How They Do it– ‘A Simplistic, Power-driven Religious Zionism Marches Away From Jewish Values’

Parading through Jerusalem’s Muslim Quarter, the Orthodox Jews marching for Jerusalem Day equate Jewish heroism with militaristic nationalism. But there are, and always were, other paths

ed note–The primary mechanism by which the world acquiesced to the creation of the Jewish state which has led to the deaths/destruction of millions and is going to lead to the death/destruction of billions can be summed up by understanding one simple concept–that it has been/continues to be the unwillingness on the part of so many to come to terms with the truly violent, rapacious and criminal nature of Judaism itself. For thousands of years it has sat there as an open secret for all to study and with which to come to terms as clearly spelled out in Judaism’s ‘holy’ books making up the Torah, and yet, rather than recognize it as the manual for war against Gentiledom that it is, instead it has occupied a place of undeserved respect as one of the world’s ‘great religions’.

And the manner by which it maintains this place has been accomplished with Opeds such as this one, talking about ‘Jewish values’ of ‘gratitude and love’ while trying to eschew the notion that it is about ‘conquest, and the incessant drive for power and dominion over others’ when in fact, this is precisely what it is, to wit–

‘When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…’–Book of Deuteronomy

‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly…’–Leviticus 25:44-46

“Foreigners will rebuild your walls, and their kings will serve you…Your gates will always stand open, day and night, so that the Gentiles may bring you the wealth of their nations and their kings led in triumphal procession, for the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish; it will be utterly destroyed.”–Isaiah 60:10-12

And yet, what is supposed to be a rational, thinking world pays no mind to these passages, appearing in black and white and which are used as the electrical current that drives all violent Judaic behavior in the Middle East and beyond, and instead, stampede like swine towards a trough full of swill in the form of essays written by ‘Jews of conscience’ such as the author herein, just because the beautiful lies he is spewing happens to ring nicely in their ears and is more pleasing than the ugly truth.

…War is peace, Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength…


While some of those Israeli and Diaspora Jews marching triumphantly Tuesday through the Old City on Jerusalem Day will feel themselves to be enacting Jewish values, Joseph Soloveitchik, one of the pre-eminent American rabbis of the last century would have disagreed.

He would have said the marchers are in fact undermining them. Soloveitchik – part of the Brisk family dynasty – followed the advice of his mother (against his father’s wishes) and earned a PhD in philosophy in Berlin. With the sensibility of those dual commitments, he helped to create the world of American modern Orthodoxy, with many of his students now heading synagogues and yeshivot throughout North American and Israel as well.  

Soloveitchik was offered and turned down an opportunity to be Chief Rabbi of Israel in 1935, at the urging of his uncle, whose Brisk family were staunch anti-Zionists.  But after World War II, he broke with them– and publicly proclaimed his Zionism, his gratitude, love and devotion for the Jewish state. On account of this embrace of Zionism, some of his family-members would describe him as a ‘Boston Sadducee.’ Where they – with other ultra-Orthodox Jews of the time – rejected Israel’s establishment, Soloveitchik saw what he called a ‘third-way’ between their rejectionism and what he saw as the Zionist ‘deification of the state.’ 

A march marking Jerusalem Day near Damascus Gate outside Jerusalem’s Old City May 17, 2015.Olivier Fitoussi
Soloveitchik’s position emanates from his understanding of Jewish history, and in particular, the transformation the Jewish people underwent at the time of the destruction of the Second Temple. At that time, an older conception of ‘congregation’ (or kahal) was ‘sublimated and transposed’ into a new conception: the community (edah). 
For Soloveitchik, the idea of community transcends the here-and-now of congregation to create a connection between both past and anticipated future. The Men of the Great Assembly, those who helped created this new kind of self-conscious Jewish community, marked the ‘beginning of a new phase in Judaism’. In this new phase, ethical fellowship replaces political domination. This new conception of the Jewish community could survive through exile, suffering and historical calamity, even without territorial sovereignty, and certainly with no political power.

Which brings us back to Jerusalem Day, triumphalism and provocation. Surely there will be those today – including of course those Muslim Quarter marchers – who will condemn Soloveitchik’s old ‘exile mentality,’ accusing him of shying away from Jews holding tangible territorial power. Indeed, the heroism Soloveitchik celebrates is not an aggressive militaristic one, but rather one that based on an ethics of reciprocity, what he calls an ‘ethico-spiritual heroism.’ 

This new form of heroism has as one of its fundamental precepts: “One human being shalt not exercise power over another.” Only God has such power, so “man wielding power over his fellow takes over an exclusively divine prerogative.” The scholar, teacher and pupil – a community made possible through teaching and study – replace the political rule of the King. In the community of the Jewish people founded in study, love and reverence for the other replaces a desire for political power and conquest.

In a novel reading of the Jewish tradition, Soloveitchik identifies what he calls an ‘anarchistic tendency’ in the Jewish sages – for them, wielding power is reprehensible under all circumstances. The ‘desire for power in all its manifestations’ whether it be ‘political, economic, judicial or even spiritual’ undermines the intrinsic dignity of man. That holds true both for the one who suffers conquest, but also –and perhaps just as much – the one who conquers. A corrupt political reality, informed by the desire for power, negatively affects each individual. Man compromises his divine image when he exploits his powers to have mastery over others.

Soloveitchik wrote about the dangers of political dominion in 1951, just three years after the Jewish state’s founding, in many ways hedging against the possibility of a Zionism gone too far, anticipating the theological and political excesses of today.  

The skeptical anarchism he attributes to the sages may, in fact, be a good antidote for the potent cocktail of messianic thinking so predominant in Israel today. Of course, given contemporary polarization, it’s hard to imagine Soloveitchik’s third way between rejectionism, now not only embraced by ultra-Orthodox, but some on the far left as well, and a triumphalist Zionism, embraced now not only by settlers, but the normative right and center.

Complexity is not for weak minds, but perhaps, on this Jerusalem Day, there is a way to celebrate with the self-consciousness Soloveitchik urges: Honoring genuine Jewish values: gratitude and love, rather than conquest, and the incessant drive for power and dominion over others.

  1. #1 by stlonginus on 05/27/2017 - 9:34

    “Soloveitchik wrote about the dangers of political dominion in 1951, just three years after the Jewish state’s founding, in many ways hedging against the possibility of a Zionism gone too far, anticipating the theological and political excesses of today.”

    So, in this op-ed, is William Kolbrener basically warning his co-religionsists that the nearly 60 year free-for-all ‘party’ is coming to a slow down because, politically speaking, they’ve bitten off a little more than they can chew? We know there is no intention of actual back-tracking; but it seems he’s telling his friends to quiet down for the time being while plans are reorganized.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: