Inheriting the Land of Israel


The beginning of Jewish national history is found in this week’s Torah reading.

ed note–of the many things I/we inherited from the many years spent working closely with the irreplaceable MCP, one thing–for better or for worse–is becoming a ‘stickler for details,’ as Mike put it, or at least in terms of those details surrounding certain subjects, one of which is Judaism, which I/we believe to be the beating heart of the problem we are all facing today.

Now, it is almost as much a law of nature as gravity itself these days that within certain circles we are not supposed to discuss Judaism. Zionism is fair game, because now it is so manifestly evil, so manifestly violent, so manifestly dishonest, so manifestly rapacious (we could go on for days until the English language ran out of synonyms) and as such, to try and squelch any discussion about the ‘Z’ word would be as pointless as trying to hide the fact that VD exists and is spread through irresponsible and immoral sexual behavior.

HAVING SAID THAT, those who do dare to venture forth into that once-upon-a time ‘no man’s land’ beginning with the ‘Z’ word assiduously avoid and–more importantly, FORBID–any honest, intelligent,  and productive discussion of the very womb which brought the once-upon-a-time forbidden ‘Z’ word into existence, the dreaded ‘J’ word, meaning Judaism.

Besides the shouting, screaming, censorship and accusations all designed to prevent and preclude any such discussions involving the dreaded ‘J’ word from taking place, one of the mechanisms by which prying eyes are kept far away from this particularly problematic area is the use of slogans that–while sounding good to itchy ears and to weak minds, nevertheless are as vacuous and as void of fact as saying that dogs can’t be carnivores because–as everyone knows–dogs are ‘man’s best friend’ and man is made of meat, and since dogs don’t eat man, ergo, dogs are not carnivores, quod erat demonstratum.

We have all run into these slogans at some point in our very difficult and at times dangerous climb in trying to reach the summit of Mt. Truth–‘Judaism and Zionism are totally different entities…One is religious, the other is political. One is peaceful, the other is violent’.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah…

We aren’t going to go into all the particulars showing just how ‘peaceful’ Judaism is, with its thousands of written commandments and commendments invoking or congratulating GAAAAWD’S chosenoids for the violence they perpetrate against Gentiles–past, present, and future–but for those who might not be aware of such protocols, we recommend this thing known as the Torah (Old Testament) and in particular, books such as Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Numbers, Kings, Joshua, etc, for a good start.

Here we have yet another piece to that puzzle linking the carnivorous nature of Zionism to the carnivorous nature of Judaism in an essay appearing on the Arutz Sheva website where our esteemed Hebraic author makes Kristol clear the fact that indeed, the roots of Zionism are to be found in the putrid, poisoned, radioactive and contaminated soil of Judaism.

As a final thought to all those who just LUUUUUV throwing names of individuals and groups out there such as Neturei Karta, Jewish Voice for Peace, Rabbis for Human Rights, Torah True Jews, Jumping Jews for Justice, Leaping Levites for Love, Hollering Hebrews for Humanity, whatever, we’d like to leave you with a little visual imagery to consider the next time some shyster comes along with that magic potion and very seductive language that ‘Judaism and Zionism are totally different’–

Individuals such as this represent what I like to refer to as the ‘squirt gun brigade’. With sirens a-blaring and lights a-blazing, they make a BIG show of arriving at the inferno that their cousins lit, and with squirtguns in hand, make an even BIGGER show of acting all tough and brave as they PRETEND to risk life and limb extinguishing the flames and do so to thunderous applause.

In the end however it is all for show, as they accomplish nothing other than creating confusion about the Judaic nature of the arson itself. The fire continues to burn, innocent people have their lives destroyed, but hey, at least they gave it a good squirt, ya’ know?

In the meantime the stupid goyim lap it up and shower them with applause for doing nothing while the rest of us who really DO risk life and limb in trying to put out the fire and save innocent lives get no credit at all while simultaneously receiving a ton of grief for naming the arsonists and–more importantly–isolating and exposing the philosophical underpinnings of the arson itself.

As we often say, if it is coming out of a Judaic mouth, your/our first assumption needs to be that in some manner it is factually flawed (fancy verbiage for ‘untrue’) because–almost as much a rule of nature as gravity itself–fish swim, birds fly, and Jews lie.

Israel National News

After almost sacrificing his beloved son Isaac on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem, Abraham returned to his home in Hevron to find that his beloved wife Sarah had died.

“And Abraham came to eulogise Sarah and to mourn for her” (Genesis 23:2). But distraught as he was, he didn’t even have a moment’s peace to mourn for his wife: he immediately had to start haggling with the devious, mendacious, and avaricious Hittite, Ephron, to buy the burial-plot in the field of Machpelah in Hevron.

Thus begins Jewish national history in the Land of Israel. This is the first-ever land purchase in our homeland, which Abraham then bequeathed to his son Isaac, who bequeathed it to his son Jacob, who bequeathed it to his sons, and so on down through all generations.

In recording these events, the Torah subtly calls our attention to something additional, something the Torah does not record directly but nevertheless wants us to notice. In the word וְלִבְכֹּתָהּ (“and to mourn for her”), the letter kaf is written in smaller type than all the other letters: ולבכתה (in Masoretic nomenclature, kaf ze’irah). Thus it appears in all hand-written Torah scrolls and in virtually all printed editions of the Torah.

What does this shrunken kaf signify?

The Ba’al ha-Turim (Rabbi Ya’akov ben Asher, Germany and Spain, c.1275-1343) writes: “The kaf is small because his mourning was small, because she was old”. That is to say, Abraham took comfort from knowing that Sarah had lived a long and full life, dying at 127 years old.

Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch (Germany, 1808-1888) offers a similar approach: he interprets the verb בוא, “come”, to connote withdrawing from a public place to a private place (and he cites the examples of how the word is used in Judges 6:19, Isaiah 26:20, and Ezekiel 3:24), and deduces that “the meaning may simply be: Abraham withdrew, shut himself in to mourn for his Sarah and to weep for her. He does not wear his heart upon his sleeve, makes no parade of his grief. Whether this is not indicated also by the small כ in וְלִבְכֹּתָהּ, we state as a possibility”.

The Kli Yakar (homiletic commentary on the Torah written by Rabbi Shlomo Ephraim of Luntchitz, 1550-1619) has a very different understanding:

“Our Rabbis said (Sanhedrin 22a) that anyone whose wife dies before him – it is as though the Holy Temple was destroyed in his lifetime…, which is why [Abraham] originally came to eulogise Sarah for her sake; nevertheless he did not cry for her, because he knew that she had ascended to the highest place of the most exalted and precious honour…. And then he cried for the ‘Holy Temple’ which had been destroyed in his lifetime…which is why [the Torah] makes a break after the word ‘Sarah’ [i.e. ‘Abraham came to eulogise Sarah and to mourn for her’ rather than ‘Abraham came to eulogise and to mourn for Sarah’] – his crying was for the Holy Temple which was, so to speak, destroyed in his lifetime. The Holy Temple was 100 cubits high, which is alluded to in the small letter kaf, because the numerical value of כ”ף is 100, suggesting that those 100 cubits were so to speak diminished”.

Hevron’s sanctity pre-dates Abraham’s purchase of the field and the cave: “The Machpelah Cave is on the threshold of the entrance to the Garden of Eden” (Zohar Hadash, Volume 2, Ruth 33b). The very name חֶבְרוֹן, Hevron, is a cognate of חִבּוּר, hibbur, connexion. Hence the name Hevron connotes “Place of connexion”. It is the place where this world connects to the next, where the Jew’s past, present, and future connect.

And Hevron was, of course, to play a major role in subsequent Jewish history as one of Judaism’s holiest cities, second only to Jerusalem: among other distinctions, it was Israel’s first capital, the city from which King David ruled over all Judea for the first seven-and-a-half years of his reign (2 Samuel 5:5, 1 Kings 2:11, 1 Chronicles 29:27).

364 years after Abraham bought the Machpela Cave, a year and a third after the Exodus from Egypt, the Children of Israel encamped in the Paran Desert (Numbers 12:16), just south-west of Israel, and from there Moshe despatched twelve spies on their ill-fated reconnaissance mission to spy out the Land of Israel.

“They went up by the Negev, and he came to Hevron” (Numbers 13:22). Though many translations render “…they came to Hevron”, the Hebrew is unequivocally in the singular: …וַיָּבֹא עַד חֶבְרוֹן, “…he came to Hevron”.

Who came to Hevron and why?

– Calev son of Yefunneh, the representative of the Tribe of Judah, parted company temporarily from his eleven colleagues and went to Hevron, there to pray at the Machpelah Cave, the Tomb of the Patriarchs, for the strength and courage to be saved from the evil counsel of the other spies (Sotah 34b). And indeed Calev opposed their counsel, he and Joshua were the only two of the twelve to enter the Land of Israel more than 38 years later, and Joshua blessed Calev and gave him Hevron as his inheritance (Joshua 14:13-14, Judges 1:20).

Forty-five years after the sin of the spies, when the Children of Israel had already conquered most of their Land, Calev reminisced about that terrible incident:

“I was forty years old when Moshe, the Servant of Hashem, sent me forth from Kadesh Barnea to spy out the Land, and I replied to him with a report as was in my heart. Although my brothers who were with me weakened the heart of the nation, I nevertheless fulfilled what Hashem my G-d wanted…. I am still today just as strong as I was on the day that Moshe sent me: as my strength was then, so my strength is now for war” (Joshua 14:7-11).

And following this, Joshua gave Hevron to Calev, and he indeed conquered it and drove out the mighty Anakim. (Hevron is, of course, in the heart of the territory of the Tribe of Judah, Calev’s Tribe.)

In recording this event, the Prophet subtly calls our attention to something additional, something he does not record directly but nevertheless wants us to notice. In the word כְּכֹחִי (“as my strength” in Joshua 14:11), the letter kaf is written in larger type than all the other letters: ככחי (in Masoretic nomenclature, kaf rabbati). Thus it appears in all hand-written Scrolls of the Prophets and in virtually all printed editions of the Tanach.

What does this enlarged kaf signify?

– I suggest that it is the exact opposite of the shrunken kaf in Genesis 23:2.

According to the Ba’al ha-Turim, the diminished kaf in Genesis connotes that Abraham’s mourning was diminished. The corollary is that the magnified kaf in Joshua connotes that Calev’s joy at inheriting the holy city of Hevron was magnified.

According to Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch, the diminished kaf in Genesis connotes that Abraham kept his mourning private. The corollary is that the magnified kaf in Joshua connotes that Calev publicised his inheritance of the holy city of Hevron to all and sundry.

According to the Kli Yakar, the diminished kaf in Genesis represents Abraham’s “Holy Temple” which was destroyed, meaning his wife who died in his lifetime. The corollary is that the magnified kaf in Joshua connotes that Calev’s “Holy Temple” which was constructed, meaning Jewish sovereign independence in the Land of Israel.

Jewish national history in the Land of Israel begins in Hevron; the national Jewish claim to sovereign independence in the Land of Israel begins in Hevron with our father Abraham. Hevron – the city which connects the individual Jew with Jewish past and Jewish future; Hevron – the city which connects the individual Jew with the Land of Israel.

  1. #1 by Jay que on 11/11/2017 - 9:34

    No offense to to the Christians that I thank you for exposing the hyprocity of the jew, but the major stories they “ the jew” told were stolen from the Mesopotamians. All claims are based on thievery , and lies. It is a fairytale that needs to be exposed.

  2. #2 by We Are One on 11/11/2017 - 9:34

    the national Jewish claim to sovereign independence in the Land of Israel begins in Hevron with our father Abraham.

    [John 8:39] They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

    They are the children of Beelzebub (hebrew for satan) and they do his lusts and speak his native language (lies).

    I too noticed that “zionism” as a subject can be critiqued now without an immediate condemnation of being labeled an anti-semite…. would it then not be possible to tie it in with the Torah? Merely point out that everything zionism is, comes from judaism? I think if we use that strategy often and long enough it might just change the consciousness of the public.

    Also, to affect the religious people, you can point out that God’s covenant (contract) was broken by the jews over and over, that they are not entitled to the land anymore. As with all things, it’s conditional. Suppose for a moment if Abraham didn’t attempt to sacrifice his son Ishmael (first born, another place the jews have tried to steal His inheritance) that God would bless Abraham? God’s covenant is with ALL people, not just the chosensteins. If you or I broke our end of the bargain, we also would not be entitled to any of the rewards.

    For the humanists out there… Britain had no right in giving other people’s land away. Imagine the opposite for a second… that Palestine gave the UK to the jews… how well would that go over in the West?

    So you see, the jews are not owed anything, for they have broken their promise to God (Divine law) and under human law, they are also in the same boat: they have no right to “israel”.

    I definitely can’t find any fault with your commentary; it’s top notch!

    I would also like to point out that the final paragraph is a particularly important statement:

    As we often say, if it is coming out of a Judaic mouth, your/our first assumption needs to be that in some manner it is factually flawed(fancy verbiage for ‘untrue’) because–almost as much a rule of nature as gravity itself–fish swim, birds fly, and Jews lie.

    If Gentiles took that to heart, we could clear up this multi-millennial problem pretty quickly.

  3. #3 by Gwaredd Thomas on 11/11/2017 - 9:34

    Well, I guess I’m pretty slow but I never understood the following:

    They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham. [John 8:39]

    My understanding of this passage is that Christ is telling them that they NEED to do the “works of Abraham”. But, weren’t they then and, aren’t they still? This doesn’t seem like very good advice. I’m confused. 😕

  4. #4 by We Are One on 11/11/2017 - 9:34

    The original story of Abraham, as told in the Quran not the version in the Bible. Abraham was a holy man, not the pimp and child killer as has been known in the West.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: