The Talmudic Argument For a More Ethical Financial System
THE FORWARD – It takes some chutzpah to write a book that takes on the whole financial system, let alone a plan to fix it. But that’s the task my co-authors and I undertook in writing “What They Do With Your Money.”
Why? Consider that Talmudic tradition tells us that the first question you are asked in making the transformation from this world to whatever comes next is “were you honest in business?” And that there are more mitzvot regarding business and property and buying and selling than there are for almost anything else. From the earliest of times, our ancestors understood that a fair economy is central to an ethical world.
Yet today, we seem very far away from even considering the question of ethics and purpose when it comes to capitalism. That’s a shame because doing so could not only provide a framework for how the financial sector should function, but also point a direction to tikkun olam, to improving our world.
Like it or not, the financial system is vital. We can’t grow our economy, provide jobs, reduce poverty, build a climate-friendly infrastructure, and or solve a host of major societal problems world without it.
Finance facilitates essential functions businesses and citizens need — from safekeeping our money to facilitating payments to sharing risk. Perhaps the most important is what is known as “intermediation,” or, as the third Lord Rothschild put it, “taking money from point A where it is, to point B where it is needed”. This can mean pooling savings to fund a mortgage, helping build an efficient power plant, or facilitating retirement savings. Finance aggregates the capital needed for economic activity.
So, at its core, finance is a service industry. While it doesn’t create food or shelter or entertainment or medical care, none of those could exist at the scale we need without the financial system.
But, and this is a big but, how does well does the financial system work?
Unfortunately, not well. It costs about two percent to move money from point A to point B. That doesn’t sound like much, but it has cost the same two percent for 130 years. In that time, we have invented computers, cars, and telephones; landed people on the moon, eradicated diseases; increased life expectancy. In almost every human endeavor, we have become more productive. Except in finance.
Meanwhile, the amount of the real economy which is intermediated has quadrupled. Today, almost one out of every 12 dollars in the US economy finds its way into the pockets of the financial sector.
That is not to say there have been no efficiencies at all. We have credit cards, automatic teller machines, affordable mortgages, better risk-shifting ability, more efficient trading markets, and a host of other improvements. But, the benefits of these advancement and efficiencies have stayed within the financial sector.
Why? First, the number of financial intermediaries has grown exponentially. Each intermediary needs to be paid, so that while each transaction may be more efficient, the aggregate is not. One study identified 16 agents that shepherd your money from your wallet (point A) to the eventual investment (point B). And they all get paid. In fact, over the course of a lifetime, the aggregate costs can decrease your retirement savings by half. Literally half. 50%. By the way, that chain of agents also attenuates us from the ownership of the companies in which we invest, which is one reason that issues that most people care about, like long-term sustainability and growing economy so that we can have better jobs, take lesser priority than trading profits and short-term returns.
The second reason is that there are misalignments between the financial system and the needs of the real economy. For example, there are 79,669 mutual funds in the world. No one knows the optimal number, but everyone is pretty sure it’s less than 79,669. Why so many? As we show in the book, they serve an important marketing purpose, even as they make investing more expensive than it should be. Simply put, that many mutual funds benefit the industry, not society.
Fixing capitalism is a game worth playing and worth winning. The stakes are enormous. What if that 2% intermediation cost were 1%? Can you imagine what our society would look like if capital cost 1% less for 130 years? If those billions – hundreds of billions – trillions of dollars – compounding each year, had been put to work at companies that “do things”? Just this year alone, the economy would be growing about 20% faster than it is.
We reject the false dichotomy that seems to permeate any discussion of the financial industry in which your only choice is to accept the financial sector as it is, or be criticized as anti-business, or anti-capitalism. We are devout capitalists. And we are financial professionals. But what we have now is sub-optimal, and the trust between finance and the rest of society is frayed, if not torn. We can do better.
The dozens of specific fixes we suggest are pragmatic. Some are common knowledge, like suggesting you invest through low-fee investment products. Some are common sense, like creating the equivalent of a “nutrition label”, so that investors can see at a glance all the real costs financial intermediaries impose, and whether the agent is truly accountable to you. Others are more technical, like amending a section of the tax code which helped executive compensation skyrocket. Some are systematic, such as extending fiduciary obligation throughout that chain of intermediaries – a fancy way of saying that if you are dealing with my money you have to have my best interests at heart. Some are long-term, like teaching the purpose of finance in business schools. Finally, some are behavioral, to make sure that people are aware of the obligation to be honest in business. Because without that, any system, however well designed, will collapse.
Getting the financial system realigned to better serve the real economy is not only efficient, it’s ethical. That’s something that the ancient rabbis would understand intuitively.
This entry was posted on 07/05/2016, 12:08 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.