Rejecting Purim parallel, Iranian Parliament speaker tells Netanyahu to ‘read the Torah’

On holiday of averted genocide of Jews in Persia, Ali Larijani says ‘nothing more than presenting such lies is expected from a wicked Zionist’

ed note–We are often accused of being ‘apologists’ for Islam and giving our Muslim friends a free pass when it comes to the same critical posture we employ in our examination/criticisms of Christians, so here goes our refutation of that charge here.

Of the many impediments existing today which prevent an honest and productive understanding (and subsequent solution) to the problems arising out of Zionism and organized Jewish power, it is the unwillingness on the part of virtually all persons assembled in the discussion–including those within the Islamic community worldwide–to deal with the beating heart of the ‘Jewish power’ problem, which is the infernal, insane religion that drives the infernal, insane behavior of its adherents. The Islamic interpretation of Judaism is that it is a ‘revealed’ religion, meaning that like Islam and Christianity, its precepts were brought to the world by prophets who were chosen by the creator to act as messengers in bringing the light of truth to mankind. However, Islam–unlike its Judaic and Christian counterparts–maintains that today’s Judaism is a corrupted version of the original truths which were brought by prophets such as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David, Solomon, etc, and that today’s Torah is a corrupted version of the original that bears no resemblance or similarity to the ‘real McCoy’ originally handed down. 

Ok, fine. That may be the case entirely, but in the present discussion involving Zionism and the problems arising out of organized Jewish power like smoke from an all-consuming fire, it is completely irrelevant. Whatever Judaism ‘may have been’ means nothing in terms of what Judaism is now, and, as far as this discussion goes, whatever the Torah ‘may have been’ means nothing in terms of what the Torah is now.

With all due respect,  Dr. Larijani and all those making up the Iranian leadership these days, you can absolutely rest assured that Netanyahu HAS INDEED read his Torah thoroughly. Every page, every word, every punctuation mark. The teachings contained in it, and particularly those passages acting as the spark that ignited the inferno of Jewish supremacism have been burned into his memory like a scar from a previous injury that will never disappear. Everytime he and his co-religionist cousins initiate some Judaic bloodbath of innocents in Gaza or wherever, he does so with complete confidence that it is the will of his god and he can cite passage after passage within the Torah–including the one sitting at the very top of this essay in black and white–that command and justify exactly what he is doing.

The insanity of the situation we all face at present can be explained and summed up thus–Jews and Christians believe that Israel’s bloodthirsty behavior is justified because the Torah is ‘God’s word’, hands down, no questions asked and no interpretation otherwise. The Muslims say Israel’s bloodthirsty behavior is not justified because today’s Torah is a corruption of ‘God’s word’ and therefore today’s Judaism is not the ‘true Judaism’ originally brought to mankind.

However, as far as those within the Islamic community worldwide are concerned, the problem with their position in all of this is that they refuse to engage in the much-needed examination of what today’s ‘false’ Judaism is and how it all plays a direct role in the unfolding Apocalypse for fear that by doing so, they will be accused of ‘bigotry’ for attacking someone else’s ‘revealed’ religion.

And thus, in the process of all of this, the one discussion that must take place if there is the slightest chance of containing this wild beast before it succeeds in devouring the entire world does not happen for the simple reason that few have what it takes to deal rationally and honestly with the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help them God, and even when it is the ugly truth.

Times of Israel

Iran’s parliament speaker on Sunday rejected Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s comparison of the ancient Persians who sought the annihilation of the Jews in the Purim story to modern-day Iran, advising the Israeli premier to study history and the Jewish Bible.

In an address to parliament on Sunday, which coincided with the Purim holiday, Iranian Speaker Ali Larijani said in Tehran that “apparently, [Netanyahu] is neither acquainted with history, nor has read the Torah,” according to Iranian media reports.

Larijani said that Netanyahu “has distorted the Iranians’ pre-Islam historical era and attempted to misrepresent events. Of course, nothing more than presenting such lies is expected from a wicked Zionist,” he said, according to the semi-official Fars News Agency.

In a meeting with Putin in Moscow on Friday, Netanyahu said Persia had made “an attempt to destroy the Jewish people that did not succeed” some 2,500 years ago, an event commemorated on the Jewish holiday of Purim,.

“Today there is an attempt by Persia’s heir, Iran, to destroy the state of the Jews,” Netanyahu said. “They say this as clearly as possible and inscribe it on their ballistic missiles.”

Putin also rejected Netanyahu’s Purim parallel, telling him that the events described had taken place “in the fifth century BC.”

“We now live in a different world. Let us talk about that now,” Putin said.

Purim, which started Saturday night, commemorates the Biblical tale of an averted genocide of the Jews in the Persian empire some 2,500 years ago, and is a festive occasion celebrated with costumes, parades and street parties in cities around Israel.

In the biblical Purim story, retold in the Book of Esther, the Persian viceroy Haman plotted to kill all the Jews in the kingdom. King Ahasuerus initially supported the plan, but eventually his Jewish wife, Esther, convinced him that he should not allow Haman to kill the Jews. Ahasuerus had Haman and his sons killed and the Jews were given leave to kill all those who wanted to destroy them.

Although historians disagree as to the precise dating of the story, all agree that it is set in the time of the Achaemenid Empire during the 5th century BCE, over 1,000 years before the rise of Islam.

Iran is home to some 25,000 Jews who are a recognized minority and are allocated one seat in parliament.

Last year, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif claimed Tehran had saved the Jews three times in history, singling out the thwarted genocide by the Persian king as one of those instances, while neglecting to mention that Ahasuerus had originally approved Haman’s order to kill the Jews.

“It is unfortunate that Mr. Netanyahu now totally distorts realities of today,” Zarif said in March 2015.

“He even distorts his own scripture. If you read the book of Esther, you will see that it was the Iranian king who saved the Jews… It is truly, truly regrettable that bigotry gets to the point of making allegations against an entire nation which has saved Jews three times in its history: once during that time of a prime minister who was trying to kill the Jews, and the king saved the Jews; again during the time of Cyrus the Great, where he saved the Jews from Babylon, and during the Second World War, where Iran saved the Jews.”

The son of a prominent historian, Netanyahu relaunched a weekly bible study session in his official residence in 2012. The prime minister’s son Avner is a past winner of the International Bible Quiz.

  1. #1 by Sabba on 03/12/2017 - 9:34

    This is where the huge contradiction lies and the Muslims are unable to see it and act upon it.

    Muslims have been saying for 1400 years that the Torah that the jews have is NOT the Torah God gave Moses (PBUH). All exegetes now agree that it had been written, re-written, and re-written countless number of times, not by any prophets but by the ‘lying pens of scribes’.

    And yet, the Muslims continue to believe that judaism as being understood and practiced by da joos is ‘holy’. They know it has nothing to do with the religion revealed to Moses, they know their book has nothing to do with the Book Of Moses and yet they continue to consider it as a divinely revealed book and is therefore sacrosanct.

    Yes, Bibi is not only reading his torah but is also applying it to the letter, unlike many people who claim to be Muslim do with their own religion.

    The mistake Dr. Larijani and the vast majority of Muslims keep on doing is failing to understand that it is their man-made torah, which made them the way they are.

    They rejected their scriptures,as is mentioned many times in the Last Testament (the Quran), they rejected and killed many of their Prophets and chose to live their lives as per the teachings of their new satanically inspired ‘torah’.

    It is their man-made torah which has turned them from being a rebellious, barbarian, backward, stiff-necked people into the synagogue of satan,

  2. #2 by Brent Schlueter on 03/12/2017 - 9:34

    I think the reason that so many ARAB Muslims have trouble seeing that the ‘lying pens of scribes’ interpolated the Torah is that the real mechanism God uses is to send his most perfect model among humanity out to a wicked ‘depraved morality’ and teach them the Word of God as both an equalizer for those whom he gives the message as well as those who have to deal with the ‘depraved morality’ in the second hand. If the Arabs accepted this then they would have to see that 7th century Arabs were a paganistic, immoral group who needed the direct attention a parent must give to a bratty child. Bratty children always need the most attention. So that means that the Arabs would have to see themselves as the moral equivalent to the Children of Israel, and not see themselves the way the Jews do as the “chosen people of God, because God came to them; and that the Arab Muslim is the Chosen of the Ummah because Arabic is the language of both the Qur’an and salat. The Marxified Arab Muslims have been so easy for the Jews to manipulate because they believe themselves to also be a Chosen within a religion. Just like the social Darwinist Protestant. What gave so many of the “Pilgrims” the mentality to kill off Indian tribes in the 17th century was that they actually uttered the words “Chosen people” in regards to themselves and Manifest Destiny was born.

  3. #3 by James Benn on 03/12/2017 - 9:34

    Apparently, with psychopaths, the areas of the brain controlling the ‘affective response’ are not damaged as such. They are simply turned off. Inactive. Dormant. The affective response is what, to a large extent, makes us ‘human’. This response governs things such as empathy, compassion, altruism, and, all importantly … conscience … and hence morality. The psycho is incapable of genuinely responding at any of these levels. Instead, they learn to fake it. And if they’re any good, they learn to fake it well. If you’ve ever had up-close-and-personal dealings with a psycho, it is like nothing else on earth. They cannot be described as fully ‘human’.

    Question is … can psychopathy be ‘taught’? As in all matters concerning animal behavior, the argument rages back and forth between the ‘naturists’ and the ‘nurturists’. The naturists believe it’s innate. They posit as evidence the fact that psychos can be born of normal parents, and vice versa. Nurturists argue that it’s their ‘social conditioning’ which turns people into psychos or triggers the psychopathic response … i.e. turns off the conscience.

    Of course the Military deliberately sets out to turn soldiers into psychos. Compassion, empathy, conscience are seen as liabilities on the battle field. That’s not to say that all soldiers are psychos. Indeed, many returning soldiers suffer from dreadful pangs of conscience leading many to suicide. And you don’t have to be a soldier to find yourself wrestling long and hard with a restless conscience. It’s not easy listening to the ‘word of God’.

    I suspect that Judaism is, in effect, a kind of military training for a polity implacably opposed to the out-group … namely, the ‘Goyim’ as they so charitably describe the rest of us. Their texts are not intended to reveal the ‘Word of God’ but its opposite. ‘Conscience’? ‘Empathy’? ‘Compassion?’ What are these except liabilities? ‘Toughening up’ means jettisoning them in the interests of the ‘in-group’.

    For rusted-on psychos, there seems to be no turning back. Once deactivated, the conscience cannot be restored. Yer average common-or-garden psycho is, in effect, an empty shell.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: