Revolt of the Plebs Broadcast Feb 26, 2013

Need we say anymore what today’s show covers?

Download Here


  1. #1 by Paulo Henrique on 02/26/2013 - 9:34

    The jews pet…

  2. #2 by Deadbeat on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    Excellent show. I have to say that Patty was way off in her weak attempt to find an inconsistencies with Keith Johnson’s reference to Ben Affleck. Not only Affleck was involved with the making of Argo but also George Clooney, the producer of Argo, who provided his name and reputation to the breakup and weakening of the Sudan. Sudan has long resisted Israeli hegemony and is a thorn in the Zionist backside.

    The unfortunate distraction robbed listeners of Keith’s valuable insights into the Hollywood propaganda system especially its enlistments of “Liberals” — people who think of themselves as “fair-minded” and “enlightened” to accept wars for Judea. “Wars” (note the quotes) are not always waged with guns ablaze. The kind of war that is being waged today are from withing that uses propaganda and cultural decadence to influence the youth and women to go rise up against their culture and traditions.

    I do hope that Keith does a follow up to today’s show. Dr. Johnson has been doing some excellent work with his laser-like focus on timely cultural issues and topics.

    Keep up the great work.

  3. #3 by Libido Dominandi - on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    Hollywood is weaponized sexauality and violence directed at Gentiles culture with profound effects. see E. Michael Jones – Libido Dominand, Sexual Liberation and Political Control.

  4. #4 by 1bigcree Shadowhawk on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    At 34:00 minutes Kieth was referring to Indigenous people of Great Turtle Island; I would once again give you the proper term for the Red Race. ‘Pnaci’ pronounced ‘pen AH see’. Meaning anyone descended from the Indigenous people of the Western Hemisphere or ‘Old Ones’.
    The 51st Congress passed a law forbidding any Ceremonial rituals, dances, or anything that would remind them of their Traditional past. And that includes languages and words used which pre-dated the ‘Manifest Destiny’ of the ‘Settlers’. It was Sir Jeffery Amherst a British Officer who proposed administering smallpox infested blankets to the Ottawa under chief Pontiac at Fort Pitt in 1763. A most despicable act. Thanks for another thought provoking and entertaining presentation; Kieth!

  5. #5 by persnipoles on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    Keith asking Ron about Iran flick ~’were they portraying them as…like reeeally inclined to bow to authority…?’ …I gotta hunch about that train of thought, but it sounds like that wasn’t so much the strategy. (I didn’t see it either). Well, after Ron spoke on it, what was the strategy? ….cue harp: flashback…

    In an old audio file, MC Piper mentioned something that might sorta relate. (kinda hard to describe from memory, but I think it’d be worth asking him about it) He saw some semi-open talk about, to crappily paraphrase, ‘re-humanizing’ after so thoroughly demonizing their subject. That is, when they’ve so perfectly degraded their enemies’ image and made them into ‘perfect’ hate-objects (as with the Nazis), there’s a ‘difficulty’ involved in ‘re-humanizing’ them. …talking as if that were the-hard-part. “Interesting,” was Mike’s only comment after reading it aloud.

    It stuck in my mind because that was exactly the weakness in their stories that sorta cracked-the-case for me. Like, what? They’re just ‘evil?’ What’s the motive? What was their situation? Why’d they do ‘it’? Whatever ‘it’ is (‘how’ isn’t even answered well). Surely even ‘evil’ people have comprehensible motives…

    But, you know, if I were evil, and, in the minds of ‘the masses,’ ‘evil’ people needn’t have solid motives… Well, I’d sure as hell do nothing but sell ‘evil’ people to that trash all day… That way, tween-aged hobbits and slightly taller do-gooders would trek hundreds of leagues just to stick a knife in THEIR evil ass, not mine.

    That hypothetical behavior fit the treatment of Hitler well enough. If you were evil, and you’d invented Hitler, he’d be your ‘my precious.’ You’d never give him up. If you could, you’d enshrine him in telescreen… You’d revel that people fantasize about going-back-in-time to whack’m. …and maybe you’d be concerned that people not take-his-name-in-vein (e.g., compare him to the current enemy-du-jour).

    Anyway, it seemed, when Mike read that to his audience, that it must be that they’d become aware of this weakness –and that maybe people did stray from holyhoax dogma exactly because of how ‘perfect’ the hate-object appeared to be; a fantasy-book villain, a devil-incarnate. If the pure-evil (or maybe even just ‘crazy’) bit is wearing thin, maybe now they need ‘humanized’ enemies to ‘save.’ Or, hey! How ’bout damaged-goods enemies to put-out-of-their-misery? Dunno. They sure need themes less likely to be deconstructed. …can’t find it again: didn’t Pletka say us masses ‘need a new myth?’

    That the film started with the story of Mossedeq fits this ‘re-humanizing’ idea in my head, anyway… But another thing it does is take that story away as a weapon: now you talk to a GWoT-sucker, and you tell ’em ‘the-west’-done-this-deed back in the fifties… now he’s likely to ‘know’ that already, and it won’t mean to him what it means to you. Ever had that experience…? Think I’ve been on both sides of that one…

    …yawll’s obsession with Robert Wagner is clearly unhealthy…:)

  6. #6 by Duma on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    The trouble is that too many spectators in this movement think the world revolves around them. MG and TUT have made it pretty clear that they are trying to reach people and alert them to the main problems (without demonization by association).

    The No.1 issue is with those pointing out the ‘jewish problem’ is that they are always in tandem with some lunatic/supremacist fringe. At this point, TUT is the only website I could recommend to an unaware neighbor and not appear as a clown.

    Right now, the Jew/CIA nexus that controls all ‘entertainment’ couldn’t be more clear. KJ is being extremely reserved in calling what he says a ‘theory’. Funny how people are quick to accept their politicians are lying rats but call out their ‘entertainers’ and all hell breaks loose. Libido Dominandi indeed (as the above documentary states).

  7. #7 by Bob on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    The problem with the determination of causality for particular ‘Sandy Hook etc.’ type events is this simple:

    Does the enemy have the ethics/morality to do such things?

    Does the enemy have the means to do such things?

    Essentially, could the enemy have the intention to do such things, and follow through?

    If there is a high degree of confidence that the answer to these questions is ‘yes’ then there is ONLY one reasonable conclusion:

    We do not know for sure, one way or the other!

    There is one conspiracy event I that know, with 100% certainty, was committed by the enemy — the obvious controlled demolition of WTC-7.

    The ‘smoking gun’ of 9/11.

    IF folks had concentrated on that ALONE, treating all else as obfuscation, the last decade may have seen some successful victories for OUR 1%.

    As it is, THEIR 1% continues to hold the upper hand; but has not yet won.

    Bob in DC

  8. #8 by Ingrid B on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    I like Keith, he is honest, dedicated, and down to earth.. and, according to the numbers of hits, I`m not alone.. and, just like Patty, Keith has the right to an opinion, we all do..

  9. #9 by Eva F. on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    Great show again, Keith, exposing the war propaganda against did’nt mention that Press TV dressed Michelle O. somehow more modest by making additions to her ” dress”. – The oscar night is an ugly meat exposition. – I really have some hope in the Iranian young people, the are probably not so easily brainwashed like westeners because of their upbringing and culture.

  10. #10 by Viper on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    Great show, stupid first caller.

  11. #11 by ron abbass on 02/27/2013 - 9:34

    Keith, since some of your commentary dealt with Chuck Hagel, it is interesting to note the meanings of his last name HAGEL. It’s a possibility that he may have so-called Jewish ancestry.

    Here’s the meaning of the Hebrew terms HAG and EL—Hagel

    HAG __The basic meaning of the Hebrew root word ‘hag’ is ‘to keep a feast’ or ‘to celebrate a holiday’, and it usually refers to the three main pilgrimage-festival seasons that were to be kept in the place chosen by the God of Israel.

    EL __The Hebrew word “el” is the singular of elohim (plural) which is used for the One True God of Israel. It also denotes “might”, “strength” and “power”.

    When used for the true God of Israel, “el” is usually qualified by additional words to distinguish the God of Israel from pagan and false gods.

    Great show, Keith! Keep on, keeping on!

  12. #12 by shaukatkhanhotmail on 03/03/2013 - 9:34

    Keith, keep up the good workThe world needs people like youWe are all mortal human beings Perfect we just cannot beIt’s ok to lose your cool at timesWe face an experienced foeWell versed in propaganda is heSo we have to be clever as a foxTo overcome his schemesThe fate of humanity is at stake Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:22:08 +0000 To:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: