ed note–we post this as a wake up call concerning the hatchet job that the JMSM is presently conducting conducting against all ‘truthers’ as a result of the madness permeating much of the discourse concerning the massacre at Sandy Hook. Those propagating these unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that ‘the Mossad’ killed all those kids, or even the less believable notion that ‘no massacre’ took place need to take stock of the fact that by propagating these ideas you are slitting the throat of the very same ‘truth movement’ you claim to be part of.
Yes, there really are Newtown truthers.
But in the crazy world of Sandy Hook conspiracy theories, this one may be the worst yet. (Maybe you’ve already heard some of the others, like the one about fantasy ties between the gunman’s family and the LIBOR banking scandal and a related theory about the Aurora shooting and the “Dark Knight Rises.”) Most of the theories are really pieces of a larger meta-theory: that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, perhaps by the Obama administration, designed to stir demand for gun control.
In the latest angle, theorists think they have found “absolute proof” of a conspiracy to defraud the American people. “You reported in December that this little girl had been killed,” a reader emailed Salon in response to a story. “She has been found, and photographed with President Obama.”
The girl in question is Emilie Parker, a 6-year-old who was shot multiple times and killed at Sandy Hook. But for conspiracy theorists, the tears her family shed at her funeral, the moving eulogy from Utah’s governor, and the entire shooting spree are fake. Welcome to the world where Sandy Hook didn’t really happen.
There are dozens of websites, blog posts and YouTube videos extolling the Emilie Parker hoax theory. If you Google her name, the very first result is a post mocking her father for crying at a press conference after the shooting. One popular video, which already has 134,000 views, was made by the producers of a popular 9/11 Truther film. “Just as the movie ‘Operation Terror’ shows the 9/11 attacks were a made-for-TV event, so too were the mass shootings … There can be no doubt that Sandy Hook was a staged event,” the narrator intones. He goes on to say that the adults who participated in the media coverage of the shootings “should be prosecuted as accessories after the fact in a mass murder” — i.e., the parents whose children were murdered in the massacre should be thrown in prison.
The crux of the theory is a photograph of Parker’s sister sitting on President Obama’s lap when he visited with the victims’ families. The girl is wearing the same dress Emilie wore in a pre-shooting photograph of the family shared with media, so she must be Emilie, alive and well. “BAM! I cannot believe how idiot these people are [sic]… That’s her,” one YouTuber exclaims as he watches the two images superimposed on each other. (Apparently missed by these crack investigators is the possibility that the sister wore Emilie’s dress and that they look alike because they are sisters, after all.)
The supporting details to the hoax theory explanation are reminiscent of the arcana of any well-developed conspiracy theory. What about the car? What about the rifle? Why does someone off camera allegedly tell Parker’s father to “read the Card” (as in a cue card) before he goes on CNN? Why is he laughing? Who is the guy running into the woods? Why is there police audio referring to multiple shooters? Why does one boy who survived the shooting tell Dr. Oz it was like “a drill”? Why was the principal quoted by a local paper after she died? Why do some of the parents look like some of the victims of the Aurora shooting — are they “all actors”? All of these questions have simple explanations, but in each case, the theorists have sided more with less likely, but more nefarious possibilities.
One man has taken it upon himself to catalog all of the theories at SandyHookHoax.com. By way of credentials, creator Jay Johnson explains: “I am the only person in the world to solve LOST,” he writes (yes, the TV show).
In an email exchange with Salon, Johnson said he initially “wanted to help the kids express their feelings and memorialize the victims … But then I saw how the local paper interviewed the principal after she was dead, and I realized it was 99% odds another psychological operation that was going on,” he explained.
Noting that he started the website on “12/21/12” he explained, “since I am the New Age Messiah, with my Look Your Heart in the Mirror™ as the new revelation from the Goddess Tefnut, aka Ma’at, of Egypt, I thought the date was significant.”
But the hoax theory has even earned the backing for some presumably more credible sources. James Tracy, a tenured professor of communications at Florida Atlantic University, sparked controversy this week after he wrote a blog post suggesting the parents were “crisis actors.” “While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place — at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described,” he wrote.
Websites owned by Alex Jones, the conspiracy theory pundit who helped start the 9/11 Truther movement and has millions of readers, are a virtual one-stop shop for Sandy Hook “false flag” miscellanea. So far, mainstream conservative figures haven’t hopped on board, though Gun Owners of American head Larry Pratt told Jones this summer that he thought there was a good chance the Aurora massacre was perpetrated by government agents.
Then there’s just the downright bizarre subgenre of theories. One posting on the community forum of Jones’ website connects Sandy Hook and Emilie Parker to Satanism, postulating that the school was a “recruiting center” for the Church of Satan. There’s even a low-budget slasher flick called “Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre” — could that be connected?
Whether there is a connection or not, we can count on the Internet’s conspiracy theorists to find one, even if it means denying the legitimacy of the mourning families’ grief.
#1 by 01abaddon on January 17, 2013 - 5:09 pm
In light of the ‘FACT’ of the fraudulent scandals in the financial world, which has brought the world to the edge of a total financial breakdown. The religious hypocrisy that has the world divided globally as religious extremists hold a world in terror. Then we have those lowest of the low of all humankind called POLITICIANS, who will and do and have sold themselves out to the highest bidder, and that is Big Business, Bankers, Oligarchs, and because of ALL the aforementioned , the planet is being raped anfd pillaged, as are nations for their assets as are the the peoples. War is the biggest business, and for it to remain so they need plenty of WARS. They need plenty sick people to feed their medical empire, as they do their war machine.
They are no longer conspiracy theories but fact, the reality of it all is MUCH WORSE than any of us can imagine. The whole system is rotten from top to bottom, NOTHING so corrupt can remain standing. Wherever you look in the world it is in freefall, the evidence is ENORMOUS of a rotten system in terminal decline. I do not need a conspiracy theory to tell me that, all it does is confirm what I see.
#2 by Gary on January 17, 2013 - 5:12 pm
See no evil,hear no evil,speak no evil
#3 by Bod on January 17, 2013 - 6:22 pm
Am I missing something here? Is the editor’s note above from “the ugly truth”? Are they really in agreement with this Reuters news article? If so, it’s suddenly clear that “the ugly truth” is just another khazarian shill mouthpiece, to be regarded as the enemy as well. If, on the other hand, this article was provided to inform about the khazar’s methods of attack – why the editor’s note that gives no other impression than “the ugly truth” agrees with the article? At the very least, this is a very poorly produced “ugly truth” article
note from me, MG–interesting, ‘Bod’, that a search of TUT indicates that this is the ONLY comment you have ever left here on this website, despite the 5 years it has been up and the more than 8,000 articles that have been published. In fact, an internet search of your email address indicates you have NEVER left a politically-related comment anywhere, anytime.
So here is my ‘khazarian’ theory–you, living in Los Angeles, which we all know is a hotbed of JDL activism, are in fact the imposter here, posing as one of us Gentile-types and trying to make trouble by using the tried and true Jewish tactic of ‘divide and conquer’.
Nice try, ‘Bod’, but unfortunately for you the make-up is wearing thin.
#4 by annebeck58 on January 17, 2013 - 7:07 pm
Mark; Thank YOU.
I am sickened by the horrible to insane comments and theories regarding Sandy Hook and the murders of such young children there.
Sorry, people; the two “other shooters”, around the back of the school were quickly identified, NOT charged, and let go. Yes, the police thought (THOUGHT) there may have been more than one shooter, and as cops are wont to do, they detained one father of children in the school and one passer-by, as both had not a thing to do with the shooting..; the shooting which sure as heck did occur.
The Libor “connection” is not a connection, at ALL. Libor trials had already taken place by the time this happened, so get that little conspiracy out of your heads. Adam Lanza went crazy all by himself. Yes, he may have been instigated by others, and he may (MAY) have been coming off of mind-altering drugs, legal or illicit- we do not KNOW this, though, either.
Not everything IS a conspiracy. Some sure is. But, not all of it.
And I find the attacks on the families (sorry they are not crying enough or are crying too much) despicable. They have lost their young children. Until and unless one who’s had a child or children that have been through such a similar trajedy comes out and says, “That’s weird”, I think people should just ZIP it.
And if you want to put that info out there, please don’t do so in conjunction with the atrocities of 9-11, because it makes those who would put forth sensible facts of 9-11 look KRAZEEE.
Again, Mark, thanks for this post. I wish we could put this one to bed, now, but then I look at some of the comments (here and elsewhere) and see that’s not going to happen any time soon.
INSANITY.
#5 by annebeck58 on January 17, 2013 - 7:11 pm
Oh, by the way, Mark — and to “bod”; come off it.
I know that I’ve also been called, “shill for IZ”, because I do not agree with the INSANE theories of Sandy Hook. I think anyone who does follow these yellow-brick-roads down the rabbit-hole are the true nutts (and possibly shills, or are playing into the hands of those who would want us to REACT so heavily to this, that we’re ignoring all of the REAL FACTS and real problems of this world.)
Cheeze-n-Rice, people- use your “brains” for a change.
#6 by bostonblah on January 17, 2013 - 8:04 pm
so what, its salon ,its owned/run by a bunch of god damn jews ,the JMSM did the exact thing with 911 truth ,
i see them trying to do damage control because they realize nobody believes a god damn word they say anymore
#7 by annebeck58 on January 17, 2013 - 8:54 pm
B/blah.. I agree; the media screws it up at least 80 percent of the time.
If you go to the Hartford Courrant (CT’s only decent paper), you will see quite a few retractions. At least they had the sense to do this, while the other papers probably did not.
So, if the media makes so may mistakes, why believe any of what they’ve said, now? It is NOT worth dissecting what the media says, as it’s all ridiculous, generally.
#8 by Abdurrahman on January 17, 2013 - 11:23 pm
Yer sure the Sandy Hook conspiracy can undermine the ‘truth movement’ but that crazy theory that 6 million Jews did not get barbecued by Hitler won’t. Wait, what about that crazy theory that Jews were the masterminds behind the 9/11 attacks; I mean just because a bunch of k**s got caught dancing on a roof top we got a bunch of crazy Jew haters saying Israel was responsible for 9/11. Yer that’s not going to be attacked by the JMSM. Hang on, what about those crazy ‘kooks’ who have suggested on their website that Israel was responsible for the Fukushima disaster, I mean those crazies are really cutting our throats with this type of kookery. But I guess everyone has got proof for that, otherwise they would not bring it up and undermine the ‘movement’. Don’t let me even get started on those moon landing deniers!
Throat cutting, missed opportunities, come on how far is this attack going to continue?. Does anyone honestly think the Sandy Hook conspiracies are going to undermine this movement anymore then denying the holocaust?
The bottom line is this: regarding the Sandy Hook conspiracies there is no concrete evidence just conjecture and a miss trust of the media. However, there is a flip side to that coin: what have those who support the JMSM narrative of events got?
#9 by Ingrid B on January 18, 2013 - 12:51 am
@ Abdurrahman, the thing to do, is keep asking, keep digging..
#10 by anastasia61 on January 18, 2013 - 1:30 am
I am surprised that the Ugly Truth is so certain that Sandy Hook is “real” that they would write two articles and engage in an ad hominem attack on those who think there are many strange things about Sandy Hook. Well, they have not changed my mind. There are too many things for which there is no credible excuse, and I am not chalking it all off to “mistake.” Perhaps the media is going to get us all used to their disinformation campaigns after Sandy Hook, and since we are now supplying them with a built in excuse that things get confused when an event occurs and we should expect them to get factual information wrong when they first report a story, well then, they can say anything they want about an event, without anyone pointing accusatory fingers at them, can’t they? Nor do they have to correct these mistakes or explain them later, do they? Sorry,. I am not buying. They got so many facts wrong and matters became so obvious to the rest of us that the media themselves had to come out and “apologize” for their misreporting. But apology or no apology, there is really no excuse for some of the mistatements of facts made by media. Their negligence in reporting was so gross and outrageous, that it began to appear deliberate.
#11 by RSG on January 18, 2013 - 2:38 am
How foolish I have been to think that the JMSM version of the events of Dec. 14, 2012 stinks. The peculiarity of the dozens of conflicting reports emanating from Newtown, the absence of bodies, the bizarre behavior of the coroner and some of the parents – the lack of any pictures showing even a drop of blood or a bullet hole anywhere – all of this is just “unsubstantiated conspiracy theories” according to The Ugly Truth. Shame on me for even questioning the media version of the events. I’m sure that the person who posted this article has been to Newtown and interviewed the families of the children who were supposedly killed there. He/she has seen the school, with all of the damage to the building that must be apparent after such a bloody massacre. I bet TUT has interviewed law enforcement officers and hospital staff about what they saw. If so, please share – I’m waiting.
Please remember what Adolph Hitler said about the Jews and their lies…
#12 by annebeck58 on January 18, 2013 - 3:01 am
News/ media comes out with plenty of errors almost every time someone is killed. And, when it is such a horrific event as this, you can bet the number of mistakes made in reporting (and repeating, as the wire-service sends these words out to the entire world for ALL media whores to repeat) will be all that much higher.
A little factoid about the Connecticut police and their policies. Not that long ago, a man SUED one of the police depts (I believe it was the state police, but not positive). Why? He was denied entry into their department because, “his I.Q. was too high”!!
Add the lower intellect of many cops to a scene that I’d say not one of them had come across before and then the inane mistakes (as they do) put forth by the MSM, you are going to hear a lot of things that make little to no sense.
That people jumped on these errors, which were retracted in some cases, as so-called proof if it being a conspracy really is irksome. The horrendous things that have been said to and about the victims of this awful event, and I include each family member as a victim, is ever the worse. If people (conspiracy addicts) are going to run amok in the web(s), it is going to continue to bother me.
People who are against any further investigation into 9-11 as well as all of these non-wars we’re involved in, simply point to ALL, “truthers”. or as they call us, “troofers”, and say, “See? They are ALL crazy; everything is a conspiracy to THEM.” It deters those who would maybe learn something about Israhell and 9-11 and all of the idiotic things we do in this world, because it causes these people to turn their heads away and say, “Crazy idiots; all of them!”, without investigating further.
Not ONE of the videos I’ve seen or the articles I’ve read has had a titch of reality as its basis, aside from what was written, here, in TUT.
#13 by hamansrevenge on January 18, 2013 - 5:21 am
Great points Anastasia…I’m not buying either. One thing we almost never see is the Jewsmedia correct themselves when they get something wrong; if it is a correction it’s usually trying to cover something up from a previous report. The following was posted at John Freind’s blog and was created by DC Dave, and I thought it was very instructive for this incident:
Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.
Dummy up. If it’s not reported, if it’s not news, it didn’t happen.
Wax indignant. This is also known as the “How dare you?” gambit.
Characterize the charges as “rumors” or, better yet, “wild rumors.” If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through “rumors.” (If they tend to believe the “rumors” it must be because they are simply “paranoid” or “hysterical.”)
Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspects of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors (or plant false stories) and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
Call the skeptics names like “conspiracy theorist,” “nutcase,” “ranter,” “kook,” “crackpot,” and, of course, “rumor monger.” Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the “more reasonable” government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own “skeptics” to shoot down.
Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated adherents to the government line who, presumably, are not).
Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
Dismiss the charges as “old news.”
Come half-clean. This is also known as “confession and avoidance” or “taking the limited hangout route.” This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal “mistakes.” This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken. With effective damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.
Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. E.g. We have a completely free press. If evidence exists that the Vince Foster “suicide” note was forged, they would have reported it. They haven’t reported it so there is no such evidence. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press who would report the leak.
Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. E.g. If Foster was murdered, who did it and why?
Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or publicizing distractions.
Lightly report incriminating facts, and then make nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as “bump and run” reporting.
Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing this is to attribute the “facts” furnished the public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.
Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your own stooges “expose” scandals and champion popular causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.
Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, “What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?” Don t the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not.
#14 by Ingrid B on January 18, 2013 - 6:02 am
I think it took a while before the truth about 9/11 began to surface, but I could be wrong.. maybe I`m just holding the cat`s ass to the fire..
#15 by bostonblah on January 18, 2013 - 7:10 am
i really dont see how this is construed as bad for the “movement” i mean we know for a fact we have no 4th estate in this country ,
we know the media and the government are one in the same entity controlled by the same tribe, ,so we know that there is no watchdog for the system,
that was supposed to be the job of the 4th estate,
now we have the internet ,which has taken the place of the 4th estate,
we the people with the internet as our medium,our tool are the new watchdogs,the new 4th estate
we are the watchdogs now
i commend all the people who have gone through the medias official story and inconsistencies with a fine tooth comb and have taken their own time to do it,
i think we see the media in a panic and doing damage control ,and trying remain relevant ,
either because we are right, or because they know they are losing credibility,or both
neither can be a bad thing, the fact that the media, the system as a whole knows people are wide awake after 911 and everything else and know that people are watching closely and hanging on every word can only be a good thing ,right?
id say the jews and their media are either in a panic ,or they are moving to the next phase of their plan
,id say that alex jones has been planted by stratfor and/or someone else ,some other group from the very beginning ,now they seem to be really rolling him out main stream ,he seems to be everywhere now ,from just being on RT to now being on CNN, huffington post,sirius satelite radio,howard stern is talking about him, hes on trutv
hes been on the history channel, the view ,in hymiewood movies like a scanner darkley
they rolled this shill out to obfuscate for the jews involvement in 911 and now they are rolling him out in the main stream again all of a sudden ,why?
we have that totally fake ,totally scripted show between him and piers morgan
you have anderson cooper holding up the sandyhook kids drawing of an owl ,then all of a sudden they have alex jones on , mr. owl , mr bohemian grove ,mr molloch ,on CNN
on piers morgan to be the straw man for the gun debate
seems like the jews are planting these easter eggs in their mainstream media deliberately to get people who listen to jones to notice
they got this guy on piers morgan calling for a revolution , and he calls for revolution on his show now
calling for a “cultural revolution”
the jews own alot of the gun manufactures too , they must have known that there would be a huge spike in gun sales
i feel they are either using this to arm everyone , then to try and provoke a violent reaction either by passing these laws or threatening a gun grab, trying to panic the people into reacting violently so they have an excuse for a total civil war, or a total crackdown
are they setting jones up as agent provocateur for some type of bolshevick revolution?
we know they are arming DHS to the teeth ,now if this was a staged event they must have known also that the gun sales would skyrocket
or do they just want the guns so we cant resist whatever they have planned ,or both
i dont know what is going on but something is definitely up ,why is it that all the people ,or most of the people in the truth movement are jews, ?
they all say the same shite and they never mention jews are behind it, and they ban and block anyone who mentions it
did they create this movement just for selling water filters and storeable food? and to make a few sheckles? or to obfuscate for who is really to blame for what is going on as another layer or layers of propaganda programming?, or is their more to it than that?
i have no idea ,but jones should be watched closely now as well
maybe we have outlived our usefulness to them as a country ,what with china fixed to be the next economic superpower in a few years ,a new host for the parasites to move on to and suck dry
im sure they would love to see us all kill each other in a bloody civil war profiting all the way as they implement the final collapse and and move on to their next host