, are financed by the military industrial complex, I have no proof, just gut instinct, he is pro-Obama, pro-war, spouts a lot of gung-ho garbage, and has a bunch of hangers-on, who swallow his BS, and I would take anything he, and his buddies say, with the proverbial pinch of salt..
Mark Glenn on the other hand, is honest, trustworthy, and caring, and I believe he is on the right track, and should be supported wholeheartedly. Any comments decrying the treatment Fetzer was dished out, was no reflection on MG, or MCP, and Mr. Tellawi probably had good reason to question Fetzers behaviour as endangering his reputation, but, if Mr. Fetzer chooses to risk his reputation, by throwing himself on the Gordon Duff bandwagon, it is really up to him..
I`m glad we have TUT, and MG..
#25 by James B on January 17, 2013 - 6:41 am
Hi Mark, excellent presentation again … and on such short notice. Hope Keith Johnson is not burning himself out. He’s an excellent contributor. You guys are doin it for us. So important to get this discussion happening, bear witness, and chip away.
But what I wanted to pick you up on was your remark that you didn’t want to buy into discussions about the Fed and Jewish control of the money systems as you thought, if I read you correctly, that these were secondary to Jewish control of ideas. Au contraire, as the French prefer to say … I say you can’t possibly have a monopoly on ideas unless you have control over the money supply. The very kernel of the entire operation is just that … the power to create the credit flows and set the interest rates. Just read any of the many quotes ascribed to Nathan Rothschild and others of the mystical bankstering community.
Ally the capacity to create money (out of thin air) – also known as usury – with Talmudic strictures on charging interest to fellow jews and you begin to understand how it is that they end up owning and running the main instruments of information and ideas. Not to mention every other goddamn thing. They create the money supply, they buy up the key industries, and they put fellow chosenites in charge. Simple.
So, yes, I think a clear-eyed analysis of the Fed and the wellspring of Jewish financial power is of the essence. I highly recommend Daryl Bradford Smith’s ‘French Connection’ site. He has a good understanding of the financial issues and he always interviews v well informed interesting people who are similarly financially well informed. Get Daryl on your show. He’s an interesting chap.
In the meantime, all power to your arm, Mark Dankof, and all the other excellent presenters in the TUT network.
#26 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 17, 2013 - 1:18 pm
FOR THE WIDER READERSHIP
Funny world! A few minutes of rushed conversation with Pr James Fetzer has sufficed to indict the man and for ruling that he has chosen “to risk his reputation, by throwing himself on the Gordon Duff bandwagon”. This is outrageous.
This is what we call in Islam, back biting, eating the flesh of your own brother, but the Islamic Law which was International before the West took over and enforced its Anglo-American “International” Law (Legality) states very cleary:
Never level any accusation against anybody when you cannot produce the evidence.
I sent a private message to “Dr Hesham Tillawi” on his Arabic page on facebook (respecting my usual Code of Conduct) or to one of those crazies impersonating him (there are many around), but have received no response from ‘him’ yet.
For all those who jump from one post to the other and ignore the contents of previous posts and broadcasts and NEVER LEARN from past efforts of the hosts who have made those broadcasts available to the whole world at great cost, it is useless to waste our time with what they write because they do not represent (delegated to speak on behalf of) the wider readership.
BAFS
#27 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 17, 2013 - 1:34 pm
#21 by Michael Mann on January 16, 2013 – 11:33 pm
“Earlier today I attempted to post most of what appears below and was not successful. The comment may be flying around in cyberspace and may never land in your comment section…”
This has occured to me a few times recently.
Regarding the Dr Hesham Tillawi and Pr James Fetzer exchange, I do not think we should drag Mark Glenn into this, at least not regarding the brief exchange itself. What I am more worried about is the lack of critical thinking being displayed by some with a tribalistic bias where the Chosen Tribe, Team, Committee … is always right:
“…I completely agree with Dr Tillawi. Those who go off the cliff on the craziness of Sandy Hook do help to discredit all of us and every other, “theory” and even fact, out there.
I think Dr Fetzer’s ideas are a bit off.”
“throwing himself on the Gordon Duff bandwagon”
“go off the cliff on the craziness of Sandy Hook”
In the mean time what Reverend Mark Dankof and his guest said in his 9 January 2013 remarkable broadcast is completely forgotten or pushed aside when it deserved a lot more appreciation than the “Sandy Hook Affair” or anything else.
Some really never learn at all!
BAFS
#28 by wad on January 17, 2013 - 2:57 pm
Mr. Glenn is taking major heat here.
This whole thing is testing the resolve and wits of the truth movement and only Mark Glenn isn’t taking the bait.
You all must understand that Glenn doesn’t believe the official story either and he more than anyone else would love to pin the blame on the usual suspects in a very direct way but until we have ADAMANT proof taking this to the direct conspiracy angle is dynamite that can and will explode in our faces.
I took a look at some of the evidence, fake actors, videos and kids still around etc.. I wouldn’t be surprised if those kids are being sacrificed in some Satanic ceremony right now but until there is REAL proof all this conjecture is just masturbation and the damage it can do to the movement if this jerking off sees light of day is tremendous.
#29 by Brendano on January 23, 2013 - 9:52 pm
01/23/2013
I do not know about all the angles of conspiracies for Sandy Hook; I heard Gordon Duff say a writer on VT [poss. a Mr. Harris] claimed Mossad hit team was what done in the victims at Newrtown CT.
However, I was and am genuinely perplexed by the 2 minute video of supposedly bereaved father,
Robbie Parker whose daughter Emile was putatively murdered at Sandy Hook, in a purported CNN news video outtake, in which Parker emerges smiling and gay [in the old fashioned meaning]
for his interview with the media and then pulls his over his smiling face and transforms it into
the opposite emotion, like the two masks which signify the theatre, the smile and the frown.
Suddenly Parker is filled with evident grief emotion and makes a statement to the camera in
the conjured character of grief.
What is the explanation for this? The video is on the internet and I first saw it from a link from Deanna Spingolas email announcement of her radio interviews for an upcoming week.
It is included all or in part in a brief video linked from the RBN homepage under ‘videos’.
I would like to know what is the meaning of this Robbie Parker video.
Another important aspect that usually arises amidst the suspicions and conspiracy categorized
notions when one of these socially/psychological disturbances resonates through the country
generated by a mass murder of usually baffling etiology, baffling motivation, and amidst bafflingly contradictory factual reports from the mass media, is the long rumored US government program to create mind controlled assassins.
There was a book by a Candy someone in the 1970′s in which she recounts the memories of her
youthful induction into the program and how her suppressed memories emerged and she survived her suicide programming. I did not read the book but now that I remember Mae Brussell speaking of it, I would like to read it.
In fact for me, the mind control assassin theory is the only one that consistently makes sense.
And I am not surprised that the US government which has for so long spent fortunes for development of novel bioweapons and chemical weaponry and EMR weaponry etc. should have diverted funding for mind control assassins from mass mind control and individual mind control projects.
Very likely the marvel of Game Theory could lend itself to be used to gauge the mass psychological effects of mass murders in the general population settings of movie theatres and schools and might well indicate such fabricated civilian mass murders might be the most effective means to alter the national collective mindset for acceptance of some scheme of the hostile elite which the unsoftened public in significant percentage might otherwise be inclined to reject if not subjected by
mass psychological shocks and induced fear that their children are not safe at school or in the movie theatres. Now that we are successfully deeply insecure as to our safety and CNN’s Cooper is to or has produced a program to dispel a Straw-Man of doubts about official accounts, what is the hostile elite going to do with the doubt-subdued American populace? Is increased gun control the end-game, or is it prelude to some other nasty thing?
Also, Mark Glenn mentions that federal and state reports will be forthcoming which will include
all the fabricated conspiracy theories that have circulated on the internet about Sandy Hook.
Interestingly, I heard a recent interview by Kevin Barrett of Gordon Duff in which the latter insisted that there are no federal investigations into Sandy Hook at this time. I am not sure if he included state investigations with the federal. So if he is correct, and I suppose he may be since he made the effort to assert that, perhaps the exposure of the conspiracy theories is being left in the hands of CNN and the controlled mass media.
Sorry this comment is so long.
–note from me, MG–A question that has not been raised yet but which should have, if we were all as much on the ball as we perceive ourselves being–
HOW did we get this video footage of the father, laughing before the interview? News organizations DO NOT give out material unless those at the editorial level have released it for public viewing.’
In other words, someone had to GIVE PERMISSION for this footage to get out there…
There is no similarly released footage of the 5 mossad officers being arrested on 911, even though we KNOW it exists…
There is no similarly released footage of the van loaded with explosives headed for the GW bridge on the morning of 911, even though we KNOW it exists…
But yet, at a time when the Jews need to paint the 9/11 truthers as kooks and crazies, there is footage of a laughing father in the aftermath of the SH shootings–
WHY?????
HOW?????
This is a MAJOR question that needs answering before we proceed any further with this discussion of a ‘conspiracy’ surrounding Sandy Hook.