Is Trump Really pro-Israel, or Is He Just ‘Art of the Deal-ing’ Netanyahu?


‘I never get too attached to one deal or one approach,’ Trump’s seminal work declares. So which Trump will Netanyahu get when he meets with the president in Washington next week?


In his seminal work of extravagant fibs, “The Art of the Deal,” there’s a part where Donald Trump described his commitment to duplicity.

“I never get too attached to one deal or one approach. For starters, I keep a lot of balls in the air, because most deals fall out, no matter how promising they seem at first,” he writes. “In addition, once I’ve made a deal, I always come up with at least a half dozen approaches to making it work, because anything can happen, even to the best-laid plans.”

This quote might be useful to anyone trying to make sense of the U.S. president’s approach to Israel.

As Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are getting ready to meet next week, for the first time since Trump became POTUS, it is still a mystery which Trump that Netanyahu – and by implication, all of Israel – will get.

When it comes to Israel, you see, President Trump has largely kept his balls in the air. He began his presidential campaign, as you may recall, with a promise to be “neutral” between Israel and the Palestinians, opining that a peace deal between the two is “probably the toughest deal in the world right now to make.”

Then Trump decided he actually does need Jewish votes and started courting right-wing supporters of Israel by shamelessly pandering to the pro-settlement agenda, and declared himself “the best thing that could ever happen to Israel.”

Then, after he got the Israeli far-right practically salivating at the opportunity to accomplish coveted goals such as having the U.S. embassy move to Jerusalem or annexing the West Bank, Trump went ahead and poured cold water on both fronts. After adamantly vowing to move the American embassy to Jerusalem throughout his campaign, as President Trump said that its “It’s a big, big decision,” one that he is “studying very long and hard.”

Furthermore, after going out of his way to signal that he would be the complete opposite of Barack Obama on settlement expansion, Trump seemed to renege on that, with the White House suddenly echoing the Obama administration by saying that “the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing settlements beyond their current borders may not be helpful” in achieving peace.

So which Trump will Netanyahu meet on February 15? The “neutral” Trump of old, the staunchly pro-Israel presidential nominee, or this new, vague hybrid who “has not taken an official position on settlement activity”? Will Netanyahu get all that he is after, or will he leave this meeting as glum as he did the last time he met with Trump? A lot hinges on the answers to those questions. For Israel, the results of this meeting would be the first indication of what kind of U.S. president it is going to get for the next four or eight years. Beyond the personal fate of Netanyahu himself, the position that Trump takes (or, more likely, doesn’t take) will greatly influence the course of Israel’s politics, its security status and its future.

For Netanyahu, the results of this meeting could have grave implications for his career, and even his freedom.

Engulfed by a series of corruption investigations, Netanyahu desperately needs Trump to give him something, anything, to bring back home. His political career is dependent right now on Trump’s willingness to provide him with an accomplishment of some kind. It could be settlement expansion, or the koshering of Israel’s new, controversial land-grab law, or it could be an American embassy in Jerusalem – it doesn’t matter.

What matters for Netanyahu is to show Israelis that his relationship with the president is so special, so very close, as to make him essentially irreplaceable. With new discoveries about Netanyahu’s cronyist and corrupt dealings seeing light every single day, Trump just might be Netanyahu’s only lifeline to avoid a trial.

Netanyahu, who’s painfully aware of this, has been doing his best lately to pander to the new president, to the point that he is even throwing “fake news” accusations around and aping his idiosyncratic syntax on social media. Of course, Netanyahu does deserve some royalties here: Many of the tricks in Trump’s playbook (attacking the media to galvanize support, for instance) came from Netanyahu’s. In many regards, after all, he is the originator and Trump the copy.

This, however, won’t help him deal with Trump as president. On the flight to the meeting, Netanyahu would be wise to leaf through his copy of “The Art of the Deal.” There, he will find the following lesson: “The worst thing you can possibly do in a deal is seem desperate to make it. That makes the other guy smell blood, and then you’re dead.”

  1. #1 by TonyFromIN on 02/09/2017 - 9:34

    51% to 49%, 60% to 40% or 95% to 5% that he is here to put a stop to more wars for Israel and to avoid war with Russia. I lean in the positive way. 80% to 20% for me.
    However, all bets are off if he orders the invasion of Iran and/or gives his blessing when Israel bombs Gaza again.

  2. #2 by MJ on 02/10/2017 - 9:34

    When you have a bunch of trouble makers in a room do not be surprised if you get into trouble. He surrounded himself with wolves read the funeral prayer for the sheep.
    Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11 and yet have been paying the price for it.
    Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction yet pays the price.
    etc etc.The poorest innocents are being murdered.
    It has combined every vice known to man, the reckoning will come on this earth and the next life.
    There is a reason it is not mentioned in End times literature. It will not exist.
    Built on, sustained on death, theft and corruption.
    The good news is that it can now be stated out in the open. There is a religious war and anyone who helps the US is in trouble.

    America needs to be non interventionist or it will get justice in spades. The prayers of the oppressed are not unheard.

  3. #3 by Citizen T on 02/10/2017 - 9:34

    Apparently not apparent to some. Pattern is not clear enough of what Trump says and what he actually does? Realpolitik, baby.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: