Paris Attack Smacks of False Flag


Continue Reading

  1. #1 by ribbung on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    No no!
    They found the flag in the getaway car, and it was a genuine jihadist flag! 😃

  2. #2 by Konrad on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    Cui bono? Jews yes, but also French politicians and rich people. The French government recently enacted a highly controversial “anti-terrorism” law that will restrict everyone’s Internet activities.

    Remember that one week after 9/11, the W. Bush regime wanted to ram through the USA Patriot Act, but it met with resistance from the public, from a few Congressmen, and from several people in the media.

    Therefore the W. Bush regime sent deadly anthrax to offices of congressmen and journalists who opposed the Patriot Act. The anthrax came with notes saying, “Allah is great,” and “Death to Israel.”

    Five people were killed, and seventeen others infected.

    As a result, the Bush regime’s Patriot Act was quickly rushed through and became law on 26 Oct 2001.

    The Bush regime claimed that the anthrax came from Saddam Hussein, but it actually came from a DoD contractor hired by the Bush regime.

    Once it became clear that this was a false flag attack, the corporate media dropped the entire affair — but the Patriot Act remained in place, and no one was ever prosecuted for the anthrax attacks.

  3. #3 by CK on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    This was Israel’s punishment of France for supporting Palestinian statehood and calling for an end to sanctions on Russia. Netanyahoo warned in November that there would be “grave consequences.” The handwriting’s on the wall.

  4. #4 by Konrad on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    The timing alone says “false flag.” One month ago France set off a stampede when its lower house voted to recognize Palestine. Then the Palestinians made a bid to join the International Criminal Court, and charge Israel with genocide. Plus there is a new anti-terrorism law in France that will further censor the Internet and charge people as “terrorists.”

    In late 2013, Malaysia’s Kuala Lumpur Tribunal found Israel guilty of genocide. A few months later, Malaysian planes started falling out of the sky.

    In 2011, Norway’s Labor Party’s youth wing was poised to impose a complete blockade on Israel. Suddenly the entire leadership of the Party’s youth wing was slaughtered in a professional operation attributed to a lone nut, Anders Breivik. 77 people killed, 319 wounded.


    Roger Cohen, a militant Jew columnist for the New York Times, says, “I am shaking with rage at the attack on Charlie Hebdo. It’s an attack on Jewish supremacy the free world. The entire Jewish controlled free world should respond, ruthlessly.”

    As always the hypocrisy is staggering. In February 2006 Charlie Hebdo published a series of 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad that had been featured in the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten. Depictions of Muhammad are not allowed in Islam. In 2011 Charlie Hebdo named the Prophet Muhammad as its “editor-in-chief.” Again the cover carried a cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad. The next day the offices of Charlie Hebdo were firebombed, and its website was hacked. (There were no injuries.)

    Mr. Stephane Charbonnier, editor-in-chief of Charlie Hebdo (and the world’s highest-paid cartoonist) said: “If we can poke fun at everything in France except Islam or the consequences of Islamism, that is annoying.”

    Of course it is NOT annoying that no one may legally question the Jewish holo-hoax. ™

    In 2012 Mr. Charbonnier told Al Jazeera that free speech must be upheld, and could not be bounded by what would and would not cause offense. (Except, of course, when it comes to questioning the holo-hoax™ and Jewish supremacy.)


    Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:25:40 +0000 To:

  6. #6 by xplorexpress on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    Link not working Helen

  7. #7 by MJ on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    Well put Konrad! You should see the hate online but the good news is there are more brethren/sisters online trying to reason with the unreasonable…….
    frustrated today….
    I am NOT Charlie by Saker
    Thank you saker!

  8. #8 by MJ on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    Looks like MP Galloway has come to similar conclusions:
    “It was already difficult being a Muslim in France in the teeth of ceaseless provocation and the lash of racism and Islamophobia. Today it just got more difficult. Those who hate Muslims and their religion have been strengthened by these murders. The west in general appears locked on a course of confrontation with much of the Muslim world. Invasion, occupation, bombardment, provocation chase and are chased by Islamist fanaticism ever more savage and dangerous. It is the road to disaster, for all of us. We must turn back before it is too late.”

    too late though……..the have the media and thus command the hearts of the non thinkers.
    We Must Turn Back Before It Is Too Late

  9. #9 by MJ on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    This post looks at that which they classify as civilized versus that which they do not.
    Liberal Condemning of Charlie Hebdo Killings Offers Little Civilising Solace

  10. #10 by steve2 on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    More evidence that it was an Israeli attack here.

  11. #11 by joekano76 on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    Reblogged this on TheFlippinTruth.

  12. #12 by Konrad on 01/08/2015 - 9:34

    @MJ: That’s a great article. There is one thing the author cannot discuss, since it would cause him to be banned, and that is the hypocrisy of Jews and their allies who claim the “right” to insult Muslims because it is part of “free speech.” But what would happen if you politely questioned the “holocaust”™ or Jewish atrocities? The entire planet would treat it as a global outrage.

    I think that most people who visit and contribute to the TUT feel as I do. We do not “hate” Jews.
    Hate is a form of love. Hate makes you fixate on the object of your hate, and do things to keep the object around, so that you can hate it. Hate also elevates Jews to the status of human-hood.

    No, we do not hate Jews. We want Jews and their worshippers to be banished, exiled, run out, loaded onto a spaceship and shot into the blackness. I don’t hate cockroaches. I just don’t want them crawling all over me.

    “So twelve deliberate blasphemers were murdered, and all of France is in deep mourning. The media worldwide does such a good job presenting it all as a planetary disaster that many thousands people worldwide say ‘I am Charlie.” they sob, light candles, and take a ‘courageous’ stance for freedom of speech. Crocodile tears if you ask me.”

    “The EU 1%-ers are now capitalizing on these murders to crack down on their own population. Sarkozy already met Hollande and they both agreed that new levels of firmness and surveillance must be implemented. Does that not reek of a French 9/11?”

    The USA had a 9/11.
    Spain had a 9/11 (Madrid train bombings 11 March 2004).
    England had a 9/11 (subway bombings, 7 July 2005).
    India had a 9/11 (Mumbai attacks, 26 Nov 2008).
    Norway had a 9/11 (Oslo massacre 22 July 2011).

    Now it’s France’s turn.

  13. #13 by MJ on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    Thanks Konrad……what is frustrating for myself is how they conflate insult or criticism of the religion with insult of the Prophet peace be upon Him…..Those 2 issues are not synonymous.
    We are used to the former and attempt to correct lies and misconceptions but the later is inexcusable.
    Personally I would have diverted sewage water on the premises.
    But methinks that this is a false flag event…..

  14. #14 by Konrad on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    @ SAYEED: A couple of responses…

    “Despite the highly suspect cui bono, all the nonsense coming out of the ‘Jews did it’ crew is quite detrimental to the cause of justice, because it’s basically all history as hearsay.”

    We share the “Mossad did it” rhetoric as an exercise is refusing to automatically believe the self-serving claims of politicians. Furthermore, “Mossad did it” is less absurd than claiming that “ISIL did it,” or “Arabs with box cutters did it.” We don’t know all the facts, but we DO know that Jews and most politicians are evil, and that most governments perpetrate false flags.

    “We have no proof that the Algerian-French Kouachi brothers…were working for any intelligence service when they attacked the Hebdo cartoon outfit, and murdered the cartoonists. Maybe they just did it because they felt insulted, and are fundamentalist psychopaths looking for any excuse to kill, and to be hailed for their notoriety, rather than ‘pizza man.’”

    That’s possible. Maybe they were tired of being marginalized and impoverished by system that is dedicated to forever widening the gap between the rich and the rest.

    ”I mean, who leaves their ID card in the getaway vehicle, unless they just don’t give a damn?”

    Someone could have planted the ID there. Immediately after 9/11 the US government claimed to have found the IDs of all the “Arabs with box cutters.” Millions of tons of rubble, and no bodies recovered yet, but here were the IDs. It was a MIRACLE!

    We don’t have enough information to reach any firm conclusion one way or the other about this latest incident.

    ”Would you blame the gun store, the shooting range, the church, the army, or the media, when some Christian fundie blows up an abortion clinic? Why do we disrespect fundamental Islamic people so much, that we don’t even consider them capable of making their own decisions, thus planning their own attacks? Why must it always be completely the government’s fault?”

    I agree, but we share the “false flag” rhetoric as a means to resist automatically believing whatever politicians claim. Moreover your comment is as applicable to politicians as it is to us.

    For example, let me rephrase your sentence…

    “Why do we politicians disrespect fundamental all Islamic people so much, that we they don’t even consider Muslims capable of making their own decisions, and thus planning their own attacks? Why must it always be completely the government’s fault the fault of all Muslims?”

    How do we even know that the attack was real? How do we know that the attackers were Muslims? We need more information.

  15. #15 by Konrad on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    MJ: What is frustrating for myself is how they conflate insult or criticism of the religion with insult of the Prophet peace be upon Him…..Those two issues are not synonymous. We are used to the former and attempt to correct lies and misconceptions but the latter is inexcusable.

    KONRAD: We must consider the social milieu. In nations like France, the gap between the rich and the rest keeps widening. The glorification of Jews and vilification of Muslims keeps happening. The Western wars of imperialism keep happening. Eventually people snap. They open fire.

    Society pretends that Muslims are privileged, not marginalized. Coddled, not vilified. According to this pretense, Muslims who open fire are insane fundamentalists who bear total blame for their actions.

    This lie, this social pretense, is part of the madness that the gunman seeks to destroy. If he cannot have respect, sincerity, and some degree of equality, he will have blood. The choice is society’s.

    MJ: Personally I would have diverted sewage water on the premises.
    But methinks that this is a false flag event…

    KONRAD: Society has a tendency to say, “If they wanted to make a point, then why didn’t they…”

    But sometimes gunmen don’t want to “make a point.” Sometimes they simply want payback. Sometimes they want to silence their oppressors. Sometimes, after years of abuse, they simply pick up a gun and take out the trash. We don’t have all the facts in this case, and we never will.

  16. #16 by Konrad on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    Sayeed: I find that laying blame without evidence, even going as far as to claim the event didn’t happen, again without evidence, is very detrimental to the cause of justice, and also to getting anyone to believe us, once we actually do get any real evidence.

    Yes, jumping to final conclusions without having all the facts will not advance the cause of justice.

    But neither will the refusal to form hypotheses and see if they fit the known facts.

    As I said, we do not have enough information to reach any definite conclusions. All we have are reasonable suspicions and educated guesses.

    Perhaps you have special information that allowed you to reach a definite conclusion.

    If so, perhaps you would care to share your findings.

  17. #17 by MJ on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    Interesting points, Konrad.
    The jurisprudence (shariah) disallows armed action against oppressors for those living as minorities, according to what I have understood from the teachings.

  18. #18 by Human Melody 1 on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    @ Sayeed … If you have at least sensed that Jewish extremism has been at work since WWI (and peaking in recent times), then you’d have guessed that they’ve been behind major world events, from genocides to false flags. The latter includes Ottawa, Sydney and Paris within a narrow time frame (wherein the Jewish need for ‘staged justifications towards disarming the public and declaring war on Islam’ is already well known to all). … And if these three events show odd similarities (from “crisis actors” to blank fires to ‘amplified gunshots that do not match the ammo’, etc.), then you would be compelled to question more, right?

    Please review these:
    – Ottawa was Completely Fake —
    – French Website Blames Mossad for “France’s 9-11” —
    – Illuminati Have No Compunction about Killing Jews [if necessary, to create a climate of fear and conflict between Christians and Muslims in the West] —
    – Anti Semitism is Often Justified —
    – Fake Terror is Oldest Trick in Zionist Toolbag —

    [An Excerpt by Dr. Henry Makow :
    “The long series of false flag terror attacks culminating with the one in Paris on Wednesday are part of a strategy to create a police state using a manufactured Islamic threat as a pretext. Jewish media flacks are central in stirring up Islamophobia. In fact, the threat is not Islamic but Jewish. The attacks are organized and sponsored by the Illuminati and carried out by the Mossad and their cutouts. Eventually people will wake up to this threat. Unless Jews speak out now, they will be counted with the enemy.”]

    Sayeed … you keep insisting on evidence and the cause of Justice! It compels one to wonder if you followed the news for decades now (where there has been NO Justice in this world, OFFICIALLY, since 9/11) … or if you are a shill! … The Jewish Illuminati are called the Secret Society BECAUSE they leave no evidence. And the very secret services (incl. ISIS-Mossad) of these Jews also operate similarly, unless they have to do daytime drills/ hoaxes JUST because they get a high from fooling those like you repeatedly!

    A humble suggestion: when you have no proof for or against a verdict, then [irrespective of what you decide] you may be considerate enough to [at least] NOT discourage those who have done far more work than you in arriving at their conclusion. Your insistence that blaming the Mossad is wrong and weakens the case for justice … adds nothing helpful to the Truth Movement … and will only take you down the road of doubting Thomas’s that’d end up in the same pit as the wretched Mossad itself. [Yes, there’s a classic discourse regarding how dupes are all too often not “innocent”.]

    As a final resource to comfort your ailing queries … please see these telling videos …

  19. #19 by Human Melody 1 on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    @ MJ … Would that ruling be sustained even in situations where a member (or members) of the minority had to save innocent lives (from among the majority or the minority) … from the injustice, abuse or threat [to life] from Oppressive Authorities?

    It gets more complex:

    What if the oppressors are using numerous, ingenious and covert “slow-kill” methods that the Justice system is designed not to address/ catch? And what if those methods are such that they remain outside classical “Shariah” definitions/ scope (because the Status Quo in existing Islamic Scholarship does not allow adequate “Ijtehad” (viz., identifying/ classifying cunning modern day crimes in light of the scope of Shariah, e.g.)? … [For instance, if they could do adequate Ijtehad, they would have stopped Sh. Faisal from agreeing to create the petro-dollar that brought Zionists where they are today … and they would have been able to hold accountable those rich Muslim countries that sit there, basking in luxury, and watching the Ummah burn and die on TV.]

    What if Shariah is completely inapplicable unless the monetary system Is first made Halaal (which is only possible when Banksters are wiped off the Earth… which is only going to happen when Jesus (a.s.) returns)?

    What if the highest authorities that certify the Ulema/ Scholars have already fallen under the control of Jewish influence (wherein the intellectual capacity of the Ulema have been kept stunted to the Jews’ advantage, for a while now)? … What if Jews have already spent billions in researching the Jurisprudence (among other things, incl. End Times’ Hadeeth) and are, thus, always steps ahead of the Ulema? [Please refer to the Hadith where Prophet (saas) said that in the End Times, the [majority of the] Ulema will be the worst people under the sky!]

    … I’m asking/ discussing only because I often felt that the Jew [/Dajjal] really did his homework … and has carved the perfect world/ game for himself to be able to push the Muslims as far as he wants to, without consequences! In other words, he has done enough to ensure that we cannot do Anything!

  20. #20 by MJ on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    Good questions HM……
    such questions do require ijtehad.for the fiqh of minorities……..bare in mind most of the Muslims living here have a weaker faith……..they are Muslims who require a watered down religion hence not much can be expected from them. A beloved shaykh once said they want a jurisprudence of weakness …….

    However in Muslim majority countries the Jewish supremacists have in an apparent fashion crossed all lines ……and all know that this requires redress,
    Btw, I find that they are more like a bull in a China shop destroying and corrupting everything that can be destroyed and corrupted……..
    That is why they do not bother with the hearts and minds of Muslims, 99% see them in all their ugliness.
    This video has not been appropriately titled but is quite interesting.

  21. #21 by Konrad on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    @ SAYEED:“Let me correct all you dupes, how dare you call me a shill who does no work. Oh! The toil involved in blaming Jews for everything, damn that must grind your fingers down to the bone!”

    Whether a Jew calls himself Bush or Goldberg or Obama is irrelevant. Jews and allies of Jews are both “Jews.” When any event directly or indirectly benefits “Jews” (i.e. benefits Jews, or allies of Jews) it is reasonable to suspect that the event may have been perpetrated, arranged, set up, or deliberately allowed by “Jews.” The US government, for example, is full of Jews, and is blindly devoted to Jews. Therefore it is a government of Jews.

    The incident involving the Charlie Hebdo magazine benefits Jews and the allies of Jews. Therefore it is reasonable to suspect that it involved Jews in one way or another. But as I said before, we don’t have enough information to reach a final conclusion.

    The first video above, (thank you Human Melody 1) looks very fake to me. It raises many questions about the Charlie Hebdo incident. You may choose to believe whatever politicians tell you. I choose to question politicians.

    “Ottawa, Sydney, Boston, Paris, Toulouse, etc etc, were all events that were LET happen, for propaganda purposes, and the continuance of wars, occupations, and the funding thereof.”

    If you LET something happen, then you are involved in it. You are complicit. If you truly have the power to stop an event, but you choose to let it happen (since the event will benefit you) then you are as guilty as the person who pulls the trigger.

    Anyway, to repeat, if an event benefits Jews or the allies of Jews, then it is reasonable to suspect that the event involved Jews. I said

    Regular visitors and contributors to this blog are highly suspicious of Jews for numerous reasons. One reason is that they are tired of being told that Jews are saintly and innocent “victims.” For me personally, the “holocaust”™ alone is so outrageous that it damns Jews as liars and swindlers. So yes, things like the Charlie Hebdo incident make me suspect that Jews may be involved.

  22. #22 by Springer on 01/09/2015 - 9:34

    Yes i think it was a false flag due to the policemans head not jolting backwards as it was hit by a bullet and also because the lack of blood.

    I triedd to spread the word on Above Top Secret but just like Youtube they removed it and both look to be nothing but tools of the state.

    None of this looks right but you can bet they will use it as an excuse to take away more of our freedoms.

    ed note–first off, let’s get our definitions straight.

    A ‘false flag’ is a real event that takes place, but which is blamed on someone else in order to achieve certain pre-determined political outcomes.

    A ‘hoax’ is something that did not take place.

    I will agree that it is a false flag, that indeed it took place but is being blamed on someone else for pre-determined outcomes, but not that it was a ‘hoax’, which you seem to think is the case in your referencing ‘no blood,’ etc.

    By the way, I have seen lots of real footage of persons being shot in the head and other body parts and where there was no recoil of the body. This happens sometimes when you are using a high-powered rifle with bullets travelling as fast as 3,000 feet per second.

  23. #23 by Konrad on 01/09/2015 - 9:34


    ”Jewish oligarchy is a huge problem, but many other oligarchies hide behind the Jews, and by focusing only on Jews, we almost completely miss the point, the other 88% of world billionaires for example.”

    I agree with you 100%. This is why I refer to evil-doers as “Jews,” whether or not they call themselves Jews. Or I use the phrase “Jews and their allies.” Or “Jews and their worshippers.”

    Jews are the outward putrefaction of a vast disease that is pandemic. Greed, selfishness, theft, murder, and so on exist with or without Jews, but Jews make everything worse. They take existing evil and greatly exacerbate it, with the willing help of their allies.

    As I explained in previous posts, Jews are part of what I call the Unholy Trinity, whose three legs are Jews, neo-liberalism, and the police state with endless war. Each leg depends on and reinforces the other two.

    Regarding unfounded assertions, I agree with you that they inhibit justice and goodness. Nonetheless we can reasonably use phrases such as, “might be” and “perhaps” and “looks like” and “seems to be,” “could be.” MOST DEFINITELY we cannot trust ANYTHING that politicians claim without us doing our own checking. And yet, most people DO believe whatever politicians say.

  24. #24 by Human Melody 1 on 01/10/2015 - 9:34

    @ MJ ,,, Thank you for the video. It was indeed an engaging depiction of the sick, unspeaking schizophrenic monsters they are by Divine curse. Watching this compels one to believe that these creatures need to be put to sleep permanently, because they’re a misery unto their own selves. … As I watched this, I wondered how just a SINGLE airing of this one video alone (so every American could watch this once) would completely shift public opinion overnight.

    If after watching this video the likes of Sayeed [out there] can continue to be hurt by any blame placed upon Israel/ Mossad [without ‘evidence’] … … then one would be compelled to conclude that he/ they are also Jews (wherein the alignment of their sentiments, however intangible or subtle, is the very evidence for that conclusion).

  25. #25 by MJ on 01/10/2015 - 9:34

    HM1 you are welcome……yup I remember when I used to entertain that knee jerk defense of the criminals, but no more.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: