NORWAY – Caricature equates circumcision with pedophilia


PEDOPHILIA CIRCUMCISION JUDAISM

YNET – Norway’s fourth-largest newspaper has recently published a caricature depicting supporters of circumcision for Jews and Muslims as pedophiles.

The offensive caricature appeared in The Dagbladet, the second largest tabloid in the country that has a circulation of approximately 75,000 copies a day.

The caricature depicts a man wearing a kippah (skullcap) and a bearded man standing next to him, both holding signs reading ‘Yes to circumcision’ and ‘Religious freedom.’ A third man, wearing a ratty coat, tells them: “I know what you mean. I, too, am told by an invisible man to fiddle with children’s penises.”

The Israeli Embassy in Norway sent a strong condemnation to the newspaper.

The ambassador in Oslo, Rafi Schutz, said: “This is a disgraceful caricature that represents a fanatical religion of false liberalism that shows zero tolerance for opinions and beliefs different from those who believe themselves to be enlightened.”

(Photo: the Dagbladet)

  1. #1 by PJ London on 05/19/2017 - 9:34

    “Smegma (Greek smēgma, “soap”) is a combination of shed skin cells, skin oils, and moisture. It occurs in both male and female mammalian genitalia. In female bodies, it collects around the clitoris and in the folds of the labia minora; in males, smegma can collect under the foreskin.”

    The idea of Male Genital Mutilation in areas where there is very little water and bathing is a luxury of course is terrible. God forbid that a boy or man should keep clean. Let him use sand to remove any detritus.

    It enhances sexual pleasure? Well we can’t have that can we.

    (Like male circumcision, female circumcision is considered as a religious requirement of the Dawoodi Bohras.) “Female circumcision is carried out on the prepuce, the foreskin over the clitoris. This is analogous to male circumcision, which is also done on the foreskin; the difference being that whilst in male circumcision the entire foreskin is removed, in female circumcision, the procedure is less invasive. It ranges from a symbolic touch to a tiny excision. Another difference is that whilst boys can be circumcised at any age, including in infancy, girls can only be circumcised after the age of seven. It is forbidden to undertake a procedure on any other part of the female genitalia – the clitoris itself is untouched. This form of female circumcision is also commonly practiced by Sunni Muslims of the Shafi’i school of thought in Indonesia, Malaysia, Kurdistan and Egypt.”

    Oh wait, that is not what we were told. You mean it actually enhances sexual pleasure? Well we can’t have that can we.

  2. #2 by Blake on 05/20/2017 - 9:34

    Brit milah is a Jewish religious male circumcision ceremony performed by a mohel. Nil to do with a Muslim

  3. #3 by jackthewolf1017 on 05/20/2017 - 9:34

    There can be zero doubt that the Jews are a very, very sick and depraved people!

  4. #4 by Leila Abdelmeguid on 05/20/2017 - 9:34

    “Depicting circumcision for Jews AND MUSLIMS as pedophiles”? Nope. This is about the practice in which Jews, NOT MUSLIMS suck the blood off a mutilated baby penis. Muslims DO NOT do this. Sorry, this wording is an attempt to make Muslims upset by something that applies to Jews ONLY!!

  5. #5 by 5 dancing shlomos on 05/20/2017 - 9:34

    favorite jew tactic
    to put other into
    jew gutter
    did this with hitler
    this ultimate evil is not adolph
    but the jew

  6. #6 by ålek sigurdsøn on 05/20/2017 - 9:34

    if they don’t like it, than leave the damn country and go back to their own sick countries of origin.

  7. #7 by stlonginus on 05/21/2017 - 9:34

    My understanding may be incorrect, but I thought that male circumcision resulted in LESS sexual satisfaction and thus the need, on average, for circumcised males to be ‘on the prowl’ and to look outside of a monogamous relationship for pleasure they may, or may not, ultimately find.

  8. #8 by PJ London on 05/21/2017 - 9:34

    ‘Twenty uncircumcised men and an equal number of age-matched circumcised participants underwent genital and nongenital sensory testing at baseline and in response to erotic and control stimulus films. Touch and pain thresholds were assessed on the penile shaft, the glans penis, and the volar surface of the forearm. Sexual arousal was assessed via thermal imaging of the penis.

    RESULTS:In response to the erotic stimulus, both groups evidenced a significant increase in penile temperature, which correlated highly with subjective reports of sexual arousal. Uncircumcised men had significantly lower penile temperature than circumcised men, [edit ; before arousal] and evidenced a larger increase in penile temperature with sexual arousal. No differences in genital sensitivity were found between the uncircumcised and circumcised groups. Uncircumcised men were less sensitive to touch on the forearm than circumcised men. A decrease in overall touch sensitivity was observed in both groups with exposure to the erotic film as compared with either baseline or control stimulus film conditions. No significant effect was found for pain sensitivity.

    CONCLUSION:
    These results do not support the hypothesised penile sensory differences associated with circumcision. However, group differences in penile temperature and sexual response were found.’

    W.T.Heck ; ‘Uncircumcised men were less sensitive to touch on the forearm than circumcised men.’

    Now there is an interesting piece of trivia for your next dinner party.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: