New Study–Jews more sexually promiscuous than all others


ed note–and this is news to whom?

forward.com

Could Jews be members of the most sexually promiscuous religion on earth? A new study, “Religion and Sexual Behaviors: Understanding the Influence of Islamic Cultures and Religious Affiliation for Explaining Sex Outside of Marriage,” written up in the journal “American Sociological Review,” seems to say so. It also found that Muslims are the most conservative when it comes to matters of sex.

While the focus of the study was on Muslims, it compared the pre-marital and extra-marital sexual behavior of Muslims in a wide range of countries to that of Christians, Hindus and Jews in those countries. The authors, Amy Adamcyzk, associate professor of sociology at the City University of New York’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice, and Brittany Hayes, a doctoral candidate there, looked at studies of people in some 30 countries ranging from Azerbaijan to Haiti to Zimbabwe, most of them not places with very large Jewish populations. They assessed data collected between 2000 and 2008 by the Demographic and Health Survey, which is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The study’s authors found that Muslim women were least likely to report having had sex before marriage, while Buddhists and Jews reported being most likely, followed by Christians, who were trailed by Hindus.

Jews were “significantly more likely than Muslims and most other groups to report premarital sex,” according to Adamczyk. “This is consistent with some U.S.-based studies that have compared the sex-related attitudes and behaviors of Jews and Christians, finding that Jews tend to be less conservative.”

Asked if that might make Jews the most promiscuous people on earth, she said, “I like the term ‘promiscuous,’ but academics would use the term ‘report’ premarital sex since we want to make clear that the only way we can know people’s sex-behaviors is by what they ‘report’ and they may lie or forget.”

The study looked specifically at sexual behavior reported by people who are or have been married, but not in relation to the strength of their religious commitment which, the paper says, is not available in the DHS data. So there are no comparisons within religious groups, for instance Catholics compared to Protestant Christians, or Orthodox compared to Reform Jews.

When it comes to extramarital sex, the study “found that married Muslims are less likely than all other major religious groups, except Buddhists, to report extramarital sex. This finding shows that Muslims are distinct from almost all other religious groups in being less likely to report sex outside of marriage.”

“This is one of the first studies to show that there are clear differences between religious groups in terms of their sexual behaviors,” Adamczyk said. There are also “likely to be other behavioral differences, which adds insight into the chasm between Muslims and adherents of Judeo-Christian faiths that we seem to be observing. Religion clearly has a powerful influence on behavior, and its effect is not the same across religious groups.”

Religions differ, overall, in their focus on pre- and extra-marital sex, she said. “Islam has been the most successful religion in putting forth religious precepts about premarital sex and getting its adherents to abide by these precepts.

“Even if you are not religious, if you are living in a Muslim majority country, you are likely to adjust your behavior and act in ways that are more consistent with Islamic religious precepts. Across the world, the Islamic faith is clearly very powerful in shaping behavior,” she said.

  1. #1 by annebeck58 on 12/06/2012 - 9:34

    Okay. One question:

    Who would commission such a study? I mean, why?

  2. #2 by Bob on 12/06/2012 - 9:34

    My guess as to why is answered early on in the article when it says the study was intended to study MUSLIMS. I don’t know what was in the mind of the folks who commissioned the study, but I have a strong suspicion that it was more about painting MUSLIMS as the “OTHER” in any and every way possible. Otherwise, why would you commission a study and specifically state that you were targeting one particular ethnic/religious group when the study obviously included respondents from at least 3 major religions and one small minor one (Jews).

    On a side note, I am always irked both by people refering to “Judeo-Christian” this or that. This term is an oxymoron. To be Jewish is to specifically deny the basis of Christianity. The two belief systems are very very different. One is essentially a tribal cult whch sees their reward from their God in this life (the entire earth and all upon it being given to them by God for their own enjoyment) and the other is a more universalist religion which sees their God as the God of all mankind and which seeks to bring all men into the grace of their God. Christians see this life as one of works, suffering and learning and that their reward will come in the next life. The only similarity between the religions is that they both use the old testament and the historical narrative contained therein. ForChrist’s sake the Jews still practice animal sacrifice!

    Islam is far closer to Christianity than Judaism. In fact, Islam when you really look into it turns out to essentially be Christianity with Arab culture applied to it. I’m not saying that Islam IS Christianity, but that when you break the two religious belief systems down to their core beliefs, they are essentially identical. The same cannot be said for Judaism. I think one of the reason for the deep seated dislike of both Christianity and Islam among religious Jews is that they feel like Chrisitans and Muslims have “stolen their God”. That the Jewish God would see gentiles as anything more than cattle is blasphemy for a religious Jew. Where Christians and Muslims believe that their adherents are only allowed to worship ONE GOD, the Jews believe that their God is only allowed to love one people, and that is the Jewish people. Like I said, the Jewish faith sees the role between God and man almost reversed from the way gentiles view these things.

  3. #3 by shafarnullifidian on 12/06/2012 - 9:34

    Perverse voyeurism. perhaps? Vicarious mental masturbatory technique? Calling out Jews for their faux “holier than thou” ‘chosen-ness’ and self proclaimed “exceptionalism”?

  4. #4 by Dr. Tony on 12/06/2012 - 9:34

    Sarah Silverman is a virgin.

  5. #5 by ruby22-kate on 12/07/2012 - 9:34

    Great comments on a crappy article imo. It made me think of the Kinsey Report, which was (again, imo) just an excuse for Kinsey’s both overt and vicarious pleasure, with no scientific value.

  6. #6 by ruby22-kate on 12/07/2012 - 9:34

    and besides lying or ‘forgetting’ there is also denial to consider. Maybe even the Jews reporting having more sex is wishful thinking or machismo.

  7. #7 by aj on 12/07/2012 - 9:34

    Someone, PLEASE, boot Silverman in the ass so hard that she disappears over the horizon. Thanks.

  8. #8 by ariadnatheo on 07/24/2015 - 9:34

    This study indicates what a whale of a job it is to try to nudge Muslims toward the cultural marxism that the Christians in the Western world accepted so gullibly, and to some extent enthusiastically. I specify “the Western world” because the Eastern Orthodox Church is shaking itself free of it, at least in Russia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: