Why Do Jews Choose Complicity?


brodner_nye_122812_620px.jpg

ed note–an extremely interesting and important concept very well expressed by Henry Makow which we posit here on a regular basis–Being ‘born’ into the Judaic mindset does not mean someone has been consigned to such a fate forever. Just as people can choose to abandon any derelict culture into which they are born and to ‘come into the light’, so too can Jews, and–like the rehab/healing process that surrounds any type of substance abuse–it begins with acknowledging that there is a problem, and that problem can be boiled down to one item–the Judaic mindset and the aberrant and uncivilized behavior that it has historically produced and the backlash that ensues which Jews refer disingenuously as ‘anti-Semitism’. 

continue reading

  1. #1 by Liz on 08/12/2016 - 6:26 am

    Why do you claim that 72 Virgins in Paradise is a Jewish invention?

    For example, in the Sunan Ibn Majah, one of the six major Hadith collections, it states in a hasan (good) narration that every male admitted into Paradise will be given eternal erections and wed to 72 wives, all with libidinous sex organs. Similarly in another hadith with multiple narrators that has been graded hasan (good), it states that the martyr (shahid) will be married to seventy-two of al-hoor al-‘iyn.

    It is quoted by Ibn Kathir, in his Qur’anic Commentary, the Tafsir ibn Kathir, and they are graphically described by Qur’anic commentator and polymath, al-Suyuti (died 1505), who, echoing a hasan hadith from Ibn Majah,wrote that the perpetual virgins will all “have appetizing vaginas”, and that the “penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal”.

    If you are going to spread, “information” at least be truthful about it or, is the truth not sufficient to meet your propaganda requirements?

  2. #2 by Jocanda (@Pepperpear) on 08/12/2016 - 10:00 am

    Just to make a point, what Makow is describing in his piece is anything BUT SOCIAL-ism. It’s ANTI-social-ism. Got it?

    The snake uses many arguments to hide the TRUTH:

    DR. Makow is full of the same kind of BS as are the NEO-CONS & NEO-Libs. In his case it’s the Neo-CONS. It’s more part truth to camouflage the false, & make the case AGAINST the social-ist impulses of the sacred society (Commun [e]-ity) of Christ. It’s called SACRAMENTAL SOCIALISM, and ‘Satan’ is trying to destroy it.

    The Devil wears many masks.

    THIS is the Socialism of CHRIST:

    Traditional Values
    http://web.archive.org/web/20000930001435/http://www.anglocatholicsocialism.org/acsoc.html

    Stewart Headlam’s “Sacramental Socialism” (c.1890):

    “In the worship of Jesus really present in the Sacrament of the Altar before you, all human hearts can join, and especially secularists, for when you worship Him you are worshipping the Savior, the social and political Emancipator, the greatest of all secular workers, the founder of the great socialistic society for the promotion of righteousness, the preacher of a revolution, the denouncer of kings, the gentle, tender sympathizer with the rough and the outcast who could utter scathing, burning words against the rich, the respectable, the religious.”

    Charles Gore (1891):
    “Many will come to Him at the last day — so we cannot but paraphrase his own words — with manifold pleas and excuse derived from the maxims of what is called the Christian world: ‘Lord, we never denied the Christian creed; nay, we had a zeal for orthodoxy, for churchmanship, for Bible distribution, but of course in our business we did as every one else did: we sold in the dearest and bought in the cheapest market; we did not, of course we did not, entertain any other consideration when we were investing our money, except whether the investments were safe; we never imagined that we could love our neighbors as ourselves in the competition of business, or that we could carry into commercial transactions the sort of strict righteousness that we knew to be obligatory in private life. Lord, in all these matters we went by commonly accepted standards; we never thought much about Christianity as a brotherhood.’

    “Then he will protest unto them; ‘Did I not say to thee, in that written word wherein thou didst profess to have eternal life: A man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of things that he possesseth? Did I not warn thee: How hardly shall they who have riches enter into the kingdom of God? Did I not bid thee seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness? Did I not tell thee that except a man in spirit and in will, at least, forsook all that had, unless he took up his cross and followed Me, he could not be my disciple? Not every one that saith unto Me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of Heaven, but he that doeth, that hath done, the Will of my Father.

    “Brethren, you may depend upon it, that you cannot be a Christian by mere tradition or respectability. You will have to choose to be Christians.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: