When it comes to Israel, Trump’s first 100 days were one big fail


The Hill


In an election where fewer than one in four Jewish voters supported Donald Trump, members of the tribe who voted for Trump were a committed, albeit small, bunch. Time and again, their argument mostly came down to one issue: Israel. For them it was simple: They believed that a President Donald Trump would be far better for Israel than a President Hillary Clinton.

Given Trump’s thin Middle East policy record, these voters were forced to make their assessment based on what he and his surrogates promised on the campaign trail. The claim was that Trump, the Republican, would be the president who understood Israel, who would stand by the Jewish state, who wouldn’t allow any “daylight” between the two nations. He would be unlike the outgoing president who these voters always found to be anti-Israel. And Trump would be better than the Democratic nominee, former Secretary of State Clinton, who at best — in their view — couldn’t be trusted on Israel, despite her staunchly pro-Israel record.

Trump would be Israel’s best friend ever, they promised.

Trump’s first 100 days in office provide an opportunity for his supporters to review his campaign rhetoric and truly assess how he’s done. For now, let’s stick to three of his promises during the campaign: moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, ripping up the Iran deal and ensuring no “daylight” between the United States and Israel.

So far, the results haven’t come close to matching the rhetoric.

Earlier today, Israeli officials said they believe Trump, like his predecessors, will sign a waiverdelaying implementation of U.S. law that would require the embassy to be relocated from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — a far cry from what some Republicans thought would be among his first moves in Middle East policy. One Republican senator even had said that “Trump at one point was ‘ready to move the embassy at 12:01 on January 20th. Maybe even 12 and thirty seconds,” and that relocating the embassy “was going to be their first move.”


That clearly hasn’t happened yet, and it remains unclear if it will.

On the Iran deal, Trump said during the campaign that his “number-one priority is to dismantle the disastrous deal with Iran.” Yet, in what is only one of his most recent in a flurry of foreign policy flip-flops, earlier this month the Trump administration refused to kill the international agreement and notified Congress that “Iran is complying with the landmark nuclear deal … and has extended sanctions relief given to Tehran in exchange for curbs on its atomic program.”

Trump also doesn’t seem to understand — or maybe even care — what no “daylight” really means. Through the first 100 days of his presidency, he has surprised Israel with statements on settlements — ones that were in line with previous U.S. Republican and Democratic administrations but which weren’t true to his hawkish campaign promises.

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Trump’s White House for the first time, the president publicly surprised Netanyahu by demanding that he “hold back on settlements,” and chided him by saying, “Both sides will have to make compromises — you know that, right.” These remarks were said to PM Netanyahu’s face, in front of a significant audience of international reporters, televised for all to see.

His public demands of PM Netanyahu weren’t an exception. Trump also said, “I am not somebody that believes that going forward with these settlements is a good thing for peace.” And earlier, Trump had said that settlements “don’t help the process … and every time you take land for settlements, there is less land left” for peace negotiations.

While I don’t find it surprising that Trump hasn’t lived up to his promises to his pro-Israel supporters, I await the outrage from those who voted for Trump solely based on the Middle East policy he promised.

Trump’s record on Israel has been mixed at best, and if one is to judge him by his promises to his supporters in the pro-Israel community, his first 100 days have been a failure.

For numerous reasons, I personally think that Donald Trump has been a bad president so far, both for the United States and for many of our most important allies, including Israel. But I’ve never been a Trump supporter.

However, for those who sacrificed their domestic policy preferences and supported an erratic, unethical and dishonest candidate for the highest office of the most powerful country on Earth, just because they believed Trump’s hawkish foreign policy promises, it’s time to look beyond his campaign rhetoric. Now is the time, instead, to look at his first 100 days and realize what he has actually done.


Aaron Keyak most recently served on the senior staff of Rep. Jerry Nadler (N.Y.-10) and currently runs Bluelight Strategies, a consulting firm based in Washington, D.C.


  1. #1 by Kerry Bindon on 04/29/2017 - 9:34

    mmmmm very interesting pro israel view of what some person thinks is going on there are lots of contradictions here in this account compared to events that no can fathom unless you can see with eyes wide open not shut and see clearly god in action now ……..saturn’s aka satan’s rule is now over……..just wake up you will see!

  2. #3 by Ty on 04/29/2017 - 9:34

    What a bunch of psychos, eh, and proof of the only good I can see since his presidential race.

  3. #4 by brianconcannon on 04/29/2017 - 9:34

    Trump ridiculed the msm fake news, then he falls for fake news and bombs Syria – neocon
    boofhead puppet idiot

    ed note–Trump ‘bombed’ Syria because to do otherwise would have put him directly in the crosshairs of impeachment, ushering in Pence and therefore a total re-capture of the WH by the Neo-cons who are out to not only jump start their infernal ‘war on terror’ but as well to get a war started with Russia. This is not a justification for what Trump did, but rather to underscore how poorly understood the are the parameters surrounding the truly dire circumstances we all face. He did not do it because he is ‘owned by the Jews’ but rather because if he hadn’t the Jews would have a necessary added component in removing him and getting WWIII started.

    People need to put the brakes on their emotionalism in all of this and start looking at the more complicated mechanics involved if there is a snowball’s chance in hell of us getting through all of this alive, which in and of itself is a stretch.

  4. #5 by TS on 04/30/2017 - 9:34

    Just playing devils advocate. Now that Trump bombed Syria he technically committed a war crime, so if he doesn’t play ball they can impeach him on that as well. You don’t just “sort of” playing along Zionists.


  5. #6 by stlonginus on 04/30/2017 - 9:34

    Aaron Keyak has the byline for this piece from The Hill. “Aaron Keyak most recently served on the senior staff of Rep. Jerry Nadler (N.Y.-10) and currently runs Bluelight Strategies, a consulting firm based in Washington, D.C.”

    A better name for his ‘consulting firm’ might have been Gaslight Strategies.

    Quotes from the home page of the ‘Bluelight Strategies’ website with a photo of 3 shemites taken during Hannukah last December, during the last days of the Obama administration.

    “U.S. Amb. to Israel Daniel Shapiro, flanked by American Friends of Lubavitch Rabbi Levi Shemtov, left, and the White House’s Matt Nosanchuk, lights the Hanukkah menorah during Bluelight Strategies’ 21st annual Latkes & Vodkas party, which had as its theme, “Make Hanukkah Great Again!”.

    Let us hope, for our sakes, that Trump has a few more tricks and/or aces up his sleeve.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: