In Words and Deeds: The Genesis of Israeli Violence

ed note–The author’s use of the term ‘Genesis’–despite his apparently not realizing it–in describing the barbaric manner in which Jews treat Palestinians is more than just a little pregnant in its implications, for indeed the roots of this Judaic hatred for the indigenous people in the region goes much further back than simply 1948, 1967, or 1993. This hatred, expressed in the most unmitigated violent manner imaginable, as well as the perceived inherent right of the Jews to rob the non-Israelite of all his possessions, including life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness–got its inception within the pages of that very same book named Genesis that appears in the title of this piece, to wit–

‘On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abraham, saying ‘To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river Euphrates’…–Genesis, 15:18

As well as the eternal hatred which the Israelite maintains towards his ‘half brother’, Ishmael, found in Genesis 16, to wit–

…And Sarah said to Abraham, ‘Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac…And so early the next morning Abraham took some food and a skin of water and gave them to Hagar. He set them on her shoulders and then sent her off with the boy into the Desert of Beersheba. When the water in the skin was gone, she put the boy under one of the bushes. Then she went off and sat down about a bowshot away, for she thought, ‘I cannot watch the boy die,’ and as she sat there, she began to sob…’

Therefore, no sane person with a GENUINE desire to understand the root of this problem and thus arrive at a logical, productive solution, can have any discussion involving the way that Jews treat the non-Jews of the region (and elsewhere) and at the same time deliberately avoid discussing these vitally important factoids. Everything that has taken place over the course of the last century has been/is/always will be as difficult to forecast and foresee as cold weather in winter and yet it is this central theme–the inveterate and organic Judaic hatred of the non-Israelite as clearly outlined within the pages of the Old Testament/Torah–that is the one thing which virtually all persons involved in this discussion absolutely refuse to discuss, either due to their own particular brand of ‘identity politics’ or else for fear of being branded ‘bigots’.

Yes, the Jews will react to the author’s essay with all their typical theatrics–they are psychologically programmed to do so in accordance with their collective hive mentality, but in the final analysis, they LOVE articles of this type, as it merely addresses the symptoms of the problem without even touching upon its real roots at the molecular, elemental, atomic, and sub-atomic levels.


Not a day passes without a prominent Israeli politician or intellectual making an outrageous statement against Palestinians. Many of these statements tend to garner little attention or evoke rightly deserved outrage.

Just recently, Israel’s Minister of Agriculture, Uri Ariel, called for more death and injuries on Palestinians in Gaza.

“What is this special weapon we have that we fire and see pillars of smoke and fire, but nobody gets hurt? It is time for there to be injuries and deaths as well,” he said.

Ariel’s calling for the killing of more Palestinians came on the heels of other repugnant statements concerning a 16-year-old teenager girl, Ahed Tamimi. AHED was arrested in a violent Israeli army raid at her home in the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh.

A video recording showed her slapping an Israeli soldier a day after the Israeli army shot her cousin in the head, placing him in a coma.

Israeli Education Minister, Naftali Bennett, known for his extremist political views, demanded that AHED and other Palestinian girls should “spend the rest of their days in prison.”

A prominent Israeli journalist, Ben Caspit, sought yet more punishment. He suggestedthat AHED and girls like her should be raped in jail.

“In the case of the girls, we should exact a price at some other opportunity, in the dark, without witnesses and cameras”, he wrote in Hebrew.

This violent and revolting mindset, however, is not new. It is an extension of an old, entrenched belief system that is predicated on a long history of violence.

Undeniably, the views of Ariel, Bennett and Caspit are not angry statements uttered in a moment of rage. They are all reflections of real policies that have been carried out for over 70 years. Indeed, killing, raping and imprisoning for life are features that have accompanied the state of Israel since the very beginning.

This violent legacy continues to define Israel to this day, through the use of what Israeli historian Ilan Pappe describes as “incremental genocide.”

Throughout this long legacy, little has changed except for names and titles. The Zionist militias that orchestrated the genocide of the Palestinians prior to the establishment of Israel in 1948 merged together to form the Israeli army; and the leaders of these groups became Israel’s leaders.

Israel’s violent birth in 1947- 48 was the culmination of the violent discourse that preceded it for many years. It was the time when Zionist teachings of prior years were put into practice and the outcome was simply horrifying.

“The tactic of isolating and attacking a certain village or town and executing its population in a horrible, indiscriminate massacre was a strategy employed, time and again, by Zionist bands to compel the population of surrounding villages and towns to flee,” Ahmad Al-Haaj told me when I asked him to reflect on Israel’s past and present.

Al-Haaj is a Palestinian historian and an expert on the Nakba, the “Catastrophe” that had befallen Palestinians in 1948.

The 85-year-old intellectual’s proficiency in the subject began 70 years ago, when, as a 15-year-old, he witnessed the massacre of Beit Daras at the hands of Jewish Haganah militia.

The destruction of the southern Palestinian village and the killing of dozens of its inhabitants resulted in the depopulation of many adjacent villages, including al-Sawafir, Al-Haaj’s home village.

“The notorious Deir Yasin massacre was the first example of such wanton killing, a model that was duplicated in other parts of Palestine,” Al-Haaj said.

The ethnic cleansing of Palestine at the time was orchestrated by several Zionist militias. The mainstream Jewish militia was the Haganah which belonged to the Jewish Agency.

The latter functioned as a semi-government, under the auspices of the British Mandate Government, while the Haganah served as its army.

However, other breakaway groups also operated according to their own agenda. Two leading bands amongst them were the Irgun (National Military Organization) and Lehi (also known as the Stern Gang). These groups carried out numerous terrorist attacks, including bus bombings and targeted assassinations.

Russian-born Menachem Begin was the leader of the Irgun which, along with the Stern Gang and other Jewish militants, massacred hundreds of civilians in Deir Yassin.

‘Tell the soldiers: you have made history in Israel with your attack and your conquest. Continue this until victory. As in Deir Yassin, so everywhere, we will attack and smite the enemy. God, God, Thou has chosen us for conquest,” Begin wrote at the time. He described the massacre as a “splendid act of conquest.”

The intrinsic link between words and actions remain unchanged.

Nearly 30 years later, a once wanted terrorist, Begin became Prime Minister of Israel. He accelerated land theft of the newly-occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, launched a war on Lebanon, annexed Occupied Jerusalem to Israel and carried out the massacre of Sabra and Shatilla in 1982.

Some of the other terrorists-turned-politicians and top army brass include Begin, Moshe Dayan, Yitzhak Rabin, Ariel Sharon, Rafael Eitan and Yitzhak Shamir. Each one of these leaders has a record dotted with violence.

Shamir served as the Prime Minister of Israel from 1986-1992. In 1941, Shamir was imprisoned by the British for his role in the Stern Gang. Later, as Prime Minister, he ordered a violent crackdown against a mostly nonviolent Palestinian uprising in 1987, purposely breaking the limbs of kids accused of throwing rocks at Israeli soldiers.

So, when government ministers like Ariel and Bennett call for wanton violence against Palestinians, they are simply carrying on with a bloody legacy that has defined every single Israeli leader in the past. It is the violent mindset that continues to control the Israeli government and its relationship with Palestinians; in fact, with all of its neighbors.

Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and editor of Palestine Chronicle. His forthcoming book is The Last Earth: A Palestinian Story (Pluto Press, London). Baroud has a Ph.D. in Palestine Studies from the University of Exeter and is a Non-Resident Scholar at Orfalea Center for Global and International Studies, University of California Santa Barbara. His website

  1. #1 by Quetzal on 01/19/2018 - 9:34

    AntiGentilists mistakenly interpret it as: “From the Euphrates to the SACRAMENTO.”
    One would be wise to NEVER lose sight of this cold, hard FACT.

  2. #2 by Carnaptious on 01/19/2018 - 9:34

    Jewish hatred of non-Jews is often claimed to be a “fringe belief”. Thousands of quotations expressing hatred of “goyim” or plans for world domination, more than a few made at major Jewish conferences, are also portrayed as the beliefs of “just one man / woman”. Ramzy Baroud notes these beliefs are shared by important figures in Israel’s elected government. That would certainly suggest that hatred of “goyim” is more than a “fringe belief”.

    In 2010, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef stated ““Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel”. The President of the American Jewish Conference called this statement “outrageous”, and “unrepresentative”. Yet when the Rabbi died in 2013, more than 10% of the population of Israel turned out for his funeral. Some of the mourners wondered “Who will lead us now?” IMO, when 10%+ of a nation turns out for a funeral, it represents probably two or three times that number who couldn’t show up for various reasons, but even 10% indicates that Ovadia’s opinion of the “goyim” is not a “fringe belief”.

  3. #3 by william Crain on 01/19/2018 - 9:34

    “From the Euphrates to the Sacramento” if that ain’t that the truth! There must be a river in Riyadh ? i just don’t see how the Arabs there can stomach the Israeli…it’s got to be plain that the Joos want it All.

  4. #4 by lobro on 01/20/2018 - 9:34

    carn, when people came out for jfk’s funeral, it wasn’t 10% of the us population, was it.

    yet his popularity was immense and still is, at least 85% of americans have a strongly favorable view of him and his policies.

    i think that ovadia’s appeal to worldwide jewry is around 100%, maybe 97% if reduced by the 5% error margin, i.e., we can be 95% sure that ovadia’s support among the global jewry is not less than 97%.

    when you remove the kol nidre voice anonymizer out of the president of american (hah!) jew congress’ mouth and translate back into hebe, it comes out as the truth meant for die juden: it is “legitimate” and “representative”.

  5. #5 by Carroll Marlin on 01/20/2018 - 9:34

    Hello TUT,

    I am a TUT subscriber and fan. What I can read of your articles always seem very well written and researched. I have been an Old Testament aficionado for many years since majoring in philosophy and religion in undergraduate school. Of course, to be knowledgeable about the Old Testament, one must understand the Jews. I love your site, however, I cannot access your site to read the rest of the excellent articles you post. I am assuming the ADL has had you site banned from the WWW. Am I incorrect in my assumption? Also, is there any other way that I can re-access the more in depth material you publish?

    Thanks for your help.

    ed note-Can I ask where you are and the method which you are using, i.e. a library or some public place? Yours is not the first email I’ve gotten recently saying they can’t access TUT.

    thank you


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: