Zionist Terrorism, from the Book of Genesis to present day Gaza and beyond–None Dare Call it Judaism



2014 Mark Glenn


For nearly 2 months, as Israel was engaged in a full-throttle/pedal-to-the-metal/’round-the-clock celebration of religiously-inspired/state-sanctioned violence against 1.5 million Gentiles in Gaza resulting in the mass murder of over 2,000 human beings, many in the ‘civilized’ world weighed in with a few adjectives they found fitting and apropo such as–





…And a dozen or so others conveying the same idea…

All accurate, without a doubt…Every letter, word, syllable and punctuation mark…

And the truth be told, how could such words not have found their way into any such discussions? The Jewish state’s latest masterpiece in Halachic holy war was so over-the-top in terms of its malice aforethought and deliberate violence against defenseless women and children that many are still left wondering whether Netanyahu’s real objective here was to have his name remembered alongside other famed butchers of men throughout history such as Herod, Nero, or even U.S. President Harry S. Truman, who–as Ariel Sharon once admiringly quipped–‘snuffed out half a million Japanese with two fine bombs’.

In truth however, and despite it being an assault on the mind’s imaginative senses, nevertheless characterizing Israel’s latest militarily-induced-late-term-abortion-on-a-mass-scale as merely ‘a bloodbath’ barely scratches the surface in terms of its size and scale, in many respects similar to describing Godzilla as merely ‘a lizard’ but then going no further…

Rather, Operation ‘Protective Edge’–as it’s been worshipfully anointed and adorned by Zionist acolytes the world over–was nothing less than a feeding frenzy of sorts, where sharks, barracudas, piranhas, or other creatures ‘long in the tooth’ and with an acquired taste for human flesh are set loose upon helpless, hapless victims while spectators ogle at the slow-motion ‘death by a thousand bites’ spectacle as if it were political snuff porn and they its devout addicts.

Sadly however, as generous as the ‘civilized’ world may have been with various words dropped into the adjective collection plate in describing the black mass that occurred during the months of July and August, the one word that (up to this point) has remained as silent as death in fleshing out (no pun intended) the real life hell taking place is the one word that–were the world right in the head–should have come spilling out of the mouths of ‘civilized’ people the world over, namely–


As well as its various sibling synonyms containing the same kind of definitional DNA, such as–





And, just as it was with the previously-listed adjectives used in describing the manner by which thousands of innocent human beings were fed to vicious, voracious hyenas clad in IDF uniforms for the purpose of pleasing and appeasing the Judaic god Yahweh–all are true, without a doubt…Every letter, word, syllable and punctuation mark…

The problem however is that words like ‘unavoidable’–biting, cutting words, razor sharp in their accuracy–are as likely to be used in characterizing what took place in Gaza as Lady Gaga is to donning a nun’s habit, taking a vow of celibacy and devoting the rest of her life to repairing all the damage her semi-nude antics have inflicted upon the civilized world in recent years.

And the reason that words such as these–the verbal equivalents of shark teeth when it comes to cutting through the cartilage known as confusion and chewing into the meat of the matter–are unlikely to see the light of day during discussions involving Israel’s ‘genocidal, bloodthirsty, barbaric,’ and ‘inhuman’ behavior is because as soon as ‘spicy’ adjectives like ‘unavoidable’ are added to the dialogue stew, things become uncomfortably warm…People start clearing their throats and loosening their collars…eyes begin darting back and forth and everyone within earshot of that dreaded word starts looking for the exit sign so they can get the hell out of there and thus avoid going where such a discussion must inevitably go.

And the reason for this is simple–Words such as ‘unavoidable’ carry problematic baggage with them, meaning connotations and implications that are quarantined from being discussed out loud when certain topics are involved, and especially when the topic happens to deal with ‘the Jewish question’. While Islam, Christianity and just about every other dish on the religious buffet table is open for exploration, critique and criticism, even to the extent that they are unfairly maligned and libeled in making a sow’s ear out of a silk purse, when it comes to that other Middle Eastern religion–Judaism–no such license is given. It is kept locked away, concealed from prying eyes, closed for business, out of town, out to lunch and everything in between unless of course all commentary remains in the safe zone–meaning affectionate, prostrate, complimentary, fawning, deferential and on the positive side of the number line.

And it is this ‘blind spot’ within the Gentile psyche, meaning its poorly-constructed understanding of Judaism as the primal, primordial, primitive electrical current powering the machinery of the Jewish state which has helped produce massacres such as ‘Protective Edge’. The Gentile world, in embracing the generally-virtuous virtues of ‘tolerance’ and ‘non-judgmentalism’ when it comes to ‘another man’s religion’ has to its own (and others’) detriment generously but foolishly given Judaism an undeserved place of honor at the table of faiths alongside other philosophies where ‘love they neighbor’ and ‘do unto others’ are considered necessary components to that religion’s identity.

With Judaism however, no such provisions exist. Like no other religion (the lone possible exception being those practiced by brutal empires of the past that made the barbaric business of human sacrifice the centerpiece of their religious and cultural identity) Judaism is by definition a two-tiered caste system of predator and prey whose sole purpose is the support, advancement, empowerment and enrichment of Jews at the expense of Gentile untouchables. Like no other religion, Judaism openly and without ambiguity commands and commends violence–including in the extreme–against those who transgress its objectives. Like ice-cream in Hell, there are no such commodities as ‘tolerance’ and ‘non-judgmentalism’ when it comes to ‘another man’s religion’ nor creatures such as ‘live and let live’.

No, in Mundus Judaicus there is only Yahweh, his commandments and the people he ‘chose’ as the enforcers of this two-tiered, predator/prey caste system, a system that could not spell the word ‘mercy’ if the letters making up that word were the only letters in existence and which is simply referred to as ‘the law’.

Yes, that’s correct–‘Jihad’, ‘terror’, ‘conversion by the sword’ and other terminology with which virtually all people these days are intimately acquainted do indeed exist, but not as Islamic concepts, but rather Judaic ones. In fact, if one really wanted to get ‘historical’ about it, Judaism was/is the ‘big bang’ from which these types of extremism originated, where backwards, unenlightened people–driven by particular and peculiar religious ideas–justify violence, theft, and any other mechanism deemed necessary for the group under the guise that their ‘god’ has commanded it.

Therefore, as crazy as it indeed sounds, in the case of Israel and her people, they truly are–as they are fond of lecturing the world on a regular basis–blameless, not only with regards to this latest massacre, but all those preceding and all those that will inevitably follow. Not in the sense that innocent people weren’t killed (deliberately and horrifically so) nor that it was someone other than the Jewish state and her people who committed these crimes, but rather ‘blameless’ in the sense that all of this was/is the direct result of religious teachings thousands of years along in the germination process that only now are circumstantially permitted to be put into practical, political, real-time use. Since it is indeed within the Judaic religious paradigm–discussed often by Judaism’s long-bearded ‘doctors of the law’, meaning the Rabbinate–that Gentiles are (technically speaking) not human beings per se but rather animals created in human form so as to better serve the Jewish people, ergo no such crime as ‘murder’ has been committed by the Jewish state–in Gaza or wherever–and therefore she, through her various spokespersons and supporters, can indeed say with a straight face that she remains blameless in the matter.

Truly, it is a case of ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’ and puts Jesus Christ’s entire ‘Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do’ commentary in a completely new light.

Having said that then, what the rest of the ‘civilized’ world needs to understand when wrapping its sane, collective mind around the insanity typified by massacres such as ‘Protective Edge’ is that while Israel’s latest opus magnus in state-sponsored religious terrorism may indeed have been over-the-top in its malice aforethought and deliberate violence against defenseless women and children (so much so as to have broken all previous records) the truth is that there certainly wasn’t anything unusual, abnormal or out of place about any of it, not by a molecule, microbe or millimeter.

No, as far as Operation ‘Protective Edge’ is concerned, it–like all the ‘Oldie-Goldie’ warm-up acts preceding it with titles such as Cast Lead, Summer Rain, Pillar of Cloud, Jenin, Sabra & Shatilla, etc–is a case of ‘situation normal’ and ‘steady as she goes.’ Rather than Israel’s recent behavior being seen as some sort of aberration, anomaly or abnormality, the proper context with which the sane world should view this unspeakable tragedy is that she–the Jewish state–functioned almost flawlessly throughout the 2-month slaughter. Everything she was/is programed as ‘the Jewish state’ to do, she did. Everything that encompasses and defines her nature, everything indelibly written into her social, religious and political DNA expressed itself like a flower coming into full bloom…Her mass murder of over 2,000 innocent men, women and children–with a smile on her face, laughter in her throat and a psalm on her lips–was as extraordinary to her political/psychological disposition and as contradictory to her Judaic ethics as the aforementioned school of sharks frenzy-feeding on a group of swimmers at the beach.

Indeed, all those involved with ‘Protective Edge’–be they Israel’s supporters around the globe, her politicians, religious leaders, citizens, etc, can sleep soundly at night knowing that what took place was indeed what the god of Israel demands and that–as stated on many occasions–the same IDF personnel responsible for pulling the triggers, lighting the fuses and pushing the launch buttons did so as members of ‘the world’s most moral army’.

The truth is–and it’s an ugly one indeed–the only ‘sin’ Israel committed during the 2-month long, Director’s Cut version of the Tel Aviv Chainsaw Massacre was that she did not kill everyone and everything in Gaza in accordance with the rules and regs outlined in her Torah–the ‘holy’ book’ upon which the Jewish state’s entire existence is founded and supported–and which explicitly commands in stark, unequivocal, black and white language that–

‘When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…’

As outrageous as this may sound to those living in the civilized and enlightened world of the here and now, what must be understood is that within the Judaic paradigm, the ‘here and now’ is only an illusion of sorts. Whereas the majority of those walking, talking, living and breathing on God’s green earth do so with their clocks and calendars set to the 21st century A.D., Israel and her people remain fixed and fixated on the yesterday of 21st century B.C., where an angry, violent, vengeful god known as Yahweh has just bestowed his preference upon one tiny, numerically and culturally insignificant group of nomads while at the same time giving them the nod to plunder the peoples and civilizations with whom they come in contact, either through outright violence or chicanery

The proof that indeed total extermination and annihilation were what was expected and required on the part of Judaism’s more devout adherents the world over comes right out of the mouths of the aggrieved and disaffected themselves. Not only was Israel’s ‘pull-out’ from the Gaza massacre considered ‘sinful’ by the majority of those worldwide proud to call themselves ‘Jews’, but also considered blasphemous and heretical as well. As news reports indicated with shocking clarity, the moment that the IDF Kill-harmonic orchestra ended the 7 week-long symphony of state-sponsored violence and left the concert hall known as Gaza, the chorus of booing, hissing, screeching and gnashing of teeth that followed was loud and raucous enough to be heard from deep space…Whether it was young Israelites gathered at the border with Gaza–watching the shock and awe while guzzling down rivers of alcohol or whether it was those who stayed glued to their computer screens in a state of paralyzed hypnosis like dirty old men leering at young women taking off their clothes– those watching the Gentile-cide taking place in real time reacted with the same kind of furious disappointment the moment the bombs stopped falling that ravenous sharks experience when in the midst of a feeding frenzy they suddenly find themselves deprived of their prey.

And, as stated earlier but which the rest of the Gentile world fails to understand, those involved with all this bloody business were able to do so with a clean conscience. As far as they were/are concerned, the number of butchered could have been 2,000, 20,000, 2,000,000 or even 2 billion for that matter, and nothing would change except the placement of the decimal point, because the fundamentals of the situation remain static, which is that killing Gentiles is as intrinsic to the foundational underpinnings of Judaism as sacraments are to virtually all confessions of Christianity.

Anyone doubting this fact need look no further than the various religious feasts celebrated yearly within the Judaic calendar where Gentiles dying in large numbers features as the nucleus around which the entire celebration revolves. From Passover (the celebration of Egyptian Gentile-cide) to Purim (the celebration of Persian Gentile-cide) there is no divorcing the inherently violent, visceral Judaic hatred of non-Jews from the religion and culture that now serves as the beating heart of the Jewish state today.

This being the case then, it’s not the fault of the Jews (as devout followers of Judaism) or ‘their state’ that massacres of this type–past, present and future–occur, anymore so than the fox who is given an empty door into the henhouse and then avails himself of the buffet set before him can be judged and convicted for his actions. As much as it’s in his nature to kill and eat as he pleases, likewise it is with the Jewish state, as once described by Ariel Sharon himself, to wit–

‘Tell me, do the evil men of this world have a bad time? They hunt and catch whatever they feel like eating…They don’t suffer from indigestion and are not punished by Heaven. I want Israel to join that club. Maybe the world will then at last begin to fear us instead of feeling sorry. Maybe they will start to tremble, to fear our madness….Let them tremble, let them call us a mad state…Let them understand that we are a savage country, dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we might go wild, that we might start World War Three just like that, or that we might one day go crazy and burn all the oil fields in the Middle East…’

Indeed, beginning at the top with creatures such as Netanyahu, Lieberman, Gantz, the rabbinate, etc, all the way down to Joan Rivers & co and their brutally-honest statements concerning the annihilation of every single Palestinian in Gaza–all those involved can be considered ‘good Jews’ for what they did and the positions they took. This is what their religion commands. They are ‘keeping the faith’ and remaining true to the teachings of their Torah and their Judaism.

By contrast, those ‘Jews’–whether as individuals or as groups–who have come out–loudly or quietly–in opposition to what took place are in the final analysis apostates of the Jewish faith as defined and delineated by the teachings of the Torah. By condemning the horrific violence inflicted upon the people of Gaza they are in effect countermanding and contradicting the very words of Yahweh–the god of Israel and of the Jewish people–that appear literally in black and white and which leave no wiggle-room for interpretation–

‘Slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…Save nothing alive that breathes…Make no agreements with them…Show them no mercy…Destroy their places of worship..Break down their images…Cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire…’

etc, etc, etc…

And finally, so that there is no doubt concerning the ‘Kosher’ certification of such grisley, gorey business–

‘For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…’

And this–the stark, black and white commands on the part of Yahweh to ‘His’ people to ‘slaughter,’ to ‘leave nothing alive that breathes ‘ and ‘show no mercy’ found within Judaism–is precisely why all the bloodshed that has taken place was as predetermined and as ‘unavoidable’ as the arrival of the seasons at fixed times of the year. As illustrated alongside other invariables, it goes thus–


‘For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction…’

‘What goes up, must come down…’

and finally,

‘Judaism kills…’

Simply stated, it could not have been any other way, and for anyone of any stripe–religious, political or whatever–to have expected differently is a clear case of maniacal thinking not rooted in reason and rationality.

It is precisely because of this fact–the mathematical certainty of Judaically-sanctioned genocide in places such as Gaza–that the rest of the Gentile world watches with shock and horror at what transpires but yet refuses to employ words such as ‘unavoidable’…Words such as this convey foreknowledge of an impending event which means that those ‘in the know’ have a moral duty in preventing it.

More than this though, the reason why words such as ‘unavoidable’ will never be used is because what words such as this convey is the presence of an intrinsic, unchangeable nature that makes massacres such as ‘Protective Edge’ inescapable.

In other words, those within the ‘civilized’ world displaying shock and horror over what took place might be forced to conclude that somewhere along the way, the ‘civilized’ world blundered BIG TIME in practicing the generally-virtuous virtues of tolerance and non-judgmentalism when it came to Judaism and has–to its own detriment and the detriment of others–generously afforded this dangerous mindset an undeserved place of honor at the table of faiths alongside other philosophies that embrace at least some variation of the ‘love they neighbor’ and ‘do unto others’ maxims, spiritual attributes that–as far as the religion of the Judah-ism is concerned–simply do not exist.

But they–those in the ‘civilized’ world–who use adjectives such as genocidal, bloodthirsty, barbaric, inhuman, etc, understand all too well the holy Hell sure to arrive at their doorstep as payback for ‘going there’ in any such discussions and who therefore choose to ‘play it safe’ by sticking with butterknife adjectives that don’t cut too deeply or too closely to that proverbial bone of contention.

Still however, the problem exists–how to explain all the violence and complete lack of remorse on the part of virtually an entire group of people as thousands of people are subjected to a deliberate program of state-sponsored human sacrifice…

Easy solution, mastered by every shifty salesman throughout history–the techniques of ‘bait and switch’ and ‘smoke and mirrors’.

And the process by which this takes place is that things are ‘explained’ but without any explanation actually taking place. In Hebrew, it is referred to as ‘Hasbara’ and is best described as a form of mind control whereby fantasy and fiction become facts and vice versa. During this seance of sorts, completely irrational, indefensible and logically-unsupportable ideas are introduced which sound great to the ears but which do serious damage to the critical mind.

Specifically, in the case of ‘explaining’ the deliberate massacres of men, women and children by the Jewish state, the magic spell which is cast over the minds of those who want to know why these things take place is to proffer the ‘explanation’ that it is ‘Zionism’ that is the problem, not Judaism.

‘Judaism’–so the spiritual sales-schtick goes, ‘is a holy faith, God-centered, beneficent to fellow man, peaceful, tolerant, non-judgmental, and which embraces virtues such as ‘love they neighbor’, ‘do unto others’ and other maxims rooted in brotherly love, compassion, decency, and above all others, justice…’

And when all that blood-n-guts business contained within the Torah is raised, namely–

‘When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…’

—-It is dismissed as passe’, antiquated, irrelevant, and a dozen other adjectives used seductively in chasing Gentile curiosity away from what the root of the problem truly is.

Tragically, (some might even say apocalyptically) this ‘explanation’ works and is used–literally–with deadly effectiveness. Like some form of the Israeli-created Stuxnet virus, the ‘Zionism is the problem’ mind-worm replicates itself a thousand times a minute, avoids detection by anti-virus software, is nearly impervious to malware removal tools, and it sits there in the Gentile brain, wiping out all the files necessary for normal intellectual operation, until finally, it overloads the system with contradictory commands that do not compute, and then–





And a dozen or so other adjectives conveying the same idea..

–the hard-drive goes into overload, seizes up and in time, the entire Gentile operating system is rendered inoperable…

Mission accomplished…The branches (Zionism) receive a few cuts and scratches from the teeth on the saw, but the root remains unharmed…Judaism is safe.

In many ways, the unwillingness/inability of individuals to grasp and accept the reality of the danger to their very existence by the predatory nature of Judaic thinking mirrors the plot line found within Peter Benchley’s novel Jaws that was later made into a film of the same name.

As unsophisticated, uncouth and uncultured as he may have appeared, with his blue-collar threads, blue-collar accent and blue collar thinking, nevertheless Quint, Captain of the Orca and shark hunter by trade–was the only sane person in the room that night. The townspeople of Amity had just convened a meeting to determine their next course of action in the aftermath of 2 people being killed by a giant, voracious shark…Had the townspeople had their wits about them, the fact that the 2 victims had literally been ripped to shreds like human confetti should have served as the nucleus around which all discussion took place that night.

But yet the townspeople–fearing more the inevitable backlash of closing the beaches during tourist season than the possibility/probability of their own flesh and blood becoming the shark’s next meal–were instead whining and squabbling like petulant, spoiled children over what was (by comparison to being eaten alive) a relatively minor issue.

And in the midst of this mindless, irrational, childish bantering, Quint spoke–

‘Y’all know me…Know how I earn a livin’…I’ll catch this bird for you, but it ain’t gonna be easy…Bad fish, this shark–Swallow you whole…A little shakin’, a little tenderizin’, and down you go…But it’s not gonna be pleasant…I value my neck a lot more than just three thousand bucks…I’ll find him for three, but I’ll catch him, and kill him, for ten…Now you gotta make up your minds, you want to stay alive and ante up, or do you want to play it cheap and be on welfare the whole winter…Ten thousand dollars for me by myself, and for that you get the head, the tail, the whole damned thing…’

Quint’s sermon was brilliant in both its simplicity and infallible logic. The ‘bad fish’ he described was like nothing he or anyone else had ever encountered before…Its disposition and demeanor was as fixed and unchangeable as water being wet or fire being hot….There could be no capturing this ‘bad fish’ and sending it away to shark obedience school to be tamed, rehabilitated and reformed…Counseling and therapy were out of the question. There could be no ‘peaceful co-existence’ with it.

In short, as long as this beast was left alive, swimming up and down the coastline, it would continue to fill its plate from the human buffet table known as Amity Island until it either died of old age or the food supply ran out.

Therefore, only one sane, moral solution to the situation existed, which was to kill it, which in the end, is precisely what took place and was the singular reason why no more people were devoured by this ‘bad fish’.

Indeed, as the old saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and if ever there were a case where ‘good intentions’ resulted in the gates of hell being thrown wide open so that every form of distilled, concentrated evil was loosed upon the world, then none better exist than the manner by which the ‘civilized’ world blundered BIG TIME in its misguided understanding of the inherently dangerous nature of Judaism. By generously affording this mindset an undeserved place of honor at the table of faiths alongside other philosophies that embrace at least some variation of the ‘love they neighbor’ and ‘do unto others’ maxims, spiritual attributes that–as far as the religion of the Judah-ism is concerned–simply do not exist, the future of mankind now has been reduced to a single punctuation character represented simply as–


Thousands of years delinquent and deficient, nevertheless the hour has come that this ‘bad fish’ must be dealt with as the maneater that it is. Its disposition and demeanor are as fixed and unchangeable as water being wet or fire being hot….There can be no capturing this ‘bad fish’ and sending it away to shark obedience school to be tamed, rehabilitated and reformed…Counseling and therapy are out of the question and there can be no ‘peaceful co-existence’ with it…As long as this beast is left alive, swimming up and down the coastline of humanity, it will continue to fill its plate from the buffet table of humanity until it either dies of old age or the food supply runs out…

Therefore, only one sane, moral solution to the situation exists, which is to kill it, not piecemeal, but rather in its entirety, meaning the head, the tail, the whole damned thing…

‘And I saw a beast arising from out of the sea…The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority. One of the heads of the beast seemed to have received a fatal wound but the wound had been healed, and because of this the whole world was filled with wonder and surrendered themselves to the beast’s demands… People worshiped the dragon because he had given power to the beast, and they also worshiped the beast, saying to themselves, ‘Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?’

–Book of Revelations, Ch. 13

  1. #1 by bigcree1 on 09/11/2014 - 9:34

    It must be, then. The only solution. Agreed! It cannot be allowed to survive. We all must slaughter this beast. Kill it. There is no other way.

  2. #2 by georgio on 09/11/2014 - 9:34

    You don’t mention the Talmud at all……why is that? I think I know why…..to put down what Christians call the First Testament.(Torah)To put Christians in the same boa.

    Ed note–no, because if you want to kill a snake you cut off the head, not the tail. The Torah is the tree from which the poisonous fruit of the Talmud grows, in case the quote from Deuteronomy included in the essay happened to escape your shortsighted and extremely limited vision.

  3. #3 by CK on 09/11/2014 - 9:34

    Excellent summation of the problem, Mark. These beasts on two legs get their inspiration from the Torah, not the Talmud. They haven’t evolved past the Bronze Age. They still hear the voice of their made-up deity in their heads telling them to kill and steal. It’s downright diabolical the way they’ve been able to control the minds of men for centuries.

  4. #4 by milktoast on 09/11/2014 - 9:34

    the usual brilliant analysis from TUT, with a title that is pure perfection. you’ve been nailing this cult for yrs. thanks

  5. #5 by Shlomo Rosen on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    Ok, it is true that Judaism does distinguish between Jew and gentile or goy. What of it? All religion is bad and ugly. Why are you acting surprised? The Torah or old testament is part of the christian bible and billions of people read it througout history. It is spelled there, black on white. That was never denied. All christians and goyem that had their hands on a copy of this book, the most published book in human history have read this. They can claim no innocence of this knowledge. Has that stopped them from including the Torah in their bible? No! That is proof that they accept it. Even the fake claim of the Galilean Yeshu as Mashiac are based on the christian interpretation, false and wrongheaded though that may be, of the Torah. You see, the christians, accept the Jewish claim of supreme authority of the Torah. They threw away their religions, beliefs and cultural traditions to embrace the Torah. So did islam. You lost, we won.
    All the validity of christianity and of islam rest on their link to the Torah, by their own admission and the acceptance of all their followers.

    I commend you for seeing this thing that sits in the plain sight. But how many other goyem will see it? Even those that read your article and had it pointed out to them. It just proves they are not fully conscious and like the drunk insisting he is sober they will ignore you and reject what you wrote.

    Good luck in your endeavours, but you will fail: you are addressing morons, so you will only face disapointment and loneliness. Few goyem are like you. I wish you the best. Religion truly is ugly and makes idiots of men. (and women)

  6. #6 by Todd Raine on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    Shlomo, if I did not have Any self worth, and not an independent thought in my head, I would agree with your dumbass deductions. But my thoughts tell me you are a weak little piss. Insecure in your own image, so you adopt this fabled history to your own blinding reflection of your own utter insignificance. Standing in a shadow not your own. Go away you little mouse. I am literally laughing at you as I am typing this you little nothing that has never been, nor will ever be. You are a fairy-tail. A story about a shark that was really a trout. Thanks for the laugh Slow-mo. Post again you little troll. It is good for us to have a laugh at your expense, and for you to remind us how weak your arguments are, and how soft the soil you laid your foundation is. Go away for now Slow-mo. But do come back please. Your comment was a hell of a laugh. Thanks.

  7. #7 by Omar C. Bustamante on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    The classic statement of the jew to escape the issue: “all religion is bad …”, no sir, only judaism is bad, ugly, evil!!! Yes your doctrine is a tribal, racial-racist, supremacist, state religion. You kill all that breathes… to conserve your impure golem satanic race. Glenn is right: yids are the beast, sons of Satan-Yaweh-Jehovah, the dragon. The Church’ fathers were wrong, foolishly included the torah in the bible. The doctrine of the pity, mercifull galilean is antinatural certainly, not human, a handicap to fight against the merciless beast. But I tell you all, the end of the beast comes, the truth will prevail and the next big step of the monster will be disastrous for him-them. At the end the morons will be you yid-s. Amen. You murderous and ugly yids, only can steal of us the lives, the land and the money, not the souls, something you don’t have liers vampires!!!!.

  8. #8 by Rene on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    Shlomo Rosen, Some Christians are still Marcions. The Old Testament -Torah- be damned.

  9. #9 by Rene on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    This is an excellent essay. When anyone says Zionism is not Judaism they are lying or have been lied to. I call Jews Jews but some censors insist on Zionist Jews or just Zionists.,

  10. #10 by El Koussa on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    The biggest mistake ever committed in the history of mankind is to relate Chrsitianity to Judaism. Christianity has nothing to do with Judaism. The New Testament is not a continuity of the Old Testament. Both Testaments contradict each other enormously. It has been all revealed in «Jesus the Phoenician».

    Could it be possible that Jesus was not Jewish? What would that mean to the faithful? Jesus the Phoenician exposes, among other unprecedented certitudes, the origin of the Jewish faith and the true hidden identity of Jesus Christ.

    Though the author claims no theological degree, as a Christian and a writer he has read and researched extensively and compiled a sound, compelling argument that the traditionally accepted story of Jesus the Jew, though largely undisputed by the faithful in favor of the biblical version, is actually an impossibility. By investigating the etymology of the name, Jesus, other questions arise regarding the incompatibility between the Great Annunciation and traditional Jewish practices, as well as the true lineage of the family of the Messiah. Then, by examining the lives of the family, friends, and Disciples of Jesus, the circumstances of Jesus’ birth are challenged, establishing which Bethlehem the child savior was born in and substantiating the origins—Galilean or Jewish—of Jesus and his Disciples. Furthermore, based on a new understanding of the true origins of Jesus and his apostles, Jesus the Phoenician reveals the truth about Jesus by showing the many holes in the traditional Jewish and biblical history that point to Jesus having been a Jew. And, finally, the reader is asked to consider the validity of the typically dismissed sources, the Apocrypha, the ex-biblical texts that suggest and support the theory of Jesus the Phoenician.

    By investigating and analyzing the Old and New Testaments, as well as numerous other books, Apocrypha, and scholarly sources, Jesus the Phoenician systematically debunks the traditionally accepted Jewish story of Jesus and synthesizes a groundbreaking explanation for this historical and theological blunder. By delving into the history of the Canaano-Phoenicians and disproving the accuracy of the established story of Jesus Christ, Jesus the Phoenician begs the reader to think outside of biblical tradition and to consider, as have scholars, theologians, and writers throughout history, the proof herein that denies the identity of Jesus the Jew.

    Check out this interview:

    Check out the book trailer:

    Karim El Koussa
    Award Winning Lebanese Author


  11. #11 by Todd Raine on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    Thank you Mr Koussa. I do have your book. I received it in early May if I remember right. Been busy researching other text, but I will now put it next in line. Thank you Sir for your work, and for your post here.

  12. #12 by georgio on 09/12/2014 - 9:34

    There is no James 10….WTF? Referring to video Jesus the Phoenician….

  13. #13 by Isaac on 09/13/2014 - 9:34

    Judaism is a Satanic Cult, its not a religion.

  14. #14 by Brian Hildebran on 09/13/2014 - 9:34

    As much as I concur with most of what you put in this essay, I wholely disagree with your conclusion on the Torah. Because Zionism is an interpretation of what the Torah means by what the Torah says. Same holds true for Dispensationalism, Historicism, Preterism, Partial Preterism, Free Grace, eternal salvation, etc. All are interpretations based upon what someone thinks is meant by what the Bible says. That doesn’t make these interpretations true! But also doesn’t make the Bible false because of bad or misinterpretation. Just like in Islam or any other religion that bases their beliefs off a written document. Zionism, modern Judaism are interpretations of Torah that are perversions of Torah.

    You never, ever, mention that MOSES actually addressed Torah to actual Israelites over 3500 years ago, and a majority of those commands were addressed SOLELY to them and actually were carried out SOLELY by them in the years that followed. I’ll give you a New Testament reference, pay close attention to the pronouns.

    1 Corinthians 4:17 For this reason I have sent to you Timothy, who is my beloved and faithful child in the Lord, and he will remind you of my ways which are in Christ, just as I teach everywhere in every church.

    Are you expecting Timothy to come to you? And remind you of the ways of Paul? Of course not! But why is it you don’t pay attention to the pronouns in the following verse?

    Deuteronomy 7:1 “When the LORD your God brings you into the land where you are entering to possess it, and clears away many nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and stronger than you, 2 and when the LORD your God delivers them before you and you defeat them, then you shall utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them and show no favor to them. 3 “Furthermore, you shall not intermarry with them; you shall not give your daughters to their sons, nor shall you take their daughters for your sons. 4 “For they will turn your sons away from following Me to serve other gods; then the anger of the LORD will be kindled against you and He will quickly destroy you.

    Was Moses speaking to Jews in the 20th Century? No, he was speaking to Jews standing right in front of him, who had just left Egypt about 40 years prior. If you interpret this to mean Jews of all time then you are a Zionist, because that’s how they interpret it. You are lending credibility to their false interpretation by your false interpretation. You sir are supporting their lunacy and evil!

    You will never debunk the truthfulness of Scripture, (because its a matter of faith just like in Islam or any other religion) but you can debunk the false interpretation of Scripture by interpreting it correctly.

    ed note–Brian, I (we) have been through this with you before, sadly with no progress. People like you are EXACTLY the types described in the piece, individuals who get a matter of faith in their mind embedded so deeply that facts and reason have no effect.

    The OT is a JEWISH BOOK. The teachings contained within it are THE VERY REASON that the Jews rejected Jesus Christ and had Him killed. If the ‘scriptures’ as you put it, were God sent, how then did they fail so miserably?

    Having dealt not only with types like you, but indeed you personally, on many occasions in the past, I know that the inevitable rebound from my ed note is going to be comment after comment after comment from you, blathering on ad nauseum about ‘scripture this’ and ‘scripture that’.

    My advice to you is this–dont. We have been down that dead end road in the past and will not be going down it again.

  15. #15 by El Koussa on 09/13/2014 - 9:34

    Hello Georgio,
    I’m referring to the «Protoevangelium of James» not the James in the NT.

  16. #16 by El Koussa on 09/13/2014 - 9:34

    Thank u Todd for ur message. Happy reading 🙂

  17. #17 by Brendon O'Connell on 09/13/2014 - 9:34

    This quote: Truly, it is a case of ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’ and puts Jesus Christ’s entire ‘Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do’ commentary in a completely new light.

    Are we sure He wasn’t referring to the Romans who were putting in the nails? The Pharisee’s knew EXACTLY what they were doing.


  18. #18 by Obama Bin Bush on 09/13/2014 - 9:34

    From Brendon O’Connell’s article above:

    (Still Jewish)
    (Still Jewish)
    (Renounced his Israeli citizenship and renounces being “Jewish”)
    (Still Jewish)
    (Renounced Israeli citizenship and renounced being “Jewish”
    (Still Jewish)

    Read this list carefully : notice that a small number of “good” jews actually renounced their jewishness? The rest, no matter how much they try, they are too in love with themselves (self-worship) to ever consider giving all that up. To break free from judaism/jewishness is an absolutely astonishing feat… no doubt a miracle before our very eyes.

    Check out : https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rabbis+say+islam+is+true ….


  19. #19 by Brian Hildebran on 09/14/2014 - 9:34

    As always Mark you and only you are the voice of truth. My apologies for having a different opinion! I forget that on this subject you can’t possibly be wrong. Again, my bad!

    Oh and lest I forget, you never offer a rebuttal just the standard, “i’m right your wrong” stance. Of course, that’s so much easier isn’t it! As much as I agree with your posts yet I find just as much to disagree with. That’s ok, wasn’t trying to convince YOU of anything!

    ed note–no, I do not see my self as the ‘voice of truth’, nor do I see myself as infallible and incapable of error.

    But on those issues where I know I am standing on terra firma, I will not yield, anymore so than I would give someone the platform here to argue that the earth is actually flat instead of round.

    And I DO engage in rebuttal and debate, except when it turns into some kind of circular, never-ending, non-productive discussion that veers down the road to Nowheresville. When people argue something based upon their ‘faith’ instead of facts, the waters get really muddy really fast and I just don’t have the time or interest in anything such as that.

    And the facts are these–the Jews today, just as they were yesterday, were/are a product of their ‘literature’. This ‘literature’ has brought disaster with it everywhere it has gone throughout its known history. Right now, as we speak and as I write this, the world stands on the precipice of total annhiliation, and it is due ENTIRELY to the Jews and their ‘literature’. There was never a time when their ‘literature’ was something benificent to mankind. There was never a time it was something that was even neutral. It has always acted as a toxc, highly-radioactive element, poisoning the environment around it where it sat.

    These are facts–not faith, not fantasy, not fiction, and it is due to your (well-established) inability to see these very obvious things, coupled with instances in the past of the same kind of circular, never-ending, non-productive discussions veering down the road to Nowheresville that is the reason why I make ‘executive decisions’ such as this to not entertain what is a waste of my (and everyone else’s) most valuable resource right now–time–in these types of discussions. The only chance we have got of saving what little skin is left on the body of humanity is through intelligent, productive discussion of FACTS–not faith–that stands the best chance of attracting large numbers of people and it is for this reason that the only religion we ‘debate’ here is the one that poses the greatest threat to us all, and that is Judaism.

  20. #20 by Brian Hildebran on 09/14/2014 - 9:34

    You do know the New Testament was written by Jews too right? That it’s main writer, Paul, was a Jewish Rabbi? Or that Jesus was a Jewish Rabbi with authority? There is research being done and has been done that Greek was not the New Testament original language but that it was first written in Hebrew? And that every instance where Paul says Scripture, he is referring to the Torah and the Old Testament? And that Torah is quoted more times in the New Testament than every other book(s) but Isaiah? Or that when Paul argued that Yeshua was the Christ, He did so from the Torah and the Old Testament? Correct me if I’m wrong but I remember you stating sometime ago that you were a Christian or that you believed the New Testament or something to that effect. To separate Yeshua and Christianity from the Old Testament simply means you really don’t understand what your reading because your not understanding original intent of the author(s). In this I stand just as strongly, or more so, as you do in your ed notes. It is not a matter of faith, as you would have it, but a study of the literature, in context of when and to whom it was being written. This is nothing more than the principles of How to Read a Book by Mortimer Adler which was NOT written concerning religious literature but applies to all literature or any written document.

    I honestly get that you disagree and stand firmly on your disagreement. That doesn’t make you entirely true nor entirely false. I agree with your notes with this caveat, The Jews are a product of their religious INTERPRETATION of their (though not really their’s) literature, which I believe to be a horrible, evil perversion. And such a misinterpretation that has been supported and amplified by the misinterpretation of both Old and New Testaments by Dispensationalists around the world who call themselves Christians. I know this firsthand because I used to believe, promote, and adhere to this interpretation before I began to study the Bible for myself instead of just taking my “teachers” word for it. 15 years ago I would be arguing from quite a different viewpoint.

    However, if you are a Christian or believer/follower of the New Testament, Paul said that Torah was “holy and good” and I assume he meant within it’s correct context and interpretation.

    Mark, I appreciate what you do on TUT, I just strongly disagree with your position in this matter. Keep up the fight as I believe you will.

    Ed note–no, the NT was not written by jews, it was written by Christians, and the fact that this needs explaining to you underscores what the basis of the problem is here.

    As I said before Brian, we’re not gong to get into these religious discussions here that go nowhere. If this is where you want to take this you’re going to have to do it somewhere else.

  21. #21 by Kelvin on 09/18/2014 - 9:34


    Yes, you are right–the Torah (OT) is the head of the snake, the fountainhead of all evil.

    I would only add:

    “There is no text more barbaric than the Old Testament….the Quran pales in comparison”–Sam Harris.

  22. #22 by Gentile Liberation Front - Auburn on 09/20/2014 - 9:34

    Calling all Torah-lovers: why do you think Deut. 15:6 tells the Israelites they’ll rule all “nations” (goyim) through usury?? But, of course Deut. 23:19 conveniently forbids an Israelite to engage in usury…when ANOTHER ISRAELITE is the victim, that is. How sweet. Or, isn’t Gen. 47 just an archetypical jewish scam, a proto-Holodomor in fact?

  23. #23 by Alan Kerns on 08/01/2015 - 9:34

    MG: lots of important points powerfully expressed. There was nothing I would want to dispute until the following paragraph:
    “In many ways, the unwillingness/inability of individuals to grasp and accept the reality of the danger to their very existence by the predatory nature of Judaic thinking mirrors the plot line found within Peter Benchley’s novel Jaws that was later made into a film of the same name.”
    I disagree with the assertion that the “nature of Judaic thinking” is “predatory”. I think it is actually parasitic – the intention being to live off the produce of their livestock. With regard to anyone who impedes their farming of their livestock, their thinking seems to be murderous or genocidal.
    I would further point out that the plot of Jaws is – to my mind – very Old Testamental. The evil predator that’s intent on killing victims at every opportunity, and therefore we must kill it before it kills all of us. Predators don’t live that way! They kill in order to eat and survive. Enough is enough for all predators that I know of.
    What to do about parasites that make our lives very ill? That is an issue that demands serious thought. I will not presume what your thinking about that may be. I think that you will find that the ramifications of the parasitic conception are quite different from, and much more extensive than, those of the predator conception. The different conceptions would require quite different strategies.
    Thanks for your gift of lots to think seriously about.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: