Ron Paul says chemical attack in Syria was a ‘false flag’


Former US Representative Ron Paul

continue reading

  1. #1 by Neil on 09/02/2013 - 9:34

    Like the puppet he replaced, Obama has no choice but to drum up a phony reason to go to war against Syria. It was outlined in Netanyahu’s “A Clean Break,” written in 1996 by half of GWB’s 2003 war cabinet. Nobody with a brain actually thought plunging Iraq back into the stone age was really about oil or US national security. The key words in all of these wars: Israeli hegemony. How? 95+% of the men who sit as majority shareholders or supreme content managers of the 40 biggest media outlets of the western world are eligible for automatic citizenship in Israel. 75+% of all campaign contributions to either party come from the same tribe. No matter who wins, they always win. Meanwhile we “conservatives” and “liberals” squabble on under the grand illusion that the two parties represent anything but extremely similar heads of the same coin.

  2. #2 by Isaac on 09/02/2013 - 9:34

    Any one who know a little about the diabolical Israel should know thay are behind all this nonsense. But the worse thing about is that Israel, the Mossad and the CIA are never caught and have gotten away with all these crimes against humanity.
    The only good thing about all this, is that the whole world are opening their eyes, even the red-necks and some evangelists talk about not going to another war and the government is lying to the American people for Israel.

  3. #3 by jeffreyalbert on 09/02/2013 - 9:34

    It makes me ill and angry every time I think of what kind of a country we might have had and what kind of a world we’d be living in if only we weren’t surrounded by idiots and Ron Paul had been elected president.

  4. #4 by Robert Pickle on 09/02/2013 - 9:34

    Ron Paul, the Proxy, only to set mandate that the Marakan people do not want constitutional law, but chose a socialist theocrisy? The same Ron Paul who also covered for the Israelis at the WTC on September 11………….come on give us a break, he has very little credibility. ALL, every single man and woman in Congress, the executive a Jewdicial are cowardly treasonist, all should have been tried by the people in a constitutional court (none exist), and if convicted of sedition or treason, their penalty to the fullest extent of the Law. Ron Paul for his part in that coverup is not exempt.

  5. #5 by Lindsey on 09/02/2013 - 9:34

    Where was/is this “hero” when it came/comes to 911? Only when it deals with another nation’s false-flag attacks, specifically in The Middle-East and EVERYONE KNOWS THAT IT WAS A FALSE-FLAG OPERATION and can not be refuted as it was what it was, this man whom everyone puts-up as the face for truth and justice telling the absolute truth, right?

    That is not good enough for me, and I know that it is not good enough for a Hell-of-a-lot of other people, either. You can say whatever you want about Ron Paul, but he was nowhere near the level of Honorable Cynthia McKinney. Anyone who wants a gold-standard returned when “they” control almost all of the gold in the world KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING AND SAYING.

    Lindsey

  6. #6 by Tim on 09/02/2013 - 9:34

    IF, the Congress of The United States, does approve of The President’s use of military assets against The Syrian Government, it will be the first ‘Constitutionally’ valid approach taken since WWII.

    The capacity of The Congress in this sphere is defined as “To provide for the national defense”; by which, is meant allocating and approving funding, and “To Declare War”.

    This will be, for “all intents and purposes”, the first Constitutionally Approved, and legitimate declaration of war, by the United States upon another sovereign country since it’s declaration of war upon Japan, on December 8, 1941.

    This will be auspicious. It portends. Foreboding of the gravest possible eventualities will follow.

  7. #7 by Tim on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    IF, the Congress of The United States, does approve of The President’s use of military assets against The Syrian Government, it will be the first ‘Constitutionally’ valid approach taken since WWII.

    The capacity of The Congress in this sphere is defined as “To provide for the national defense”; by which, is meant allocating and approving funding, and “To Declare War”.

    This will be, for “all intents and purposes”, the first Constitutionally Approved, and legitimate declaration of war, by the United States upon another sovereign country since it’s declaration of war upon Japan, on December 8, 1941.

    This will be auspicious. It portends. Forebodings of the gravest possible eventualities will follow.

  8. #8 by JGUISEPE' on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    @ 6/7 -Tim

    Even though there is a VERY slight possibility that congressional aproval will be had , still, – Obama DOES NOT HAVE the CONSENT of the GOVERNED !!

    REMEMBER MOST (NOT ALL) OF OUR CONGRESS CARRY THE WATER FOR THE RABID ZIO-CON AGENDA …. THIS TO ME IS LEGITIMATE ENOUGH REASON TO LEAVE IT UP TO THE “CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED” – MEANING THE U.S. POPULATION THEMSELVES; TO DECIDE TO ENAGAGE IN ANY TYPE OF CONFLICT FOR ZIONIST’S BENEFIT ONLY – NOT THE UNITED STATES.

  9. #9 by JGUISEPE' on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    *approval

  10. #10 by Dante Ardenz on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    oh yea ! old Ron Paul.. the God Bugger … Who CONTROLS THAT? Rothchild-FEDERAL RESERVE.. The Germans do not even have access to their own stocks ! (SEE Russia Today-German Gold Missing,YOU TUBE) and this old codger thought he would get a pass by writing a book” Freedom Not Fascism”… BUNK ! using that term, meant to confused.. Fascist States NATIONALIZE BANKS ! freeing them from JEWS ! But oh the dumb PATRIOTS drank that u p.. I’ll take his help on this! Since his son Rand threw in with the Jews where does he stand ? SEE SATAN AT THE WAILING WALL. Real Jew News.Com.. IT SAYS SO MUCH !

  11. #11 by jeffreyalbert on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    Yeah, right, the only son of a bitch that has been in Washington in the last 100 years or so that has recommended ending the Federal Reserve…He didn’t have much of a chance against the Zionist controlled media as it is, I wonder how far he would have gotten announcing that 911 was a Mossad operation especially as he was running for the Republicunt nomination? Austrian economic theory as I understand it, and Ron Paul’s economic proposals as I understand them have not one goddamn thing to do with putting us the “Gold Standard”.

    As I said before – surrounded by goddamn idiots. ID EE OTTS

    We haven’t got a prayer.

  12. #12 by Robert Pickle on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    The constitution was superceded in 1991, HJR 104, Public Law 102-14. This is none other but a set up for justification against those who oppose, and will in fact, begin an international war

  13. #13 by Tim on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    JGUISEPE’

    Yes, your right. The qualifying “IF” introducing the comment.

    Nevertheless, on the ‘fast-check”, the consensus of the governed was vocally and overwhelmingly against The U.S.A. entering WWI. President Wilson, who took America into that “war to end all war”, had even campaigned with the promise to keep America out of it, at all cost.

    Likewise, at the ourtset of WWII, there were dissenting voices; then, however, the attack by Japan muffled those. The momentum caused by that enabled American entry into WWII fueled by over whelming emotion.

    Such was the apparatus that fueled America’s responses after 9-11, of which, the Syria conflagration is being framed as “an extension of”, if only subconsciously. Interestingly it’s orchestration had been set forward as a necessity, to initiate the Neocon-Israeli agenda; and, even delineated as “A new Pearl Harbor”.

    However, I know as well as you, that the consensus of the governed will be disregarded, for I don’t believe a national referendum tally has ever been allowed, on any point, as the deciding means of any question in The United States.

    I agree with what you say. Though alluded to, and I thought it clear, perhaps I should rephrase the idea; as, “The last two declarations of war, by the United States, were World Wars.”

    In my view, the legality of which is beyond all of our control, a formal declaration of war, taken in the historical context of those previously made, portends World War.

  14. #14 by rehmat1 on 09/03/2013 - 9:34

    Currently, Ron Paul is hunted by the Jewish for agreeing to be a the keynote speaker at a conference sponsored by Canadian Fatima Center. The Catholic group, has long been designated by Jewish groups as “radical Christian” and “Jew-hater”. Incidently, Mel Gibson’s father Hutton Gibson is contacted with the group.

    http://rehmat1.com/2013/09/03/splc-ron-paul-mingles-with-canadian-jew-haters/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: