Wake Up America with Sammi Ibrahem Jan 26, 2013
Thank you for helping us keep the lights on
Archived Radio Programs
My Articles
Mark Dankof’s America–Broadcast Archives
On The Warning Track Broadcast
Snippets and Snappits
Keith Johnson-Revolt of the Plebs Broadcast
The Real Face of Judaism and Zionism
Israhell on Earth
the 5 dancing Israelis on 911
JEWISH FAMILY VALUES
Mask of Zion Report Archives
Judeo-Christianity
Mocking Jesus on Israeli TV
Jewish Ritual Infant Genital mutilation
Sammi Ibrahem Broadcast Archives
Max French’s The Victory Hour Archives
God’s Chosen People
Examples of Jewish Hate Speech
911 Facts Unknown to Most People
Press TV/Russia Today Interviews
The Naked Facts Blogspot
#1 by Frank on January 27, 2013 - 2:03 am
Thank you Sammi and your guest Alan Hart for this insightful and realistic assessment of the Middle East situation. I only wish this information could reach millions of people before it’s too late.
The Zionist (both Jewish and Christian) will never accept a one state solution, or the giving up of Jerusalem. The alternative (ethnic clensing) of forcing millions of men, women and children to abandon their homes and flee to the unknown will be the most likely scenario. A false flag operation by the Mossad will be needed as an excuse to make this happen.
#2 by Ghazi Al Hind on January 27, 2013 - 2:57 pm
#3 by Ghazi Al Hind on January 27, 2013 - 3:03 pm
BOOK: The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten “White” Slaves
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/31076
They came as slaves; vast human cargo transported on tall British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.
Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. They were burned alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to other captives.
We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? We know all too well the atrocities of the African slave trade.
But, are we talking about African slavery? King James II and Charles I also led a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s famed Oliver Cromwell furthered this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbor.
The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.
Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.
From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.
During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.
Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.
There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on it’s own to end it’s participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.
But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.
Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.
But, where are our public (and PRIVATE) schools???? Where are the history books? Why is it so seldom discussed?
Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of Irish victims merit more than a mention from an unknown writer?
Or is their story to be one that their English pirates intended: To (unlike the African book) have the Irish story utterly and completely disappear as if it never happened.
None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books conveniently forgot.
#4 by Ingrid B on January 27, 2013 - 3:22 pm
All due respect to Sammi, but, there were one or two things Mr Hart said, which I would take issue with. I do not understand why he considered knowing Meir to be such an honour, or why he thinks one state for all is the better option. I also have difficulty understanding his views on Obama, or his solution to US politics. No-one should need to tell grown people in congress right from wrong. Possible sponsorship of his book featured strongly as well. I fear he is right about one thing though, the final push for ethnic cleansing of Palestine. The Khazars don`t give a damn about world opinion, in fact, the more the world condemns them, the more they love it..
#5 by Eva F. on January 27, 2013 - 3:31 pm
thank you Sammy and Alan, that was a great and very important show. In Alan’ Hart books you get a lot of information you never knew before- so much insight and details.- But I’m really praying for another solution with justice for the Palestinians. With zionists and christian zionists we’re facing pure evil and psychopathology .
#6 by Blake on January 27, 2013 - 4:34 pm
Frank, it is immaterial what they think. At the end of the day only the American Govt needs to tell them where to go and they will fold in a matter of days. It is an unsustainable butchering farce
#7 by Deadbeat on January 27, 2013 - 6:43 pm
@Ingrid
I listened only up to the part where Alan Hart seemed to be promoting the Holocaust myth. I find Hart to be best described as an anti-Zionist Zionist (AZZ). His main concern seems to be making excuses for Jewish behavior and to find rhetorical arguments that clouds the issue regarding Jewish behavior. He an advocate of the “not all Jews” rhetoric and that “Zionism” is the “enemy” of Jewry rather than its natural outgrowth. Hart is favorite of the Left for those reasons.
Brother Nathaniel did a piece on Alan Hart that sums up best Hart’s role as an AZZ…
Is Alan Hart Running Cover For AIPAC?
I think Sammy should do a better job vetting his guest. People like Mr. Hart do not need a forum like The Ugly Truth. Mr. Hart already has a soapbox on the Left/Liberal “alternative” media outlets like Democracy Now! and Information Clearing House.
If someone like Mr. Hart is going to be on then they should be asked TOUGH questions about their positions. The type of questions they won’t get asked from the AZZ outfits.
#8 by Egeria on January 27, 2013 - 7:55 pm
Thank you so much dear Sammi for having Alan Hart on your program. I have been following Alan Hart’s work for many years now, and though I do not always agree with all of his views, I have huge respect for his decades-long committment to the Palestinian cause and find him an invaluable asset and source of information for the truth about the takeover of Palestine. His monumental book on the rise of Zionism is not only beautifully written, it also provides for a complete framework to understand the 20th Century’s political history.
Great discussion, dear Sammi.
#9 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 12:05 am
@Deadbeat, thanks for confirming my suspicions. I got the feeling that Hart was taking advantage of Sammi`s inate kindness, and his, Harts, pro-Jew stance is reminiscent of Galloway`s, who was BFF with the father of the Millibands. In my opinion, the only decent solution for Palestine, is to drive out the occupiers, and return Palestine to it`s rightful inhabitants, allow the Palestinians in diaspora to return, and let Palestine heal. Unfortunately, I can`t see that happening anytime soon..
#10 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 12:07 am
@Deadbeat, thanks for confirming my suspicions. I got the feeling that Hart was taking advantage of Sammi`s inate kindness, and his, Harts, pro-Jew stance is reminiscent of Galloway`s, who was BFF with the father of the Millibands. In my opinion, the only decent solution for Palestine, is to drive out the occupiers, and return Palestine to it`s rightful inhabitants, allow the Palestinians in diaspora to return, and let Palestine heal.
#11 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 12:19 am
@Deadbeat, thanks for confirming my suspicion. I got the impression that Hart was taking advantage of Sammi`s inate kindness, and his making excuses for the jews, puts him on a par with Galloway, who was bff with the father of the Millibands, the jewish control in UK politics..
The only solution for Palestine, in my opinion, is to drive out the occupiers, allow the Palestinians in diaspora to return, and let Palestine heal. Can`t see it happening though, not without a miracle..
am having a lot of difficulty posting comments..
#12 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 12:20 am
am having a lot of difficulty posting comments..
#13 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 12:21 am
funny, that one went through, but not my reply to Deadbeat
#14 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 12:23 am
try again..
@Deadbeat, thanks for confirming my suspicion. I got the impression that Hart was taking advantage of Sammi`s inate kindness, and his making excuses for the jews, puts him on a par with Galloway, who was bff with the father of the Millibands, the jewish control in UK politics..
The only solution for Palestine, in my opinion, is to drive out the occupiers, allow the Palestinians in diaspora to return, and let Palestine heal. Can`t see it happening though, not without a miracle..
#15 by Ingrid B on January 28, 2013 - 12:33 am
@Deadbeat, excellent article, again written by a decent jew..
#16 by Deadbeat on January 28, 2013 - 10:09 pm
@Ingrid,
Alan Hart can also be described as a gatekeeper. The problem with gatekeepers is that they present themselves as being “concerned” about the injustice’s victims while their real agenda is to maintain the very injustice they profess to be against. They real aim is to control the opposition and to divert the discourse into a direction away from the root cause and the real perpetrators.
In Hart’s case while he does speak to Palestinian’s injustices he still promotes the Jewish narrative and seeks to blame others in order to absolve Jewry. In the end these gatekeepers exacerbate the injustice by altering the discourse away from the real problem and avoid real solutions.
As Brother Nathaniel indicates in his article, Hart seeks to describe AIPAC as a “Christian” and Jewish organization in order to divert the naive from focusing on Jewish power, Jewish responsibility and Jewish culpability.
As Ariadna Theokopoulos concludes in her excellent contribution article, he Left Gate Getting Crowded
The left gatekeepers, in packs or individual operators, should be exposed at every opportunity.
Alan Hart is one such gatekeeper and his exposure is vital to strengthening the Truth Movement.
#17 by Ingrid B on January 29, 2013 - 12:51 am
@Deadbeat, I find it reprehensible, the way the Palestinians, and all good, and trusting people, are manipulated, used, and abused, by the system. A prime example is Al-Jazeera, they had me fooled for some time. You are right, exposure is vital, so, keep doing what you are doing..