AIPAC official: PM’s Congress speech hurt Iran deal opposition

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu attends a news conference in Jerusalem

Member of pro-Israel lobby tells Israeli media that Netanyahu’s March address transformed Iran deal into partisan issue; AIPAC spokesman says the comments ‘do not represent or reflect our views’

ed note–as much as some without the necessary stereoscopic vision are inclined to view all of this in a merely one-dimensional way, i.e. that it is all a ‘set-up’ and that no real contention between warring factions exists, nevertheless this is exactly what is taking place and doing so with very dangerous implications that are not as far removed into the future as some may want to believe.

The gangsters presently at each others’ throats are not limited simply to weapons such as machine guns, switch blades, and brass knuckles in fighting their fights. What we are talking about here are 2 sides in possession of–

A. Nukes

B. Substantial control over the money supply and economy

C. Access to industrial infrastructure functions such as the powergrid, water, gas, internet, etc, etc, etc

 The point being, that what we are facing here is a fight between King Kong and Godzilla and with the rest of us in the middle.

We are approaching mid-September, the anniversary of both 911 and the attempted economic meltdown of America that took place in 2008 and an Israeli PM who is fuming over the fact that he has been made a fool of in front of the entire world by an African American President.

And again, while some would say it is all a ‘show’, my personal position on it is that people the world over–and especially in the US–best batten down the hatches because I think it is safe to say that we are in for some rough seas.

Times of Israel

An official from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the leading pro-Israel lobby in the US, on Thursday blasted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for harming the opposition to the Iran nuclear deal by insisting on addressing Congress on the issue in March.

“Netanyahu’s speech in Congress made the Iranian issue a partisan one,” the AIPAC official told Israel’s Walla news. “As soon as he insisted on going ahead with this move, which was perceived as a Republican maneuver against the president, we lost a significant part of the Democratic party, without which it was impossible to block the agreement,” said the official, who asked not to be named.

AIPAC’s spokesman Marshall Wittmann dissociated the organization from the remarks. “The comments by the purported ‘AIPAC official’ to Walla News about the prime minister do not represent or reflect the views of our organization and were not authorized by us,” he told The Times of Israel. Ahead of Netanyahu’s speech to Congress, he also noted, AIPAC made plain it firmly supported the prime minister’s address. “AIPAC welcomes the prime minister’s speech to Congress and we believe that this is a very important address,” Wittmann said at the time. “We have been actively encouraging senators and representatives to attend and we have received an overwhelmingly positive response from both sides of the aisle.”

Dozens of Democratic lawmakers were absent from Netanyahu’s speech — which had been set up without the knowledge of the White House — including President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden.

AIPAC has been at the forefront of the battle against the agreement reached in July between Iran and the world powers, which curbs Iran’s nuclear program in return for the lifting of crippling economic sanctions. But, according to veteran Israeli journalist Ben Caspit, the lobby had opposed Netanyahu’s speech to Congress and urged him to reconsider in anticipation of the strain it would place on US-Israel ties. Netanyahu apparently declined, and the speech went ahead.

According to the AIPAC official quoted by Walla, the lobby was not the only source to raise these concerns with the prime minister.

“A few weeks before Netanyahu’s speech in Congress, Democratic senators implored him to cancel, saying it was inappropriate for the Israeli prime minister to work like this behind the back of the president of the United States,” the official said. “Instead of the speech, they proposed that he come to Washington and meet with them behind closed doors, without the TV cameras, so he could explain his position on the Iranian issue.”

The official added: “A lot of people here think that if Netanyahu had accepted their offer, it would have improved our chances [to foil the deal].”

On Wednesday, Democratic Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) said that she supported the agreement, granting Obama the backing of the 34 senators he needs to ensure the agreement can beat any attempts in Congress to kill it.

In order to scupper the agreement, the opposition to the deal needed 13 Democratic senators to go against their president, who has consistently championed the agreement and vowed to veto any move by the Republican-dominated Congress to disapprove it. And by speaking to Congress in early March, the AIPAC official said, Netanyahu made the issue a purely partisan one.

“What happened was that 50 Democrats boycotted the speech, and many others were there but filled with anger and bitterness toward Netanyahu, who forced them to choose between Israel and the president,” the official told Walla. “From that moment on, the story of the agreement with Iran became Democrats against Republicans, as with many other political issues. This made Obama’s task of persuasion easier.”

  1. #1 by Dante Ardenz on 09/03/2015 - 9:34

    Nutanyahoo, and the Jews originated the Left/Right game for all people to be corralled into two simple but competitive camps.
    They can than play each against the middle.
    ThecJews overreached by taking total control of the Right/ Conservativism in US politics,and culture/ religion,exposing them to a flank attack.

    Of course their God Yahweh Deneriuge ,operates Left/Right/Shadow…..Talmudic Contradictions.

    But the Jews instinct is ultra conservatism, as they are the most reactionary ideology/theology possible.

    The Jews only promoted ,” The Left”, as a way to take down Gentile systems.

    The forwarding analysis, is precisely correct, as since the Jews hit the world with the Left Hook, they deprived the Gentile of Capital Control….now in charge,they are back to their original ” Right ” position.

    This was Ann Rands ,Pierre Rothschild’s mistress blueprint for Jewish Finance control in Atlas Shrugged, Ludwig Von Misses, and Milton Friedman.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: