Rabbi– ‘I Asked Trump To Bomb Syria And now I Regret It.’


ed note–a typical display of Judaic wordplay in masking the true focus/intent of the piece, and would have been a slam-dunk in that regard were it not for one littler booger in it all–

‘This was political theatre cooked up between the administration and the Putin regime (who were warned in advance) and the Assad regime (also warned).’

So, in other words, our esteemed Hebraic essayist now understands what the ‘bombing’ was all about and is distraught that the Jews were out-Jewed by Trump.

Rabbi Robin Podolsky, the Forward

Recently, I signed a letter, circulated by a rabbi whom I revere, who will, I think, be remembered as one of the important rabbis of our generation. I was in august company; the letter was also signed by deeply respected teachers and colleagues. Immediately, equally respected colleagues and friends sent emails asking (in more polite terms): WTF? Having mostly been off of social media for the Passover season, I’ve had a quiet time out to think about what I’ve done. And I’m sorry.

Just before Passsover, nauseated at the massacre of civilians perpetrated by Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, I signed a letter which called on Donald Trump to “Order targeted airstrikes on Assad regime air facilities, jetways, and fix-wing and rotary aircraft so as to prevent the regime from carrying out further chemical attacks with nerve agents.”

And then, son-of-a-gun, he did it. And, I’ve been marooned on the Island of Dread and Regret ever since. While I don’t think that our letter had anything to do with the decision (or, probably, ever came to his attention), I’ve been increasingly regretful that I put my name to something that offered the tiniest bit of cover or support for 45.

So what’s my problem? Am I just upset because a president I don’t support actually did something admirable and I don’t want to admit it? No. But, in an oblique way, that’s getting warm.

See, here’s the thing: I thought we were pushing against a closed door and that we would be lucky to get any presidential acknowledgment of wrongdoing by the Assad regime. That’s because I made the mistake of taking Trump at his word. Just a week previous, his administration had signaled acceptance of Assad’s continuing rule in Syria. The administration is still being investigated for illicit ties to the regime of Vladimir Putin, Assad’s sponsor. I figured we were shaming him for his consistent support for brutal dictators, like Egypt’s Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, like Vladimir Putin and like Assad himself.

Then he did a 180 away from his own policies.

After years of urging President Obama not to take military action in Syria, immediately after assuring Assad that he was welcome, as far as the US is concerned, to do whatever he wanted, Trump bombed Iraq….er Syria. While enjoying a mind-blowingly good piece of chocolate cake. Because of an action on Assad’s part that was completely in character and entirely predictable?

Three possibilities suggest themselves, and I don’t know which is scarier:

1. Our current president really is naïve and uninformed enough to be shocked at learning that the Assad regime would murder “beautiful babies.”

2. This was political theatre cooked up between the administration and the Putin regime (who were warned in advance) and the Assad regime (also warned).

Or (most likely),

3. This guy is completely erratic, has no policy, and has no frikkin idea about what he will do next. And he wields the mightiest arsenal this planet has ever seen.

Dread. And regret.

Things I still believe:

• There are some war crimes, such as deliberate massacres of civilians, that demand a response from the world.

• “The world” is a mashup of power relations both economic and political, ideologies, alliances and interests. No one is disinterested. Still, when it comes to genocides, massacres, torture, created famines and similar atrocities “we” have to draw lines somewhere. That is what the UN, an institution for which, until recently, Trump has expressed nothing but contempt, is supposed to be for. (In reality, the United States and Russia can each end any initiative before it begins).

• Resistance is resistance and it’s not compatible with respectful petition (This is the most embarrassing part of all—I should not have forgotten that). The action for which we were calling would have been appropriate coming from a president of intelligence and discernment, one who had done everything possible to see that it didn’t come to this (Oh, Barack Obama, where are you now?). We behaved as though such a person sat in the Oval Office because, well, because that’s what was needed, you see, and I thought it was a neat rhetorical jab to address its current occupant as though he were such a person. I was being too clever by half.

•Now that we have officially owned our share of the wreckage, it’s time to give the Syrians safe passage to our country. No more excuses.

Unlike some of my friends on the left, I no longer assume reflexively that no exercise of American military power can ever be justified. Not after the former Yugoslavia where, if anything, we were a little late in bestirring ourselves. Of course, as various correspondents have pointed out, that was not only a UN affair, it was also a project of NATO (another institution for which Trump has discovered belated respect), one that was supported tepidly by Congress.

Generally, though, there is much to be said on the side of those who resist any mobilization of the American imperium for any purpose. Look at Iraq: Saddam Hussein was as brutal and evil as is Assad, but removing him did not heal or stabilize Iraq; all we did was redistribute the pain. We should always ask who stands to gain (multi-national oil interests and the military industrial complex come to mind).

Something was done and nothing is better. Assad’s regime remains in power, and even the airfield is still viable. Meanwhile, our attention has been diverted from the issue of the Trump administration’s collusion with Russian intelligence operatives and from their steady removal of federal protections from racist and violent police departments, union-busting, pollution and discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation. And they lost a warship for a little while.

Again, I made a mistake, and I’m sorry. I’m learning how it’s possible to be filled with weariness and dread at the same time. It’s going to be a long four years.

  1. #1 by Kerry Bindon on 05/02/2017 - 7:04 am

    what an absolute sickening read this is who do these jewish rabbits think they are gods chosen people…? what a laff….the quicker they realise that these legends in their own lunch time these self appointed emperors with not only no clothes are naked to the world now but their very own weiner is a shrivelled up piece of dead meat. the quicker the world can move on to a new age and life

  2. #2 by O'Rourke on 05/02/2017 - 9:23 am

    “There are some war crimes, such as deliberate massacres of civilians, that demand a response from the world.” Another jew dripping with hypocrisy and lies. Again, it sounds like he’s referring to the jews’ crimes against humanity regarding the Palestinians. It takes chutzpah to accuse others of exactly what you’re guilty of! Putin & Assad “brutal dictators”? “Assad perpetrated massacres of his own people”?

    This jew is delusional or else just trying to spread more lies for the benefit of Israel. The guy needs a hard palm-slap to the side of his head by a strong man that would leave that ear ringing for a couple of days.

    Cheap, hypocritical, lying jew talk; I’m sick of it.

  3. #3 by RICH on 05/02/2017 - 10:46 am

    An interesting read. A glimpse into their mindset.

  4. #4 by stlonginus on 05/03/2017 - 7:33 am

    “Rabbi” Robin Podolsky wrote:
    “Now that we have officially owned our share of the wreckage, it’s time to give the Syrians safe passage to our country. No more excuses.”

    How is writing this transparent missive “owning” anything for which the Jews are responsible? She decrees the result of her and her co-religionists signing a petition to attack Syria is for the goy to provide ‘safe passage’ to Syrians?

    If the results had been more to your liking “rabbi,” (like a full scale attack to oust Assad) might then your reaction have been one of silence with occasional hand-wringing?
    Go blow it out your backside “rabbi”.

    “Again, I made a mistake, and I’m sorry. I’m learning how it’s possible to be filled with weariness and dread at the same time.”
    I, for one, don’t care, what you are “learning.”

  5. #5 by sunlight on 05/04/2017 - 1:18 pm

    the rabbi could tell it to the wind…ha, ha, ha, ha….the chosen ones?????

  6. #6 by sunlight on 05/04/2017 - 1:19 pm

    the chosen ones??????

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: