Senate Democrats are preparing to move ahead with consideration of several proposals to limit gun violence, but prospects for the controversial ban on hundreds of specific weapons and parts are diminishing, according to lawmakers and aides familiar with the process.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the chief sponsor of the ban, said Tuesday that her proposal won’t be included as part of a bill encompassing several proposals that the Senate Judiciary Committee approved last week and that the Senate is expected to begin debating when it returns from a two-week recess in early April.
In addition to the assault weapons ban, the Judiciary Committee approved a bipartisan proposal to make gun trafficking a federal crime; a bipartisan bill to expand a Justice Department grant program that provides funding for school security; and a Democratic proposal to expand the nation’s gun background check program.
Instead of including the assault weapons ban in the final bill, Feinstein said Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) has told her she can introduce it as an amendment to the full bill — fulfilling his promise to hold an up-or-down vote on the measure. A separate vote will be held on an amendment to limit the size of ammunition clips, she said.
Reid said later Tuesday, however, that the amendment has no chance of passing. “Right now her amendment, using the most optimistic numbers, has less than 40 votes. I — that’s not 60,” Reid said. “I have to get something on the floor so we can have votes on that issue and the other issues that I’ve talked about. And that’s what I’m going to try to do.”
“Obviously I was disappointed” when she heard the news, Feinstein told reporters Tuesday.
“The enemies on this are very powerful, I’ve known that all my life,” Feinstein added, referring to the National Rifle Association. “But I’m confident this bill would be constitutional.”
Reid’s decision is a setback for President Obama and congressional Democrats, who are pushing a series of proposals to limit gun violence in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Conn.
The most ambitious and controversial proposal backed by the White House, Feinstein’s bill would ban almost 160 specific semiautomatic weapons and rifles and assorted military-style parts and also limits the size of ammunition clips to 10 rounds, banning larger rounds used in some of the more recent and brazen mass shootings. The ban has 22 other Senate Democratic co-sponsors, including Feinstein.
A bill limiting the size of ammunition clips was originally introduced by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), but was merged with Feinstein’s bill and approved by the Judiciary panel.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who along with Feinstein has led the charge for an assault weapons ban, said he remained hopeful that the bill could succeed.
“I think we have growing momentum on our side,” Blumenthal said. “Newtown was a call to action and I think we’ve made tremendous progress. Three-plus months ago, this issue was politically untouchable. This time is different.”
Over the Easter recess, Blumenthal said he expected advocates for the ban to continue meeting with lawmakers in their home states. “They have been very compelling when I’ve seen them talk to my colleagues,” he said. “I’ve had families visit Washington and talk to a number of my colleagues privately. It’s been very, very powerful.”
Senior Senate Democratic aides called talk of the ban’s demise “premature,” but admitted that it is unlikely to be included as part of the broader package, which could be introduced by Reid as early as this week.
Still unresolved is what Reid’s final bill might say about expanding the gun background check program. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) is working with other Democrats to find potential Republican co-sponsors for a revised bill that would permit exceptions for firearm exchanges between family members or close friends. But talks have been hampered by disagreements over whether to establish a record-keeping system for non-commercial gun transactions.
“Hopefully reasonable people will look at reasonable proposals and something will happen,” said one of the negotiators, Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W. Va.).




















































#1 by Jean on March 21, 2013 - 3:17 pm
The second amendment states, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The Communists in DC are infringing upon the 2nd amendment and are unapologettic
for their actions. They should be charged for treason as they are at war with the American people.
Violating their oath of office. Criminals do not abide by laws. These laws apply only to law abiding
people. The do gooders are doing good for the criminals and they know it. They could not be as
stupid as they appear in wanting to pass such stupid laws. There are evil intents behind this.
#2 by Romans70AD on March 21, 2013 - 5:32 pm
The Jews believe that the American constitution is just an archaic piece of paper to be torn up and thrown in the garbage. They are not alone in this, they have political accomplices actively working to bring about the fall of America.
#3 by Luciana on March 21, 2013 - 6:30 pm
There are more than 300 million guns out there in America. Do you actually believe every gun owner will turn in their guns? I think not. There are more guns out there than people in the US. I would be mindful of the USA Free Army.
#4 by 1bigcree Shadowhawk on March 21, 2013 - 9:05 pm
Well said Jean.
Couldn’t agree more. These are Natural Laws, actually and the way they will be kept is by all people acting together against this Jewish tyranny of despotic megalomaniacs.
#5 by Steven on March 22, 2013 - 9:38 pm
Allowing women to usurp authority over men or to teach is against holy scriptures. First Timothy chapter2 verse 9 through 15.
Therefore having women in government is ungodly and down right subversive. Diane Feinstein and Hillery Clinton ought to be dismissed ASAP and possibly arrested for high crimes against the constitution and humanity. If god through Jesus Christ would entrust his holy legacy to his 12 disciples it is also reasonable that government be also entrusted to godly men and not feminists, sodomites, satanists and other criminals , perverts or their fans for.