Muslim man becomes first person to ever commit a gruesome murder in Great Britain

Scores of fired-up and highly articulate white people were preparing to get off their sofas and launch an unrelenting crusade to rid the country of anyone with a skin tone darker than Dale Winton’s on Wednesday night, after a Muslim man became the first person to ever commit a gruesome murder in British history.

As soon as they heard the news, the furious soldiers of St George leaped straight into action and began preparing their arms for the battle ahead, stopping only momentarily in their preparations to change their Facebook profile pictures to Union Jacks and post statuses about how great this country used to be before immigrants started murdering everyone.

The New Age Man spoke to the renowned historian, Professor Graham Mobey, to try and find out what life used to be like in Britain before the Muslims ruined everything. He commented:

“Living in Britain used to be like living in a fairytale paradise where the women were beautiful, the men were brave and chivalrous, and not one famous white TV presenter ever tried to have sex with a child.

“Our country’s history is completely free from incidents of cold blooded murder such as what we saw in Woolwich on Wednesday. From the Roman era, through the times of the Vikings, the Normans, the Tudors, the English Civil War, colonialism, Jack the Ripper and Fred West, not one white man has ever committed a gruesome or morally repugnant act, and there was certainly no one who ever tried to do a rape or chop someone’s head off.” The Professor went on: “The only sane conclusion one can draw from this week’s events is that, if we got rid of all the Muslims, we could all go back to how things used to be when, as I just said, there was definitely no raping or murdering.”

Whilst it’s clear that there are a lot of fired up white men out there ready for battle, it is still not clear how a group of ragtag men, who only step foot outside their villages to go to McDonalds or on Jeremy Kyle, will be able to overthrow the government and put all the Muslims back on a boat to where most of them didn’t come from.

The New Age Man caught up with one EDL member whilst he was taking a break from repeatedly smashing his face against the keyboard of his computer. He offered a lucid and articulate description of the EDL’s nuanced immigration policy:

“Muh muh nom meh mah wah wah Muslim. Dom dah wah bla dom dah dah Islam”

Whether the EDL will now be able to form some sort of cogent political force and gain influence by entering and winning elections, is not clear. One pollster told the New Age Man that it will depend entirely on how many mentally retarded people are actually registered to vote in Britain.

  1. #1 by George on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    Zionist London Rothschild Central Bankers try every which way to spark their racist wars using their own intelligence agencies and social engineering institutes (Tavistock comes to mind) to control Humanity and shape the world into a certain submission to their “one world government” tyrannical (Jew) Bankster control.

    We can say for sure that all these so-called Muslim “converts” (victims) have been mind bended (reverse engineered) by all these brute agencies to set up their own sick realities:

    They keep going at it, even though patterns remain the same: (The Making of a Slave)

  2. #2 by Ba Aden on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    Rape killing have always been there as a daily cost in England through the years. But now that is a Muslim converter that is the killer so in a sudden England was so clean and free from all that shit as this new age person wants us to know, I dont know where Jack the ripper and tens of his kind that existed in the British history came from? Arab? Muslim?

  3. #3 by SW on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    Nothing like a good sense of humor in these times.

  4. #4 by abdurrahman on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    Like I have said I live a few miles away from woolwich which is a complete dump. Stabbings, murders, rapes are common in these parts. In fact people have been beheaded on the streets, its nothing new. But the ‘white man’ seems to forget the reality they have created for themselves and the oppressed in the lands they bomb and destroy with their repugnant culture. Even though I am white, the first chance I get I will live this sinking ship, I will leave my home searching for another land. The reason is not due to immigration but rather is due to ‘British culture’ where babies are killed at birth, fornication is the norm, men marry men and the honor of the mother is surpassed by prostitutes.

  5. #5 by Insomniac on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    Henry VIII executed 57,000 – 72,000 Catholics during the Catholic uprising
    Edward VI massacred more than 5,500 Cornish Catholics
    Mary I burned 284 Protestant heretics
    Jack the Ripper 5 murdered [some credit the count as high as 23]

    Crime Vault UK

  6. #6 by annebeck58 on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    This is one of the best posts, ever!

    It’s just like in Boston; ’til two Chechen guys (and their pals, who were all Muslim, it seems) came along, there was never any terror or killings or even injuries of Bostonians, in Mass. Sure, there was that ONE time when I was a kid, that the whole East-Coast was terrified (maybe that’s not the right word, as terror only comes from Muslims, hey?) over the, “Boston Strangler?, but besides that Boston has been a completely calm place, free of murder…, free of manhunts. Heck, the day it was celebrating (Patriot’s Day), nobody was injured in any manner. During the Boston Tea-Party, only tea was hurt, right?

    But, of course, it’s only those dark(er)-skinned folk who perpetrate terror-acts. Here’s one thing I want to say to the Brits: IF you did not want dark-skinned folk in your “white-country”, you should have never brought BLACK slaves into your area. If you don’t want immigrants (and the young men from Woolwich were not immigrants- they were born IN England!!), get the hell out of their countries.
    It’s quite simple.
    Leave people’s homelands alone and they will feel no need to leave their homelands. They won’t be flocking to GB/UK if their own lands are safe. But, you make them unsafe, so this is pretty much what you get in response.

    These men did this because of what GB and US and others are doing to their families and their lands. Stop attacking their lands and you can wave good-bye when they all get on planes or boats or trains to go back HOME.

    Same goes for America. We need to leave people be.

  7. #7 by f.p. on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    If a man plants corn, he will harvest corn, it does not get simpler than that.

  8. #8 by kathleen abell on 05/26/2013 - 9:34

    Beautiful! Thank-you for cheering me up.

  9. #9 by mothman777 on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    I have to say that when they said the soldier who was hacked to death said that he believed ‘life is for living’, I saw the total and utter nonsense of that statement.

    After all, he was stated in the media to have seen seen military action in several war-torn hotspots in various countries in the world, and was a professional soldier trained to kill, not a redcoat working for Butlin’s holiday camps helping people to have a good time.

    How many people had he killed himself? And given the fact that about 97% of all casualties of modern warfare today are civilians, how many of the people that he killed personally had been civilians?

    Was that soldier truly such a victim?, or was a little of the mindless violence that he himself had been thoughtlessly inflicting on others merely been returned to him in a similarly mindless way as a form of karma.

    After all, the ‘conflicts’ that Britain finds itself in are nothing more than artificially-contrived and totally pre-planned wars that are merely Jewish world empire-building, thinly-cloaked under the pretense of bringing democracy and freedom to people in far-off lands, leaving their victims’ lands covered for thousands of millions of years with highly radioactive ‘depleted’ and non-depleted uranium and other highly dangerous radioactive isotopes, in horrendously savage acts of pure insane hatred, committed by people who are not fit to be out of top security prison mental hospitals, like British PM David Cameron, who polluted the natural fresh water aquifer of Libya with radioactive uranium weapons deliberately, ruining water that could have greened all of Northern Africa and given life to hundreds of millions of black people. Cameron certainly nipped that in the bud, just like Jew Bill Gates, who plans to reduce the world population by one billion, no less, with his divine authority; none of those who will be ‘reduced’ will be Jewish by the way of course, as that would be unthinkable racism to prevent any Jews from having children.

    The British leaders working for the Jews have insanely judged to death even the future inhabitants of presently Muslim lands some hundreds and even thousands of millions of years into the future, with horrific genetic damage and inconceivable suffering, so no wonder some of the Muslims are going bloody crazy, and that response with a machete against one single man, a soldier, can hardly be justifiably considered so worthy of condemnation compared with when we see the pictures of Muslim women and children blown to pieces by British and Americans using air bases in England to pilot drones, left horribly mutilated for live with huge parts of their bodies missing.

    I mean, just who is really insane? Is it really just the guy with the machete?, surely, we should be seeing allegations of insanity and condemnation of the British government in the media everyday for their acts of mass murder against largely civilian groups of victims, in countries that have never done the UK or America any harm at all in reality.

    The only ‘crime’ of these victims is that they are not Jewish, and are thus under judgement of the Talmud edict; “Even the best of Gentiles should all be killed”. And when the scum-sucking creeps who work for the Jews wake up, the Jews will kill them too. That will be the moment that those Gentiles will wake up, the moment the Jews kill them stone dead, in accordance with the edicts of the Talmud, and it is coming; just read the Noahide Laws.

    Now everyone says the killer was a ‘madman’, and all the ‘Uncle Tom’ Muslims in the media say he was nothing to do with them, and was not doing representing Islam in any way.

    If he really believed life is for living, then how come he followed a profession that totally terminates the lives of others? The killing done today by the British army never enables others to live, it only genocides them and inflicts slavery on the survivors. That is what the ‘drummer’ did in reality, being nothing more than a mercenary for Israel in effect.

    The soldier who died was obviously in the wrong profession (should have gone to Specsavers).

    He ought to have known that his ‘firm’ were largely responsible for 4,400,000 Muslims having been slaughtered in Iraq for no reason at all, since even President Bush acknowledged that Iraq never had anything to do with 911, and since the ‘informer’ ‘Curveball’ admitted that he totally fabricated his account of ‘weapons of mass destruction in Iraq’, and that is a very out-of-date official United Nations total of soldiers and civilians who died in Iraq from sanctions, bombing and other military action to bring Iraq ‘democracy’ (genocidal annihilation).

    So the soldier who died wanted to save lives, yet worked for the biggest firm of mass-murderers on the planet. The organized ‘grief’ for him, purportedly sincere by the British PM, is absolutely nauseating. The more dead Gentiles the better as far as he is concerned. Every dead Gentile is a great cause for celebration amongst the Jews, and that dead soldier would be no different, since all wars are arranged by Jews to get Gentiles to kill each other.

    No, PM Cameron is actually very happy that the soldier was hacked to death, Things are going according to plan, and maybe the murderer was some kind of Manchurian candidate, and maybe he really had been recruited by MI5, as his friend alleged he had been requested to work for MI5 several times, or even controlled by him in some way to do what he did.

    MI5 and MI6 were responsible for many of the bombings in Northern Ireland after all, whilst telling people that the IRA and ‘loyalists’ did them, that information being freely available in America from released intelligence files.

    When women and children are blown to bits by mindless scum remote piloting drones from air bases in England, with their 97% civilian collateral loss rate, how many of those women and children are mourned over in the British press, with a similar sense of ‘outrage’?.

    The absolute hypocrisy of the Jew-controlled British Press makes me utterly sick, as does the EDL waving their Israeli flags, they truly are scum of the earth, shamelessly working for the very people, the Jews, who have totally destroyed England spiritually and materially, whilst they purport to be patriots.

  10. #10 by amerikagulag on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    Channeling The Onion today are we? Nice.

  11. #11 by annebeck58 on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    Mothman; my point to Rodney, the other day was just that. At least these young men chose a soldier. As a soldier, he really cannot be considered INNOCENT. Though the do-ers said they were basing this off of, “an eye for an eye…”, had they really been going that way, they would have chosen a child and her civilian mother.
    I think these young men were not and are not insane. I think their point was made, even if it wasn’t exactly gotten/’ comprehended by the people they were addressing it to. Continue killing innocents (well, all people) in Muslim lands, and start seeing the same thing happen in our “White lands”. We need to end these murders and destruction of lands if we don’t want to see more of this. But, our government(s) seem to have no intention of doing this, no matter what happens. In fact, when a Muslim man (or men) kill a person in the Western-world, it’s a terrible thing (it is “terrorism”), and the media and their owners use it as exactly that.

    We have to be a lot smarter than to play into their hands in our crying out.

  12. #12 by Ghazi Al Hind on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    Exclusive: How MI5 blackmails British Muslims

    Five Muslim community workers have accused MI5 of waging a campaign of blackmail and harassment in an attempt to recruit them as informants.

    The men claim they were given a choice of working for the Security Service or face detention and harassment in the UK and overseas.

    They have made official complaints to the police, to the body which oversees the work of the Security Service and to their local MP Frank Dobson. Now they have decided to speak publicly about their experiences in the hope that publicity will stop similar tactics being used in the future.

    Intelligence gathered by informers is crucial to stopping further terror outrages, but the men’s allegations raise concerns about the coercion of young Muslim men by the Security Service and the damage this does to the gathering of information in the future.

    Three of the men say they were detained at foreign airports on the orders of MI5 after leaving Britain on family holidays last year.

    After they were sent back to the UK, they were interviewed by MI5 officers who, they say, falsely accused them of links to Islamic extremism. On each occasion the agents said they would lift the travel restrictions and threat of detention in return for their co-operation. When the men refused some of them received what they say were intimidating phone calls and threats.

    Two other Muslim men say they were approached by MI5 at their homes after police officers posed as postmen. Each of the five men, aged between 19 and 25, was warned that if he did not help the security services he would be considered a terror suspect. A sixth man was held by MI5 for three hours after returning from his honeymoon in Saudi Arabia. He too claims he was threatened with travel restrictions if he tried to leave the UK.

    An agent who gave her name as Katherine is alleged to have made direct threats to Adydarus Elmi, a 25-year-old cinema worker from north London. In one telephone call she rang him at 7am to congratulate him on the birth of his baby girl. His wife was still seven months’ pregnant and the couple had expressly told the hospital that they did not want to know the sex of their child.

    Mr Elmi further alleges: “Katherine tried to threaten me by saying, and it still runs through my mind now: ‘Remember, this won’t be the last time we ever meet.’ And then during our last conversation she explained: ‘If you do not want anything to happen to your family you will co-operate.'”

    Madhi Hashi, a 19-year-old care worker from Camden, claims he was held for 16 hours in a cell in Djibouti airport on the orders of MI5. He alleges that when he was returned to the UK on 9 April this year he was met by an MI5 agent who told him his terror suspect status would remain until he agreed to work for the Security Service. He alleges that he was to be given the job of informing on his friends by encouraging them to talk about jihad.

    Mohamed Nur, 25, a community youth worker from north London, claims he was threatened by the Security Service after an agent gained access to his home accompanied by a police officer posing as a postman.

    “The MI5 agent said, ‘Mohamed if you do not work for us we will tell any foreign country you try to travel to that you are a suspected terrorist.'”

    Mohamed Aden, 25, a community youth worker from Camden, was also approached by someone disguised as a postman in August last year. He alleges an agent told him: “We’re going to make your travelling harder for you if you don’t co-operate.”

    None of the six men, who work with disadvantaged youths at the Kentish Town Community Organisation (KTCO), has ever been arrested for terrorism or a terrorism-related offence.

    They have repeatedly complained about their treatment to the police and to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, which oversees the work of the Security Services.

    In a letter to Lord Justice Mummery, who heads the tribunal, Sharhabeel Lone, the chairman of the KTCO, said: “The only thing these young people have in common is that they studied Arabic abroad and are of Somali origin. They are not involved in any terrorist activity whatsoever, nor have they ever been, and the security services are well aware of this.”

    Mr Sharhabeel added: “These incidents smack of racism, Islamophobia and all that undermines social cohesion. Threatening British citizens, harassing them in their own country, alienating young people who have committed no crime other than practising a particular faith and being a different colour is a recipe for disaster.

    “These disgraceful incidents have undermined 10 years of hard work and severely impacted social cohesion in Camden. Targeting young people that are role models for all young people in our country in such a disparaging way demonstrates a total lack of understanding of on-the-ground reality and can only be counter-productive.

    “When people are terrorised by the very same body that is meant to protect them, sowing fear, suspicion and division, we are on a slippery slope to an Orwellian society.”

    Frank Dobson said: “To identify real suspects from the Muslim communities MI5 must use informers. But it seems that from what I have seen some of their methods may be counter-productive.”

    Last night MI5 and the police refused to discuss the men’s complaints with The Independent. But on its website, MI5 says it is untrue that the Security Service harasses Muslims.

    The organisation says: “We do not investigate any individuals on the grounds of ethnicity or religious beliefs. Countering the threat from international terrorists, including those who claim to be acting for Islam, is the Security Service’s highest priority.

    “We know that attacks are being considered and planned for the UK by al-Qai’da and associated networks. International terrorists in this country threaten us directly through violence and indirectly through supporting violence overseas.”

    It adds: “Muslims are often themselves the victims of this violence – the series of terrorist attacks in Casablanca in May 2003 and Riyadh in May and November 2003 illustrate this.

    “The service also employs staff of all religions, including Muslims. We are committed to recruiting a diverse range of staff from all backgrounds so that we can benefit from their different perspectives and experience.”

    MI5 and me: Three statements

    Mahdi Hashi: ‘I told him: this is blackmail’

    Last month, 19-year-old Mahdi Hashi arrived at Gatwick airport to take a plane to visit his sick grandmother in Djibouti, but as he was checking in he was stopped by two plainclothes officers. One of the officers identified himself as Richard and said he was working for MI5.

    Mr Hashi said: “He warned me not to get on the flight. He said ‘Whatever happens to you outside the UK is not our responsibility’. I was absolutely shocked.” The agent handed Mr Hashi a piece of paper with his name and telephone contact details and asked him to call him.

    “The whole time he tried to make it seem like he was looking after me. And just before I left them at my boarding gate I remember ‘Richard’ telling me ‘It’s your choice, mate, to get on that flight but I advise you not to,’ and then he winked at me.”

    When Mr Hashi arrived at Djibouti airport he was stopped at passport control. He was then held in a room for 16 hours before being deported back to the UK. He claims the Somali security officers told him that their orders came from London. More than 24 hours after he first left the UK he arrived back at Heathrow and was detained again.

    “I was taken to pick up my luggage and then into a very discreet room. ‘Richard’ walked in with a Costa bag with food which he said was for me, my breakfast. He said it was them who sent me back because I was a terror suspect.” Mr Hashi, a volunteer youth leader at Kentish Town Community Organisation in north London, alleges that the officer made it clear that his “suspect” status and travel restrictions would only be lifted if he agreed to co-operate with MI5. “I told him ‘This is blatant blackmail’; he said ‘No, it’s just proving your innocence. By co-operating with us we know you’re not guilty.’

    “He said I could go and that he’d like to meet me another time, preferably after [May] Monday Bank Holiday. I looked at him and said ‘I don’t ever want to see you or hear from you again. You’ve ruined my holiday, upset my family, and you nearly gave my sick grandmother in Somalia a heart attack’.”

    Adydarus Elmi: ‘MI5 agent threatened my family’

    When the 23-year-old cinema worker from north London arrived at Chicago’s O’Hare airport with his pregnant wife, they were separated, questioned and deported back to Britain.

    Three days later Mr Elmi was contacted on his mobile phone and asked to attend Charing Cross police station to discuss problems he was having with his travel documents. “I met a man and a woman,” he said. “She said her name was Katherine and that she worked for MI5. I didn’t know what MI5 was.”

    For two-and-a-half hours Mr Elmi faced questions. “I felt I was being lured into working for MI5.” The contact did not stop there. Over the following weeks he claims “Katherine” harassed him with dozens of phone calls.

    “She would regularly call my mother’s home asking to speak to me,” he said. “And she would constantly call my mobile.”

    In one disturbing call the agent telephoned his home at 7am to congratulate him on the birth of his baby girl. His wife was still seven months pregnant and the couple had expressly told the hospital that they did not want to know the sex of their child.

    “Katherine tried to threaten me by saying – and it still runs through my mind now – ‘Remember, this won’t be the last time we ever meet”, and then during our last conversation explained: ‘If you do not want anything to happen to your family you will co-operate’.”

    Mohamed Nur

    Mohamed Nur, 25, first came into contact with MI5 early one morning in August 2008 when his doorbell rang. Looking through his spyhole in Camden, north London, he saw a man with a red bag who said he was a postman.

    When Mr Nur opened the door the man told him that he was in fact a policeman and that he and his colleague wanted to talk to him. When they sat down the second man produced ID and said that he worked for MI5.

    The agent told Mr Nur that they suspected him of being an Islamic extremist. “I immediately said ‘And where did you get such an idea?’ He replied, ‘I am not permitted to discuss our sources’. I said that I have never done anything extreme.”

    Mr Nur claims he was then threatened by the officer. “The MI5 agent said, ‘Mohamed, if you do not work for us we will tell any foreign country you try to travel to that you are a suspected terrorist’.”

    They asked him what travel plans he had. Mr Nur said he might visit Sweden next year for a football tournament. The agent told him he would contact him within the next three days.

    “I am not interested in meeting you ever.” Mr Nur replied. As they left, the agent said to at least consider the approach, as it was in his best interests.

  13. #13 by Ghazi Al Hind on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    Eton college’s exam asks boys to justify army shooting protesters dead

    Britain’s elite school Eton, where Prime Minister David Cameron went to school, has asked 13-year old boys to pretend to be Prime Minister and justify the army shooting dead 25 protesters in a speech to win a scholarship, British media reported.

    The question, which was put to students applying for the King’s Scholarship, worth one tenth of Eton’s £32,000 a year fees, is entitled “Concerning Cruelty, Clemency and Whether It Is better To Be Loved than Feared”, and follows a passage from Machiavelli.

    “The year is 2040. There have been riots in the streets of London after Britain has run out of petrol because of an oil crisis in the Middle East. Protesters have attacked public buildings. Several policemen have died. Consequently, the government has deployed the army to curb the protests. After two days the protests have stopped but 25 protestors have been killed by the army,” the question reads.

    Candidates are then asked to imagine that they were the Prime Minister and to write a speech for broadcast to the nation on why the decision to deploy the army against violent protests was both necessary and morally right.

    The headmaster of Eton College, Tony Little, emailed the US paper the Huffington Post saying the question has been taken out of context and that Eton School does not favor any particular political viewpoint.

    “We are looking for candidates who can see both sides of an idea and express them clearly. High ability candidates at this level are often asked to put themselves in someone else’s shoes,” he wrote.

  14. #14 by Ghazi Al Hind on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    Freind of Woowich attacker says he was sexually assulted in Kenya and harrased by MI5:

  15. #15 by michael mazur on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    That considerably damaged car didn’t look as if it had struck that steel square stanchion tube, being one of two uprights holding that street sign, as there was neither a mark on it nor any deformation of it, nor was the concrete in which it was set, disturbed.

    And why was the heavy blood pooling and trail on the other side of this road sign, and not on the same side as the car ?

    In other words, the road sign stood as divider between location of car and original location of body, which doesn’t make any sense for when a car strikes a pedestrian at speed the body goes onto the bonnet and into the windshield, crazing it.

    So how come then, the body initially ends up on the other side of the double stanchion supported road sign ?

    Trying to make sense of it i would say that the man was already dead and brought in from elsewhere and lain on the street – he was never on the footpath, but the footpath was bloodied with something, as we saw.

    What was the role of the double road sign stanchion, then ? To confuse the normal sense of the extent of the damage to the front of a car when supposedly striking a human body/steel stanchion combo, for this was the car MI5 stole to then damage elsewhere in the way they did, to then drive it to where we see it.

    We can expect the two alleged killers to be accused of stealing the car too, which, in the scale of the issues, will barely get a mention.

  16. #16 by jerzyulickirek on 05/27/2013 - 9:34

    “WOOLWICH MASSACRE DECEPTION EXPOSED special edition 22 May 2013

    Published on 26 May 2013
    For the first time you can watch what happened in sequence and detail, you will soon understand how this was done by using actors and extras as well as clever camera angles.
    includes young extra admitting it is a movie scene, which all the extras were probably hired for totally unaware that it was a propaganda machine in action.

    This man wasn’t killed and the 2 “terrorists were not shot, the police were actors.

    The car was strategically placed, there was no blood anywhere other than fake blood, take a good look at this video, then watch it again and again and you will soon see it was a movie it was all well rehearsed but sadly many of you out there fell for it, so I hope
    to God this video will wake you up from the hypnosis you are under.


    Love and Gratitude ”


  17. #17 by michael mazur on 05/28/2013 - 9:34

    Thank you Jerzy for the find. I too, agree that ‘the car was strategically placed’. It must follow that the rest of the narrative in total is faked.

    Personally, i don’t believe this Lee Rigby ever existed, hence all the pictures of him and estranged wife are of other people.

  18. #18 by mothman777 on 05/28/2013 - 9:34


    Many thanks for this, I agree with you after seeing this video that this is indeed another cleverly done fake made by the government.

    I see that there is no blood on the road from where the man supposedly had his head cut off, no head rolling round anywhere, and the person sat nursing the ‘victim’ in the street with his arm around him is absolutely ridiculous considering that the ‘victim’s’ head had supposedly been completely chopped off.

    The bit where the ‘murderer’s’ hand extends into giant spider fingers is weird too.

    So, wow! It is getting a lot like the films; ‘Running Man’, and ‘1984’, where people are told stuff is going on and has been going on that never has been. Maybe, the idea is, that by extension, our minds will also apply the same principle to real wars, believing them also to be unreal, or never being quite sure, or able to be quite sure, forever trapped in a state of inaction as a direct consequence.

    Quite probably a certain number of people are meant to find this out on the network of internet underground reports, the whole thing being a cleverly done bit of psychological manipulation. Clever stuff by Tavistock Jew psychologists.

    When we saw railings going right through the bodies of the 7/7 ‘bombers’ outside the station and an unreal plane going right through a skyscraper on 9/11, those of us with enquiring minds were meant to see that by the US and UK governments, or they would not have made those blatantly artificial films to show us. We are then intended to brainwash ourselves, and the various factions of conspiracy theorists to brainwash each other into senseless white noise. That is their attempt at absolute power. Can we see through them? Yes we can.

  19. #19 by jerzyulickirek on 05/30/2013 - 9:34



  20. #20 by annebeck58 on 05/30/2013 - 9:34


    Were not most of these videos shot using cell-phones? If so, the quality of video is not going to be great. I am not going to accept a cell-phone video (and still from such) to tell me that it was implanted later or not.
    If all of the videos show pretty much the same thing, and these people are certainly not all related to each other, saying one was doctored and the rest not (yet, again, they all look the same, save the color-tone/tint/hue) the assessment does not fly.


    False-flag does NOT mean the event did not happen. It just means the doers or those behind the doers are not whom they’ve been purported to be, but is our government(s). Okay?
    Let’s start with this one premise: WHO benefits? And stop with the inane minutia.

  21. #21 by jerzyulickirek on 05/31/2013 - 9:34


    After watching as much as possible on the subject I do believe that the whole thing is staged event.
    I didn’t happened.
    Imagine yourself talking friendly to a man who few minutes earlier beheaded another living soul ?
    But we do see this in those videos:)
    Or woman with pram passing by instead of running away?
    Apart from many other interesting anomalia.
    No.I don’t buy it.


  22. #22 by D on 10/13/2013 - 9:34

    600,000 White English moved out of London from 2000 – 2013 because we don’t want to live with these people. They have turned the suburbs of Britain into hellholes.i used to be a soldier I have seen the things Muslims do to each other in there own countries .they are 2000 years behind the west if someone does’nt do something we are going to end up with with a problem like Detroit , run by blacks in absolute shitstate in the 50s it was mainly whites now it is mainly blacks and it is worse than Afghanistan.

    ed note–Irony so thick you could cut it with a knife. You admit to being a soldier who has invaded islamic lands, probably killed innocent men, women and children in the process, and yet you are going to talk about how muslims fleeing the violence WHICH YOU YOURSELF ADMIT TO HELPING PEPETUATE have turned ‘white’ lands into ‘hellholes’.

    What you are is a murderous piece of shit and the Jews’ dream come true in terms of their personal, private mercenary army.

  23. #23 by annebeck58 on 10/13/2013 - 9:34

    Whhhaaa-haa, D!
    * a guy so proud of himself to not even use his name???*

    Dearest “D”;
    Sure, and we ALL know that back in 1960’s London, there were no criminals and no gangs (where the hell do you think the Irish gangs of Boston/USA got their ideas from?) There were NO bombings of buses, as the English had NO problem with other Whites, including other Englishmen! In the sixties and seventies, before punk (another voilent sort of revolution= with MUSIC) came about, Brits were not sellling drugs to other Brits and people were not found in alleyways, door-stoops, and seedy motel rooms with hot-shot needles still in their arms,

    Irish gangs/ mobsters took on ideas and attitudes and doings of the ENGLISH brothers..; it actually trickled down to AMERICAn Black and Hispanic gangs. So do not try and tell US that Whites in London were happily tucking-in on Sundays dinner of pork-pie or toad-in-the-hole with their kids outside in absolutely NO danger. Where the heck do you think the boogey-man came from? It came from YOUR ancestors as well as mind (as a descendent of Brots, too.)

    Learn some of your own history before you blame everything on Blacks, ya git!

  24. #24 by annebeck58 on 10/13/2013 - 9:34

    Say; Mark, can you fix my typos? I am sure the git will concentrate on that rather than the content of my message, as it will be completely lost on him.

    One more thing, to the git; What about the Westies? The British protection-rackets? WHY did the Irish hate the Brits so much? It was due to the overwhelming number of criminals trying to take-over their island, too; these men were White and English.
    And, if Brits did not want Blacks at all, they should not have ordered and supplied the land with slaves. Same goes for the US.

    Detroit was NOT run by Blacks back in the sixties; it was run by the mob, as was every other large American city. Do so history research, D.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: