The 911 Truth Movement Goes to Court in the UK.


AE911Truth Evidence Goes to Court Feb 25, 2013

On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.

Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.

This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7 and NIST’s 2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300 AE911Truth petition signers supported these complaints by sending letters to BBC, requesting that BBC show this evidence to the public.

As a continuation of this process with the BBC, documentary film maker Tony Rooke has decided to take a personal stand on this issue. People in the United Kingdom are required to pay an annual TV licence fee which is used to fund BBC’s operations. Tony has refused to pay his TV licence fee on the basis of specific anti-terrorism legislation.

Section 15 of the UK Terrorism Act 2000, Article 3, states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism. Tony’s claim is that BBC has withheld scientific evidence which demonstrates that the official version of the events of 9/11 is not possible and that BBC has actively attempted to discredit those people attempting to bring this evidence to the public. According to Rooke, by doing this, BBC is supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have not yet been identified and held to account.

Rooke has been charged with a crime for not paying his TV Licence Fee. However, he has lodged a legal challenge to this charge and has now been successful in being granted an appearance in a Magistrate’s court, where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge. Tony has put together a formidable team to support him in presenting the evidence, including the following two outstanding 9/11 researchers:

Professor Niels Harrit


Dr. Niels Harrit is a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and is one of the world’s leading experts on the scientific evidence that contradicts the official story of 9/11. Professor Harrit’s team of scientists in Copenhagen proved that there was nano-engineered thermitic residue, both ignited and unignited, throughout the dust of the three WTC towers. He led the team and published the peer-reviewed study in an official scientific journal. He is also an expert on the other aspects of scientific evidence indicating controlled demolition of the three towers.

Professor Harrit was interviewed for a major documentary with BBC in 2011 where BBC clearly attempted to harass and discredit him rather than look at the scientific evidence, which was devastating to the official story of the destruction of the Twin Towers. Professor Harrit’s team took the precautionary step of recording this interview, as well as the interaction before and after the interview, which clearly shows the harassment and highly inappropriate conduct by BBC

Tony Farrell


Tony Farrell is a former Intelligence Analyst for the South Yorkshire Police Department. He was fired in 2010 because he felt compelled by his conscience to tell the truth in his official report and state that, due to his extensive analysis of the events of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings, he considered that the greatest terrorist threat to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal sources within the US and British establishment. He is now dedicating his life to helping to expose the evidence and he is challenging his dismissal through international court.

Other members of Rooke’s presentation team include:

Ian Henshall: Leading UK author on 9/11 and founder of the UK group ‘Re-investigate 9/11’

Ray Savage: Former counterterrorism officer who demonstrates the official 9/11 story is not true

Peter Drew: UK AE911Truth Action Group Facilitator

In addition to these presenters, there are detailed written testimonies of evidence and support from four other 9/11 researchers which will be deployed to bolster to Tony’s defence:

Richard Gage, AIA: Founder/CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Dwain Deets: Former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects
Erik Lawyer: Founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Jake Jacobs: Veteran US airline pilot and member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth

The evidence about 9/11 that will be presented by the various individuals above has rarely, if ever, been seen in any court of law in the United Kingdom, so this court case represents a unique and valuable opportunity for the 9/11 Truth movement.

We encourage all AE911Truth supporters and petition signers in the UK to attend this court hearing – the more the better. An outpouring of support will strengthen the message that the 9/11 truth movement needs to be heard and that there needs to be a new and independent 9/11 investigation.

The date and location of the hearing are as follows:

February 25th at 10:00 am

Horsham Magistrates’ Court [Court 3]
The Law Courts
Hurst Road
West Sussex
RH12 2ET

For further information, please contact Peter Drew, AE911Truth UK Action Group Leader, attruthfor911 [at]

  1. #1 by Blake on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    Very interesting. Thanks.

  2. #2 by sharkey on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    This ranks up there with Geraldo Rivera (Fox News commentator) saying, on air, that WTC 7 was demolished. Sadly, it was forgotten and nothing more said about it, just the same old evil Muslim bullshit. I hope that this is a catalyst to put all of those criminals in jail. They can never payback the heinous crimes that followed 911 let alone 911 itself. I wish I could be there in support and hope a million people show.

  3. #3 by Mark Propheter on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    Thank you Mr. Rooke you have done great service for humanity.

  4. #4 by Bob on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    It would be wonderful if this evidence was allowed to be presented in open court and broadcast to the world, but I suspect that the presiding magistrate will be pressured to either not allow any of this evidence into the proceedings or to close the courtroom nd suppress any release of any of this testimony.

  5. #5 by annebeck58 on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    Thank you for posting this.
    I hope it will open some minds and change opinion regarding the farce of 9-11, as well as 7-7.
    Funny, in a way, that all it took to ignite this little fire was refusal to pay a (nominal) TV licensing fee. I’d say the, “law”, should have quit while they were ahead. But, as usual, they believe they are above it all, and because of this attitude, feel justified in all of their endeavors.
    I do, however, believe more Brits are aware of what’s really going on and are happy to talk about it; certainly, the percentage is a lot higher than in the USA. One day, I hope the America will be more open-minded and able to see what our government has done, not just in regard to 9-11, but in reference to their hand(s) in every so-called terrorist plot in our country (as well as many other nations.)

    I hope the number signing on will grow from three-hundred to three-million and that it will spread, “across the pond”, too! Wondering, though; how much conspiracy of silence will follow/cover-up this trial?

    I need to look up a video I saw, about a week or so ago, posted in youtube. I believe it was made by BBC about ten years ago, and it did not go along with the official line/lie of 9-11, or 7/7, either. If I find it, I’ll post it here.

  6. #6 by Alan Kerns on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    Surely to goodness there is “A COURTROOM SOME WHERE” that has not been corrupted. My impression is that the major “powers” – you know in that “separation of powers” stuff – are all effectively owned and controlled by the money racketeers. Actually there is an instance where a court case was conducted which exhaustively presented evidence of an atrocity that was ‘an inside job’. See William Pepper’s book “An Act of State: The Execution of Martin Luther King”. Pepper acted for King’s family and won the case – the family was awarded something like $100 in nominal damages. Guess what? This made absolutely no difference! The corruption of the powers is absolute! That is the reality that has to be dealt with. I don’t know about you, but the thought of that terrifies me. No wonder ordinary folk are prone to deny reality.

  7. #7 by Rudy on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    How they’ve managed to keep the 9-11 scandal under wraps and off the burner is astonishing, with all the irrefutable facts and evidence.

  8. #8 by Rudy on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    Many many millions of people world wide know Israel did it, despite the fact that the Zionists control ALL western media.

  9. #9 by Iman on 02/23/2013 - 9:34

    As an Arab and a Moslem I wish that they could prove that 9/11 was not done by Moslems , but am not that enthusiastic about this court because evil has taken up with these people that they will do anything to prevent it from blowing up. Evil always is a winner, unfortunately .

  10. #10 by annebeck58 on 02/24/2013 - 9:34

    Yes, Rudy.
    Far too many Americans don’t even know what the term, “Five dancing Israelis”, means, or that it pertains to those caught celebrating the towers being hit/bombed/taken down. Then again, many Americans don’t know that building-7 also came down, without being hit by any plane or anything else.
    I do not agree with everything AE-911 says, but at least it opens up dialogue. And that BBC and all American “news” programs won’t talk about it (unless it’s to belittle the whole scientific community as, tin-foil hat wearers..) should worry all Americans as well as all Westerners.

  11. #11 by N Clark on 02/24/2013 - 9:34

    Too many puzzle pieces have fallen into place with the present day evil, starting with WWI, about the extreme evil destruction which has fallen on mankind. Why don’t we have spies to find ALL of them and take them out just like they took out Kennedy, brietbach, Chris, etc. over 50 deaths while Clinton was in office involving government people’s…..including a child in Arkansas who saw too much. He was 9 years old. They have started every war, hired and caused most of the bombings, killed millions. I do believe this evidence to be exposed is correct. Anyone with common horse sense knows vehicles don’t suffer the damages that occurred, from a falling building, as one little clue that it was done with nuclear blasts. Buildings come down everyday all over this world without vehicle damage. Something is very fishy with our evil world governments and elites.

  12. #12 by Bob on 02/24/2013 - 9:34

    “How they’ve managed to keep the 9-11 scandal under wraps and off the burner is astonishing, with all the irrefutable facts and evidence.”

    Actually it isn’t really all that astonishing. They haven’t prevented people from talking about 9/11, they simply drown out those voices with their near total control of mass media throughout the Western world. Think about it. Where do most people get the information upon which they form their opinions on such things? The vast majority get their opinions from three major sources, Television, which is under the complete control of Jewish interests, reading (newspapers and such) which are either under the direct control of Jewish interests or merely regurgitate information that they get from Jewish dominated media outlets, or from the internet. The internet is the only medium not yet fully brought to heel by Jewish power, but they do a good job of “drowning” out the voices online with huge minsinformation campaigns as well as their own online outlets.

    What they are able to do with the control of the mass media is to bombard people with the Jewish narrative of history (including 9/11) and to discredit anyone who presents any alternative narrative as a fringe loon or an “anti-Semite”. I would venture to guess that the number of people who have awakened enough to understand that the official narrative of 9/11 is complete nonsense (even if they haven’t been able to figure out exactly what the “truth” really is) is counted in the many millions. But you would never know this by watching or reading “main stream media” sources. There they present the narrative that says that all but a few lunatics understand that the official narrative is the obvious and irefutable “truth”…..

    This is why Jewish power no longer sees much to fear from public opinion. They understand that they have the power to shape public opinion as their needs dictate. It doesn’t matter that they cannot convince everyone, they don’t need to. They convince nearly everyone that they have convinced nearly everyone else, even if in reality 30% or more of the people do not believe their narrative. Even most of the 30% are convinced that 99% do believe the official narrative and hence most are deterred from being more vocal and open about their views for fear of being too far outside the “main stream”.

    Look at our political system. It is a farce and any rational objective observer can see that the overwhelming percentage of the population do not support either of the two major parties, yet there is ZERO chance that any other political party could take control of the US government….Congress has an approval rating of less than 15%, and often it dips into the single digits. In the past few elections about half of the American public did not even bother to cast a ballot because they are completely dissillusioned with the system. The media plays games with the statistics by only counting “registered voters” or “likely voters”, you never see them give straight up statistics based upon the total pool of adult citizens….because to do so would reveal just how “undemocratic” and unrepresentative our government has become. Yet most Americans, even though they themselves may have rightly concluded the futility of the political system, still think that they are in a minority and that most Americans are still participating in this system. Look at Obama’s 2012 victory. About 25% of the public voted for Obama, that means that 75% did not. But the story gets even more gloomy when you look into the statistics. How many of the people who voted for Obama did so more out of fear that the republican nominee would be “worse” rather than because they supported the policies of the Obama administration? I think it is fair to say that at least half of voters (of both parties) vote more against the other party than for the policies of their own party. That would indicate that probably less than 15% of Americans actually support the policies of the Obama administration, yet his election victory was declared “decisive” by the MSM. The truth is that the US government has no real legitimacy these days, but the media continues to tell us that it does and we continue to pretend to believe them despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    We live in a prison largely of our own making. We allow others to use their control of mass media and basic psychology to manipulate us into beliefs which have no basis in reality and it is these beliefs that provide the strongest of the chains that bind us. The truth really can set you free.

  13. #13 by annebeck58 on 02/24/2013 - 9:34

    Yes, N. Clark;
    This (nuclear energy/ bombs) is why I say there’s much I agree with regarding AE-911-Truth, but the biggest part I have to disagree with them in.
    If one watches the videos of each tower, just prior to falling, the energy-heat wave is quite apparent. I wish AE-911 group would not just poo-poo that, because it’s the only thing that makes it all make sense to me. When I watched and heard what Dimitri Khalazov had to say about nukes, it all fell into place.

    But, Americans don’t even understand nuclear energy and, because of this, they believe NYC would have been completely glassed-over and nobody in the area would have survived. As I’ve said many times, we need a complete overhaul of our education system– particularly in the area of physics and, of course, history.

  14. #14 by 1bigcree Shadowhawk on 02/24/2013 - 9:34

    Even though most of us here will agree to the deplorable depths of corruption in the halls of power; someone must step into the line of fire and this has indeed begun with Mr Rooke and Co. The AE911Truth group and all other parties are going to make this fight worth every minute, every dollar, every breath and every single innocent person who was killed on that day. This could very well mark the beginning of the end of the coverup and scandalous skullduggery of the inside agents and their directors. Now will come a questioning of the many previous False Flag events, Assassinations and ‘Catalyzing Events’ such as Pear Harbor, the World Wars, HoloHOAX and more. We are not some ‘fringe group’ or ‘Conspiracy Nuts’. We are a sensible, logical very rational people who merely have right to know the facts surrounding these many strange and often life changing occurrences which have only resulted in so many draconian crackdowns and loss of freedom, liberty and our very dignity to an insidious force of darkened souless creatures; addicted to domination over the planet out of a sheer malicious hatred of earthly humanity. I look forward with much anticipation and guarded optimism to a most successful outcome in this endeavor for us all.

  15. #15 by jguiseppe on 02/24/2013 - 9:34

    I found some phone numbers on the net for this court, in case some want to call there for follow-up news maybe? I didn’t see any where would they have a “live” court session, but thought these numbers could help some check in to see the outcome tomorrow…

    Horsham Magistrates’ Court

    The Law Courts
    Hurst Road
    Horsham West Sussex
    RH12 2ET

    DX 135596 Haywards Heath 6

    Court number 2947


    Criminal Enquiries
    01273 670888
    Criminal Enquiries
    01273 811770 (fax)
    Family Proceedings Court
    01403 252474
    Family Proceedings Court – Fax
    01403 258844

  16. #16 by Ingrid B on 02/25/2013 - 9:34

    hope we do get a follow up, hopefully something good..

    the BBC has also been involved in the Saville sex scandal, as has the health service, stories of satanic rights commited on children..

  17. #17 by Spitfire on 02/25/2013 - 9:34

    I just thought about something. You should really bring this up…

    Remember the Louvre incident with the Graffiti being painted on the painting a couple weeks ago?
    The jewish elite knew this court hearing was going to take place. What better way to discredit your enemies than to commit a dastardly act for the whole world to see, and sign your name as your opposition. Gangs do the same thing with Graffiti. They tag their enemies gang names in places that other gangs control so there can be gang wars between both of their enemies and they sit back and watch. Bait and switch. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was done to make the AE911 truth people from looking like thugs before they have this hearing.

    ed note–SF, I thought the EXACT same thing when I read this piece. I think you hit the bullseye with your comment.

  18. #18 by annebeck58 on 02/25/2013 - 9:34

    Yes, I figured it could be one of “theirs” doing this to prove us all as crazy — enough to deface a master’s work. But, I didn’t make the connection between that and the trial.
    That makes a lot of sense.

  19. #19 by 1bigcree Shadowhawk on 02/25/2013 - 9:34

    Good call spitfire. i made a comment about that at the Lourve Article here. An agent provocateur sent to cause damage to our movement. I did not know of the timing of the Court Case at the time I posted my comment; but now it figures. ‘They’ leave nothing to chance and play all sorts of paltry games to get one over and stay one step ahead of their opposition. They know they’re liars so that only makes sense.

  20. #20 by bostonblah on 02/26/2013 - 9:34

    good observation SF ,
    but my first reaction to this story was, blah blah blah blah blah
    who cares they will just go in circles like the rest of the patriotard jew controlled 911 jewth movement , they will never mention the word jew, or israel or mossad truck bombs or israeli spy rings ,it will all be a controlled opposition show and nothing more

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: