The upcoming religious feast of Purim celebrated by Jews worldwide–a harmless get together or a festival rejoicing over the deaths of of Gentiles?
This, as well as Mike Huckabee’s suggestion that Israeli Spy Jonathon Pollard be freed when Obama visits Israel.
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
Like this:
Like Loading...
This entry was posted on February 12, 2013, 3:03 am and is filed under The Ugly Truth Podcast, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
#1 by sea on February 12, 2013 - 4:14 am
Muslim scholars censure Israel building project near al-Aqsa (50m)
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/12/288502/muslims-say-no-to-building-near-alaqsa
#2 by Bob on February 12, 2013 - 5:17 am
I happen to flip over to Bill Maher’s show this evening. The experience was a “not so subtle” reminder of just how dominated by Jews the US media has become. Of the five people on this panel discussing US politics and foreign policy, 4 were Jewish. The only non-Jew on the panel was Martin Basheer, who is not American.
Bill Maher himself is Jewish, although he spent most of his career claiming to have been “raised catholic”, he announced a few years ago that his mother was in fact Jewish….and therefore according to Jewish law, so is he.
The other guests on the panel were:
Tina Brown, Jewish media figure and editor of Newsweek. Brown is also not an American, she is British.
Josh Barro, Jewish media pundit for Bloomberg News.
and physcist Lawrence Kraus, also ethnically Jewish (although I believe he claims to be an atheist).
Anyone who didn’t know better would have to conclude from watching this show that America was overwhelmingly Jewish, and a part of the British Commonwealth. None of these people bothered to disclose their ethnic identities or even their nationalities before delving into discussions of what US policies (both domestic and foreign) should be.
This panel was noteworthy for who was NOT represented on the panel…Not a single white anglo-saxon protestant American. In fact, not a single gentile American could be found on the panel. Sadly this is not unusual in today’s MSM. It is actually quite rare these days to see a WASP male on any political discussion panel. The only exception to this is when they trot out some “Christian-Zionist” to proclaim his devotion to God’s chosen people. I cannot recall the last time I saw a political discussion panel on the MSM on which at least 25% of the pundits were Jewish, and it is fairly common for the percentage of Jews on these panels to be 50% or higher.
Yet, Jewish power still crushes any public figure who even alludes to the prevalence of Jews in the MSM…and any “coimmoner” who raises the issue is immediately dismissed as an “anti-Semite”. But hasn’t the level of Jewish domination and control surpassed the point at which it can be denied? This is the second of the two topics which I firmly believe we should be hammering away at. It is easily proven and does not require “belief” in any theory. It is a subject that will stir people’s minds in the direction of the important questions of the day. Questions whose very asking undermines the matrix of Jewish control.
Bob
PS Mark I apologize for my comment being off topic, but it is not possible to “start a thread” here so I comment where I can. Thanks.
ed note–No apologies Bob, ya did great.
#3 by sea on February 12, 2013 - 6:28 am
#4 by Ingrid B on February 12, 2013 - 7:33 am
If I look like a voodoo doll that`s what I am,
If I look like a voodoo doll that`s what I am,
If I look like a voodoo doll, who takes his lickin`standing tall,
Who`d rather fight you back, than crawl, that`s what I am..
(words of Kristofferson..)
Let`s face it, anyone who “worships” at the wailing wall, is either a war criminal/mass murderer, or a protector/apologist for the same..
#5 by 1bigcree Shadowhawk on February 12, 2013 - 9:40 am
Yes Bob, you hit the nail on the head! Yes Mark; let us elevate the discussion as well as our level of expectations as to make way for a more healthy & balanced future for the seventh Generation. Those coming after us. They are counting on it. This very intention resonates powerfully and reaches the very cosmos to manifest in all things. Our enemy cannot stop it.
#6 by Egeria on February 12, 2013 - 9:05 pm
Dear Marco – first of all thank you for your kind gesture of advancing yesterday’s program to an earlier hour. I’m sure, many listeners outside the US must have been grateful like I was.
Only today I could find the calm required to read your latest essay – this time on Jewish cannibalism.
A real masterpiece Marco – just as all of your essays are.
Well, you do know I am in awe of all that you write, comment, analyze, compose and de-construct.
It is food for the soul and the mind and the spirit.
Last night’s program was another such profound exercise, and I was mesmerized listening to you.
But I also want to seize the occasion to thank you for the material you publish.
I am so grateful because you do something I personally shy away from: To explore the Jewish press. I simply cannot bring myself to open that can of worms, and even less so on a daily basis.
I don’t know how you can bear it without falling ill in the body and the spirit.
Prof. Antonio too reviews daily the Italian Jewish online press – and then reports on it.
To watch Press-TV is already quite painful, but at least I see friendly faces and hear comments by people with a heart and a soul.
Thank you so much Marco for all you do, for the daily gifts over your website and for sharing your thoughts with us.
#7 by bostonblah on February 12, 2013 - 9:22 pm
ok 1 last thing i will say about sandy hook nose
will you please watch this video and look at this hideous jewesses kids in the photo,
it is quite obvious that the kids in the photo are her kids , they all have jew fros there is no doubt that they are brother and sisters, and there is also no doubt that they are veronique pozners kids ,they look just like her
and “noah” is not in any of the photos,in all the photos of “noah” he is alone
, now lets just assume for some reason he was not in the family photo,unlikely but i guess its not out of the realm of possibility it still does not explain the fact that this kid”noah” dont look at all like the mother or any of his so called siblings
now just look at the photos of “noah” and tell me that he is that hideous jewesses kid, and that he is the the sibling of the kids in the photo with the huge sideshow bob like jew fros, ,he has straight hair , not a red jew fro, he dont look at all like veronique pozner, or her kids,
can we please use some common sense here,
again, is it possible that he is her kid, i guess so, but it is highly unlikely
also the kids uncle just so happens to be a lawyer and drafts all this legislation withing 2 weeks of his nephew being killed ,same guy who goes on CNN right after and is only concerned about loosing money from donation websites being set up in the supposed dead chosenites name
#8 by bostonblah on February 12, 2013 - 9:23 pm
sorry wrong video
#9 by Deadbeat on February 12, 2013 - 11:01 pm
Notice none of the “media watchdog” group ever make any mention of Jewish power and Jewish overwhelmingly disproportionate representation and control of the public airwaves. Perhaps that is because the “media watchdog” groups are overwhelmingly Jewish themselves. Jews play both sides of the debate.
#10 by Deadbeat on February 12, 2013 - 11:06 pm
When talking about the media there needs to also be an examination of Sabbath goys who are not “Christian Zionists” but use the credentials to brand their “credibility” such as Alan Hart and Christopher Hedges.
In fact Alan Hart is on the war path against Holocaust revisionists and there needs to be a response to his ongoing slander. At one person is responding Alan Hart’s commentaries. You can read them on Ziopedia
Alan Hart and the Nazi holocaust
Alan Hart and the Jewish Dark Art of Gatekeeping
Part 3: Alan Hart and his pathetically imploding case against revisionists and ‘deniers’
#11 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 13, 2013 - 12:55 am
#10 by Deadbeat on February 12, 2013 – 11:06 pm
“In fact Alan Hart is on the war path against Holocaust revisionists and there needs to be a response to his ongoing slander.”
A few years ago I proved Alan Hart to be a liar and a hypocrite! He lied about the USS LIBERTY and the so-called Six Day “War”!
He also lied about the Armenian “genocide”!
BAFS
#12 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 13, 2013 - 2:23 am
Nota Bene
I did mention many times that Michael Collins Piper should not use and repeat the “Mujahedeen e Khalq” without specifying that the members are communists (Marxists) and are not Muslims even if many pose as Muslims. As a Muslim I do not welcome that term because of its Islamic connotation. People who are not aware would be convinced that this is an Islamic Party when this is not true. Piper has been repeating that name hundreds of times without (to my knowledge) specifying that these people were originally and currently mainly Communists.
Unfortunately, my many requests fell into deaf ears. When I lived in Paris, France was openly financing, training and arming those Communist terrorists and assassins to invade and kill Iranians during the US-UN-ISRAEL-EU ‘covert’ war against Iran.
Basheer
#13 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 13, 2013 - 2:31 am
Dear Mark (Glenn)
Please, do not invite that scum Obama for any talk even if this will not happen. You never know, the FBI can use that as a pretext to trap you!
That coward is 100% guilty of mass murder and he does this by design and will not go to Iran as he knows very well he will not be allowed to go or come back alive from there! Because of the Jewish roots of his wife, of the Jewish Mafia who put him in the White House, and of his Sodomite past, the guy is absolutely untrustworthy.
The Americans want him, and he is going to do exactly what the Jews want him to do when the time is ripe. He did not attack Iran because this one is a lot tougher war that would have this time real serious consequences for the US and even Europe, including Israel.
Love
Basheer
#14 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 13, 2013 - 2:50 am
Regarding the “Old Testament”, we have enough evidence to prove that it can never produce a GOOD CHRISTIAN if followed to the letter. But, we have to be honest and admit that it also has a lot of wisdom in many of its passages.
The story of Esther is made up and is crap!
The story of Israelite slavery is made up and is crap!
Whether it is “antisemitism”, “Exodus” or the “Holocaust”, those demons always come out a lot richer with a lot of gold, precious stones, power and a monopoly on almost every valuable commodity and service. But, Islam put an end to Jewish power and malevolence until the Muslims themselves became decadent and their leadership joined the Devil.
Unfortunately, decadent Christendom has unleashed the Demons and is allied to them and Muslims are still not fully emancipated and not yet ready to fight them successfully!
BAFS
#15 by Bob on February 13, 2013 - 6:23 am
BAFS, I tend to agree with you that most of the Christian sects have been completely subverted by Jewish power, whether they realize it themselves or not. I am not “anti-Christian” and by way of full disclosure if I was raised in any church, it was the Mormon Church.
My own view is that all of these Christian sects, including the Mormons, are mostly good people, but they are subscribing to an interpretation of Christianity which has been twisted into the service of Judaism. This twisting really got underway in a big way when the Schofield Bible was pushed into mass circulation. But even earlier, the Catholic church had been heavily infiltrated by Jews (who had “converted”).
I have my own spiritual beliefs, but I have no problem with most of the teachings of Christ (or Mohammed for that matter). What I do have a problem with is this notion that Jesus himself was a Jew. I do not believe that the actual historical record (such as it is) supports this theory. It is my understanding that he was Gallilean, an area not predominantly populated by Jews at that time. Many have attempted to claim that Jesus was a Judaic Rabbi, this doesn’t seem likely to me either. But whether or not he was ethnically Jewish, his teachings were specifically anti-Jewish. In fact, his anger was exclusively aimed at the Jews while he preached forgiveness and peace to all others (including Jews who accepted him as the son of God).
It is my sincere hope that each man and/or woman can fulfill their spiritual needs with whatever belief system they may have. I begrudge no person their spiritual beliefs or traditions, so long as people do not use their own particular beliefs to set themselves above others or interfere with the rights of others. But Christians who have fallen for this false concept of “Judeo-Christian” culture should really step back and examine the facts for themselves.
I guaranty you that no self respecting Jew believes in anything like a “Judeo-Christian” culture and would be horrified at the mere suggestion of such a thing. In fact, this concept is a contradiction in terms. Judaism, by its very definition rejects Christianity and everything it stands for. Christianity rejects everything Judaism stands for. To believe that the two are somehow “close cousins” is utter nonsense. In fact, it is Islam and Christianity which are far more closely related, and whose beliefs are largely compatible, if not completely identical. Most of the differences between Islam and Christianity are really cultural differences inherent to the various peoples practicing the two religions rather than inherent conflicts between the fundamental teachings of the religions.
If you strip away the religious dogma and just look at the value systems inherent in the two religions, they are quite similar. The same cannot be said for Judaism. Someone else described Judaism as an extreme form of xenophobic tribalism rather than a relgion. I think that is an apt description.
#16 by Rebel of Oz on February 13, 2013 - 2:05 pm
Over the course of a week and three articles which have been duly debunked and ridiculed, Alan Hart’s whole case against Holocaust revisionism has now collapsed to little more than a quote of a guy called Samuel Crowell whom he calls “the author of what some regard as the definitive books which make the case for Nazi holocaust revisionism.” He quotes Crowell as saying “Revisionism tends to be extreme in its rejection of Nazi atrocities.” Now, neither me nor the fellow activists I spoke to about Alan’s latest article title The Nazi holocaust: My response to my critics have ever heard of Samuel Crowell, in spite of his Jewish first name. The revisionist scholars we are familiar with, Germar Rudolf, Juergen Graf, Robert Faurisson, Arthur Butz and Carlo Mattogno, do NOT reject the notion of Nazi atrocities. They reject the three law-enforced dogmas of the Holocaust faith: the claim that the Nazis had a plan to exterminate the European Jewry, that they did indeed kill them by the millions and used the delousing fumigant Zyklon B and the (non-toxic) exhaust fumes of a diesel engine for the purpose. But even if revisionist scholars did go too far in their rejection of Nazi atrocities, where exactly would that change anything about the validity of their arguments against the mainstream Holocaust narrative?
Read more: http://therebel.org/565571-alan-hart-and-his-collapsing-case
ed note–I have worked with/interviewed Alan on several occasions, and there are a few issues–the Holocaust and Judaism, where I differ with him 100%. However, as far as his practical experience in dealing with matters related to the Middle East, he is in a class by himself. We in this movement simply have no access to anyone with the kind of practical experience he has.
Having said that, at the same time, despite the differences I have with him over matters such as the Holocaust and Judaism, I understand nevertheless where he is coming from with the last 2 articles he has penned. My own personal experience in dealing with a certain element within the ‘Holocaust/Hitler/WWII camp has been that it can be maddening to deal with certain individuals within it. May of them have made the 3 aforementioned items into something of a cult all its own, and ANY deviation from them results in a tidal wave of irrational screeching and hollering, on the same level both quantitatively and qualitatively with the Jews themselves, but obviously in the opposite direction. In general, some of the revisionists within this group cannot be counted on to participate in a rational, reasonable discussion about the present state of affairs viz a viz Israel, Jewish power and the Middle East and who instead want the entire discussion to center around Hitler, what a great guy he was and how white people are being persecuted more than anyone else.
So I think that what is needed here is balance. Alan needs to brush up a little on his WWII history, and those in the revisionist camp must come to realise that there is more to understanding this thing known as the Jewish problem than simply exculpating white europeans from the false blame attributed to them concerning WWII, as well as recognizing that the entire Jewish-spun narrative on the Holocaust and Hitler is something that has penetrated western society down to the bone marrow and that it is not going to be eradicated through a campaign of irrational screeching and reactionary behavior.
#17 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 13, 2013 - 11:39 pm
#16 by Rebel of Oz on February 13, 2013 – 2:05 pm
ed note–…
However, as far as his practical experience in dealing with matters related to the Middle East, he is in a class by himself. We in this movement simply have no access to anyone with the kind of practical experience he has.
Having said that, at the same time, despite the differences I have with him over matters such as the Holocaust and Judaism, I understand nevertheless where he is coming from with the last 2 articles he has penned.”
I am almost entirely in agreement with Mark on this. My main objection is that Alan Hart refused to respond to or simply ignored my queries when he was interviewed by Mark some time ago.
Some of my arguments were
As a journalist, Alan Hart knew that an Armada of Western journalists were already on deck of one destroyer of the Sixth Fleet before Israel attacked the Arabs
That those journalists were gagged when the Sixth Fleet failled to nuke Cairo because the Israelis did not sink the USS LIBERTY
That he himself was sent in advance of the attacks to join the Israeli Army on the terrain (the Sinai, etc.)
Added to those “mysteries”, I heard Alan speaking of having seen the evidence of the “Armenian Genocide” when more Muslims were killed during WWI and the Bolshevik Bloodthirsty ‘Revolution’ about which I never heard him say a single word.
If what I read about his promotion of the Jewish “Holocaust of Six Million” is true, how can reasonable person trust him on anything?
But, time permitting, I will read those 2 articles because I would like to believe that the man is not EVIL and may be even a kind of hero regarding the Middle Eastern cause! I may not have seen qualities that Mark Glenn has seen in him.
#10 by Deadbeat on February 12, 2013 – 11:06 pm
Many thanks for posting those links.
BAFS
#18 by annebeck58 on February 14, 2013 - 12:36 am
Mark;
(your note)
“So I think that what is needed here is balance. Alan needs to brush up a little on his WWII history, and those in the revisionist camp must come to realise that there is more to understanding this thing known as the Jewish problem than simply exculpating white europeans from the false blame attributed to them concerning WWII,..”
I absolutely agree. The problem with one sits firmly on either extreme side is that they can be no give and take. Each discussion would devolve into an argument with no meeting of the minds.
Sometimes, it’s as important to learn something as it is to, “be right”. In fact, in every case, I think that’s what we need to look toward.
Having preconceived notiong and being stuck on them, alone, is going to help nobody to learn a thing.
#19 by annebeck58 on February 14, 2013 - 12:38 am
(ugh– notions!)
Hate that..
And don’t know why, but suddenly wordpress wants to sign me in via twitter, which is crazy as the other day it was not allowing me to share to twitter, at all, from here. again? UGH.
#20 by 1bigcree Shadowhawk on February 14, 2013 - 2:06 am
WWII history indeed needs a really critical reread. I suggest a couple of links and videos with Deana Spingola interviewing Veronica Clark on Hitler. And another interview with J Bruce Campbell. Also one should search Veronica Clark’s book ‘Hitler’s Black Nazis’. David Irving is another gifted speaker and WWII revisionist who breaks through the many webs of deceit. He has written about it as well as researched it thoroughly and will not disappoint. The entire Ernst Zundel affair is another good source to delve into. Such names as Fred Leuchter, Professor Faurissen, Germar Rudolph, Sylvia Stoltz who was one of Zundel’s Defense Lawyers in now famous trial. She is still fighting the Jewish dominated Court System in Germany toady as to clear the path for the freedom to question and speak out on the real goings on during WWII. Another name of infamy regarding the Concentration Camps post WWII is ‘Shlomo Morel’. He ran these as true Death Camps where German people were imprisoned and many died under his watch. Also search the WWI Veteran & Officer Major Racy Jordan ‘Major Jordan’s Diaries’.
#21 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on February 14, 2013 - 6:09 am
#15 by Bob on February 13, 2013 – 6:23 am
“BAFS, I tend to agree with you that most of the Christian sects have been completely subverted by Jewish power, whether they realize it themselves or not. I am not “anti-Christian” and by way of full disclosure if I was raised in any church, it was the Mormon Church.”
I had decided not to enter into any debate with anybody on TUT, and I will not do so here. I never looked for people to agree with me and on the contrary I expected them to disagree and provide solid reasons for it. But, it is rare to have any healthy debate on TUT. Most never want to learn or put relevant questions or even answer pertinent questions that keep coming up post after post, year after year.
I will not use this opportunity to star a lecture, but would stick to the question of religion and God. I do not know if you are American or not, but here in Europe we have a different perspective completely. Most of us have killed God for good and worship the Zionist controlled Totalitarian dictatorships instead! Elisabeth II is a Satanist Freemason and yet she pretends to be the head of the Anglican Church and all the Anglicans accept this big lie.
Most Christians refuse to admit that Christianity is Hellenistic based on Greek writings and not Arabic, Amharic, Aramaic, Syriac, Coptic or “Hebrew” ones. Yet, they waste their lives with the Old Alliance and the Old Testament.
They also refuse to admit well documented facts that their Holy Bible is incomplete with
16 out of 20 Gospels missing
14 out of 15 Apocalypses (revelations) missing
50 out of some 100 other texts (epistles, etc.) missing.
Missing, hidden, destroyed, burnt, banned, etc.
This is the root cause of the problem some 1700 years ago and also because of so many “Versions” of the “same Bible” and NOT only because of the recent Scofield Bible! My 1727 Bible has 81 Books; my Catholic Bible has 73 Books. The original King James Bible had 73 Books too, but today it has only 66 Books! I recently learned from Pr Texe Marrs (?) that the New International Version had been financed by the Rothschilds and also that all other Bibles other than his King James Version are Satanic!!!???
So, is it a surprise that Christians are so messed up in their religion and way of life? Or that almost half of “White European” Christendom has walked away from their religion? The way many of us in Europe perceive modern Christianity is unlike what Americans think. We see
Early Christianity having been corrupted by Paul
Then by Roman Catholicism, but universalised.
Catholicism being corrupted in turn by Judaism and Zionism, in particular after Second Vatican Council and with the two Zionist Popes, after having produced a great civilisation despite all its ugliness.
A perpetual doctrinal war between Catholics, Lutherans, Calvinists, American Protestants, Jehovah Witnesses, Mormons, 7th Day Adventists, and hundreds other Sects and denominations.
However, basic Christianity has still retained the best anti-Mammonic moral code for a decent humanity that is just waiting to be revived, and only Islam and true Muslims can help achieve this renaissance because they share much in common with Christian Ethics.
Daryl Bradford Smith is an Atheist and one of the best and bravest humans on this planet, yet Atheism cannot produce a moral code like Christianity or Islam and it has none as Atheists make it as they go along and it consists of a pell-mell of moral, amoral and immoral practices that can never compare with a proper Islamic-Christian Moral Code.
It took Barry Lyndon, a recent acquaintance of mine, more than 15 years to get out of an indoctrination programme by the Mormon Church that lasted more than 15 years. Today, Barry dislikes all religions and God and has turned to Ufology and says he is (with many others) in regular contact with Aliens, spaceships, Galactics, etc.
I have the same problem like my Catholic friend Alain Soral, author, autodidact and philosopher. He does not pretend to be a believer in God, but behaves as if he believes while others pretend to believe in God when they don’t. Atheists in general do the same pretending to believe in or uphold a moral code when they don’t.
As I said I am not debating any issue. Although I make no claim and expect the readers to do their own research and find their own answers, any correction is welcome. The truth does not need me and facts speak for themselves.
Basheer
#22 by annebeck58 on February 14, 2013 - 4:57 pm
Yes, Shadow.
I think a lot of us (maybe even all of us) who grew up in the West, particularly the States, have had to re-read ALL of what we were taught in school, to learn, finally, the truth of what really happened– and what did NOT happen.
I was, mainly, trying to stave-off yet another argument (again rooted in religion) on this forum.
If each of us starts with the premise that we were hoodwinked (brainwashed, lied to, taught lies) as children and into adulthood, and decide to research all of the “evil people” and wrongdoings by those who’ve been condemned to death or for life, we have to accept that others may have more or different knowledge than us. And if we care about spreading truth, we have to care about continuing to learn. Otherwise, we’re still passing-on half-truths, which probably make little sense to those we’d like to turn toward that truth.
Of course, the words we choose and the tone we take (impossible to read online, generally) is going to help our cause or it’s going to not help anyone.
When it comes down to it, who here or anywhere, knows everything?