Despite America First rhetoric, chemical weapons attack in Syria may force US president to take on greater involvement in global affairs

ed note–Just as Trump knew that the bomb hoaxes in the US were Judaic false flags, he knows as well that Assad did not do this, but is not free to say it in public due to the TSUNAMI of screeching that would ensue on the part of Judea, Inc and its tentacled operatives in the US Congress, to say nothing of the American people themselves who are prisoner to the intoxicating effects of the JMSM.

That being the case, Trump is going to SAY things that pander to this narrative. He may even make certain superficial gestures that give the appearance that he has ‘turned’, but all can rest assured that the picture that will be given for public consumption on the part of his administration will be a very different thing from what is actually taking place behind the scenes.

For all we know, there is a Seal team on the ground in Syria right now rounding up those who were responsible for this gas attack and the news of their capture–along with other troubling pieces of information linking them to Israel–is going to be dropped in the world’s lap in exactly the same way as the arrest of the Judaic terrorist in Israel took place.

Times of Israel

For US President Donald Trump, the reality of the world’s problems may be starting to sink in.

Standing in the sunny White House Rose Garden, the president said Wednesday that the gruesome chemical weapons attack in Syria had changed his views on the quagmire of a conflict that he’d previously indicated he wanted to steer clear of. He mourned the deaths of the youngest victims — “innocent children, innocent babies” — and said brutality had “crossed a lot of lines for me.”

“It is now my responsibility,” he declared.

The president’s words were far from a declaration that he intends to act, and he notably avoided discussing what retaliatory options he would be willing to consider. Ultimately, his rhetoric may well land among the litany of harsh condemnations of Syrian President Bashar Assad by former US president Barack Obama and other world leaders that did little to quell the six-year civil war.

Yet Trump’s willingness to accept that he now bears some responsibility for a far-away conflict marked a significant moment for an “America First” president who has vowed to focus narrowly on US interests. His comments also suggested a growing awareness that an American president — even an unconventional one like him — is looked to as defender of human rights and a barometer of when nations have violated international norms.

The bloodshed in Syria is just one of the intractable international problems piling up around Trump. North Korea appears intent on building up its nuclear program, despite vague threats from his administration. The Islamic State terror group is still wreaking havoc in Iraq and Syria, while a Pentagon review of US strategy sits on his desk.

Trump conceded Wednesday that of all the world’s problems, the Middle East is one area he would rather avoid. His decision to at least rhetorically take a measure of responsibility was all the more striking given his frequent shoveling of blame for problems big and small onto anyone but himself.

In public, he faults Obama for leaving him “a mess” and says his campaign opponent Hillary Clinton is behind the flood of revelations possibly linking his campaign to Russia. In private, he berates his staff for failing to fix the self-made crises that have battered the White House, including his pair of travel bans blocked by the courts and the failure to pass health care legislation.

Trump initially took the same blame-shifting approach in addressing the deadly attack in Syria. In a short written statement Tuesday, he said the carnage was “a consequence of the past administration’s weakness and irresolution.”

In 2013, Obama pulled back from planned airstrikes against Syria following a chemical weapons attack, despite having declared that the deployment of deadly gases would cross a “red line” for him. Obama’s decision was widely criticized in the US and by Middle Eastern allies, and undermined later attempts to compel Assad to leave office.

“The regrettable failure to take military action in 2013 to prevent Assad’s use of chemical weapons remains a blight on the Western world,” said Senator Bob Corker (R-Tennessee), the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Still, foreign policy officials within the Trump administration were irritated by the president’s eagerness to focus on his predecessor in his first reaction. Some wanted him to focus more on condemning Assad and highlighting US resolve.

Their objections did little to sway the president at the time. But just a day later, Trump appeared more willing to embrace the gravity of the situation and his new role in it.

His posture may well have been impacted by the fact that his remarks in the Rose Garden came after his meeting with Jordan’s King Abdullah, whose country has borne the brunt of the refugee crisis spurred by the Syrian war. Jordan is among Washington’s most important partners in the region and is significantly dependent on the United States.

Abdullah, who worked closely with Obama, enthusiastically embraced Trump’s condemnation of the chemical weapons attack. During a joint news conference, he said to Trump, “I believe under your leadership we will be able to unravel this very complicated situation.”

Eliot Cohen, a Trump critic who served in the State Department under president George W. Bush, said that whether Trump intended to or not, he now has put himself in the same position as Obama, raising the stakes for action in Syria, perhaps without having thought out whether he plans to follow through.

“The deep irony here is you may see a lot of the same failures that the Obama administration had, except delivered with a different style,” Cohen said.

  1. #1 by know the enemy on 04/07/2017 - 9:34

    We’re waiting to hear you spin this one now that dumpster has bombed Assad.

    ed note–there is no need to ‘spin’ anything because the facts pretty much speak for themselves in explaining the situation. The problem is that people–including you, based upon your comment–get locked into a mode of thinking similar in many respects to the sheep in George Orwell’s Animal Farm with their incessant ‘4 legs good/2 legs bad’ protocol and therefore incapacitate themselves from seeing the more complicated levels involved in all of it. If Trump were truly owned by the Jews and out to do their bidding, we would be seeing something along the lines of what took place in Iraq under GWB or what took place in Libya under BHO, and this simply isn’t the case. After being coordinated with the Russians (and probably the Syrians as well) an airfield was bombed with minimal collateral damage and in the process the move to remove Trump and replace him with a Zionist ideologue was stopped dead in its tracks. If this fact escapes your notice then I’m afraid you are not cut for the kinds of discussions that take place here and would be better suited going to one of those other sites where the answer to all questions posed is–‘it’s dJooz’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: