Ex-UK Ambassador: Assad wasn’t behind the chemical attack


ed note–of course, it goes without saying amongst intelligent, critically thinking people that Assad and the Russians did not do this. It SHOULD go without saying as well however–again, amongst intelligent, critically thinking people–that whatever Trump says/has said in the aftermath of this needs to be weighed against what his enemies are trying to achieve. If indeed this was an attack by those forces in Israel, America, and the West against Trump (and all can be somewhere between 100 and 110% sure that this was/is the case) who are out to re-make him in the fashion of his predecessors viz a viz regime change in Syria, a hostile posture towards Russia and the program that began in the early 1990’s with the first invasion of Iraq and then the ‘new and improved’ version that replaced it after 9/11, then no one should be surprised if Trump–in order to avoid falling into the traps that have laid for him with this FF attack would say things/do things aimed at neutralizing the highly-charged atmosphere that has been created as a result, including statements by him condemning Assad and the Russians for ‘their role’ in this. What is he supposed to do, go before the American people and have a rational conversation with them how it was his enemies in the ‘deep state’ that did this? Judea, Inc would crucify him and the US Congress would begin impeachment proceedings against him on this very issue.

The point is that no one should allow themselves to get too exorcised over the things Trump has said on this matter nor allow themselves to fall into the ‘NYUH-HUH, NYUH-HUH, TOLD YA TRUMP WAS A WARMONGER AND ALL THE OTHER STUFF WAS JUST AN ACT’ trap. As we have been counseling people here now for over a year, don’t pay as much attention to what Trump says as much as to what Trump actually does.

  1. #1 by chris safos (@ChrisSafos) on 04/06/2017 - 9:34

    they want to drag us into more war without positive evidence,we do not another iraq

  2. #2 by Strayhorse on 04/06/2017 - 9:34

    DID Hillary Clinton and the Obama State Department transfer the chemical weapons belonging to Libya to the rebels fighting against Assad in Syria? Is THIS why Americans were murdered at Benghazi? This MUST be investigated before WWIII breaks out.

  3. #3 by Matt C. on 04/06/2017 - 9:34

    um…. so… what about now?

    http://www.moonofalabama.org

  4. #4 by spirittoo on 04/06/2017 - 9:34

    Of course Assad had nothing to do with it. The US wanted Trump to change his mind and it work with the same false flag attack the US pulled by in 2013.

  5. #5 by james ha on 04/06/2017 - 9:34

    forget that the U.S. tried to frame Assad for “gassing his own people” in 2013 and 2014 and how those hoaxes were exposed. forget that Assad surrendered all his chemical weapons, confirmed by the pentagon and the U.N.

    just ask yourselves these simple questions:

    why would Assad, on the verge of winning the war, and gaining support from Trump, use chemical weapons, knowing it would open the door to invasion that the neo-con war-hawks want?

    and if Assad were dumb enough to use chemical weapons, why use them on civilians instead of the enemy?

    THIS STORY MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL!

  6. #6 by Michael McNulty on 04/07/2017 - 9:34

    America will start the war that kills a billion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: