ed note–let’s just contrast this statement against similar ones, and ponder what would take place if it were uttered by ANY American government official, down to and including the county dog catcher in Nowhere, North Dakota–
–’Any attack on Jordan will be treated as an attack on the United States’
–’Any attack on Saudi Arabia will be treated as an attack on the United States’
–’Any attack on Egypt will be treated as an attack on the United States’
–’Any attack on Lebanon will be treated as an attack on the United States’
–’Any attack on Pakistan will be treated as an attack on the United States’
or even–
–’Any attack on Germany will be treated as an attack on the United States’
Now, some of the countries listed above are ALLIES of the US while others are considered ‘strategic partners’. NONE of the countries listed above are guilty (at the state level) of having engaged in terrorist attacks on America, such as Israel did in 1954 with the Lavon Affair. NONE of the countries listed above attacked a US ship for 2 hours and killed 34 sailors, as Israel did with the USS LIBERTY. NONE of the countries listed above stole close to a million documents of highly-classified material from the US and then sold them to our enemies at the time, as Israel did with Jonathon Pollard. And yet, were any elected official AT ANY LEVEL to make a similar statement as Paul did about Israel for any of the other countries listed in this small demonstration of compare/contrast, they would be accused of exercising influence of a foreign power.
ISRAEL is guilty of all the above mentioned and more, and yet, we have elected members of Congress saying that if this parasitic, murderous entity is attacked in any way, the US is obligated to consign EVEN MORE of her treasure and blood in ‘protecting’ her.
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul took what very well could be considered his most pro-Israel stance yet, saying in an interview that an attack on Israelshould be treated as an attack on the United States.
Asked whether the United States would stand with Israel and provide it foreign aid if the Jewish state were attacked by its enemies, Paul went a step further.
“Well absolutely we stand with Israel,” he said in an interview with Breitbart News, “but what I think we should do is announce to the world – and I think it is pretty well known — that any attack on Israel will be treated as an attack on the United States.”
Paul recently returned from a trip to Israel, where many believe he went to bolster his credentials for a 2016 presidential run. The libertarian Kentucky senator is seen as having a bigger burden than other candidates in demonstrating his pro-Israel bona fides because of his opposition to foreign aid and his connection to his father’s ideology.
Paul’s father, former Texas congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul, was widely seen as unfriendly to Israel. For instance, the elder Paul once went on Iranian state-sponsored television and likened Gaza to a concentration camp.
But the younger Paul is trying to demonstrate that he is pro-Israel, even if he opposes foreign aid to the Jewish state. He reiterated in his interview with Breitbart News his opposition to foreign aid, but again noted that he favors cutting aid off first to anti-American countries before ultimately cutting it off to American allies like Israel.
Paul, who has not been coy about his interest in running for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, perked up when the interviewer framed a question by saying, “let’s say you become President Paul at some point in the future.”
“I like the ring of that,” Paul interjected.
#1 by LindseyNarrates.wordpress.com on January 26, 2013 - 6:21 pm
NOW, is there any doubt that Ron and “Ayn” Rand were always there to make people believe that this system still works?
And to think that I sent that POS Ron Paul $100 of my truly hard-earned money in 2007 for his 2008 campaign where he had over THREE MILLION DOLLARS–3,000,000–MINIMALLY LEFT-OVER, when he could have done so, so much with that vast amount of money. He did the same damned thing THIS TIME, and apparently, gave the money to “Ayn” Rand for his campaign then and for the future.
Folks, we were played for suckers, and the only difference is how long it took some of us to realize what their games IS, not just WAS.
Lindsey
NB: One more thing…do not dare say that “Ayn” Rand Paul is not his father, because that is bullshit and all of you should know it by-now. NOT ONCE has Ron Paul chastised his son for his neo-con attitude and complete reversals on what people in Kentucky BELIEVED they were getting, and not only that, but RON PAUL GAVE THAT POS ALL THE SUPPORT THAT HE COULD, even after he refused to endorse his own father for the presidency. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a SCUM-BAG.
#2 by Tony on January 26, 2013 - 6:52 pm
This piece of work swore an oath to defend this country, not a Israel, Canada, Japan, or wherever. If anyone is a resident of Kentucky, I suggest you call this Tard’s office and tell his staffer just that.
#3 by puppy powder on January 26, 2013 - 7:20 pm
Cobra Curren$y
http://vimeo.com/57298083
Many businesses not ready for phase out of Canada’s penny
ottawacitizen.com/business/money/Many+businesses+ready+phase+Canada+penny/7874214/story.html
#4 by Dante Ardenz on January 26, 2013 - 7:26 pm
I never trusted the old coot of a father,and always new that the silly incompetent son was not at all real.His comments are pure Neoconservative (JEW)and the policy right out of the Rothchild Playbook.There stooges,the British, used the German move across Belgium as an excuse to enter WW1,and of course the terrible Declaration Of War against Germany on September 3,1939 when the Reich never wanted war with the British Empire,over there real issue with Poland over Danzig.The nasty bewigged ,dweeb Rand Paul now gets the Jew pass to run for president by promising WW 3 over there nasty theocracy !
#5 by drizza on January 26, 2013 - 8:27 pm
How is it that someone son can be soo different from the father. Ron Paul never went to Israel and did this BS. People u cannot lump Ron Paul into this as u can see the Jews did didn’t treat him fair at all during his campaign. I am so glad this was posted I never did like this clown Rand Paul.
#6 by Chris Christianson on January 26, 2013 - 8:54 pm
it’s enough to want to make you PUKE! I hope someone NUKES Israel; what do you think of that Rand, you brown-nosed kiss ass?
#7 by Zan Overall, The Wise Old Man on January 26, 2013 - 8:57 pm
Does he mean that if Israel attacks Iran and Iran responds by attacking Israel, we are supposed
to attack Iran?
#8 by Isaac on January 27, 2013 - 12:38 am
Rand Paul is a filthy pig. He is a brown nose. I do not like him.
#9 by Steven on January 27, 2013 - 1:16 am
How about an attack on the united states will be treated as an attack on the united states and leave it at that? As a foriegn policy it is constitutionally legal and is cheaper than the alternatives.
#10 by KPRyan on January 27, 2013 - 1:34 am
That some still defend RP is mind-boggling.
Do you realize a simple vote of the Congress is all it would take to murder the Federal Reserve?
Yet what did RP spend a couple of years doing? Trying to get a bill passed to ‘audit’ the Fed. Who the hell gives a damn about an audit of an entity that has a total and complete stranglehold on this country? Hey, Ron… guess what… if (a big IF since all his effort was for naught) you do, one day, get a few clown accountants to actually audit the Fed’s books … those books will be so corrupted that no one will be able to make heads or tails out of ‘em. In fact, I’ll bet if they ever actually do audit the fed, they’ll come back with a response like this: “Well golly gee whiz. We done did the audit on the books and the audit actually showed the ignorant US taxpayer owes a lot more to the Fed than the Fed originally thought!”
Lindsey is correct: RP was controlled opposition inserted as a safety valve to make fools believe the system could, if they just raised enough money and passed out enough bumper stickers and wrote enough letters to the Editor, be ‘fixed’. What they don’t know is the entire system is ALREADY FIXED and it was FIXED the day the founding fathers signed their names to the US Constitution!
#11 by Blake on January 27, 2013 - 8:45 am
Since when? This just adds more fuel to their insanity. This usurping entity is so far off the scale of sane and rational and America is on the wrong side of history.
#12 by Ingrid B on January 27, 2013 - 8:48 am
@Dante Ardenz, yes, I remember reading that Chirac, the French president, visited the old fart Churchill, and found him in the garden, shaking his fist in anger, at the skies, because the Germans had not, until then, bombed civilians, which would have given the old jew bastard the excuse he needed, to go to war on Germany..
#13 by wad on January 27, 2013 - 1:15 pm
I too fell for the Ron Paul hoax….
this is just humbling. His whole lvoe affair with Ayn Rand/Rosenburg, miss rothchild mistress, should have been the enought to raise some of our eyebrows. We are all learning “how to think” as we go along.
It’s a race against time, but everyday new leaders among us are born and we grow ever wiser.
#14 by Bob on January 27, 2013 - 4:05 pm
Ron Paul? I think he was the real deal. I also think in the end he sold out. I think he cut a deal NOT to make a third party run (which would have been the most popular third party run in history, although probably not successful) and in excahange the political future of his son Rand was assured by the PTB.
You cannot look at Ron Paul’s career and believe anything other than that he really believed in what he was saying. He was consistent over decades with warnings about fiat currency, the FED and these foriegn wars. Another poster above chastised him for his proposal to audit the FED instead of kill it. I thought then and still believe that this was a rational first step in that direction. By showing people just how much “money” the FED had been creating out of thin air and giving to these international bankers, Paul hoped to stir enough public outrage to make killing the FED politically possible. He never made any secret about his desire to end the FED and to have a monetary system free of central banking.
Where I disagreed with Paul was on his suggestion that we return to a gold standard, which I believe would be disasterous, and his “free trade” stance, which history has now shown to be economically suicidal. But on Foriegn policy and monetary policy, he was spot on and he is the only politician in this system to raise these issues and give people an opportunity to vote against Jewish power. That more people didn’t do so is a sad comment on the general ignorance of Americans when it comes to these issues as well as a testament to the power of propaganda and the mass media.
That being said, I agree that Rand Paul is just another ambitious politician ready to sell his soul to Jewish power to finance his political career.
#15 by Bob on January 27, 2013 - 4:33 pm
I should add that Ron Paul will be seen historically as America’s last chance to achieve peaceful political change. A chance that the public rejected at the polls. What his 2012 campaign proved is that you cannot defeat Jewish power within this political system. Electoral politics, at least at the national level, are now a pointless endeavor and a waste of the time and resources of true patriots. The answers to our problems will not be found in Washington DC, but in our own local communities.
It is in our local communities where we still have an opportunity to educate our fellow citizens about the true nature of Jewish power and the systems they use to enslave us. It is at the local level that real representative government is possible and it is at the local level that mass media and the power of money is still possible to overcome. Waging the struggle on a more local level creates tens of thousands of battlefields, each one providing an opportunity for victory. This is a strategy that minimizes the advantages of Jewish power while maximizing our own.
If we are serious about defeating Jewish power and reclaiming our nation and our culture, then we must be prepared to do more than complain about the actions of Washington DC, which we have little power to affect. We must be prepared to wage the struggle at the most basic level. First by empowering our family, friends and co-workers with the knowledge of Jewish power and its true nature. We should concentrate on spreading the word among people who already respect and trust us as individuals….and encourage them to pass on this information to their family, friends and co-workers. It is this kind of networking built upon established personal connections and trust which provides the best way to overcome the power of mass media.
To make this work we have to shake off the fear of openly speaking about these issues. The more of us who are willing to engage with our own personal contacts on these topics in an open manner, the easier it will become for others to do so. In the old USSR the state owned/controlled all mass media. The people were able to largely overcome the power of this mass media when the gap between the reality people could see with their own eyes and that which was being promoted by the media became so great that people began to speak openly within their families and circles of personal friends about the true nature of the reality within which they found themselves. These conversations spread throughout these personal networks and overpowered the mass media. Even while people were still afraid to speak in public on these issues, through these interconnected personal networks, the word spread and people were made aware that they were not alone and that most people shared their views. I’m not suggesting that this phenomenon caused the fall of communism, only that it is a very effective way to overcome a hostile mass media. In fact, it may be the only way to overcome a hostile mass media. Alternative media is important, perhaps vital, but it alone cannot prevail over the power of mass media when it comes to the struggle for public opinion.
If Americans just knew the truth about our situation and the Jewish power which confronts us, Americans would cast off this Jewish power in short order. Fortunately for us, there is ample evidence available of this truth. Our job, at least as I see it, is to make people aware of these issues and direct them to the evidence they need to “prove it” for themselves. It seems to me that this is a prerequisite for any successful struggle against Jewish power.
#16 by Amy Aremia on January 27, 2013 - 8:49 pm
what hold does Israel have over Ameica that we continue to give in to their demands; we keep giving them and giving them —- WHY? We borrow money to keep our own na tion solvent? Why is it that we continue to financially Israel whenever we are in deep debt?????????????
Wake up America before Israel takes over America completely….
#17 by Ingrid B on January 27, 2013 - 11:51 pm
@Bob, I know from experience that it helps to know that you are not alone.. Maybe it`s time to go back to the days of soapboxes in parks, and the handing out of leaflets..
#18 by Bob on January 28, 2013 - 4:38 am
Ingrid, I think simply talking openly with those who know you and with whom you have a relationship of trust is the best method. Everyone (okay, almost everyone) has people who trust them and/or respect their opinions. These people are going to listen to what you say and give it more credence than some stranger, particularly a stranger listening to some anonymous person online, or even a stranger on a soap box in the park.
For the sake of argument, lets say that there are 10,000 people in the USA who are now aware of Jewish power and its true nature. If each of them speaks openly with those who they know well and only convinces 1/2 of them to actually look into these issues and discover the evidence out there…and lets say that only 2 of those people begin to talk openly to their network of friends, family and coworkers with the same success, and so on and so forth….In a fairly short period of time the word would spread through the general population like a wild fire. There is a point of “critical mass” when enough people are speaking openly on these topics with each other that it becomes, not only “acceptable discourse”, but the prevailing opinion among the masses. This can and will happen regardless of the propaganda being pumped out 24/7 by the MSM because at the end of the day, people trust people in their inner circles more than they trust some pundit on a tv screen.
What you would see is the vaunted MSM reduced to ridcule just as the state media in the old USSR was. It is my belief that this is the most effective way to overcome Jewish control of the MSM. It should be clear by now that we cannot “win” playing their game where they hold all of the trump cards. I readily admit that my proposal requires the most work, but it has the novelty of being one that takes advantage of a strength we have (personal relationships) and minimizes those of Jewish power (unlimited money and control of the mass media). I’m open to other suggestions, but so far I’ve not seen a more practical proposal with a better chance of success.
Bob
#19 by Bob on January 28, 2013 - 4:48 am
Ingrid, when you get right down to the essence of it, what I am suggesing is that we use the power of the exponential function, which Jews have used so successfully against us, against them. Only instead of applying this function to usury, I am suggesting that we apply it to the passage of information via personal relationships.
All that is required is a committed core of people to shake off their fear of speaking openly on these topics and to engage with all those around them with whom they have existing relationships. Some will refuse to accept what they are told and even refuse to look at the evidence. But most of these people will come around once the “critical mass” I mentioned above is reached and these views become “acceptable”. This is okay, all that is required is that each of us can convince just two others to look at the evidence. The problem with most Americans is not that they refuse to accept what the evidence proves, but that they are ignorant of the evidence. Once exposed to it, most people experience a kind of transformation as the world that had appeared so unexplainable suddenly comes into sharp focus and begins to make perfect sense.
My experience is that once someone undergoes this transformation, they develop a “need” to tell others and only fail to do so out of fear of openly expressing views that they themselves might have once dismissed as looney. It is that fear which we must overcome.
#20 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 4:50 pm
@Bob, I agree, have been doing this for some time, the soapbox suggestion was my attempt at levity. I didn`t recieve a christmas card from my half brother`s partner this past christmas, because I sent her e-mails containing what she termed “drivel”, but that`s OK, I can only hope that others, at least, began to think things through. Lately I have been e-mailing regional TV stations here in Norway, in an effort to open the eyes of some Norwegians, to the complicity of their government, as a member of NATO, in supremacist war crimes, ever since ww2.. Yes, Bob, word of mouth is good..
btw, I think your comments are invaluable..
#21 by bob on January 28, 2013 - 7:08 pm
Ingrid, thank you for your kind words. Sadly there will be those who cannot bring themselves to open their eyes. Might I suggest that when introducing someone to the subject that you start with one fairly straightforward issue. One for which supporting evidence is readily available. Once you can show someone one small portion of the problem in a way in which they can verify for themselves the accuracy of what you are saying, they will then be predisposed to lend more credence to other issues you might bring forth. In this way you begin an educational process which in many cases will take on a momentum of its own.
Whenver I attempt to give someone “too much information” at one time, I lose them right there. I have found that fractional reserve banking is the most effective “ice breaker” with which to introduce people to these issues. It is easily verifiable and most people are absolute shocked by what they learn. In Norway, there might be a better or more local issue that would serve the same purpose. The reality we find ourselves in is so similar to that in the movie “the Matrix” that it is kind of eerie. Most people go through life oblivious to the system they are living under or their role in it. But once awakened to this reality the knowledge cannot be easily forgotten. This knowledge completely changes the world view of those exposed to it.
#22 by truther on January 28, 2013 - 8:27 pm
Ron Paul was part of the controlled opposition. Although he had talked about the follies of the Federal Reserve, during the OWS protetst, he never mentioned it when it could have counted the most.