2013 Mark Glenn
In this, the world of post-destruction Iraq/Syria/Libya/Afghanistan/Gaza/Lebanon, etc, it is more than a little believable that someone from one of those aforementioned neighborhoods might harbor enough of a grudge to strike back with what’s commonly referred to as an act of terrorism.
After all, lest we forget, this is precisely what nearly 300 million Americans sanctimoniously did in the aftermath of 9/11 after 3,000 of their own lost their lives. Having little to no understanding of the laws governing cause and effect, Uncle Sam’s tempermental and trigger-happy offspring handled it the only way that’s ever made sense to them–Invade a series of countries, drop millions of pounds of ordnance on heavily populated cities, destroy infrastructure, murder millions of people, cause incalculable suffering and not feel an ounce of remorse or regret over it.
So it is entirely believable, expectable even–that a few individuals, after seeing what’s happened to their own extended family members and under the influence of raw, powerful emotions such as grief, rage and everything in between, might just decide to pull an ‘Uncle Sam’ themselves and do to America what America has done to others the world over–kill innocent people at an otherwise festive event such as the Boston Marathon.
Yes, it’s a simple, 2-syllable word known as ‘blowback’ and as inescapable as the laws of gravity, inertia, action/reaction, or, if we want to get ‘biblical’ about it, those dying by the sword who live by it…
The ugly truth be told, the only difference between the 2 scenarios–Americans killing innocent Muslims or Muslims killing innocent Americans–lies in the manner by which it is Hollywood-ized by Jewish interests out to steer American opinion in a direction favorable to Israel. When Americans mass murder Muslims, it’s sexy like Tom Cruise…Fighter pilots and/or drone-operators–calm, cool, and collected–sitting in their air-conditioned wherevers behind computer consoles with perfect teeth and perfect hair, sipping iced coffees and launching laser-guided missiles that find their bullseyes on weddings, schools, places of worship and families seated around dinner tables…
Whereas with their Islamic counterparts, it’s backwards, barbaric and Quentin Tarantino-esque, as they are forced to use means as sophisticated as momma’s favorite stew pot and barely-21st century cell phones.
The other ugly truth is that Americans really should thank their lucky stars it doesn’t happen more often, and by ‘often’ we mean on a daily basis. Over the last half century America has–directly or indirectly–murdered millions of civilians throughout the Middle East (and beyond) and yet, despite what should be the inevitable volcanic eruption arising from raw, powerful emotions such as grief, rage and everything in between, there have only been 2 events–count ’em, 2–where someone (or a group of someones) succeeded in carrying out acts of terror against America, meaning 9/11 and Boston, 2013.
Perspectively speaking, there have been more massacres of Americans by mentally-unstable, pistol-packing non-Muslims addicted to psychiatric drugs in the last 12 months than there have been by Muslims perpetrating acts of terror in the last 12 years.
Very unimpressive numbers indeed, considering the amout of hysteria, hype, hoopla and hyperbole with which the collective American psyche has been gang raped viz-a-viz buzzwords such as jihad, 72 virgins, suicide bombers, and all the rest bantied about by interested busybodies.
And yet, predictably and sadly, Americans fail to grasp the mathmatic significance to all of this. A mere 2 events in 12 years despite the incalculable amount of war and desolation inflicted by the US against those who strike back only twice in little more than a decade’s time. What’s wrong with this picture?
On the other hand however, just because a slightly-to-almost believable story involving 2 individuals tired of seeing their extended family killed in various Islamic locales throughout the world seems to tie up all the loose ends and seems to explain the obvious regarding the events in Boston doesn’t mean there aren’t more twists and turns to it than meet the eye.
Indeed, without getting into non-sensical armchair forensics about body parts blown off that really weren’t or ‘crisis actors’ whose job was to make Boston ‘look’ like the event that some allege it really wasn’t, there are real-life, honest-to-God questions that could/should be pondered and discussed regarding very real behind-the-scenes beneficiaries who cashed in big time as a result of the day’s events.
First, after getting past all the ugly political face paint and rancid perfume with which the event has been dolled-up and setting aside phraseology meant to put Americans on even more of an aggressive war footing than they are already, the first thing that needs recognizing is that the bombing in Boston–by face value, at least–was by definition a crime of passion. It was–as of this moment–neither an act of war by another state nor something planned and executed by an established group listed by the U.S. or any other government to be a sponsor of terrorism.
But being a ‘crime of passion’ does not preclude the possibility/likelihood of someone (or a group of someones) from having maneuvered individuals under the influence of raw, powerful emotions such as grief, rage and everything in between into committing such acts, if it worked in their own interests.
And we can be rest assured there were (are) individuals whose interests were served that day in Boston, individuals who needed the carnage, chaos and everything in between to take place in the same way a dentist needs tooth decay to stay in business.
As intended, Boston–like 9/11–was not one of those ‘sweet nothings’ whispered into the collective ear of America that is here today and gone tomorrow. It’s exactly the kind of ‘whiplash’ event that results in people wanting action, wanting it now and wanting it BIG, meaning that someone (or a group of someones) has to die, to the point that if an entire nation of otherwise innocent people must be blown to bits in order to get one (alleged) guilty individual, so be it.
This being the case then means the first question any rookie investigator asks in a crime of political passion such as this is–
(a) who needed it to happen, and
(b) who benefited from it.
Before isolating who did benefit from this drama (or trauma, if you prefer) let’s first shorten the list of prospective suspects by identifying those who didn’t benefit from it.
Obviously, the 2 Tsarnaev brothers themselves, one dead and the other–innocent or not, nevertheless–already convicted in the court of public opinion and facing the gallows.
Next on the list of non-beneficiaries are the religion of Islam and its 1.5 billion adherents around the world who on a daily basis are being hunted, shot, bombed, poisoned, starved, jailed, tortured and everything in between by an Israelified America and her cooperative cousins around the globe. As a result of that day’s events, Muslims everywhere can now expect even more violence against their persons and patriae, including (or perhaps especially) those living in places such as Syria, Iran, Pakistan, Lebanon, etc.
And finally, on the list of those not benefiting from the events of that day are several billion people the world over who are dying (literally) for a little peace and quiet in their personal and collective lives. Included in this are countries such as America and her Western cousins who are (were) beginning to cool off to the idea of perpetual conflict with 1.5 billion Muslims and who are (were) ready to throw in the towel on this whole ‘clash of civilizations’ nonsense.
In fact, it can be accurately said that virtually the entire planet, weary from war and ready to move on to other issues such as life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness did not benefit from this latest event in any fashion…
…The entire world that is, except for one tiny section of highly-contested real estate lying along the eastern shores of the Mediterranean calling itself the Jewish state.
Ahhhh, an interesting development, surely. 2 individuals of Islamic persuasion and Russian nationality carrying out an act of terror in what is historically the birthplace of America, at a time when Israel is screeeeeeching like a Banshee for war against countries such as Syria, Iran, and possibly Russia, simultaneous to the American war machine beginning to sputter and stall…
As far as Israel is concerned, the timing could not have been any better. Like Moses parting the Red Sea so that his fellow Israelite banditos could high tail it out of town with all of Egypt’s gold and silver before Pharaoh’s army caught up with them, this latest event in Boston was a ‘lifesaver’ for Israel if ever there were one.
Why, so much did this problematic, theocratic ethnocracy benefit from the events in Boston that we could easily take Bibi Netanyahu’s infamous–
‘9/11 was good, as it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel…’
as well as his–
“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq that has swung American public opinion in our favor…’
…and apply them perfectly to Boston without need of any alterations, adjustments, nips or tucks whatsoever.
Indeed, the only thing missing from the entire drama in Boston were the same ‘5 dancing Israelis’–Mossad agents one and all–in New York on the day of 9/11 who were seen high-fiveing each other over the collapse of the Twin Towers and who later admitted on Israeli TV that indeed they were–one and all–Mossad who had been sent to the U.S. to ‘document the event’.
So, is a war-weary world out of line then in imagining the clinking of champagne glasses and shouts of ‘L’Chaim!’ in various locales such as Tel Aviv, New York and Washington D.C. in the aftermath of what took place in Boston? Is it over the top to picture powerful Jewish interests slapping each other on the back and snickering at the recent bad fortune that befell America as they did on and after 9/11?
Not in the least. In fact, of all the rabbits pulled out of various black hats by media magicians working for organized Jewish interests, it–Hebraic festivating over the recent terrorism in America–is the only part of the story that seems believable, despite it being (as of this moment) only theoretical in nature.
Of course, the less informed (or more disingenuous) of those participating in a conversation of this type would react at such statements with either wide-eyed bewilderment or wide-eyed outrage at the notion that dear little Israel–America’s ‘only ally’ in the Middle East could either (a) pull off an act of war such as Boston, or else (b) suffer an attack of the giggles about it within the most private of confines…
That’s because these wide-eyed types don’t know (or don’t care) about certain historical events that have preceeded Boston, including but not limited to–
(a) the Lavon Affair
(b) Israel’s attack on the USS LIBERTY
(c) Mossad’s involvement in the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983
…or any of the many other high-profile events where Americans lost their lives in order to put them on a war footing with Israel’s declared enemies and thus secure the continued existence/survival of the Jewish state.
What must be remembered when considering the possibility/likelihood of Israeli involvement in something such as the Boston bombing is that finding angry, desperate Muslims and maneuvering them into acts of violence that can then be used for maximum political effect is Israel’s forte’ and has been for a loooong time. The Jewish state understands all too well the strategic importance of LIGHTS…CAMERA…ACTION!’ in mobilizing–not just dozens, but rather–dozens of MILLIONS of people in performing actions which benefit her and which she deems necessary to her continued survival.
And again, for those who react with moral indignation that such unsavory business could possibly be the pervue of America’s ‘only ally’ in the Middle East, perhaps it is fitting then to recall the conclusion (s) to which the U.S. Army School of Advanced Military Studies arrived in a 68-page report submitted to the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff a mere one day before the attacks of September 11, where Israel and her intelligence service Mossad were characterized as–
“Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”
Let us have no illusions then about this, i.e. Boston and its immediate aftermath. In places such as the United States and Europe, well-scripted political terrorism (coupled with plenty of special effects and riveting dialogue) is as necessary for the health of the Jewish state as fresh blood is to vampires. Anything–and especially anything ‘dramatic’–leading to an increased hatred for Muslims and thus the continued ‘clash of civilizations’ between Judaism’s 2 biggest competitors only augments Israel’s political viability and strength.
Likewise let us have no illusions either about the fact that there are plenty of people–Zihadists in their own right–willing to make sure all of this takes place…Backwards, violent individuals who embrace the oldest brand of religious extremism that’s ever existed, where the idea of forcing people–by hook or by crook–to accept the precepts of this peculiar creed known as Judaism is considered a justified method of evangelism.
Lest we forget–
‘You are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you above all others upon the face of the earth…Therefore when the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire…
–Book of Deuteronomy
So, can events such as Boston (as well as 9/11, Israel’s attack on the USS LIBERTY, the Lavon Affair and all those other events where Americans lost their lives in order to put them on a war footing with Israel’s declared enemies) be considered the logical outcome of Judaism’s intrinsically violent and irrational jihadist precepts as laid out in books such as Deuteronomy, Leviticus, etc?
A very loud and authoritative ‘Aye, aye, Captain’ if ever there were one…
And of all the players involved, the one who is the most dangerous, the one most likely to engage in such behavior and with the most motive and means of carrying out something like Boston was none other than–
(drum role please)
Yes, the same ‘Bibi’ who crowed how wonderful it was that 3,000 Americans lost their lives on 9/11 because of the political currency that would inevitably land in Israel’s savings account as a result. The same religious nutcase with a doomsday mindset (and with the weapons of mass destruction to bring it all about) who has not let a day go by without warning the world of the dire consequences of religious nutcases with a doomsday mindset getting hold of weapons of mass destruction…
The same Bibi who recently stated that the West–including those in Boston, Massachusetts–would be at war with ‘radical Islam’ for the rest of the 21st century…
What a Judaically-hypnotized world needs to understand about all this is that Netanyahu, despite his skill as a shape-shifter in appearing as an educated, sane human being when the cameras are on, nevertheless in essence is nothing more than a wild animal in an expensive suit. As mad as any rabid dog in the latter stages of its affliction, he is the political equivalent of the canine monster featured in the movie Cujo tearing a car to pieces in order to tear to pieces the woman and child hiding within it.
What makes Netanyahu so dangerous is that he is not just a believer, but a died in the wool, militant believer in the cause of Judaism/Zionism. When it comes to all that biblical mumbo-jumbo about the Jews being ‘God’s chosen people’ destined to ‘inherit the earth’ and ‘rule the Gentiles’ with a ‘rod of iron’, his position is a very loud and unequivocal ‘AMEN, BROTHER’. When discussion comes ’round to that mad real estate venture known as ‘Greater Israel’, with the ‘Jewish state’ stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates as outlined many times in the Old Testament and in which Netanyahu’s forebearers were commanded by their warlord Yahweh to ‘leave nothing alive that breatheth’ in the process of ‘redeeming’ the land, Bibi’s position is an affirmatory ‘SO HELP ME GOD…’
And all anyone need do in testing waters such as these is to consider the various massacres he has personally authorized and then defended through his network of Hasbara operatives embedded throughout the western media. In his mind (formed by the genocidal precepts of both Torah and Talmud Judaism) the god of Israel demands Gentile human sacrifice, and whether it is those of Gaza, Syria, Iran or even those of Boston, Massachusetts, Gentile blood is Gentile blood and the vengeful, warlike deity Yahweh is appeased.
In short, Nutty Netty and the Likud government which he heads are the equivalent of silver-screen psychopaths all have come to know over the years from such films as Fatal Attraction, Cape Fear and/or Stephen King’s Misery all rolled into one, and with a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons that give teeth to this peculiar brand of messianic madness.
So the question is, would a Bibi Netanyahu, much like the character Alex Forest in Fatal Attraction, feeling ignored, neglected, and pushed aside, engage in some sort of political terrorism against America in order to set things right again with the Jewish state’s political lover (s) in Washington D.C.? Driven by the purist ideals of Judaism/Zionism, would a Nutty Netty have his own personal team of hired hit in Mossad–true believers as much as he is–pose as FBI agents in order to–
(a) maneuver individuals such as the Tsarnaev brothers into blowing things up, or
(b) blow things up themselves and set the Tsarnaev brothers up to take the fall, as Israel has done in countless situations?
Yeah, I think we can get an ‘AMEN, BROTHER’ over such a hypothesis. After all, it would not be the first time Israel has engaged in dirty business such as this. As outlined by investigative journalist Mark Perry in his piece False Flag appearing in Foreign Affairs magazine, it was revealed how Mossad agents in Pakistan were posing as CIA in trying to recruit members of the terrorist group Jundallah to carry out acts of terror against Iran.
So, Mossad posing as CIA in Pakistan or Mossad posing as FBI in Boston–Qu’est-ce que c’est la difference? In fact, given the ease with which Israel and her people move (slither) about the United States, (pretending to be art students, movers, or salespersons at kiosks throughout America’s shopping malls) and many of them having been born and raised here already, it would actually be an easier gig than trying the same thing in Pakistan.
Aside from this however, the question that rookie investigators out to solve the mystery of the Boston Massacre need to ask is this–Was the threat to do bodily harm to the collective body of the United States not precisely the message that mad dog Milikovsky (Netanyahu’s original family name) conveyed just a few months prior to the bombings in Boston, where on the floor of the UN General Assembly he held up the infamous cartoon drawing of the bomb with the lit fuse, a bomb that looked an awful lot like the ‘pressure cooker’ bombs said to have caused all the murder and mayhem in Boston?
Indeed it was, and despite the fact that the entire world was laughing at what appeared on the surface to be cartoonish stage props, the fact is that it was a carefully-crafted warning to the world’s leaders that things were about to blow if he did not get his way…
…a threat that was validated on the morning of April 15, 2013 in the city of Boston.
The truth is that during the best of times Netanyahu (as well as the other dogs who run in his pack) is a dangerous psychopath. It is therefore no stretch to imagine how dangerous he is in the worst of times, which pretty much describes where we are now.
Bibi has seen better days. A gangster accoustomed to snapping his fingers and getting what he wants before his demands are even uttered, now he is forced to deal with a recalcitrant American president who won’t attack Syria, won’t attack Iran and is (even if only tepidly) making noises about Jewish settlements in the West Bank…Nutty Netty has just come back from Russia after meeting with a very confident and virile Vladimir Putin who won’t be pushed around and who has told him where to stick his demands concerning the delivery of the S-300 air defense system to Syria…Not only is the planned ouster of the Syrian president not materializing, but as well Assad is seen in the Middle East as the one Arab leader who stood up to both the US and Israel and won…
And finally, in a mere few weeks, Iran is about to elect a new president, and as a result, Israel will be forced to start all over again the business of propagandizing the world concerning whatever ‘madman’ (her words) ascends to that office. For 8 years, all the dire predictions made by Israel concerning Iran being ‘the next Nazi Germany’ and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad being ‘the new Hitler’ will have to begin anew, and this time with Israel’s credibility very much in the toilet and therefore not as likely to get the kind of traction and pseudo-believability that it did in the previous 8 years.
And because of all this, Netanyahu looks like a shmuck and a shlemiel in front of his people worldwide, and the result of THIS is that his people–equally embarrassed–are kvetching and breathing down his neck on a continual basis that goes something like this–
‘Bibi, baby, WTF??? The shwartze…da monkey in the White House–He’s makin’ a monkey outta you and makin monkeys outta da resta us…Why you lettin’ him do dis Bibi? Da Gentiles–day laughin at us every day… Very bad for bizniss Bibi, very bad…Gotta do somtin…somtin soon…’
Therefore, when we see Bibi smiling, joking, or otherwise yukking it up in front of the cameras these days, what we must remember is that inside he is seething and boiling…There isn’t a moment on any given day where he isn’t a cauldron of murderous, malicious rage bubbling over and very much the ticking time bomb whose caricature he held up on the floor of the UN General Assembly, about to explode and destroy everything in his immediate environs.
And is this not exactly the message Bibi wanted conveyed to Obama and his counterparts in Europe on the morning of April 15, 2013 in Boston, Massachusetts, the birthplace of America? Even the use of pressure cookers as the instrument (s) of this act of terrorism was meant to convey a subtle yet impossible-to-avoid-noting message, namely that things are getting ready to blow–BIG TIME–unless something can be done to relieve that pressure, meaning giving Israel the wars she demands.
And let us not make the mistake of thinking that this was just a one shot deal either. We can assume that in some fashion King Bibi has conveyed the message that his people are spread throughout the US, (and elsewhere) ready for repeat performances of what was done in Boston, and at the snap of his fingers if he doesn’t get his way things will go BOOM all over the land of the free and home of the brave and with something a lot more devastating than Momma’s favorite stew pot and barely-21st century cellphones.
The reader will recall how–following the U.S. presidential elections in November 2012 when Netanyahu’s kept man did not get the White House as Likud had worked so hard to achieve–how a penitent, sheepish Netanyahu very prominently stated in various interviews throughout the Jewish mainstream media that he would no longer interfere with American politics at the Presidential level, but would instead seek to ‘cooperate’ with the Obama administration in its 2nd term…
What all persons everywhere (and especially those in America) however should have seen was a scene out of The Godfather, where the ‘keep your friends close, but your enemies closer’ strategem is utilized by an aggressor with a criminal mindset in distancing himself and his pack from what is to be the scene of a planned crime and in the process, removing themselves from the list of likely suspects.
“The big winner today, intended or not, is the state of Israel and there is no question that the Israeli leadership is feeling relief…”
So said George Friedman of stratfor.com, arch supporter of Israel and personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu on the morning of 9/11.
And like the statements made by Netanyahu that day, these too could be applied without need of alterations, adjustments, nips or tucks whatsoever to Boston…
…as well as to all those other places where repeat performances are scheduled to take place in the not-so-distant future.