Orthodox Judaism treats women like filthy little things

If a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they’ll save the man, ‘who is obligated to perform more commandments,’ whereas a woman’s ‘wisdom is only in the spindle.’ In fact, ‘words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women.’

By Yossi Sarid


If you would like to know the source from which your brothers derive their brazen behavior, go over to the study hall and open a page of Talmud. It’s true that the Torah has 70 faces, but the trend of these faces is clear: The source of the pollution is in halakha (Jewish law ) itself. What is happening in Beit Shemesh and its satellites is not “contrary to halakha,” it is mandated by halakha. And the rest will be told to the grandmothers, daughters and granddaughters.

Anyone ignoramus knows that the Torah’s “ways are ways of pleasantness,” that “the honor of a king’s daughter is within,” and that “proper behavior comes before the Torah,” but it’s worth knowing more. It’s worth knowing that a woman is unfit to be a judge, and is also unfit to give testimony. She is unfit for any public position with authority. “Thou shalt appoint a king over thee” – a king and not a queen.

A daughter, commanded the sages, must not be taught Torah, because “the mind of woman is not suited to be taught, but [only] to words of nonsense.” Women are light-minded and have little knowledge.

And if a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they’ll save the man, “who is obligated to perform more commandments,” whereas a woman’s “wisdom is only in the spindle.” In fact, “words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women.”

A man must say three blessings every day during morning prayers: He thanks God “that He didn’t make me a gentile, that He didn’t make me a woman, that He didn’t make me an ignoramus.” And it’s not proper to speak to a woman too much, since “all her conversation is nothing but words of adultery,” and whoever talks to her too much “causes evil to himself and will end up inheriting hell.” And let’s not even talk about the fate of someone “who looks even at a woman’s little finger.”

The extremists who spit at women, who call themselves Sikarikim, learned their lesson 101 times and learned it well: A husband would do well not to let his wife go outside, into the street, and should restrict her outings “to once or twice a month, as necessary, since a woman has no beauty except by sitting in the corner of her house.”

Because inside the house – very deep inside – her glorious honor awaits her: “Every woman washes her husband’s face and feet and pours him a cup and prepares his bed and stands and serves her husband. And any woman who refrains from doing any of these tasks that she is obligated to perform – is forced to do them.” Some recommend forcing her with a whip or by starvation “until she gives in.”

And needless to say, she is at her husband’s disposal whenever he is overcome by a desire “to satisfy his urges with her.” And if she continues to rebel, he always has the right “to divorce her without her consent.”

And there are many similar halakhot, only a few of which we have collected here. Nor have we cited everything in the name of the ones who said them, for lack of space. The readers are invited to find the references on Shabbat – and to browse around – on their own; this is a good opportunity for study. We will direct your attention to Tractate Shabbat, which does a good job of summing up halakha’s attitude toward women: “a sack full of excrement” with a bleeding hole.

Some people will seek to console themselves: It’s true that this is the halakha both m’doraita (from the Torah ) and m’drabanan (from the rabbis ), but that is not what is taught nowadays. But it suffices to listen to the sermon the sage Rabbi Ovadia Yosef delivered five years ago, based on the well-known halakhic work “Kitzur Shulchan Aruch”: “A man must take care not to walk between two women or between two dogs or two pigs, and men should also not allow a woman or a dog or a pig to walk between them.”

Treating women as impure and filthy begins with halakha and continues with actions. As long as the religious and ultra-Orthodox parties – Shas, United Torah Judaism, Habayit Hayehudi and National Union, none of which have any women in the Knesset – are not disqualified, their nakedness will continue to sing out and the nakedness of the land will be revealed.

  1. #1 by Ingrid B on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    Surely these women have a choice.. In a healthy society, they would be protected..

  2. #2 by ruby22shoes on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    “a sack of excrement” I knew that women were considered unclean, but how can they talk this way about their mothers, sisters, daughters, wives?

    Tnx for the references..

  3. #3 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    The Holy Bible says money is the root of all evil. It is now proven that JUDAISM IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL!


  4. #4 by NOZ CAVAN on 12/31/2011 - 9:34


  5. #5 by Franz Seiler on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    All of what is written in this text is basically contained, or: implied, or: can be systematically, logically correctly deduced from this not so obnoxious-looking text: (As far as I’m informed all of their girls from the age of eleven, all of their boys from the age of twelve take part in this ceremony every year. Of course, the implications of this text will be learned only in the course of the adolescence by the ones taking part…As far as I understand it they are being trained on these implications in their so-called “religious instruction”. (Cp. to this Karl Marx: “Religion ist Opium für das Volk.” – “religion is opium for the uneducated, lowly folks” In other words: Religion is but a cloak to hide our acceptance of any crooked ways if it appears to be in the interest of the leading men of “our” community – just like in the famous “1984”.)
    (Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kol_Nidrei)
    “All personal vows we are likely to make, all personal oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our personal vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths.”[4][5]
    (:end of quote)
    This text is system-analytically, logically wrong as it purports to nullify, void all concepts – of the ones accepting this text as a basis for his life – by means of concepts!!! [In regard to this (logical-systematical mistake) the text quoted is like the famous bit that’s tradited from the “Sophist” Menon: “Nothing (pre)exists, if there did we couldn’t perceive it adequately, if we could perceive it adequately we could not communicate it properly.(See Diels “Fragmente der Vorsokratiker”) … As philosophical and political orators the men who called themselves, were called “Sophistes” claimed to prove anything and the contrary (especially for money). Sokrates opposed them.]
    Make such a wrong text the basis of your life then all you deduce from it, is systematically, logically right. The scholastics put this consequence from any wrong basis thus “Ex falso sequitur aliquid.”

  6. #6 by blue1avatar on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    the first Jews ]adamnah n ayvah] gave their allegiance to the Devil in secret and he allowed them to get close to the serpent people who must have been putting their eggs into the souls of every Hebrew born ever since. any self respecting woman ought to knock a male on the head for the least of this awful muck. their god is this Devil [now defunct]. all their historys and opinions since are written to support the lie that they are the chosen men of The Light when you only have to look at them in their dark ever whining bellies to know these are hellions.

    i appeal to any Hebrew who truly wants God the Light to abjure, despise and repudiate judaism, zionism, subtefuge and subversion, and also the cruel stinking weeds of judaism…that is; bent christianity and loathsome islam. it is the parting of the ways….

  7. #7 by Kermit on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    I will never read the talmud.

  8. #8 by Adalberto Erazo on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    Now we know why jewish women are dating Arab men in IsraHell.

  9. #9 by 30.06 on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    The debasement of women and the corruption of societies has always been two very powerful motivating factors for the Jews to flood every society with their perverted pornography .

    They debase everything that comes from God .

    That’s what Satan’s demons are meant to do .

  10. #10 by ruby22shoes on 12/31/2011 - 9:34

    @Franz Seiler: Well this kol nidrei can be the answer to gentile prayers. I’ve often wondered why the UN cannot just say: we dissolve this project that we began with hope for peace & stability and zionists changed to a smash & grab theft ring of life and land and even body parts. What is so loathsome must be allowed to perish. Israel as a state is null & void – 99% of the UN would agree.

    Who would not agree? US, Palau & the entity.

    Good for the kosher goose – good for the gentile gander? Eh?

  11. #11 by Kermit on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    Reply to thirtyodd six:

    Are the jews to be shunned for being too orthodox, or too bohemian?

    Both? Or..

    Are we all just a bunch of whining hypocrites? (sorry)

    It seems they might actually hate women for some reason..

    Where’s the love?

    HAPPY New Year EVERYONE =)

  12. #12 by andie531 on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    Jesus’ view on women was a complete 180 from the Talmud:

    This blog does a good analysis of passages in the NT regarding women and Christianity:


  13. #13 by Lindsey on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    Bla, bla, bla.

    It’s not just the heebie-jeebies, people.

    Have all of you forgotten about the “Promise-Keepers?” Not ONE MENTION of these “Christians” believing the EXACT SAME SHIT as what you see here, with a few exceptions dealing with animals and where to walk.

    What is written in the Torah is also found in the Bible, HENCE, the Promise-Keepers movement from several few years ago.


  14. #14 by Al on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    How come… the nation who calls itself superior and the only democracy and civilized nation in the Middle East behaves so crazy?!… When many people in Israel follow and believe these crazy people, then what would you expect from their government?

  15. #15 by akidahamad on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    All Jews have to abide by the teachings of their Torah (corrupted form ofTaurat given to Moses by God) and Talmud. And if they choose not to follow the rules and the instructions on life as delineated in their religious books, they will cease to be Jews. Consequently, their claim for a Jewish State will be null and void. How can there be Jewishness without Judaism?

  16. #16 by Sheila on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    The israeli come back is “women in saudi arabia cannot drive”. As if this is of comparative nature! So what! There are some women drivers that need a protective male to chaufer them Personally I prefer a man to drive so I can talk without having to concentrate on driving, and enjoy the view. There are taxis to take, bicycles for transportations, and horses for a few alternatives. There is NO alternative to the jewish tradition of being a woman, a low class woman, it is more of the same talmud view to get men to do the evil work of the fathers.

  17. #17 by andie531 on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    “Not ONE MENTION of these “Christians” believing the EXACT SAME SHIT as what you see here, with a few exceptions dealing with animals and where to walk….What is written in the Torah is also found in the Bible…”

    That is true if Christians go by the Old Testament, which is JEWISH. The New Testament concerns Jesus’ p.o.v. The NT has been misinterpreted over the centuries to maintain a sort of Judaic status quo on women – the above mentioned book and blog explain that.

    Real Christianity has no resemblance whatsoever to Judaism, outside of the fact that both sprang from the same part of the world.

  18. #18 by andie531 on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    “There are some women drivers that need a protective male to chaufer them”


  19. #19 by ruby22shoes on 01/01/2012 - 9:34

    “There are some women drivers that need a protective male to chaufer them”

    I see a huge, glaring problem on waiting around for a male escort/driver that is told his entire life he is superior to women, and is propagandized to the point of thanking God every morning for not being born a woman…and that is, how do you motivate one of these ‘gents’ to chauffeur a sack of excrement with a bleeding hole?

    At the very least wouldn’t it stink up the car?

  20. #21 by MJ on 01/02/2012 - 9:34

    @Sheila Saudi society is also a product of their cultural traditions.

    for your information:
    Women in Islam versus the Judeo-Christian tradition: THE MYTH & THE THE REALITY

    Did you notice that they never point out the appalling record of Hinduism?

    Dr. Ingrid Mattson: Women of Islam (1 of 4)
    (President of the Islamic Circle of North America)

  21. #22 by andie531 on 01/02/2012 - 9:34

    “Personally I prefer a man to drive so I can talk without having to concentrate on driving, and enjoy the view.”

    It may interest you to know that where I live, there is an unmet demand for female taxi drivers. The male ones (who are mostly foreign) seem to have a penchant for making unaccompanied young women uncomfortable by “hitting” on them.

    If I had the resources, I’d start a cab company with straight female and a few chatty gay male drivers to cater to this customer segment. I’d also paint the cabs pink.

  22. #23 by ruby22shoes on 01/02/2012 - 9:34

    Here in Pittsburgh we have pink cabs, in addition to the traditional yellow ones. I believe the pinks are advertisements for breast cancer awareness; I don’t know if a portion of the cab’s earnings go to research or to help post surgery women.

  23. #24 by Sheila on 01/05/2012 - 9:34

    What I am saying is there is NO comparison to forcing a woman to the back of the bus – to not allowing her to drive. There is no comparison of the Quran teachings to the Talmud. The west loves to chide the Muslims for not allowing women to drive – this is not a big deal, there are plenty of alternatives. What the talmud forces upon women that is not reported in the west are these very abhorrents of women. How about the sin of jewish men kissing their wives goodnight and leaving to have sex with a goy. Upon return nothing is said or done, it is just something the woman understand, mother to daughter don’t talk about and expect. Perhaps because jewish women hate sex after motherhood and know their men wants it so are happy they violate the goy. I don’t know. I suppose to some of you the no driving deal is worse than the infedelity. Perhaps if we could just choose religions many men would be jews as they can violate children, sleep around on their wives, feel superior, push women around. While women would be Christian, in the gentile way.Me, I would not mind covering up, I don’t like to be oogled over and treated as a breast and ass. And for driving, I would ride a horse, a bicycle, a scooter or carriage. Yet you men are offended that a woman cannot drive. what a world

  24. #25 by Sheila on 01/05/2012 - 9:34

    andie531. Lets start a business, the pink cab tours. ! *)

  1. Orthodox Judaism treats women like filthy little things « Zionist Outrage

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: